{"1": {"fulltext": "mmkW\\nm\\nm\\nm\\nNmS\\n111\\n$\u00c2\u00a98\\nHI\\n4ufr\\nm.\\nm\\nam\\nr\\nGE9I", "height": "4533", "width": "2667", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0001.jp2"}, "2": {"fulltext": "LIBRARY OF CONGRESS.\\nChap JjjTopyright Noli. 1 .J\\n8helt T |y|_3\\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA.", "height": "4245", "width": "2401", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0002.jp2"}, "3": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4245", "width": "2401", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0003.jp2"}, "4": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4317", "width": "2620", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0004.jp2"}, "5": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4317", "width": "2620", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0005.jp2"}, "6": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4304", "width": "2685", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0006.jp2"}, "7": {"fulltext": "NEW YORK TRAINING SCHOOL FOR DEACONESSES\\nOLD TESTAMENT\\nLITERATURE\\nNEW YORK\\n1900", "height": "4452", "width": "2859", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0007.jp2"}, "8": {"fulltext": "TWO copies receivhd*\\nLibrary of CcL^c f%\\nOffice oft-\\nB\u00c2\u00abgi*tM af \u00c2\u00ablpyrfg(.f s.\\n^2\\n/Is\\n60074\\nCopyright, 1900\\nBY\\nHASLETT McKIM\\nUbe IRnicfcerbocfeer pvzm, Wew UJorfc\\nSECOND COPY.", "height": "4304", "width": "2685", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0008.jp2"}, "9": {"fulltext": "ABBREVIATIONS.\\nASS Song of Solomon. By W. F. Adeney (Expositor s Bible).\\n1875.\\nBB Book by Book. London, 1892.\\nBD Smith s Bible Dictionary Amer. Ed., 1868-70. In part, second\\nedition, London, 1893.\\nBE Book of Ecclesiastes. By Samuel Cox (Expositor s Bible).\\nSecond edition, 1898.\\nBT Book of the Twelve Prophets. By G. A. Smith (Expositor s\\nBible). 1896-98.\\nBW Biblical World. Chicago, 1893-\\nC Coheleth (Book of Ecclesiastes). By C. D. Ginsburg. London,\\n1861.\\nCB Cambridge Bible for Schools.\\nCC Cambridge Companion to the Bible, 1893. (For large-type\\nedition,\\nCOT Canon of the Old Testament. By H. E. Ryle. London, 1892.\\nDB Dictionary of the Bible. Edited by James Hastings. 1898-\\nDL Divine Library of the Old Testament. By A. F. Kirkpatrick.\\nLondon, 1891.\\nDP Doctrine of the Prophets. By same. London, 1892.\\nE Expositor. London, 1875-\\nET Expository Times. Edinburgh, 1890-\\nGSS Song of Songs. By C. D. Ginsburg. London, 1857.\\nHI History of Interpretation. By F. W. Farrar (Bampt. Lectures).\\n1886.\\nIB How God Inspired the Bible. By J. Paterson Smyth. 1892.\\nThird edition (1898) quoted in\\nLE Lectures on Ecclesiastes. By G. G. Bradley. 1885. Second\\nedition (1898) in\\nLI Inspiration. By W. Sanday (Bampt. Lectures). 1893.", "height": "4450", "width": "2859", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0009.jp2"}, "10": {"fulltext": "2 Abbreviations.\\nLOT Introductio?i to Literature of the Old Testament. By S. R.\\nDriver. Second edition. 1891.\\nMP Minor Prophets. By F. W. Farrar. New York. [n. d.]\\nOD Old Documents and the New Bible. By J. Paterson Smyth.\\nNew York. [n. d.]\\nOTJC Old Testament in the Jewish Church. By W. Robertson\\nSmith. Second edition. London, 1892.\\nPI Prophets of Israel. By late W. Robertson Smith. New edition.\\nLondon, 1895.\\nTC Teaching of Christ. By Bishop Moorhouse. London, 1891.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0010.jp2"}, "11": {"fulltext": "OLD TESTAMENT LITERATURE.\\nTEXT.\\nI. Textual Criticism, (i) At first sight might appear\\nthat field for such criticism very limited as to Old Testament.\\nWhy? (2) How far back do existing Old Testament MSS.\\ngo (3) Popular explanation of uniformity to what extent\\ncorrect (4) What means of knowing whether MSS. earlier\\nthan those surviving exhibited variations from these latter\\n(5) What is a Vcrsio?i (6) Name principal ancient versions.\\n(7) Some ways in which errors might easily find admission into\\nHebrew text (OD 12, 16 f., 20-22). (8) Salient points of bitter\\ncontroversy regarding vowel-points (OD 13 fi\\\\). (9) Some\\nexamples of principles on which textual criticism rests.\\n(i) Text in Hebrew MSS. almost same in all (OD 3).\\n(2) Not as much as a thousand years. (3) That shows\\nmarvellously perfect care of Scriptures. Doubtless true\\nfor many centuries but not to be predicated of earlier cen-\\nturies (OD 32). (4) Ancient versions, which were made\\nfrom earlier MSS. than those now existing. (5) A trans-\\nlation. (6) Targums, Septuagi?it, Vulgate, Peshitto.\\n(7) (a) Hebrew anciently written without vowels hence\\nwrong vowels might be inserted later (cf. Gen. xlvii. 31,\\nand Heb. xi. 21). (b) Not improbably words often ran\\ninto one another, {c) Several letters resembled each\\nother, (d) Mistakes through similarity of sound, in", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0011.jp2"}, "12": {"fulltext": "4 History of Text\\ncase of dictation, (e) Right word taken from wrong\\nplace. Marginal words finding way into text. (8)\\nGreat antiquity ascribed to marks by Jews. Why Prot-\\nestants and Romanists agreed. What established by\\nLevita? (9) (a) MSS. not always of equal value; (b)\\nwhere they are, majority decides best reading (V) where\\nnot, earlier MSS. probably more correct (OD 25 f.).\\n2. History of Text. (1) Four Periods into which history\\nof Old Testament text roughly divided (2) Character used in\\nFirst Period (3) Two important facts of Second Period\\n(4) Probable state of text in this Period (5) What evidence\\nas to text in Third Period? (6) Explain (a) k thibh and\\nq ri, (b) usage regarding ineffable name Jhvh. (7) (a) What\\ngreat work completed in this Period (b) For what are we\\nindebted to makers of Talmud f (c) Illustrate extreme rever-\\nence for text. (8) In history of text two important events fall\\nin Fourth Period what are they (OD 88-92) (9) Two\\nfamous schools of this time (OD 76-79)\\n(i) (a) Before Ezra, (b) From Ezra to Fall of Jeru-\\nsalem, B.C. 450-A.D. 70. (c) Talmud Period, a.d. 70-\\n500. {d) Massoretic Period, a.d. 500-1000 (DL 58\\nif.). (2) Old Hebrew as distinguished from so-called\\nSquare (Assyrian) writing (OD 2 ff.), DL 58 f. (3)\\n(a) Fixing of O. T. Canon, (b) adoption of Square char-\\nacter (OD 66 f., DL 60 f.). (4) Verbal uniformity\\nprobably did not exist. To this conclusion point Sama-\\nritan Pentateuch and LXX. (DL 61 f.). (5) That stand-\\nard text (substantially that of present) gradually grew\\nup. By time of Talmud absolutely fixed (DL 63 f.).\\n(6) (a) Mean written and read. Former used\\nof wrong word in text latter of right word in margin.\\n{b) Vowels of Adonai {Lord) substituted for real vowels\\n(now unknown) of Jhvh. DL 65 f. (7) (a) Talmud. 1\\n1 For Talmud, see OD 79-82 126-143.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0012.jp2"}, "13": {"fulltext": "History of Text. 5\\n(b) Care of text, (c) Pen washed before writing names\\nof God. Even evident mistakes corrected only in mar-\\ngin. (8) {a) Reduction to writing of exegetical tradition\\n[Massora) current in previous period, (b) Increased\\nefficiency of Massora. DL 72, OD 90-104. (9) Tiberias\\nand Babylon. DL, 70 f.\\n3. Massoretic Text. (1) Which the text that has come\\ndown to us By what name known (2) Three lines of\\nreasoning showing that not free from error (DI, 76)\\n(i) Palestine, to distinguish from that used by Jews\\nof Dispersion (cf. OD 85 f.), Massoretic. (2) (a) Evi-\\ndence furnished by itself, e.g., not admitting of transla-\\ntion without violence to grammar (b) parallel passages\\n(c) ancient versions. DL 73-84.\\n4. Samaritan Pentateuch. (1) Wherein lies its chief\\nvalue in textual criticism (2) What diminishes weight of\\nvariations from received text\\n(1) From circumstance that probably derived from\\nJewish text not later than B.C. 430 (OD 49 f. (2) Be-\\ncause own text has been frequently tampered with (OD\\n51). Cf. OD 118-125.\\n5. Targums. (1) What? (2) How originated\\n(i) Aramaic paraphrases of Scripture that was read in\\nSynagogue at first oral, then written. (2) Because\\nknowledge of Hebrew confined to learned (OD 144 f.).\\n6. Septuagint. (1) When translation begun (2) What\\nconfers special interest? (3) Romance of Aristeas (OD 149-\\n151) (4) Probable place of origin? (5) How does it appear\\nthat not by Jewish scholars (6) What takes from worth for\\ncritical purposes\\n(1) B.C. 280. (2) Was Bible used by our Eord and\\nHis apostles. (3) Ptolemy wishes Pentateuch translated", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0013.jp2"}, "14": {"fulltext": "6 Inspiration.\\nfor his library thousands of captives set free procession\\nto Jerusalem six Jews from each of twelve tribes come\\nto Egypt gold letters 72 days work 72 cells of early\\nChristian version of story exact uniformity of trans-\\nlation. (4) Alexandria. For needs of Jews of Disper-\\nston. (5) Imperfect knowledge of Hebrew mistakes in\\ngeography Kg3 ptian words Macedonian Greek (OD\\n152 f.). (6) Translation not accurate own text corrupt.\\n7. Other Greek Versions. (1) Name three in or before\\na.d. 200 (OD 83). (2) Story of Aquila? s version (OD 157-\\n159)?\\n(i) Of Aquila,Symmachus, Theodotio7i. (2) He gives\\nup heathenism for Christianity then Christianity for\\nJudaism L,XX disliked by Jews.\\n8. Vulgate. (1) How did Vulgate come to be written (OD\\n169 (2) Immense influence on history of Bible (171)?\\n(3) How received at first and for long time (4) Illustrate\\nchange of opinion by time of Council of Trent (173).\\n(i) So many errors in old Latin Bibles. At first Jerome\\nattempted revision, but ended with translation from He-\\nbrew. (2) For more than thousand years parent of every\\nversion in Western Europe. (3) With unbounded abuse.\\n(4) Then made standard Bible.\\nSee, Visit to Codex B, BW xii. 5 ff., Siloam inscription, 458.\\nINSPIRATION.\\nI. A General Indication. (1) With all the variety in Old\\nTestament books what feature attests supernatural origin (DL\\n85 f.) (2) Confirmatory evidence in ourselves (DL no f.)\\n(i) Undesigned unity of life and spirit. Cf. DL 109 f.,\\nIB 33 f. [37], 36 [41]. (2) Message of Bible finds sou\\nof man. IB 22 [26], cf. 37 f. [42].", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0014.jp2"}, "15": {"fulltext": "Inspiration. 7\\n2. Nature of Inspiration, (i) An important distinction?\\n(DL 87). (2) How nature of inspiration to be investigated\\n(3) Providential analogy suggesting itself? (4) Analogy be-\\ntween Incarnate Word and Written Word (DL 91)\\n(i) Between fact of Inspiration and its iiature. TC\\n1 ff. (2) In Scriptures themselves. IB 63 [68]-68 [73].\\n(3) Between our changing views respecting Nature and\\nRevelation. (4) Just as sometimes Christ s Humanity\\nand His Divinity have been so presented as to destroy\\nthe one or the other, so with the Human and Divine in\\nScripture. IB 126 f. [132].\\n3. Evil of Theories. (1) From what assumption should we\\nbe free in studying question of Inspiration (DL 89) (2) How\\nhave expressions Scripture is word of God, and Scripture\\ncontains word of God, each been perverted (DL 91)\\n(1) That God in revealing Himself must have followed\\nplan commonlv supposed by Christian world. IB 45\\n[49.1-57 62 1- Cf BW 82 ff 2 Former into\\nVerbal Inspiration latter, to destruction of all differ-\\nence between inspiration of Scripture and that of notable\\nmen in every age. IB 101 [io7]-io3 [no], cf. 107 [113\\n112 [118]. On Human Element see 113 [ii9]-i25 [132]\\nCOT 12 f.\\n4. Degrees of Inspiration. (1) Difference between other\\nliterature and Bible (DL 92) (2) How may case stand as re-\\ngards most of Apocrypha f (3) What perfectly consistent with\\nrecognition of Inspiration\\n(1) Former lacks unity of spirit and purpose. (2) Dis-\\ntinction between them and canonical writings less sharp\\nthan commonly thought. (3) Different degrees of Inspi-\\nration.\\n5. Chief Clue in Question of Inspiration. (1) As to In-\\nspiration, fact to be noted (2) Best method of studying", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0015.jp2"}, "16": {"fulltext": "8 Classification and Arrangement.\\nquestion? (3) What the Christian view of purpose of Old\\nTestament (DE 93-95) (4) What do we see in pursuing this\\nplan of study (5) Result of failure to see it (DE 107 f.)\\n(1) No clear-cut theory possible (DE 90). IB 95 [101]-\\n97 C io 3]- 2 To find what inspiration is, we should\\nbear in mind what it was/or. (IB 137 [144J-139 [147]).\\n(3) To be record of God s gradual revelation of Himself\\nin preparation for the Gospel. (4) Not that the Divine\\nmethod of working was such as we might have supposed\\nbeforehand, but that a gradual Divine education of Israel\\nshows itself (DE 97-103. IB 26 [30] ff.). (5) Neglect\\nto perceive that Bible a record of progressive revelation\\nis responsible for many difficulties. On Progressiveness\\nof G00V s Teaching, see IB Chap. V.\\n6. What Inspiration is not. Some negative character-\\nistics of Inspiration (DL 103-106)?\\nDoes not (a) dispense with literary methods, (b) secure\\nfreedom from error, nor (c) independence of environment.\\nSee Theories of Inspiration, BW v. 169 ff.\\nCLASSIFICATION AND ARRANGEMENT.\\n1. Number. (1) How many books in our Old Testament?\\n(2) In Hebrew (3) Reconcile discrepancy.\\n(i) 39, (2) 24, (3) Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, Minor\\nProphets, in each case one book Ezra and Nehemiah\\ntogether one. Hence, 39 15 24. (CC 3 a [6]).\\n2. Groups, (i) Three groups of books in Hebrew Bible\\n(2) To what, triple division probably due [6] (3) Four-fold\\ndivision to which books in our Bible easily lend themselves\\n(4) Three historical periods into which second division falls\\n(5) Proverbs and Ecclesiastes not Poetical what then [5]", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0016.jp2"}, "17": {"fulltext": "Classification and Arrangement. 9\\n(i) Law, Prophets, Hagiographa (CC 2 b [5] (2)\\nGradual formation of Canon. (3) Pentateuch Historical\\nBooks, Poetical, Prophetical (CC 2 a, b [4] (4)\\nJoshua, Judges, Ruth, before Monarchy (b) Samuel,\\nKings, Chronicles, during Monarchy (c) Ezra, Nehe-\\nmiah, Ruth (episode), after Captivity. (5) Belong to\\nWisdom literature.\\n3. Prophets, (i) Hebrew subdivision of Prophets? (2)\\nAnother? (3) Why Daniel not to be classed strictly with\\nProphetical writings (4) How does Jonah differ from them\\n(5) Two facts that would naturally have enhanced popular\\nesteem for Prophetical writings (CC 5 b [13] (6) Prophetical\\ndivision probably not completed until when (CC 6 a [14]\\n(i) Former and Latter. Refers to position, not date.\\n(2) Four Major, two Minor. (3) Apocalyptical rather\\nthan prophetic. (4) By almost exclusively narrative\\nform. (5) Fulfilment relative to Captivity. Cessation\\nof Prophecy would also increase value of what left in\\nwriting. (6) Some time after Nehemiah.\\n4. Hagiographa. (1) What suggested as leading to de-\\ntermination of canonicity of Hagiographa (2) Usage of\\nSynagogue as to Hagiographa (3) Name some books of\\nHagiographa that would seem rather to belong elsewhere.\\n(i) Destruction of sacred books under Antiochus Epi-\\nphanes. (2) Never all read in Synagogue. Only in\\npost-Talmudic days that Five Megilloth used in Syna-\\ngogue (CC 7 b [18]). (3) Da?iiel, Ezra, Nehemiah,\\nChronicles would seem Prophetical or Historical (CC 2 b\\n[5])-\\n5. Order. (1) As to order of books, what noticeable in\\nLXX (2) What not unlikely the reason (3) Last book of\\nHebrew Old Testament", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0017.jp2"}, "18": {"fulltext": "io Canon.\\n(i) Great variety in different manuscripts (CC 3 a\\n[6] Cf. COT 213 ff. (2) Gradual formation of Canon\\nrather than Alexandrian independence. (3) Chronicles\\n(CC 3 b [6]\\nCANON.\\nI. In investigating formation of Canon, what important fact\\nmeets us at outset 2. First certain intimation of Canonical\\nScripture in Israel 3. Early Jewish tradition regarding\\nformation of Canon (CC 4 a [10])? 4. A later phase (4 b\\n[10] 5. Character of evidence for both 6. Substratum of\\nfact 7. Purpose in collecting writings into Canon 8. Earlier\\nstage preceding formation of Canon? 9. What might well\\ntend to delay such formation? 10. Three stages of prepara-\\ntion? II. Classification of earliest collections of writings for\\nnational instruction? 12. How Canon probably formed [11]?\\n13. What would then be successive stages 14. At what date\\nHebrew Canon officially decreed (CC 7 a [17] 15. Show by\\ncertain discussions of Jewish doctors freedom allowed in criti-\\ncism of canonicity.\\nI. That no historical account exists. COT 3. 2. In\\ntime of Josiah. COT 18 cf. 47, 57. 3. Attributes to\\nmiraculous agency of Ezra (cf. 2 Esdras, Ch. 14). COT\\n239 ff. 4. Ezra and Men of Great Synagogue (OD 63 f.\\nCOT 250 ff. 5. Of no value. 6. Final assertion of\\nauthority of Law brought about by Ezra and com-\\npanions. 7. Religious, not merely literary. COT 6 f.\\n8. When writings belonged to ordinary literature of\\npeople. COT 15 f. 9. Existence of other means of\\nknowing will of God. Ibid. 10. (a) Of the books in\\nearliest form, (b) in present form through editing, (c) of\\nreceiving them into Canon. COT 17. II. [a) Songs,\\n(b) laws, (c) histories, (d) prophecies. COT 18 ff. 12.\\nGradual growth of several centuries. 13. (a) Law, (b)", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0018.jp2"}, "19": {"fulltext": "Apocrypha. 1 1\\nLaw and Prophets, (c) Law, Prophets, and Writings. Cf.\\nCOT, chaps, iv-viii. 14. Council of Jamnia (Circ. a.d.\\n100). 15. About Ezekiel, Ecclesiastes, and others.\\nAPOCRYPHA.\\nI. How did early Christian writers come to hold Apocrypha\\nin high esteem (CC 8 a [18])? 2. Augustine s testimony?\\n3. What decreed respecting Apocrypha by Council of Trent\\n[20]? 4. Two distinct senses in which word Apocrypha\\nused 5. On what ground Apocrypha retained in English\\nChurch 6. In Jewish literature what do these books rep-\\nresent (CC 8 b [21])? 7. Three Apocryphal writings sup-\\nposed to be referred to in New Testament (CC 8 b, 9 a\\n[21, 22])?\\nI. All books of IyXX and early Latin versions popu-\\nlarly accounted of equal authority. Cf. COT 208 f. 2.\\nChurch, but not Jews, held Apocrypha canonical.\\n3. All books in Vulgate of equal inspiration. 4. (a)\\nPseudepi graphic writings of heretics, (b) Books not\\nused in Church services. 5. Useful for example of\\nlife and instruction of manners. 6. Chief remains of\\ncenturies just before and after Christ. 7. (a) Book of\\nEnoch Jude 14), (b) Assumption of Moses (Jude 9), (c)\\nBook of legendary adventures of Moses (2 Tim. iii. 8).\\nSee Jewish Apocalypses BW vi. 97 ff. Apocrypha, viii. 272 fF. Book\\nof Enoch, xii. 37 fF.\\nPENTATEUCH.\\nI. Name, (i) Name given by Jews to Pentateuch, and\\nmeaning (2) Earlier and later sense?\\n(i) Torah {teaching, law). BB 1. (2) (a) Individual\\ndecision on moral or ceremonial question, (b) did not till\\nafter Exile imply written Law. COT 32 f.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0019.jp2"}, "20": {"fulltext": "1 2 Pentateuch.\\n2. Purpose. Design traceable through all Pentateuch\\nTo exhibit development of people chosen by God to\\nperform great work in world (BB 3).\\n3. Unity. Its character\\nOf idea, more than form. Strict chronology lacking\\ndifferent accounts of same event side by side repetitions\\n(BB 4).\\n4. History. (1) At what point does it begin (2) Process\\nof limitation (3) Broad difference between modern historical\\nwriting and Pentateuch (4) Difference in matter of notes\\n(i) Creation (BB 3). (2) Out of family of Noah,\\nShem s descendants selected from them, family of\\nAbraham. Then Isaac, facob, Ephraiyn, and fudah (BB\\n3). (3) In former, historian uses own words in latter,\\nof original authorities (BB 4), (4) What would be in\\nmodern foot-note is put in text of Pentateuch (BB 4).\\n5. Laws. (1) Two elements of Pentateuch (2) Purpose\\nfor which Law given (3) What underlies laws (4) Increas-\\ning explicitness in Cove?ia?its (5) Pentateuch legislation has\\nwhat two-fold reference in time? (6) Three different Codes,\\nsupposed by many to be contained in Pentateuch (7) On\\nwhat ground wide difference in time inferred regarding these\\ncodes (8) An earlier than Jewish origin for merely ceremonial\\nsystem\\n(i) Narrative and legislation former the main purpose\\nof books though latter a prominent feature (BB 2).\\n(2) Education of people to fulfil high end (BB 3). (3)\\nGod s Covenants (BB 3). (4) With Noah, less explicit\\nthan with Abraham; that again, than Covenant at\\nSinai (BB 4). (5) Back, to choosing of people forward,\\nto realization of meaning of choice (BB 3). (6) Book of\\nCovenant (Exod. xx. 23-xxiii.), Deuteronomic Code\\n(introduced in reign of fosiah), Levitical Code (great", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0020.jp2"}, "21": {"fulltext": "Pentateuch. 13\\npart of Exodus, and all of Leviticus) This last many\\nconsider to have been introduced after Exile (BB 12).\\nCOT 24 ff., cf. 71 ff. (7) That there are differences in\\ntheir provisions, suggesting changes in course of time,\\nand advance from simple to more elaborate ritual. L,OT\\n80. (8) In general features, system like that of other\\nSemitic races. COT 27 f., PI 55 f., cf. BB 36 f.\\n6. Authorship. (1) Very likely, not until when was\\nauthorship of sacred books assigned (2) Fact particularly to\\nbe noted in respect to authorship of Pentateuch (3) As re-\\ngards Mosaic authorship, what is all that is stated in Penta-\\nteuch itself? (4) Respecting share of Moses in composition, of\\nwhat are we left in ignorance? (5) Foundation of Jewish tradi-\\ntion that Moses the author? (6) What then may reasonably\\nbe expected as to traditional view\\n(i) At or after collection into Canon (BB 5). (2)\\nMosaic origin not asserted by Pentateuch itself (BB 5).\\n(3) That Moses wrote certaiyi specific things (BB 6). (4)\\nHow much it was (BB 7), COT 31. (5) General belief\\nas to historical position of Moses, not on examination of\\nwritings, time not being ripe for that (BB 7). (6) That\\nit should have to be modified (BB 7).\\n7. Composite Nature. (1) Early stages of theory of com-\\nposite character of Pentateuch (2) When epoch-making line\\nof investigation started (3) Conclusion reached by Astruc?\\n(4) Later stage of investigation (5) Further considerations\\nleading to idea of composite character? (6) Name principal\\ndocuments supposed to form basis of Pentateuch. (7) With\\nwhat view supposition of late date for canonical recognition of\\nour present Pentateuch perfectly consistent\\n(i) First, Jews attributed concluding verses of Deuter-\\nonomy to another than Moses. Subsequently, things", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0021.jp2"}, "22": {"fulltext": "14 Genesis.\\nnot easily coming from his hand were accounted later\\nadditions (BB 9). (2) Middle of eighteenth century.\\n(3) That different names for God indicate different docu-\\nments that with two larger and some smaller docu-\\nments Moses made Genesis and first part of Exodus (BB\\n10). (4) Peculiarity as to names of God found in other\\nbooks as well as Genesis. When separated according to\\ndifferent names, each portion has own additional pecul-\\niarities. Deuteronomy different in important respects\\nfrom documents used in preceding books. Traces of\\nsame documents in Joshua also (BB 10). (5) (a) Repeti-\\ntions, (b) discrepancies and inconsiste?icies, (c) lack of\\norderly arrangement. DL, 44; DB ii., 363 f. (6) (a)\\nPriestly (symbol P.). So called from circumstance\\nthat priestly laws in Leviticus considered to belong to\\nsame source, (b) Jehovistic, designated by J. (c) A\\nsecond writer using, as does P., name Elohim, but very\\nclosely related to J. In consequence of this resemblance\\nowing, as supposed, to combination by compiler two\\nare frequently referred to as one whole, and styled JE.\\n(d Deuterono?nic writing. Few traces elsewhere than in\\nDeutero7iomy and foshua. Symbol D. Way in which\\npresent form of Pentateuch thought to have been reached\\nsubstantially this By various Editors {Redactors), first\\nJ+E then JE D lastly JED -f P. DB ii. 375 COT\\n35. (7) That nucleus to be referred to Moses. CC 5 a,\\n[12] DI, 41-50.\\n8. Method of Modern Criticism. Two lines modern\\ncriticism follows?\\nLiterary, from evidence of Pentateuch itself, as to\\nstyle, etc. of different parts Historical, from evidence of\\nhistorical books of Old Testament (BB 10 f.) DL 7 f.\\nOn Place of Moses in O. T. Hist., see BW v. 161 ff. His Age and\\nWork, vii. 31 ff., 105 ff.\\nGENESIS.\\nI. (a) By whom title Genesis, Exodus, etc. given?\\n(b) Inadequacy of name Genesis f 2. (a) Main subject? (b)", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0022.jp2"}, "23": {"fulltext": "Exodus. 15\\nsubject of first ten chapters (c) at what point does Genesis close\\n3. Noteworthy literary feature 4. (a) Instances of Duplicate\\naccounts {b) of later writer than Moses f 5. Marked difference\\nbetween early Hebrew traditions and those of other ancient\\nnations 6. Mistake to which dread of Science due that many\\nhave? 7. What brought out by comparison of Babylonian and\\nAssyrian traditions regarding Creation, Deluge, etc. with\\nBiblical accounts\\nI. (a) Hellenists and Church Fathers (BB 17). (b)\\nChief purpose of book not to describe origin of world.\\n2. (a) History of family of Abraham, (b) Creation and early\\nhistory of race, (c) removal of chosen family to Egypt.\\n3. Series of Genealogies, of Adam, Noah, etc. (BB 18).\\n4. (a) Of Creation and Flood (LOT 6 fT.) {b) References\\nto Canaa?iite in land {Gen. xii. 6) and kings over Israel\\n(xxxvi. 31) name of Dan {Gen. xiv. 14 cf.fudg. xviii.\\n29) reference to Moses as in past {Deut. xxxiv. 10), and\\nto his personal character {Numb. xii. 3). 5. High re-\\nligious tone of former. Natural objects not deified, even in\\npoetry and men of sacred writers not endowed with\\nfabulous qualities, as heathen heroes (BB 19, 23). 6. Of\\nnot seeing that purpose not so much to tell about nature\\nas about God of nature (BB 20 f. In Bible have\\nrevelation, not science in Nature, science not religion.\\n7 {a) Resemblances indicating common source, {b) strong\\ncontrast between polytheism and monotheism (BB 22 f.)\\nDI y47 f.,97f-\\nDivine and Human Elements in Earlier Chaps., BW iv., 266 ff., 349 fT.,\\n407 ff. Heb. Stories of Deluge, BW iv., 20 ff. Deluge in other Literatures,\\nBW iv., ii4ff. Mythic Elem. in O. T., BW vi., 115 ff., 194 ff. Babylon\\nAccount of Creation, BW iii., 17 ft*., 109 ff.\\nEXODUS.\\nI. (a) Between what two points does Exodus carry on history\\nof nation? {b) Two parts into which this period roughly\\ndivided, and main subjects of each (c) Three clearly-marked", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0023.jp2"}, "24": {"fulltext": "1 6 Leviticus.\\nstages of the history 2. How Exodus exhibits advance upon\\nGenesis. 3. (a) Difference in sphere of religion? (b) Re-\\nligious belief probably animating people in common with fore-\\nfathers 4. (a) Upon what basis Theocracy established at\\nSinai? (b) Where does Decalogue again appear, under con-\\nsiderably different form (c) Old and probable supposition\\nrespecting original form of Decalogue 5. Historical impor-\\ntance of Exodus to subsequent books of Old Testament 6.\\nFundamental conception of Exodus regarding Israel J. Basis\\nsome observances of Exodus may have had 8. What has been\\nshown with respect to the Plagues f\\nI. (a) Death of Joseph and erection of Tabernacle, (b)\\nhistory before reaching Sinai Oppression, departure\\nfrom Egypt, journey to Sinai at Sinai Law at Sinai,\\nratification of Covenant, setting up of Tabernacle (c)\\nnation enslaved, 7 edeemed, set apart to God s service (CC\\n36, b [96]). 2. History, not now of individuals but of\\nnation (BB 26). 3. (a) Continuous communication of\\nDivine will to whole people, instead of occasional revela-\\ntions to individuals, (d) Consciousness of Divine call\\nand anticipation of new home (BB 27). 4. (a) Ten Com-\\nmandments and Book of the Covenant (LOT 28), {b) Deut.\\nv. 6-21. For example, Fourth Commandment has ad-\\ndition in order that thy man-servant and thy maid-\\nservant may rest as well as thou, etc. LOT 30 f. (c)\\nThat consisted merely of commandme?its themselves, ex-\\nplanatory comments being added afterwards {ibid.). 5.\\nThey presuppose Exodus (BB 28). 6. Holiness of na-\\ntion. 7. Older and simpler usages. Vide Sup?-a 5, (8),\\n(p. 13). 8. Were probably intensified forms of common\\nvisitations (BB 30).\\nLEVITICUS.\\nI. Inappropriateness of name? 2. Where scene laid and\\nwhat the mode of life 3. Character of laws 4. Under what", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0024.jp2"}, "25": {"fulltext": "Leviticus. 17\\ndifferent aspects nation regarded in first two legislations (as\\nmany consider them, cf. OTJC p. 318) and Levitical legisla-\\ntion respectively 5. Five sections of which book consists\\n6. Law of Holiness, (a) Several chapters of Leviticus sup-\\nposed to have belonged at one time to a distinct Law-book by\\nwhat name this designated (b) To what does it bear striking\\nresemblance and how this accounted for by some {c) Formula\\nintroducing many laws of Holiness (d By what peculiarity\\nH. distinguished from other parts of the Law (e) How H.\\nconsidered by man}- to differ from the rest of P. How\\nexplained 7. (a) What noticeable as to groups into which\\nregulations about sacrifices fall (b) as to occurrence of num-\\nber ten as basis of codification 8. What do the laws seem to\\nbear on their face 9. What noteworthy as to Feast of Taber-\\nnacles? 10. In what did Levitical offerings reach highest\\npoint? II. Against what the nation specially guarded 12.\\nOf which Documents does Leviticus form part throughout 13.\\nPost-Exilic origin, (a) In what light the Levitical Legisla-\\ntion regarded by many at present time (b) Caution, however,\\nto be observed (c) Question arising in this connection (d\\nAssumption to be rejected (e) That there is an element of\\nfiction in the Levitical code is admitted by advocates of new\\nview on what principle is it sought to justify it What\\nhas led many believing in Divine origin of distinctive features\\nof Old Testament religion to regard Leviticus as post- Exilic\\nI. Levites mentioned only once and incidentally,\\nwhereas priests everywhere BB 33) 2. At Sinai. Of\\ndesert. 3. Mostly religious and ceremotiial. 4. As na-\\ntion and as church. Word congregation\\ncharacteristic of P. OTJC 320. 5. (1) Sacrificial ordi-\\nnances, (2) ritual of consecration of priests, (3) ceremonial", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0025.jp2"}, "26": {"fulltext": "1 8 Numbers.\\nuncleayiness, (4) Day of Atonement, (5) Law of Holiness\\n(CC 36, b [96]). {a) Law of Holiness. (Chaps, xvii.-\\nxxvi.) (CC 37, a [97]). Symbol H. LOT 43 ff. (b, Legis-\\nlation in Ezekiel. By supposition that Bzekiel the\\nauthor. By others, supposed to have been derived from\\nhis legislation. Traditional view, that Ezekiel borrowed\\nfrom Leviticus. (CC I.e. (c) M Ye shall be holy, for I\\nJahveh your God am holy \\\\d) Frequent recurrence of\\nI am Jahveh at end of paragraphs, (e) By differ-\\nence in style and motive (LOT 43 cf. 54). (f) That\\nprobably H. has basis of older priestly legislation. 7.\\n{a) Three groups, each of ten instructions, (b) In all\\nlaws of Pentateuch, is thought that each distinct subject\\ntreated under ten provisions. 1 8. Evidence of having\\noriginated at different times (BB 35). 9. That are ap-\\nparently two accounts. CC 37, a [97]. 10. Sin-off er-\\ning and Day of A tonement (BB 38). II. Idolatry. 12.\\nPriestly Code (LOT 39). 13. (a) As ritual code of Second\\nTemple (OTJC 382 ff. (b) This code not to be thought\\nof as altogether new^. (c) What merely law for Second\\nTemple, and what history of original Mosaic Sanctuary,\\n(d) That not every law called Mosaic to be taken as lit-\\nerally given in wilderness. [e) In early laws of all\\nnations necessary modifications habitually carried out by-\\nlegal fictions. OTJC c. (f) Convergence of two\\nlines of evidence literary and historical former method\\nindicating, by diversity of style, incongruities, c. in\\ndifferent parts, that whole Law not the work of single\\nwriter, but belongs to different periods latter, that pre-\\nExilic institutions of Israel, as appearing in historical\\nbooks, not in conformity with Levitical Law. OTJC\\n390 ff. cf. Lect. IX., and pp. 422 ff.\\nSee Priests Code, BW xi, 440 ff.\\nNUMBERS.\\nI. To what has name reference 2. Scene of first section\\n3. Substance of second 4. Nature of account of this period\\n5. Scene of last section 6. As to how long time is record\\n1 BD. s.v. Levit.. p. 1647, a.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0026.jp2"}, "27": {"fulltext": "Numbers. 19\\nalmost silent 7. What fact bearing on question of subsistence\\nfor such vast numbers in the wilderness? 8. Probable mode\\nof life during wanderings 9. Regarding worship of period,\\nwhat brought out in Joshua V. 10. How matter presented\\nby the prophets II. An indication of later hand? 12. And\\none to the effect that at least not all the narrative by Moses f\\n13. For what is Numbers remarkable 14. Striking case of\\nrepetition 15. What supposed by some regarding account\\nof the Spies 16. A narrative remarkable for high numbers\\ninvolved\\nI. Two numbering s of people at Sinai, and in plains\\nof Moab (BB 41). 2. Sinai. 3. Journey from Sinai to\\nplains of Moab (BB 42). 4. Events not in regular order,\\nbut interspersed with laws. 5. Plains of Moab. 6. 38\\nyears (BB 43). 7. Even now, when almost total absence\\nof cultivation, large numbers are supported. At time of\\nExodus must have been immensely more productive\\n(BB 45). 8. Not incessant marching, but life like that\\nof modern Arabs tribes scattered over country in search\\nof pasture (BB.46). 9. Distinctive requirements of\\nLevitical law not observed (BB 47). 10. Israel said to\\nhave served strange gods in wilderness. II. Ahtmb.^zx.\\n32 while children of Israel in the wilderness.\\n12. Fact that list of stations (eh. xxxiii) said to have\\nbeen written by Moses suggests his not having written\\nnarrative referring to them. 13. Fragments of ancient\\npoetry (CC 38, a [100]). 14. Five entire verses repeated\\nverbatim, twelve times. {Numb. vii. 13, 19, 25, etc.) A\\ncharacteristic of P. (LOT 56 f.) 15. That it is double\\n(LOT 58), cf. OTJC 401 ff. So Rebellion of Korah, etc.\\nregarded as made up of two or three narratives. (LOT\\n59 ff. History of Balaam also considered composite.\\n16. War against Midian. 12,000 Israelites, without loss\\nof a single man, carry off 32,000 virgins and 800,000\\nhead of cattle, (eh. xxxi), LOT 63 f.\\nOn Early Songs, see COT 18 if.; Story of Spies, BW i, 168 ff.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0027.jp2"}, "28": {"fulltext": "20 Deuteronomy.\\nDEUTERONOMY.\\nI. (a) Scene of book? (b) Time covered? (c) To what point\\nhistory brought down 2. (a) Particulars in which book differs\\nstrikingly from rest of Pentateuch (b) Of what, book made\\nup 3. Special measures for preserving memory both of Eaw\\nand events of wilderness life 4. Of what do last two chapters\\nbut one consist mainly 5. With what, hortatory character of\\nDeuteronomy in keeping 6. Show that legislation more than\\nrepetition of that of preceding books. 7. Difference between\\nDeuteronomy and Leviticus in respect to Priesthood 8. Feat-\\nure in worship strongly insisted on 9. Modern view of book,\\n(a) View held regarding Deuteronomy by many modern critics\\n(b) Assuming three stages of legislation in the Pentateuch\\nsupposed by modern critics, what middle position offers itself\\nbetween traditional opinion and that of critics (c) Two con-\\nsiderations in answer to charge that Deuteronomy, if not by\\nMoses, is forgery f (d) How explained that speeches ascribed\\nto Moses that are not by him (e) On what ground maintained\\nthat this practice followed in Old Testament So far from\\nbeing forgery, it is urged that Deuteronomy is simpry what?\\n(g) And how stands case with respect to inspiration f (h) In\\nwhat way objection met that laws occur that would be out of\\nplace in century 8-7 B.C.? 10. How does influence of Deuter-\\nonomy in subsequent books of Old Testament appear\\nI. (a) Still in plains of Moab. (b) 40 days, exclusive\\nof days of mourning for Moses, (c) Death of Moses and\\neve of entrance into Promised L,and. 2. (a) Hortatory\\ntone; Moses speaks in own name (BB 50). (b) Ad-\\ndresses by Moses, reviewing past and giving counsel for\\nfuture. 3. (a) Law to be inscribed on plastered stone at", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0028.jp2"}, "29": {"fulltext": "Joshua. 21\\nMount Ebal (b) to be read every seven years before\\npeople (c) Moses to compose historical song. 4. Song\\nof Moses, and Blessing of Moses. 5. Situation described\\nin book. 6. (a) Omission of what specially referred to\\ndesert, (b) Variance between Leviticus and Deuteronomy,\\nfrom change in circumstances (BB 52 f. 7. In Le-\\nviticus, sons of Aaron distinguished from Levites in\\nDeuteronomy, scarcely any distinction. 8. Central Sanc-\\ntuary (BB 54). 9. (a) (1) Legislation of Deuteronomy\\nearlier than Leviticus, (2) book composed in same age\\ndiscovered in, (3) was basis of Josiah s reformation, (4)\\ntill then, Book of Covenant only authoritative code, 15)\\nDeuteronomy ascribed to Moses in interest of centralisa-\\ntion of worship (BB 55), (b) that stages neither existed\\nin time of Moses, nor separated by centuries from each\\nother (BB 56). {c) That book does not claim to be by\\nMoses that laws not inventions of supposed author\\n(LOT 83 f. (d) Common with ancient historians\\nfreely to put speeches in mouth of their characters (LOT\\n84 (e) Of great similarity in style of speeches to nar-\\nrative itself. David, Solomon, and prophets express them-\\nselves in Chronicles in manner distinctively belonging to\\nlater age (ibid.), (f) Adaptation of older legislation to\\nnewer needs new element being hortatory setting (LOT\\n85). (g) Inspiration in no respect less than that of any\\nother anonymous part of Old Testament, (h) That they\\nare (1) naturally included in recapitulation of Mosaic\\nprinciples supposed to be addressed to people just before\\nentering Canaan, (2) would indirectly be of service\\nagainst tendencies of later date (ibid.). 10. In adoption\\nof its religious terminology. Jeremiah s phraseology,\\ne. g., evidently modelled upon it (LOT 95).\\nBook of the Law, COT 47 ff.; Deuter. Code, OTJC, Lect. xii. See also\\nB (5) vii, 151 ff.; ET viii, 196 ff., E (i) x, 16 ff. BW xi, 246 ff., 438 ff.\\nJOSHUA.\\nI. Of what three parts does Joshua consist? 2. Modern view\\nof book 3. Why name Hexateuch now used for Pentateuch\\nand Joshua together? 4. Striking omission in account of", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0029.jp2"}, "30": {"fulltext": "22 Judges.\\nConquest 5. Probable view as to time required for Conquest\\n6. From what ancient writing is extract given In what\\nconnection\\nI. Conquest of Canaan, (2) partition of land, (3) hor-\\ntatory conclusion (BB 59). 2. From differences in style,\\ncomposite origin inferred to great extent, continuation\\nof Pentateuch documents. Cf. LOT 96 f. 3. Because\\ncontents and structure of Joshua show connection with\\nPentateuch (LOT 96). 4. Conquest of largest part of\\nland not referred to (BB 62 5. That work much slower\\nand more difficult than might be inferred at first (BB 63).\\nLOT 96 f. 6. Book of Jashar. In Chap. x. 12, 13 (Sun\\nstanding still). LOT 101.\\nJUDGES.\\nI (a). How word Judges to be taken (b) Extent of their\\nauthority 2. Literary character of work 3. Three divisions\\nof Judges, and substance of each 4. Number of the Judges?\\n5. As to chronology, what seems probable 6. To what differ-\\nent periods does introduction seem to belong? 7. Apparent\\nsignificance of different materials observable in book 8. From\\na statement in closing chapters, what may be inferred as to\\ntime of writing Judges 9. (a) Two views regarding Judg.\\nxviii. 30: until the day of captivity of land (b) What,\\nhowever, clear? 10. Probable source of accounts of Judges?\\nII. Noticeable feature in framework into which these old\\nstories fitted 12. Plan on which compilation made 13. Two\\ndangers to which nation exposed? 14. Contrast between re-\\nligious life in Judges and in preceding books (b) What this\\nby many considered to show\\nI. (a) In sense of maintaining cause of anyone. Yet\\njudical function not excluded (BB 67). (b) Merely local", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0030.jp2"}, "31": {"fulltext": "Ruth. 23\\n(LOT 157). 2. Series of sketches of leaders and times\\nnot continuous narrative. 3.(1) State of country at begin-\\nning of period, (2) history of Judges, (3) Appendix:\\nMigration of Dan to North, and War against Benjamites\\n(LOT 151). 4. Twelve, not counting usurper Abi?ne-\\nlech, and regarding Deborah and Barak as one (BB 68).\\n5. (1 That 480 years between Exodus and commenceme7it\\nof Temple (1 Ki. vi. 1) divided into 12 round periods of 40\\nyears, (2) overlapping of periods (BB 69 6. One, at\\ntime of Joshua other, of Samuel (BB 70). Chap. i. 1\u00e2\u0080\u0094\\nii. 5 supposed to be fragments of old account of in-\\ndividual efforts of separate tribes account being parallel\\nwith Joshua, rather than continuation (LOT 152 f.). 7.\\nThat different parts come from different hands (BB 71).\\n8. From statement that there was no king in Israel maj^ be\\ninferred that some portions written during Monarchy.\\n9. (a) Reference to overthrow of Northern kingdom\\nhence evidence of composition in time of Captivity (2)\\nthat some lesser calamity meant (BB c). (b) That\\nportions of book much earlier than Captivity. 10. Tribal\\nor family traditions preserved orally (BB 72). ^11. Fre-\\nquently recurring expressions, e. g. Children of Israel\\ndid evil anger of the Lord kindled against them peo-\\nple sold into hand of So-and-so, and served for so many\\nyears. Jehovah raised up saviour and land had rest forty\\nyears. 12. Of illustrating single guiding principle. 13.\\n(1) Corrupting influence of inhabitants of country (2)\\ndestruction of own nationality (BB 73). l 14. (a) In Judges,\\nno reference to Laic, nor to Tabernacle service what\\ntold is out of keeping with Law (BB 74). (b) That re-\\nligious institutions of Israel developed out of crude stage.\\nOTjC2 35 f.,cf. 267 ff.\\ny\\nRUTH.\\nI. Connection with Judges f 2. To what period does com-\\nposition belong\\nI. Though probably written at different times, events\\noccurred in time of Judges (BB 68). 2. By some,\\n1 Cf. LOT 152.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0031.jp2"}, "32": {"fulltext": "24 Books of Samuel.\\nconsidered pre-Exilic by most, Exilic or post-Exilic\\n(EOT 426 f.).\\nSee E (1) ii., 1 ff.\\nBOOKS OF SAMUEE.\\nI. (a) Different ways of designating Books of Samuel and\\nKings (b) Objection to taking all as one whole 2. Why clear\\nthat Samuel not the author of Books of Samuel? 3. Appro-\\npriateness of present title 4. (a) Time covered (b) Event\\nforming dividing line between 1 and 2 Samuel? 5. What\\nconstitutes close of books 6. Where does the psalm of 2\\nSam. xxii. appear again (with variations) In grouping\\ncontents of the books, point to be noted 8. Suggestion as to\\nreason for 2 Samuel ending where it does 9. Round what\\nthree characters does history centre? 10. (a) Nature of evi-\\ndence for time of composition (b) To what different periods\\nthe books assigned? II. Indications of indebtedness to pre-\\nvious writers? 12. View of man}^ regarding account of\\nDavid s entrance on public life? 13. How supposed to re-\\nceive support from EXX? 14. Another consideration? 15.\\nAnother apparent discrepancy 16. One of the most striking\\nfeatures of religious life described in these books 17. Notice-\\nable absence from account? 18. Noteworthy manifestation of\\nprophetic activity in Samuel s day 1 9. How prophecy of this\\nperiod explained by some? 20. Part really performed by\\nprophecy in relation to priesthood 21. In what sense Samuel\\nthe first prophet 22. Points regarding these early prophets\\nas to which we can only conjecture? 23. Importance of pro-\\nphetic movement at this time regularly embodied 24. What\\nassociated with prophecy in Samuel s time 25. One meaning", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0032.jp2"}, "33": {"fulltext": "Books of Samuel. 25\\nof word for prophesy? 26. What else besides prophecy\\ninay have received impulse at same time 27. To what work\\ndid some prophetical men of this time apply themselves How\\nthis appears? 28. Why time of Samuel favorable for this\\nwork 29. How light thus thrown on finished style of first\\nwriting prophets 30. Great historical event of period of\\nSamuel? 31. Distinctive principle underlying David s admin-\\nistration\\nI. (a) With Jews, Samuel and Kings each one book\\nin LXX. the whole four regarded as one series and\\nknown as the Books of Kingdoms. In Vulgate,\\nkingdoms changed to Kings (BB 77), cf. LOT\\n162. (b) Authors, times of composition, and character-\\nistics all different. 2. His death spoken of in early part.\\n3. Samuel s influence extends to end of period described\\nin book. 4. Birth of Samuel to end of David s pub-\\nlic life (LOT 163). (b) Death of Saul. 5. Appendix\\nof miscellaneous contents (2 Sam. xxi.-xxiv. In-\\nterrupts continuity between preceding chapters and\\nbeginning of 1 Kings (LOT 173). 6. Psalm xviii.\\n7. That parts run into and presuppose one another (LOT\\n163). 8. That was determined by written materials\\ndrawn upon. But some have supposed that early part of\\n1 Kings may have been originally joined to Books of\\nSamuel {^BB 78). 9. Samuel, Saul, David. 10. [a) Only\\nvery general and indecisive (BB 82 f.). (b) Exile. II.\\nI Book ofjashar quoted, (2) Poetical passages Song of\\nHannah (1 Sam. ii. 1-10), Lament over Abner (2 Sam.\\niii. 33 f. 2 Sam. xxii. Ps. xviii.), and last\\nwords of David (2 Sam. xxiii. 1-7) BB 83. Song of\\nHannah considered by many not to have been composed\\nwith reference to Hannah (LOT 164). 12. That two\\naccounts have been fused into one (BB 84). For ex-\\nample, in one account David a mature man of war\\nwhen brought before king in other, a shepherd lad, in-\\nexperienced in warfare (LOT 169), cf. OTJC 119 if.\\n13. By omissions of Vatican MS. (BB 84). But differ-\\nences not altogether removed in this way (LOT 170).", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0033.jp2"}, "34": {"fulltext": "26 Books of Kings.\\nIn i Sam. xviii. 6-30 (Saul s jealousy) considerable\\nomissions occur in I,XX (Vat. MS.)- See OTJC 122 ff.\\n14. Hebrew text apparently less pure than in most Old\\nTestament books (BB 84). 15. In 1 Sam. vii. 13 Philis-\\ntines said to have come no more into coasts of Israel all\\nthe days of Samuel, yet (ix. 16) Saul is made king to\\nsave Israel from Philistines. And severity of oppression\\nis described (BB I.e.). 16. Prophetic activity beginning\\nwith Samuel and its permanent influence (BB 85). 17.\\nOf explanation of origin of prophecy. I\u00c2\u00a7. Kxcitement\\nand musical exercises of bands of prophets. 19. As\\nsimply result of patriotic fervor (BB 85). 20. Prophecy\\nnot, as some suppose, a reaction against Priesthood, but\\nits function to call attention to greater worth of spirit\\nthan of form (BB 86). 21. With him first, prophecy an\\norganized movement. 22. Way of spending time, ex-\\nternal union, relation to subsequent schools. 23. Con-\\ntinued all through history of people, a powerful influence\\nin national life (BB 87). 24. Connection with music.\\n25. Rave. The son of the prophets who came with\\nmessage to Jehu was described as a mad fellow (BB\\n87). 26. Sacred Song (BB 88). 27. Writing history.\\n(2). In Chron. various prophets mentioned as writers\\nof history. 28. National spirit had sprung up in peo-\\nple. 29. Shows literature had been long growing.\\nSome have supposed no literature existed before Amos\\nand Hosea (BB 90). 30. Establishment of Monarchy\\nin particular, David s line. 31. Recognition of God as\\nnation s ruler (BB 91).\\nOn religious worship of period of Samuel, see OTJC 269 ff. On Samuel,\\nsee also E (4) vi., 98 ff. Schools of prophets, E (1) iii., 241 ff.\\nBOOKS OF KINGS.\\nI. Period covered 2. (a) What naturally suggested as to\\ntime of writing {b) And as to country in which written\\n(e) A reference not harmonizing with, this view? Probable\\nsupposition in consequence 3. To whom authorship ascribed\\nby Talmud f An objection to this view? 4. Three-fold", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0034.jp2"}, "35": {"fulltext": "Books of Kings. 27\\ndivision of books 5. Idea present to writer throughout? 6.\\nLiterary framework 7: Method of giving history of divided\\nkingdom 8. Probable sources and plan 9. With passages\\nof what other books are parts of Kings in close verbal agree-\\nment? 10. (a) As regards sources used by writer, feature dis-\\ntinguishing Kings from preceding books (b) Nature of works\\nreferred to as authorities (c) Besides these, what compositions\\nof different sort very likely made use of? (d) Noticeable feat-\\nure of references to Elijah and Elisha? II. {a) Position of\\nprophets in time of kings? (b) Which prophet not mentioned,\\nthough very prominent in contemporaneous history (c)\\nIndebtedness of books to prophetic tone? (d) Of what this\\ntone consists (e) How prophetical spirit shown in reproof of\\npeople? 12. Idea of some modern writers regarding the Law\\n13. By what external evidence historic credibility of Kings\\nattested 14. Result of comparison of chronology of Kings\\nwith that of monuments? 15. Two periods into which w T hole\\ntime between Exodus and Return from Captivity divided\\n16. Suggestion presenting itself in Ki?igs as well as Judges?\\nI. Accession of Solomon to 37th year of Captivity\\n(BB 92). 2. (a) From work closing before end of Cap-\\ntivity, that author did not survive Exile, (b) Among\\nexiles in Babylon from phrase indicating side of Eu-\\nphrates the writer was living on. (c) To kingdom of\\nJudah and Temple as still existing That present books\\nanother edition of a work before Exile. 3. Jeremiah.\\nResemblances in Jeremiah occur in what probably is edi-\\ntorial addition (BB 93). Though not Jeremiah himself,\\nyet was one like-minded and almost certainly contempo-\\nraneous and writing under same influences (LOT 189).\\n4. (1) Solomon s reign. (2) Events of two kingdoms, (3) of\\nkingdom of Judah. 5. Promise to House of David never\\nlost sight of (BB 99). 6. Beginning, continuance, and", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0035.jp2"}, "36": {"fulltext": "28 Books of Chronicles.\\nclose of various reigns indicated by recurrence of similar\\nphrases, i. e., how old when began to reign, how long\\nreign, mother s name (in case of Judali), character of\\nreign, place of burial, next king s name, reference to\\nauthorities used. 7. First, events of Northern kingdom,\\nthen contemporary history of Judah. What connected\\nwith both, related separately under each. 8. Records\\nof kingdoms in separate forms. To give in original\\nwords what is used. Necessary changes not always\\nmade, e. g., staves of ark remain unto this day, as\\nplaced in Solomon s time (BB 100). 9. Isaiah (2 Ki.\\nxviii. 15 -xx. 19 Is. xxxvi.-xxxix). and Chronicles.\\n10. (a) Refers by name to them, (b) Probably State\\nRecords, (c) Of more popular character. About men\\nlike Elijah. (d) Interspersed in general narrative,\\nforming distinct wholes. II. (a) Closely connected\\nwith religious and political movements of nation (BB\\n102). (b) Jeremiah, (c) Without it, would be bald\\nchronicle, (d) In viewing events as so ordered that\\nfaithfulness to God brings blessing, and unfaithfulness\\nHis displeasure and nation s decline, (e) What rebuked,\\nnot neglect of ceremony, but forgetfulness of God. 12.\\nThat was nothing but instruction of prophets (BB\\n104). See OTJC 298 ff. 13. Records of neighboring\\ncountries. 14. Agreement as to date oiFall of Samaria;\\ndiscrepancies before and after (BB 107). Fall of\\nSamaria, B.C. 722. 15. About 480 years each, building\\nof Temple being middle point. 16. That these two\\nperiods divided each into 12 parts.\\nOn religious worship of period, see OTJC, Lect. ix.\\nBOOKS OF CHRONICLES.\\nI. Whence name? 2. By whom divided into two? 3.\\nProbable approximate date and evidence for this 4. (a) Dif-\\nference in conception from all preceding books (b) And in\\nliterary form 5. Chief aspect of the history 6. Restricted\\naim in another respect 7. (a) What form does introduction\\ntake? (b) Aim in view? 8. Probable reason for passing over", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0036.jp2"}, "37": {"fulltext": "Books of Chronicles. 29\\nDavid s reign at Hebron f 9. Sources very likely drawn upon\\nby Author 10. On what ground Chronicles disparaged\\nI. From Jerome, who called them Chronicle of whole\\nof Sacred history. Some editions of Vulgate gave\\nbooks the name Chronicles. LXX applied title mean-\\ning things passed over, i. e., by previous writers not\\na good designation (BB no). 2. LXX. Chronicles with\\nEzra and Nehemiah really form single continuous work\\n(LOT 484). 3. Close of Persian domination, or early\\npart of Grecian, (2) Decaying period of language, (3)\\nlate genealogies (BB 1 10 f.). Di iver thinks date later\\nthan B.C. 300 rather than before (LOT 487). 4. (a)\\nView given of whole period covered by other books\\n(BB 111). (b) Fondness for genealogical lists. 5.\\nReligious more about Temple and c. than wars and\\ngeneral affairs. Same religious interest observable in\\nEzra and Nehemiah. Reass styles entire work Ecclesi-\\nastical Chronicles of Jerusalem (LOT 486). 6. Refer-\\nence almost exclusively to Judah (BB in). 7. (a)\\nAlmost entirely genealogies. {b) To lead up to history\\nof Judah (BB 112). 8. Main interest of author in re-\\nligion and worship. 9. (a) Book of Kings of fudah and\\nIsrael, (b) Samuel and Kings, (c) writings designated by\\nnames of prophetical men, (d) various registers, c.\\n(BB 1 15 f. In many cases, additions by author of Chron-\\nicles show didactic aim, with tendency to refer to moral\\ncauses what happened. Speeches uniformly display\\npeculiarities of Chronicler s own style, and are composed\\nby him (LOT 499). 10. That have little independent\\nvalue that where differ from other books is through\\nmisconceptions of later time or even falsification (BB\\n116 f.). Is considered difficult to take as strictly histor-\\nical what is peculiar to Chronicles. Figures systemati-\\ncally higher than in rest of Old Testament, while there\\nis no reason for supposing text specially corrupt. Scale\\non which events represented is such that had things\\nreally happened just as described they could scarcely\\nhave been passed over by Samuel and Kings. Speeches\\nare from different point of view from that of earlier\\naccounts. Chronicler seems to have reflected spirit of", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0037.jp2"}, "38": {"fulltext": "So Ezra and Nehemiah.\\nown age, and so to have idealized past. But, on other\\nhand, no reason to charge him with wilful perversion.\\nHe merely describes things as he really supposed them\\nto have been (EOT 500 ft.). In Ch 7 vn icles, some think\\nwe have first beginnings of that transformation of history\\ninto Haggadah, which is so conspicuous in later Jewish\\nliterature (Sayce, High. Crit. and Mon., pp. 461 ff.).\\nEven by some writers not in sympathy with modern\\ncriticism in the main, is admitted that Chronicles a\\nsecondarv authority in matters of Israeiitish history\\n{Lex Mosaica, p. 288). See also OTJC 140 ff., BW v.\\n97 ff.\\nFor Speeches, see E (5) i., 241 ff., ii., 140 ff, 286 ff. Midrashic\\nelement, iv., 426 ff.\\nEZRA AND NEHEMIAH.\\nI. Why these books go natural^- together? 2. By what\\nname called in early times? 3. How treated in Hebrew\\nCanon 4. Probable explanation of varying treatment 5.\\nWiry supposed that Ezra, Nehemiah, and Chronicles originally\\none continuous work? 6. Eength of time over which Ezra-\\nNehemiah extends 7. Three divisions of the history 8.\\nTwo prophets belonging to first period 9. How indicated\\nthat in present form books not by Ez?-a and Nehemiah 10.\\nSupposition as to wa}- in which books reached present form\\nII. (a) Noticeable feature as to language? (b) mistaken idea\\nregarding language spoken by returned Exiles 12. New\\nelement in religious history from time of Ezra, and why 13.\\nHow Legalism and Rabbinism the natural fruit\\nI. Ezra and Nehemiah contemporaries. Much about\\nEzra in Nehemiah (BB 120). 2. 1st and 2d Ezra.\\n1 Esdras (so-called in EXX and A. V., though\\nat other times 3 Esdras) is made up mainly from 2\\nChronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. In Vulgate, 1 Esdras", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0038.jp2"}, "39": {"fulltext": "Esther. 31\\nour Ezra, and 2 Esdras our Nehemiah (LI 262,\\nn). 3. Put separately yet regarded as one. 4. Felt to\\nhave common origin in time and situation yet in part\\nto be work of both Ezra and Nehemiah on other hand,\\npresent shape supposed due to common influence. 5.\\nChronicles ends in middle of sentence this carried on in\\nopening words of Ezra (BB 127). 6. About a century,\\ni. e., from first year of Cyrus (B.C. 538) to 32nd year\\nof Artaxerxes (B.C. 432). 7. (1) From first Return to\\ncompletion of Temple, (2) Ezra s leadership of second\\ncolony, (3) joint labors of Ezra and iVehemiah in es-\\ntablishing community at Jerusalem. 8. Haggai and\\nZechariah. 9. In places, times of Ezra and Nehemiah\\nregarded as past. Some lists also belong later (BB 126\\nf.). Some parts written in first person these known as\\nMemoirs others in third (LOT 511). 10. Writings\\nof Ezra and Nehemiah served as nucleus for subsequent\\nwritings of Chronicler (BB 127 f.). 1 1. Some parts in\\nAramaic (LOT 508, 515), i. e., a Western dialect of that\\nlanguage, dialect spoken in Palestine, {b) that Jew T S for-\\ngot Hebrezv in Babylon, and spoke Chaldee on re-\\nturning to their land. Haggai and Zechariah and other\\npost-Exilic writers use Hebrew Aramaic exceptional.\\nGradually, however, Aramaic came into use from asso-\\nciation with neighbors in Palestine. Term Chaldee\\nhere a misnomer (471). 12. Zeal in study of Scripture,\\n(2) Law a sharp separation between Jews and heathen\\n(BB 129). 13. Were result of excessive anxiety to pre-\\nserve nation from surrounding idolatry. There being\\nno longer political independence, all energy devoted to\\nreligion that might else have been bestowed in part upon\\npublic affairs. 1\\nESTHER.\\nI. How Esther strongly distinguished from other books of\\nOld Testament 2. Primary purpose of book 3. To what\\nspecial division of Hagiographa does it belong 4. Show high\\nesteem in which Esther held by later Jews. 5. Probable date\\n1 On Ezra, see K (3) vi., 53 ff., 287 ff.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0039.jp2"}, "40": {"fulltext": "f\\n3 2 Book of Job.\\n6. Character of narrative 7. How book received by Christian\\nwriters, and why\\nI Not part of the connected series only episode.\\nOther features as well place it apart from all other Old\\nTestament books (BB 131). 2. To explain Feast of\\nPurim. 3. Five Rolls, which were read in Synagogue\\nat certain sacred seasons Esther at Feast of Purim (LOT\\n409). 4. Regarded almost as highly as Law itself (BB\\n131). 5. At least not earlier than Chronicle s-Ezra-\\nNehemiah near close of Persian donii?iation (BB 132).\\nBattle of Issus, B.C. 333. 6. Hardly wholly free from\\nimprobabilities. Esther, e. g., it would seem could\\nhardh^ have been queen for at time queen was another\\nwoman, and one unlike Esther in character. Writer at\\nleast seems to have worked up his materials so as to\\nproduce striking effects. Most modern critics suppose a\\nbasis of history, but also elements not strictly historical\\n(LOT 453 f.). 7. Depreciated, canonicity questioned,\\ntone condemned (BB 134). Last of books of Hebrew\\nCanon to obtain sanction in Church (LI 213 f.). Ewald\\nremarks (LOT 457) that in passing to Esther from other\\nbooks of Old Testament we fall from heaven to earth.\\nIn regard to charge of absence of religious spirit mark-\\ning work, Orelli (PRE 2 iv. 347 f.) says that but for the\\nconsciousness that God alone could save from threatened\\ndanger, there would have been no meaning in the fast\\nby which Esther and the others prepared themselves.\\nFurther, that MordecaV s words (Esth. iv. 13 f.) suggest\\nhis reliance upon God s promise of protection to His\\npeople that absence of religious allusions may perhaps\\nbe explained by dislike to introduce such topics on\\nfestal occasion.\\nBOOK OF JOB.\\nI. Contents. Five parts of book\\n(a) Prologue, (b) Debate of Job with Friends, (e)\\nSpeeches of Elihu. (d) Of the Lord out of Storm.\\n(e) Epilogue. (BB 136 ff.)", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0040.jp2"}, "41": {"fulltext": "Book of Job. 33\\n2. Kind of Composition, (i) How may book be de-\\nscribed? (2) Fiction, or History? (3) Why not History?\\n(4) To what class of Hebrew literature belonging\\n(i) Dramatic Poem, but not Drama. (CB xxi.) (2)\\nGenerally considered to have historical basis. (3) In-\\nferred (among other reasons) from (a) Scene in heaven,\\n(b) artistic character of debates (CB xvii). (4) Wisdom\\nLiterature. Book is religious philosophy (CB 385).\\n3. Plan of Work. (1) On what principle speeches ar-\\nranged? (2) Gap occurring\\n(i) Three cycles, of six speeches each, by friends in\\nturn with Job s reply to each. (2) In third cycle,\\nZophar silent.\\n4. Purpose, (i) Problem of book? (2) Idea of which\\nfriends took for granted the correctness? (3) Author s pur-\\npose and where to be found\\n(1) How to reconcile suffering of righteous with\\nrighteousness of God. (2) That suffering a proof of\\nsinfulness, degree of former indicating degree of latter.\\n(3) (a) To combat this idea, and show that suffering not\\nnecessarily punishment may be no more than trial of\\nrighteousness, (b) In Prologue.\\n5. Prologue. (1) Function? (2) Substance? (3) In liter-\\nary form, how do Prologue and Epilogue differ from rest of\\nbook (with unimportant exceptions)\\n(I) Key to action of poem (CB xxx). Even solves\\nmystery that is topic of discussion in poem (CB 25).\\n(2) Job s wealth and piety. His disinterestedness called\\nin question in council of heaven by the Adversary, who\\nthen receives permission to bring disaster upon Job.\\nThis happens, and Job stands test. He is again\\ncommended by the Almighty in the heavenly council,\\nand again Satan is permitted to afflict him, this time the\\nblow falling upon the sufferer s own person. Job still", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0041.jp2"}, "42": {"fulltext": "34 Book of Job.\\nremains true to God. Hearing of his calamities, three\\nof his friends come to condole with him. Then Job\\nloses self-control. (3) Is in prose.\\n6. Job s Attitude to God (1) What point does Job per-\\nsistently maintain (2) Some indications of strength of convic-\\ntion (3) Quote fine passage expressive of Job s determination\\nnot to swerve from his path, come what may. (4) Charges\\nagainst God put into Job s mouth (5) What saved Job from\\nrenouncing God (6) In his sore perplexity Job speaks almost\\nas if were three different Gods; how? (7) Two very striking\\nthoughts arising out of Job s full assurance of ultimate restora-\\ntion to God s favor? (8) (a) Popular Hebrew conception of\\ndeath? (b) Advance beyond it by faith of pious? (c) Peculi-\\narity of Job s position? (9) Meaning of Redeemer as used\\nby Job (10) As to question of a resurrection body, what may\\nwell be the case? (Il) How may we suppose the I^ord s\\nanswer out of storm brought about great change in Job s atti-\\ntude? (12) So far as appears, what the immediate source of\\ninfluence\\n(i) His innocence. (2) (a) Repeatedly expressed\\ndesire to meet Almighty face to face, (b) wish that pro-\\ntestation of innocence could be graven in rock, (c) that\\nhe might have indictment to wear as crown of honor,\\n(d) assurance that time must come when God will\\nacknowledge Job s innocence. (3) Yet shall the\\nrighteous hold on his way, etc. (Ch. xvii. 9). (4) Of\\ninjustice to Job and in world at large of unaccountable\\nhostility to Job of set determination to crush him. (5)\\nUnappeasable longing for restored fellowship with God\\n(CB 80). (6) God of past, who watched over him\\nlovingly; of present, persecuting him; of future, who\\none day will receive him back into gracious favor (CB\\n122). (7) (a) What a precious boon it would be if only", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0042.jp2"}, "43": {"fulltext": "Book of Job. 35\\nGod would hide Job in Sheol, till the day of His anger\\nwas over (CB 103) (b) That even though Job sank\\ninto grave dishonored, and even after his body had\\nperished, Job s righteousness should be vindicated before\\nmen, and that by none other than God Himself. (8) (a)\\nDreamlike existence, (b) That communion with God\\nnot broken off in death. \\\\c) Communion with God already\\nsevered in present life (CB c). (9) Not Deliverer from\\nsin, but Vindicator (R. V. viarg.) from unjust accu-\\nsation. (10) That Job wholly taken up with idea of\\nseeing God question as to how, not present in mind\\n(CB 295). (II) Not by meeting Job s intellectual diffi-\\nculties, but speaking immediately to his spirit, by reve-\\nlation of Himself (CB 277. cf. 259 f.). (12) Divine glory\\nin natural world.\\n7. Treatment of Job by his Friends. (1) Their gradual\\nchange of standpoint (2) What particularly excited their\\nindignation? (3) Probable explanation of Divine condemnation\\nof friends\\n(i) (a) First believe that all will come out well, if\\nonly Job be penitent and patient. The upright never\\ncut off (Ch. iv. 7). {b) Then that Job s obstinate refusal\\nto confess his sin, and Job s daring charges against God\\nare proof of his deserving to the full all the suffering that\\nhas befallen him (Ch. xi. 6). (c) Finally, get so far as\\nto accuse him of definite sins, for which they draw upon\\ntheir imagination (CB 163). (2) Irreverence and bold-\\nness of Job toward God and in speaking of Him. (3)\\nNot, of course, their seeking to justify God s dealings,\\nbut perhaps their disingenuousness in not admitting to\\nbe true what was true (CB 288).\\n8. Its Effect upon Job. (1) Opposite emotions roused in\\nhim (2) Different methods of defence resorted to (3) How\\nreasoning of Friends characterized (4) His only hope\\n(i) Longing for sympathy, and bitter indignation.\\n(2) Argument, sarcasm, personalities. (3) As either", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0043.jp2"}, "44": {"fulltext": "3 6 Book of Job.\\nnot new or not true. That God was great, Job was as\\nwell aware as they in sa} r ing that God prospered the\\ngood and punished the wicked, they described what\\nought to be, not what really was. (4) In turning from\\nthem to God (God as He would some day be).\\n9. Job s Long Monologue (xxvii-xxxi). (1) With what\\nintroduced (2) In what respects does it present great difficul-\\nties (3) Theme of stately lyric it embodies\\n(1) Picture by Job himself of God s greatness (2) (a)\\nAs to sequence of thought, {b) from apparent opposition\\nto Job s previous and subsequent sentiments (CB 186, cf.\\nI 9\u00c2\u00b0)- (3) Wisdom.\\n10. Elihu. (i) Who was Elihuf (2) Reason for taking\\npart in discussion (3) Prevailing view of modern scholars re-\\ngarding these speeches? (4) Why considered that this not\\nportion of original work\\n(l) Youthful bystander. (2) Shocked to hear Job\\ncharge God with injustice, and stirred up against Friends\\nfor lack of success in convincing Job. (3) That were\\nput in at later date. (4) (a) Elihu not named in Prologue\\nor Epilogue, (b) no notice of him by Job, (c) language\\nbetrays later origin, (d) thought to break connection.\\n11. Epilogue. Its subject?\\nRestoration of Job s prosperity.\\n12. Age and Authorship. (1) Earliest probable time of\\ncomposition, and why (2) Why later period (e.g. not earlier\\nthan 7th century .b.c) more likely? (3) Widely separated\\ntimes to which ascribed? (4) In what age, however, scene\\nlaid Reasons for statement\\n(i) (a) Time of Solomon, (b) Strong disposition then\\nshowed itself to discuss such questions as those of this\\nbook. (2) Because was then that generally accepted", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0044.jp2"}, "45": {"fulltext": "Proverbs. 37\\nviews called in question. To do this is purpose of book\\nof Job (CB lxiii.). (3) From days of Patriarchs down to\\npost-Exilic times. (4) Patriarchal. Such the coloring of\\nbook its names of God and its description of life and re-\\nligion of Job s day belong to Patriarchal period (CB lv. f.).\\nOn Job see, Drama in Semitic Liter, BW v. 16 ff. Problem of Suffer-\\ning in O. T., vii., 255 ff., 325 ff. O. T. Wisdom, x., 183 ff. E T v., 505\\nff.,K(5)ii-, 377 ff-, (i)ii-, H7 ff.\\nPROVERBS.\\nI. (a) Of what do first nine chapters consist (b) Fine pas-\\nsage in this division of book? 2. (a) Describe next division, (b)\\nOf what each verse composed 3. How does third division\\n(Chaps, xxii. 17-xxiv. 22) differ in character from previous one\\n4. In what relation do two divisions of book stand to two others\\n5. Striking peculiarity of division (Chap, xxx) containing\\nwords of Agar 6. Another collection bearing name of a\\nperson 7. Of what the last division made up 8. Indication\\nthat many of the proverbs had long been in oral circulation\\n9. Besides the Proverbs, what other portions of Old Testament\\nincluded in Wisdom literature? 10. Show (a) prominence of\\nthe Wise; (b) that not peculiar to Jews. II. (a) Important\\nfeature of other Old Testament books that is absent from\\nWisdom literature (b) With what class in Middle Ages may\\nthe Wise be compared? 12. How Wisdom personified? 13.\\nIn what way might spirit of the Wise in Book of Proverbs be\\ndescribed? 14. How charge to be met that material well-bei?ig\\nusually held out as motive in Proverbs f 15. As regards\\nauthorship, what supposition probable\\nI. (a) Of praise of Wisdom (LOT 370 f.). Verse\\n1 not title to book, but introduction to exhortations\\nfollowing also points forward to collection beginning at", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0045.jp2"}, "46": {"fulltext": "38 Ecclesiastes.\\nChap, x., and expresses worth of these proverbs. Up to\\nthat chapter, proverbs are only here and there (LOT\\n382 f. (b) Personification of Wisdom (Chaps, viii.-ix. 6).\\nLOT 372. 2. (a) Has title Proverbs of Solomon.\\nConsists (x.-xxii. 16) of proverbs in strict sense (LOT\\n372 f.). (b) Single proverbs in two lines. 3. Rather a\\ncollection of maxims with proverbs intermixed than of\\nindividual proverbs (LOT 375). 4. Of Appendix: (1)\\nWords of wise, and these also are sayings of the\\nwise. (2) Proverbs of Solomon, and Proverbs of\\nSolomon which the men oiHezekiah King of Judah copied\\nout (LOT 376). 5- Conspicuous manner in which number\\nfour occurs (LOT 378). 6. Words of Lemuel, a king\\nthe oracle which his mother taught him (xxxi. 1-9).\\nLOT 379. 7. Description of virtuous woman (xxxi. 10-\\n31) verses arranged alphabetically. 8. Proverbs agree-\\ning in one member but differing in others. (BB 173). 9.\\nEcclesiastes, Job, and some Psalms (37, 49, 73), BB 174.\\n10. (a) Old Testament references suggest that were rather\\nprominent class in Israel (LOT 368 f.). {b\\\\ The East and\\nEgypt named as home of some. II. (a) Reference to\\npeculiar features of Jewish nation or religion (LOT\\n369; BB 174 f). (b) Humanists of Israel. 12. As\\nmaster workman assisting God in Creation, and as\\ndirecting affairs of men (LOT 370, cf. 372). 13 Good-\\nnatured, sympathetic, and appreciative (BB 177). 14.\\nMaterial blessings to the Jews a sign of Divine favor (BB\\n179 f. 15. That there is a nucleus the work of Solomon\\nbut that in general the book a collection from many\\ncenturies (BB 183). LOT 383.\\nSee E (3) viii. 193 ff., (4) i. 452 ff. BW i. 365 ff-\\nECCLESIASTES.\\nI. Character. (1) Word that expresses character of whole\\nbook (2) Show how applies to Hebrew title (Qoheleth) (3)\\nVarious views as to nature of work? (4) An instance of\\nauthor s cynicism f (5) Singular estimate of book by a modern\\ncommentator", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0046.jp2"}, "47": {"fulltext": "Ecclesiastes. 39\\n(i) Book an enigma in many ways; even as to very\\npurpose (LE 3 f. [6] (2) Word does not occur else-\\nwhere in this form. Root-idea that of gathering,\\nalways with reference to persons but not certain how\\nroot-idea modified in present instance. Then again, form\\nis feminine how to explain this, another difficulty.\\nGenerally supposed title means one who convenes an\\nassembly. Preacher misleading Ecclesiastes,\\nthough in some respects a good Greek equivalent for the\\nHebrew, itself needs explanation (CB 15 ff., LE 40 [59]\\nff. DB s. v. Eccles (3) (a) Satire on Eastern government,\\n(b) colloquy between two or more voices refuting one\\nanother, \\\\c) soliloquy representing contradictory senti-\\nments, (d collection of many sayings with scarcely any\\nmethod (LE 5 [7]). (4) Qoheleth s depreciation of women\\nOne man among a thousand have I found; but a\\nwoman among all those have I not found (vii. 28).\\n(5) That instead of being the most melancholy book in\\nCanon it is one of the most consolatory and inspiriting\\n(BE 15).\\n2. Design. (1) Some views regarding aim of book? (2)\\nExplanation of marked difference of opinion (3) Two oppo-\\nsite tendencies in interpretation (4) Illustration of extent to\\nwhich writers have read their own fancies into Ecclesiastes\\n(5) General drift of book? (6) Passage from feremiah seem-\\ningly throwing light on meaning here (7) What according\\nto many must be added to this account of the teaching (8)\\nKey-note of book\\n(i) (a) To be record of Solomon s penitence, to\\nteach future life and judgment, (c) to recommend ascetic\\nlife, (d) to advocate (according to some) scepticism;\\naccording to others, utter indifference, or Epicureanism,\\nor pessimism (LE 4 [6] f.). (2) By selecting some and\\nignoring others among contradictory sentiments, it is\\neasy to make book fit in with various theories. For\\nillustrations of how meaning of author has been at times\\nexplained away, cf. LE 32 [44] ff. (3) Depreciating book", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0047.jp2"}, "48": {"fulltext": "4-o Ecclesiastes.\\non one hand, and exalting it on other by making it,\\ne.g., speak almost language of New Testament. (4)\\nA physician (a.d. 1666) tried to show that Solomon\\nfamiliar with modern discoveries of anatomy and with\\ncirculation of blood. But it pleased the I+ord that this\\nknowledge should, with the possessor of it, sink into\\ndust and darkness, where it lay buried for the space of\\ntwenty-five hundred years at the least (C. 156). (5)\\nThat life in every way unsatisfactory best thing possible\\nto enjoy with moderation such pleasures as God puts\\nwithin our reach (LOT 441). (6) Jer. xxii. 15 Did\\nnot thy father eat and drink and do judgment and justice\\nand then it was well with him? (CB 123). (7) The\\nlooking forward to judgment to come. (8) Vanity of\\nvanities, all is vanity. Occurs no less than 39 times\\n(CB 103).\\n3. Author, (i) Reasons for supposing him to have been\\nSolo?no?i? (2) Instance showing recognized incapacity of tra-\\ndition to determine such a point? (3) Reasons for regarding\\nbook not by Solomon, but author as merely personating that\\nking? (4) What to be said to charge oi forgery, then? (5)\\nApproximate date\\n(1) {a) Qoheleth expressly identified i. 1) with son\\nof David, king in Jerusalem Only person answering to\\nthis is Solomon, (b) Both Jewish and Christian tradition\\naccepted Solomonic authorship (CB 196\u00c2\u00b0.; cf. C 244).\\n(2) Tradition affirmed Book of Wisdom to be inspired\\nwork of Solomon, yet not now believed to be so (cf. C\\n254 f. (3) (a) Writer speaks of Solomon as belonging\\nto past (i. 12): I was king over Jerusalem. But\\nSolomon king to the last. Probably to explain this\\ndifficulty that legend of Solomon s dethronement by\\ndemons arose (BE 15 f., C. 245 f., L,E 21 [27]). (b)\\nCondition of things described does not suit Solomon s\\nday (LE 24 [30] ff.) (e) But if things were in his time\\nsuch as here described, was for him to put a stop to these\\nwrongs rather than lament them {d Vitiated language.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0048.jp2"}, "49": {"fulltext": "Ecclesiastes. 4 1\\nDclitzsch If book of Ecclesiastes written in age of Solo-\\nmon, there is no history of Hebrew language (LE 22\\n[28], CB 24). And Ginsburg We could as easily\\nbelieve that Chaucer is the author of Rasselas as that\\nSolomon wrote Koheleth (C. 253, CB 24). (4) No\\nmore so than certain ancient books, e. g. some writings\\nof Plato, or books of modern poets (LE 21 [27], CB\\n20 f.). (5) Second or third century B.C. Perhaps\\nvery latest book of Old Testament Canon (LE 29 [41],\\nCB 29 fT.).\\n4. Inconsistencies. (1) Mention some instances where\\nsame thing is at one moment commended highly and the next\\ndisparaged. (2) How these contradictions to be accounted\\nfor? (3) Sometimes, writer had his darkness relieved, if only\\nfor a moment, by some thought of brightness illustrate. (4)\\nIn midst of all these conflicting feelings, what would seem to\\nhave kept him from utter scepticism\\n(i) Speaking of (a) Wisdom, he says (ii. 15) As it\\nhappeneth to the fool, so will it happen even to me\\nand asks, Why was I then more wise On the\\nother hand (vii. 11, 12), Wisdom is as good as an in-\\nheritance, yea, more excellent is it. And {b) of Life (ii.\\n17) So I hated life again (vii. 1), the day of\\ndeath [is better] than the day of one s birth. Yet so\\nmuch better is life than death that (ix. 4) a living dog\\nis better than a dead lion. (c) In inculcating the fear\\nof God, Qoheleth knows (viii. 12 f.) that it shall be well\\nwith them that fear God, which fear before him but it\\nshall not be well with the wicked. Nevertheless, he\\ndeclares (ix. 2 ff.) All things come alike to all there\\nis one event to the righteous and to the wicked, as is\\nthe good, so is the sinner. And the dead know not\\nanything, neither have they any more reward (cf.\\nLE 112 [170]). {d) So again as regards his continually\\nrepeated counsel to make the most of the opportunities for\\nhappiness in life, he gives his readers to understand that,\\neven if they do, it may not help matters for that (ix.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0049.jp2"}, "50": {"fulltext": "4 2 Ecclesiastes.\\nn) the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the\\nstrong, bnt that time and chance happeneth to them\\nall. And in respect to a coming judgment, he bids\\nthe young man rejoice, indeed, in his youth, but know\\nthou, he adds (xi. 9), that for all these things God\\nwill bring thee into judgment. (Cf. L,E 128 [193]). Yet\\nthe next moment we hear that men are no better off than\\nthe beasts. Even one thing (iii. 19) befalleth them;\\nas the one dieth, so dieth the other man hath no\\npre-eminence above the beasts all are of the dust,\\nand all turn to dust again. Who knoweth the spirit of\\nman, he inquires, whether it goeth upward, and the\\nspirit of the beast, whether it goeth downward to the\\nearth? (2) By changing moods of Author (cf. L,E\\n94 [142]). (3) (a) Of the joy of sunshine (xi. 7)\\nTruly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for\\nthe eyes to behold the sun. Or again (iii. 11) He\\nhath made everything beautiful in its time. (b) Of\\nthe possibility that God will some day make a difference\\nbetween good men and bad men (iii. 17) I said in\\nmine heart, God shall judge the righteous and the\\nwicked. (4) His fear of God (LE 100 [149] f).\\n5. Analogies with Job. (i) Some resemblances between\\nQoheleth and Job? (2) Suggested analogy as to plan of work\\n(i) In (a) charges brought against God s government\\nof world, e. g. in passage already cited (ix. 2 ff.\\nAll things come alike to all, c. (b). the short-\\nlived feeling that a time would come when God would\\ndo away with the seeming injustice of His rule on\\nearth. (2) That just as writer of Job used debates in that\\nbook as a means of discussing the problem of the work,\\nso here autobiographical sketch of Solomon serves a similar\\npurpose (DB i. 637, b).\\n6. Closing Chapters, (i) In the picture of man s decay\\nand death (xii.), what the two chief lines of interpretation?\\n(2) For all these things God will bring thee into judgment\\n(xi. 9, cf. xii. 14) to what question is there no perfectly", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0050.jp2"}, "51": {"fulltext": "Ecclesiastes. 43\\nclear answer? (3) And what must be said regarding the\\nspirit s return unto God who gave it (4) Fitness of these\\nchapters as a Lesson on last Sunday of Christian year\\n(i) That death represented as storm coming on or\\nthat we have description of physical effects of old age and\\ndeath (CB 213). (2) What and where this judgment is\\nto be. The words are hanging, as it were, in the sky\\nvague, undefined, unexplained, yet not to be conjured\\naway or treated as of little moment (LE 128 [193]).\\nReason why by some not taken in natural sense is\\nbecause are thought out of harmony with general tone\\nof book. Many feel this not to be decisive. (3) To\\nhim it will return. More he says not. We\\nmust not press his words too far. As just now, he spoke\\nof judgment, but gave us no picture of the sheep on the\\nright hand, the goats on the left, so here he has no more\\nto say, no clear and dogmatic assertion of a conscious\\nand separate future life (EE 131 [196]). (4) If the\\nfinal portion of the very latest of Old Testament books,\\nthey represent the sigh, so to speak, for more light,\\nthe sense of weariness and dejection that falls sometimes\\nupon the troubled human spirit as the night becomes\\nmore intense before the first glimmering of dawn\\n(LE 123 [187]).\\n7. Epilogue. (1) Where supposed to begin (2) Obvious\\nchange in form (3) Writer (4) On view that by later hand,\\npurpose of Epilogue\\n(i) By some at xii. 8 by others at xii. 9. (2)\\nAuthor now spoken of in third person. (3) Many think\\nnot by author of book. (4) To explain true meaning\\nof book (CB 225 EE 131 [196]\\n8. Presence in Canon. In connection with disputes among\\nJews as to fitness of book to be in Canon, what opinion gener-\\nally held", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0051.jp2"}, "52": {"fulltext": "44 Song of Solomon.\\nThat they were after it was already in Canon. Ac-\\ncording to Jewish tradition, canonically discussed and\\nratified at Council oi famnia (a.d. 90 and 118.) COT\\n138 cf. 195 CB 27 f.\\n9. Value. Point out some ways in which fitness of book\\nto be in Holy Scripture may be seen.\\n(i) Was specially fitted to speak to men of writer s\\nown age (BB 191 f. (2) Appeals ever to one of soul s\\nmoods. There is a mood of melancholy and sadness\\nto which in one form or other the human soul is liable\\nand this has found its most complete expression in Ec-\\nclesiastes (LOT 444 cf. LE 39 [52] (3) For all\\nthe sense of dissatisfaction and gloom that pervades\\nbook, writer cannot give up fear of God. And though,\\nas some think, it be in no clear, unmistakable language\\nthat the world to come is made mention of, yet it is much,\\nunder the circumstances, that it should appear at all.\\nThat one should see the misery of existence as only the\\npessimist can see it that the writer could be brought by\\nhis own stern logic to a point where it is but an easy\\nstep to Atheism, and yet not only not take this step but\\nfeel no slightest impulse to take it, may well, says Cor-\\nnill, be regarded as a notable triumph for Old Testament\\npiety. No more than a postulate Qoheletti s faith may\\nhave been, yet it was just as much a part of his own\\nmind as misery and disappointment were part of the life\\naround him. He could not by its help, indeed, explain\\nthe mysteries that encompassed him he simply fell back\\nupon this the faith of his childhood {Einleit. S. 248). (4)\\nIf for us Christians it served no other end, the book\\nwould at least be as a dark back ground for our faith\\n(IvEioS [165] f.).\\nCourse of Thought, BW iv. 326 ff., cf. i. 453 ff. Was Koheleth a\\nSceptic? E(5) ix. 389 ff.\\nSONG OF SOLOMON.\\nIn Hebrew, title is Song- of Songs (as also in R. V.). Canticles, from\\nVulgate {Canticum Canticoruni).", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0052.jp2"}, "53": {"fulltext": "Song of Solomon. 45\\n1. Author, (i) Some grounds for not considering Solomon\\nthe Author (2) Date suggested by many, and why\\n(i) (a) Improbable that fine eulogy of Love near end\\nis by one who (1 Kings xi. 3) had 700 wives and 300\\nconcubines (ASS 11). {b) No evidence, either in history\\nor this book, of Solomon s reformation of character (ASS\\n7). (e) Shepherd theory thought to fit poem so\\nmuch better. (2) Tenth century B.C. Because of way in\\nwhich Tirzah and Jerusalem spoken of, Tirzah having\\nbeen capital of northern kingdom at this time (LOT\\n423). Also general language and style supposed to in-\\ndicate origin in flourishing age of literature. On other\\nhand, from certain peculiarities of language post-Exilic\\ndate has been inferred (cf. BB 196).\\n2. Character. (1) Two opposite conceptions as to literary\\nfor??i (2) Reasons for accepting unity of poem\\n(i) That it is a collection of independent love-songs,\\n(d) a continuous poem. (2) (a) Has form of dialogue, for\\nmost part with same characters, (b) one and same fe?nale\\nfigure appears throughout {E?icycl. Britann., s. v. Can-\\nticles).\\nMost obscure book in whole Bible. Has been variously explained\\n(among other views) as setting forth love of Jehovah for Israel as giving\\nhistory from Exodus to the coming of the Messiah as referring to union\\nof Soul with Body as conversation of Solomon with Wisdom as pro-\\nphecy of Church from the Crucifixion tilt after the Reformation as\\nintended to glorify the Virgin Mary (HI 32 f. GSS 101 f.).\\n3. Interpretation. (1) Three schools of interpreters (2)\\nWhich the earliest known of the three (3) First certain ap-\\npearance of Allegorical interpretation of the Song (4) In\\nwhat way this method of interpretation long used by Jews\\n(5) How does Typical method differ from Allegorical? (6)\\nDifferent views regarding the Shulamite f (7) Objections to\\nAllegorical and Typical interpretations (8) Yet with what\\nqualification (9) Besides understanding poem in natural", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0053.jp2"}, "54": {"fulltext": "4 6 Song of Solomon.\\nsense alone, in what other point does modern view differ from\\ntraditional (10) Grounds for adopting Shepherd theory\\n(il) What, however, to be noted? (12) One source of diffi-\\nculty in interpreting poem\\n(i) Those taking the poem as {a) intended purely in\\nnatural sense, Kb) allegorical, (c) typical. (2) Allegori-\\ncal Jewish interpretation of love of Jehovah to Israel\\nbeing modified by early Christian Church to adapt to\\nChristianity. Some, however, have supposed love in-\\ntended to be between Christ and the individual soul (BB\\nJ 93)- (3) I n writings of Origen (a.d. 185-284). Wright,\\nIntrod. to O. T., p. 171. (4) In poetical paraphrases.\\nduring Middle Ages, to give consolation to dispersed and\\nsuffering Jews (GSS 38 ff. (5) In latter, Solomon and\\nShulamite mere figiwes standing for something higher\\nin former, relation of love between Solomon and Shula-\\nmite really existed, but only object in describing it is to\\ntypify spiritual relations (BB 194). (6) (a) That she was\\nPharaoh s daughter, wife of Solomon, (b) a 3 oung wo-\\nman of Galilee. (7) {a) No evidence to favor these\\nmethods (ASS 49); (b) contrary to usual rule that alle-\\ngories indicated as such (GSS 119 f.), (c) sense complete\\nin itself, (d) Solomon not fitted to represent Christ (GSS\\n122). (8) That not necessarily objectionable, provided\\nit be understood that these meanings not intended by\\nwriter (LI 405 f. But cf. ASS 51 f.). (9) In supposing\\ntwo lovers, i. e. a shepherd youth, in addition to Solomon.\\n(10) [a) Not to be supposed that Solomon would be repre-\\nsented as peasant, without reason given, (b) difference in\\ntone between manner of King s address to Shula??iite and\\nthat of supposed shepherd, (c) so with replies of Shula-\\nmite to them both, (d) separation (on theory of one\\nlover only) on wedding-day improbable, (e) Shep-\\nherd theory brings catastrophe at end, Solomon\\ntheory at middle, thus depriving of motive the second\\nhalf of book (ASS 76\u00c2\u00b0.). (il) That modern view by no\\nmeans claims to be full} established. It is only that it\\nappears much better than anj^ of older theories. In any\\ncase, good deal has to be assumed (LOT 411). (12) That", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0054.jp2"}, "55": {"fulltext": "Jeremiah. 47\\ndifferent parts not marked by names of different charac-\\nters. Some help, however, in change from masculine to\\nfeminine, singular to plural, and vice versa.\\nThe shepherd was regarded as the Shulamite s accepted lover by Ibn\\nEzra in 12th century, and by another Jewish writer in the 14th (GSS 46,\\n56). The first to adopt modern view as to design of book was a Jewish\\npoet in first quarter of present century (ibid. p. 59).\\n4. Analysis. Story of poem on modern view\\n(LOT 410 f.) Beautiful Shulamite maiden surprised\\nby King and retinue on royal progress, and brought to\\nhis palace in Jerusalem. There King tries to win her\\nheart and persuade her to live at court. But she is al-\\nready pledged to a young shepherd, and the King s love\\nand flattery cannot move her. At last, she is allowed to\\nreturn home, where, at close of poem, the lovers appear\\ntogether and extol the worth of genuine love as com-\\npared with that which money and rank can buy.\\n5. Purpose. (1) How differs on old and new view respec-\\ntively (2) A lesser purpose which, it has been suggested,\\nbook may have been intended to serve\\n(i) (a) To show triumph of love over polygamy, (b)\\nto exhibit fidelity of true love (LI 211 f.). (2) Conse-\\ncration of love of nature (LI 212 cf. LE 12 [15], Stanley,\\nJC, ii. 241, LOT 420 f.).\\nSee, Study of Form and Contents of S.S., BW ii. 247-258. Reference\\nto Budde s view that S.S. is collection of folk-songs to be used at Hebrew\\nwedding festivities, ET v. 340 ff., cf. BW v. 208 ff. Paraphrase of S.,\\nET vii. 105 ff., 170 ff.\\nJEREMIAH.\\nI. Relation, in time, of Jeremiah to Isaiah f 2. What\\nknown of Jeremiah s birthplace and family 3. National\\npolicy opposed by him Account of this policy. 4. Trace\\nconnection between history of Egypt and Judah from time of\\nManasseh to destruction of Jerusalem. 5. Subsequent history", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0055.jp2"}, "56": {"fulltext": "48 Jeremiah.\\nof Jeremiah 6. In whose reign did his prophetical activity\\nbegin 7. Extent to which religious reform carried 8. As\\nlast resort, what counsel given by prophet 9. Treatment of\\nJeremiah at hands of his people 10. Changed estimate of his\\nwritings subsequently? II. How did his prophecies come to\\nbe written 12. Group among his prophecies similar to some\\nin Isaiah and Ezekiel f 13. Feature almost absent from prophe-\\ncies of Jeremiah 14. By what conception does Jeremiah sur-\\npass in spirituality every other prophet 15. Chief thought\\npresented by prophet 16. Features rendering book less inter-\\nesting than writings of other prophets 17. From what source\\nchap. 52 derived 18. Two ways in which chronological\\norder disturbed 19. As to present arrangement, what view\\nimprobable 20. Principal differences between Hebrew text\\nand LXX\\nI. Born shortly before death of latter (BB 217). 2.\\nIn Anathoth, a little north of Jerusalem. Of priestly\\nfamily. (LOT 232.) 3. Of courting friendship of\\nEgypt. Egypt had risen again into power and become\\nrival of Assyria (BB 218). 4. In Manasseh s time\\nEgypt once more a great power, and disposition began\\nin Judah which Jeremiah discouraged. In opposing\\nKing of Egypt, Josiah lost his life at Megiddo. Four\\nyears after, Nebuchadnezzar defeats Egyptians at Carche-\\nmish, and Jehoiakim, son of Josiah, becomes subject to\\nBabylon. Rebels, and Jerusalem falls, and its king is\\nslain. His son Jehoiachin {Jeconiah, Coniah) with\\nflower of land carried to Babylon, Zedekiah {Mattaniah)\\nbeing permitted to reign over remnant. Zedekiah seeks\\nalliance with Egypt, whereupon Chaldeans capture Jeru-\\nsalem, Temple is destroyed, king with other captives\\ntaken to Babylon, and Gedaliah made Governor of Judah.\\n5. Carried to Egypt by murderers of Gedaliah. Tradi-\\ntion of his death by stoning is of little worth (BB 219\\nCC 54, a [143]). 6. In 13th year of Josiah (BB 221). 7.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0056.jp2"}, "57": {"fulltext": "Lamentations. 49\\nOpen idolatry abandoned, outward regard for religion\\nmaintained. 8. To submit to Chaldeans. 9. His writ-\\nings publicly burned, himself thrust into the stocks, and\\nimprisoned (BB 224). 10. Restored Jews greatly influ-\\nenced by his writings. In days of Christ was expected\\nJeremiah would come to prepare way for Messiah. II.\\nProphet commanded by Jehovah to write in roll all he\\nhad spoken. This dictated to Baruch. Next 3^ear roll\\nread before people. Read also before Jehoiakim by\\nJehoiakim s order. King in anger cuts up roll and\\ncasts it into fire. Second roll prepared with additions\\n(LOT 234). This probably nucleus of our present book\\n(CC c). 12. Prophecies concerning foreign nations\\n(xlvi-li). Among them a long one against Babylon.\\nCyrus referred to. Thought by some not to be by Jere-\\nmiah (LOT 250 ff.). 13. Messianic prophecy (BB 225).\\n14. Of the New Covenant (xxxi. 31-34). LOT 257.\\n15. Purely ethical nature of Jehovah and inwardness of\\nrelation to minds of His servants. What needed by\\npeople, not reform but regeneratio?i (CC 54, b [144]).\\n16. Sameness of language and of stor}^. With perhaps\\nexception of Ezekiel, less studied than any book of Old\\nTestament (BB 227). 17. Taken by compiler of Jere-\\nmiah from 2 Kings xxiv. 18-xxv. 30, historical account\\nof capture of Jerusalem by Chaldeans (LOT 252). 18.\\nSome narrative sections disjoined from discourses to\\nwhich refer some passages brought together on account\\nof common subject, though of different dates (CC 54, b\\n144]). 19. That prophecies placed in present order by\\nJeremiah or even by Baruch (LOT 254). 20. Groups\\nof prophecies on foreign nations differently arranged.\\nNearly 3000 words in Hebrew text left out in LXX\\n(BB 228).\\nOn Jeremiah, see E (5) i. 66 ff. {Stalker) (4) iv. 241 ff. Short Papers\\non, B (1) vii. 241 ff., 358 ff, 453 ff, viii. 59 ff., 230 ff, xi. 65 ff.\\nLAMENTATIONS.\\nI. Of what does book consist 2. Common characteristics\\nof three of these Elegies 3. General subject of all five 4.\\n4", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0057.jp2"}, "58": {"fulltext": "50 Ezekiel.\\nHow does subject of third differ from all rest 5. As to Au-\\nthorship, difference between LXX and Hebrew text 6. State\\ncase regarding authorship. 7. If not by Jeremiah, by whom\\nI. Five Elegies. 2. Each begins with word How\\nand is alphabetical; i. e., every verse, half- verse, or\\nsmall group of verses, begins with letter of alphabet.\\nBut there are slight irregularities in this respect. 3.\\nJerusalem after capture x Chaldeans. 4. In being\\nmore personal I am the man that hath seen affliction,\\netc. 5. LXX especially ascribes book to Jeremiah; his\\nname omitted in Hebrew text. LXX It came to\\npass, after Israel was taken captive and Jerusalem made\\ndesolate, that Jeremiah sat weeping, and lamented this\\nlamentation over Jerusalem. Jewish and Christian\\nwriters ascribe to Jeremiah. 6. On whole, balance of\\ninternal evidence against Jeremiah s authorship. 7. A\\ncontemporary.\\nSee K (4) v. 65 ff. {Stalker).\\nEZEKIEL.\\nI. Where did Ezekiel prophesy 2. Position in life 3.\\nWhen prophetic call received 4. Prophetical contempora-\\nries 5. Relation between Ezekiel and fellow-exiles 6. Sub-\\njects of the three sections of book 7. As to unity of book\\n8. How does first section open 9. In prophecies on foreign\\nnations how is Ezekiel s point of view unlike that of Amos,\\nIsaiah, or Jeremiah f 10. In prophecy of restoration of Israel\\nwhat striking symbolism used by prophet? II. Character of\\nEzekiel s vision and description of restored Temple f 12. Two\\nimportant points in connection with this prophecy 13. Fea-\\ntures omitted from Ezekiel s description of Temple service 14.\\nNew Junctionary named? 15. As respects Temple, what dif-\\nference comes out between Ezekiel and prophets generally\\n16. Aim of Ezekiel s entire system of regulations for Temple", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0058.jp2"}, "59": {"fulltext": "Ezekiel. 51\\n17. Similarity between vision of Ezekiel and that in last chap-\\nter of Revelation f 18. As to nature of his prophesying, con-\\ntrast between Ezekiel and most of the prophets 19. Plan of\\nwork contrasted with that of writings of Isaiah and Jeremiah f\\n20. As to method of teaching, three things in particular char-\\nacteristic of book 21. What may be supposed regarding\\nnature of symbolical actions\\nI. In land of captivity (BB 233). 2. Priest. 3.\\nFifth year (b.c. 592) of Jehoiachirt s captivity. 4. Jere-\\nmiah and Daniel. 5. Of antagonism. Ezekiel did not\\nspeak openly among them addressed only those who\\nvisited him in his house. Yet upon Exiles it was that\\nhe fixed his hopes for future. Zedekiah and Jews at Je-\\nrusalem he gave up (EOT 261). 6. (a) Approaching\\nfall of Jerusalem, (b) prophecies on foreign nations, (c)\\nIsrael s future restoration. 7. From first to last, bears\\nstamp of one mind. 8. With vision of majesty of Je-\\nhovah Four Cherubim appear from out of storm-cloud\\nand a chariot. Supported on heads of Cherubim, a\\nfirmament, and on firmament a throne with Divine Form\\nupon it (LOT 262). 9. Ezekiel brings out fact that fall\\nof Jerusalem not purely a triumph for heathen. Similar\\nfate will befall them (EOT 268). 10. Vision of Valley\\nof dry bones (EOT 273). II. (chapters xl.-xlviii.).\\nMost obscure of all his prophecies (BB 238). 12. {a)\\nTemple not restored on lines of this vision, but in main\\nafter Solomon s Temple {b) physical impossibility of car-\\nrying out prophet s details. Natural boundaries pre-\\nscribed, i. e., between Sea and Jordan, several miles too\\nnarrow to fill out assignment for Temple and Priests and\\nEevites. 13. Ark of Covenant, High Priest, Pentecost,\\nand Day of Atonement. (BB 239). 14. The Prince,\\nwhose duty was to provide sacrifices. 15. Greater im-\\nportance attached to ceremonial observances of religion\\n(EOT 274). 16. To secure sanctity of Temple and holi-\\nness of people. Ideal element evidently present in Eze-\\nkiel s account. 17. Eiving waters (xlvii.) flowing from\\nunder altar and into Dead Sea, making latter sweet (BB", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0059.jp2"}, "60": {"fulltext": "52 Daniel.\\n239). 18. Theirs spontaneous his often the result of\\nreflection (LOT 278). 19. Methodically arranged, seem-\\ningly by prophet s own hand. 20. Symbolical figures,\\nsymbolical actions, visions (CBxxv. 21. Were, at any\\nrate some of them, imagined merely e. g. (iv. 5), lying\\non his side immovable for 190 days (ibid. xxix.).\\nOn Ezekiel, see BW v. 248 ff.\\nDANIEL.\\nI. In which division of Hebrew 7 Scriptures does Daniel stand\\n2. Peculiarity as to language f 3. Subjects of the two parts of\\nbook 4. Describe more fully former half. 5. Account of\\ncolossal image in Nebuchadnezzar s dream? 6. Traditional\\nview regarding empires intended? 7. What that of many\\nmodern interpreters 8. Describe Nebuchadnezzar s dream of\\nthe mighty tree, and its interpretation. 9. Daniel s Vision of\\nthe Four Beasts 10. Vision generally supposed to refer to\\nAntiochus Epiphanes II. Period represented y Seventy Weeks\\nand how commonly interpreted 12. General outline of vision\\nof Daniel by the Hiddekelf 13. What supposed by many re-\\ngarding date of book? 14. (1) Three-fold evidence on which\\nlate authorship based? (2) Under first head, difficulty con-\\nnected with Belshazzar f (3) Foreign elements in language (4)\\nWhat noteworthy regarding Aramaic and Hebrew of Daniel (5)\\nDoctrines taught in more developed form than elsewhere in\\nOld Testament, and somewhat resembling literature of period\\nmuch later than Daniel? 15. What suggested idea that book\\nprobably belongs to age of Antiochus Epiphanes 16. On\\nsupposition of this late authorship, how book to be explained\\n17. Feature not excluded by modern view 18. What con-\\nsidered Author s motive in narrative parts? 19. How does", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0060.jp2"}, "61": {"fulltext": "Daniel. 53\\nbook differ from earlier prophets in its view of history 20.\\nAs prophet, how does Daniel differ from other prophets\\nI. Hagiographa. 2. Partly Hebrew, partly Ara?naic.\\n3. (a) History of Daniel (i-vi.), visions attributed to\\nhim (LOT 458). 4. Made up of several loosely joined\\nsections, each a complete narrative in itself (BB 241).\\n5. Head of gold, silver breast and arms, body brass, legs\\niron, feet iron and clay mixed. Stone cut out without\\nhands suddenly falls, smites feet, which then break up,\\nwhile stone becomes mountain filling whole earth LOT\\n459). 6. (a) Chaldean, (b) Medo-Persian (Cyrus), {c)\\nMacedonian, then Seleucidce (Antioch), and Ptolemies, (d)\\nRo?nan. Stone regarded as representing Kingdon of God.\\n7. (a) Chaldean, (b) Media?i, (c) Persian, (d) Macedo?iian.\\n8. Head towering to heaven, beasts and fowls sheltered\\nby branches. Nebuchadnezzar hears command for its\\ndestruction. Tree symbolized King who was to be\\nhumbled and for seven years bereft of reason (LOT 460).\\n9. Saw rising from Sea a lion with eagle s wings, a bear,\\nleopard with four wings and four heads, and a fourth beast\\nwith iron teeth, destroying all things, and with ten\\nhorns. A little horn springs up and roots out three\\nof others. Celestial assize held. Beast is slain, and one\\nlike unto a son of man, i.e., in human form, comes\\nwith clouds of heaven into presence of the Almighty and\\nreceives from Him universal dominion (LOT 462). 10.\\nOf he-goat from West meeting ram from East. In place\\nof broken horn of goat, four other horns rose up. Out of\\none of these comes little horn, taken to mean A?itiochus\\nEpiphanes. Angel Gabriel explains meaning to Daniel,\\nthough name of Antiochus does not appear. He-goat\\nrepresents Greeks with Alexander four horns being\\nfour kingdoms into which at his death Macedonian\\nempire divided (LOT 465). Antiochus ascended throne\\nB.C. 176. II. (a) Time taken fully to atone for iniquity\\nof people. Seventy years of Captivity being nearly up,\\nDaniel implores God to look favorably upon His people.\\nGabriel explains that not 70 years, but 70 weeks of years\\nrequired, (b) As prediction of death of Christ, and de-\\nstruction of Jerusalem by Titus. View labors under", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0061.jp2"}, "62": {"fulltext": "54 Daniel.\\nserious difficulties. No unobjectionable interpretation 3-et\\nfurnished (IX)T 464 f. 12. Angel prevented hitherto by\\nprince [guardian angel] of Persia, but being now\\nassisted by Michael, prince of Jews, comes to Daniel\\nand tells of long contest he (the angel) and Michael will\\nhave on behalf of Daniel. Then struggles are related\\nof succeeding centuries. History of Antiochus most fully\\ndescribed of all. Death of Antiochus followed by resur-\\nrection of Israel. Finally, advent of Messianic age an-\\nnounced (LOT 466). 13. Not earlier than circ. B.C. 300,\\nand written in Palestine. Probably composed under per-\\nsecution of Antiochus {circ. B.C. 168) LOT 467. 14. (1)\\nFacts of historical nature, (b) language, (c) theology\\n(LOT 467. 469, 477). (2) Is called King of Babylon and\\nNebuchadnezzar called his father. Last king of Babylon,\\nNabonidus no relation to Nebuchadnezzar (LOT 468).\\n(3) Persian words very numerous. Also, are a few Greek\\n(LOT 469^. (4) Aramaic is Western dialect, such as\\nspoken in Palestine. Hebrew resembles that of age sub-\\nsequent to A T ehemiah (LOT 471 ff.) (5) Doctrines of\\nMessiah, Angels, Resurrection, Judgment of world.\\nGeneral atmosphere and tone of book not those of Kxile\\n(LOT 477). 15. Culmination of interest in relations of\\nJews with Antiochus.\\nProphets generally encouraged people in hour of actual need. But Dan-\\niel shows no interest in contemporaries nor does he anticipate the Return\\nlooks to remote deliverance. After time of Antiochus, picture given is\\nless distinct. If book by writer in time of Antiochus, all becomes clear\\n(DOT 478). That work as we have it now is b} 7 one living in days of that\\nruler, is accepted by even moderate critics (ibid. 483). Cf. LI 215.\\n16. By regarding author as offering consolation\\nhis age needed on account of persecutions that were\\narising. 17. Predictive element. 18. Not merely to\\ndescribe events in Daniel s life, but to magnify God of\\nDaniel (LOT 479). 19. Embraces much more. Is con-\\ntinuous succession of empires. (LOT 480). 20. No\\nspecial authority as prophet laid claim to. No Thus\\nsaith the Lord (LOT 481).\\nSome Queries about Daniel, BW vi. 264. Recent discoveries and Book\\nof Daniel, E (3) i. 217 ff., 431 ff., ii. 437 ff.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0062.jp2"}, "63": {"fulltext": "Hosea. 55\\nHOSEA.\\n1. Contemporaries. Position of Hosea among contempo-\\nraneous prophets\\nYounger contemporary of Amos older, of Isaiah and\\nMicah (DP 107).\\n2. Hosea and Amos. (1) How has distinction between\\ncharacter of teaching of Amos and Hosea respectively been ex-\\npressed (2) Difference in regard to nature of prophetic call\\nin two cases? (3) Another consideration tending to influence\\npersonal feelings of each\\n(i) Former taught that God is Justice latter,\\nGod is Love (Cornill, Der Israel. Prophetismus, S. 48)\\nformer was prophet of Conscience latter, prophet\\nof Repentance (BT i. 229). (2) With A?nos, came from\\nwithout The lion hath roared, who will not fear\\nThe Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy?\\n(Amos iii. 8). To Hosea, came in bitterness of own\\nsoul. (3) Both, prophets to Israel but former an out-\\nsider, latter himself a subject of northern kingdom (PI\\n154\\n3. Hosea s Marriage. (1) (a) Relation in which Jehovah\\ndescribed as standing to Israel? (b) What led to this treat-\\nment of subject? (c) View taken of Hosea s marriage f (d)\\nOther views (e) Explanation considered to justify opinion\\nthat Hosea married in ignorance of woman s real character?\\n(f) Support idea of this ignorance receives from typical mean-\\ning of incident? (2) Difference between Semitic idea of union\\nof god with a land and Hosea s of relation of Jehovah to Israel\\n(3) What specially constituting Israel s unfaithfulness as spouse\\nof Jehovah? (4) Before Jehovah s compassion could receive\\nback Israel, what first needed?", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0063.jp2"}, "64": {"fulltext": "56 Hosea.\\n(i) (a) Husband, {b) Hosea s own domestic experience.\\n(c) That wife chosen in ignorance of true character (BT i.\\n236 ff., DP 117 ff., PI 180 ff., E (4) in. 7Q f.)- (d) That\\nwhole story allegorical that is in all points to be taken\\nliterally. {e) That Hosea referred his knowledge after-\\nwards acquired of God s purpose, back to time when\\nthat purpose entered upon its fulfilment, i. e., the day of\\nbetrothal (BT i. 238). Hosea represents earliest\\nrelations of Israel to Jehovah as innocent. (2) Former\\nphysical latter moral. On former view, a god simply\\nthe great ancestor of his people (PI 168). Jehovah s\\nrelation by grace, not by nature He had adopted Israel\\n{ibid. 169). Further, bride not the land, but the people.\\nCorn, wine, etc. were love-gifts from husband to wife\\nShe did not know that I gave her the corn, and the\\nwine, and the oil, etc. {Hosea ii. 8). BT i. 243. (3)\\nHer going after the Baalim, images nominally repre-\\nsenting Jehovah, but worshipped as heathen worshipped\\ntheir deities {Hosea ii. 5, cf. 8, 12). BT i. 243 f. (4)\\nIsrael s discipline. This the Exile was to be (BT i.\\n245 ff-).\\n4. Two Parts of Book. (1) Contrast as to times described\\nrespectively in former and latter (larger) part (2) Character\\nof second part? (3) Striking indication of deep moral decay\\nin second period\\n(i) (a) Prosperous reign of Jeroboam II. (b.c. 790), {b)\\ndisintegration of nation in following reigns. (2) Diffi-\\ncult to interpret. Due in part to corrupt text, in part to\\nemotional character.\\nIt is as if prophet cannot think out things and reason out things.\\nHe sways like a pendulum from one extreme to another now blazing\\nindignation against the people s wickedness and blindness and madness,\\nand the next moment lamenting over them like a mother over her only-\\nson (E (4) iii. 71). Text one of most dilapidated in the Old Testa-\\nment, and in parts beyond possibility of repair (BT i. 220).\\n(3) That even priests and prophets corrupt.\\nL,et none find fault and none upbraid, for my people are but as their\\npriestlings. O priest, thou hast stumbled to-day and stumble to-night\\nshall the prophet with thee (emended text, iv. 4. BT i. 257).", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0064.jp2"}, "65": {"fulltext": "Joel. 57\\n5. Romance of early history of Israel\\nThat Jehovah called puny race as chosen people, pass-\\ning over Assyria, Egypt, etc.\\nGod s eyes, that passed unheeded the adult princes of the world, fell\\nupon this little slave-boy, and He gave him a career From Egypt I\\ncatted him to be my son (BT i. 291).\\nOn Hosea, see BW v. 461 f., xii. 257 ff., E (1) ix. 241 ff. {A. B. Davidson)\\nx. 422 ff.\\nJOEL.\\nI. Where probably did Joel prophesy? 2. How does case\\nstand as to his belonging to priesthood f 3. And as to date of\\nprophet 4. Condition of country 5. Part performed by\\nprophet in emergency 6. Point noteworthy in his account of\\nthe plague 7. In what way announcement introduced of\\nGod s world-wide plan? 8. What represented as required by\\nnation s consecration 9. Of what the outpouring of the\\nSpirit the precursor? 10. As to Joel s prophecy, give view\\nopposed to that presented in Answ. 5. 1 1. Three theories\\nabout the locusts 12. Wide range of dates assigned to\\nprophecy? 13. Between what two dates does question practi-\\ncally lie? 14. What probably the one sure inference as to\\ndate? 15. Two striking characteristics of Joel s style? 16.\\nHow has limitation of his religious range been exaggerated\\nI. Written and published in Jerusalem (BB 260). 2.\\nCan neither be proved nor disproved. 3. Nothing defi-\\nnite known only matter of conjecture from book itself.\\n4. Land laid waste by successive visitations of locusts.\\nWorse experience of plague overhanging (BB 261). 5.\\nFirst, declares that suffering due to judgment of God\\nforetells worse things urges penitence. Then, people\\nhaving repented, gives assurance of God s pity and", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0065.jp2"}, "66": {"fulltext": "58 Amos.\\ngrace and concludes with picture of setting up of God s\\nkingdom on earth. 6. Vividness of description, both of\\nwhat has been and what is to be. Luxurious suffer\\nreligion suffers, and agriculture. Time for priests to\\ngather people for prayer. Locusts described in distance,\\nnear at hand, and when right upon the suffering land.\\n7- Nation s temporal relief not enough. People have\\npart in world scheme. To fulfil part, must be conse-\\ncrated to God (BB 262). 8. Inspiration of each indi-\\nvidual. 9. Judgment of world. 10. That calamities all\\nhave reference to future. Possibly but idea not in har-\\nmony with language. II. That to be taken (a) literally,\\n(b) allegorically, r) apocalyptically, as in Revelation.\\nOn this view locusts regarded a s supernatural agencies\\nbelonging to last times. Literal interpretation the\\nnatural one, and mostly favored by modern scholars.\\nFor Allegorical sense, is claimed by advocates that de-\\nscription suits human beings better (BB 263). 12. Five\\ncenturies (BB 265). 13. Circ. b.c. 860, beginning of\\nreign of Joash and post-Kxilic period [circ. B.C. 445).\\n14. That Joel either first or last among writing prophets.\\n(BB 267). 15. Descriptive and oratorical skill. 16.\\nDoes emphasize ritual of penitence, }^et implies import-\\nance of reality. And temporal prosperity considered as\\nbasis of spiritual. Outpouring of Spirit confined, it may\\nbe, to Israel still, salvation based on spiritual character.\\nMessianic future not so exalted as with some prophets\\nyet there is progression in God s dealings with world.\\nSee (A. B. Davidson) E (3) vn. 198 ff. and (Elmslie) E (4) iii. 161 ff.\\nviii. 208 ff.\\nAMOS.\\nI. The Prophets, (i) Semitic conception of Deity? (2)\\nWhat the relation of a god to his tribe thought to involve (3)\\nConsequent functions of prophet in primitive society (4) Es-\\nsential idea of Old Testament prophet (5) Wherein did early\\nprophets of Israel resemble other Semitic prophets, and wherein\\ndiffer (6) Three groups of the Canonical prophets", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0066.jp2"}, "67": {"fulltext": "Amos. 59\\n(i) Every tribe had a god and every god had a tribe\\n(BT i. 14). (2) One involving concern for all practical in-\\nterests of tribe. (3) Among other things, to give infor-\\nmation, e. g., regarding whereabouts of lost property, or\\nescaped criminals as to time for sowing crops, etc. (ibid.\\n15, (4) That he was a speaker for God (ibid. 12). (5)\\nIn similarity of methods in moral superiority (BT 17).\\n(6) 1. Assyrian Period, 2. Chaldean, 3. Post-Exilic.\\nAssyrian Period (b.c 760-700). To Israel: Amos. Hosea. To Judah:\\nIsaiah, Micah. Chaldean Period (B.C. 640-570) Nahum, Zephaniah,\\nHabakkuk, Jeremiah, Ezekiel. Post- Exilic Haggai, Zechariah, Ma-\\nlachi. As to dates of Joel, Obadiah, and parts of Isaiah and Zechariah,\\nopinions differ. Jonah is, as Jewish tradition puts it, a book by itself,\\nand Daniel is regarded as not among prophets in Canon (DP 19 ff.).\\n2. Condition of Country. (1) How long interval between\\nElisha and Amos? (2) Contrast between state of country in\\ntime of two men respectively (3) Moral condition of Israel in\\nday of Amos? (4) Religious? (5) As respects religion, into\\nwhat was land fast falling\\n(i) About 40 years. (2) In days of Elisha country\\nharassed by enemies of Amos, exceptionally prosperous\\n(BT 31 ff.) (3) Oppression of poor, luxury, perversion\\nof justice, immorality (CB 99 f.). (4) Crowded temples,\\nfrequent pilgrimages, elaborate ceremonial, costly gifts\\nbut no care for righteousness (BT 39 f.).\\nIt was not political blindness or religious indifference, but a profound\\nand fanatical faith, that made Israel insensible to the danger so plainly\\nlooming on the horizon (PI 132).\\n(5) Heathenism (BT 157).\\n3. Amos a Conspicuous Figure. (1) What makes Amos\\na striking figure among prophets (2) On what occasion his\\nposition marked by great impressiveness (3) Instance of way\\nin which Amos preached God s universal providence", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0067.jp2"}, "68": {"fulltext": "60 Amos.\\n(i) First (unless possibly Joel) among writing pro-\\nphets juncture of his appearance and startling character\\nof Message (BT i. 73). (2) Of his presence at great\\nreligious festival at Bethel, to face, all alone, wealth and\\npower and popular favor there arrayed against prophet\\nof Jehovah (BT 107 f.) (3) Reference to Divine guid-\\nance in case of Ethiopians, Philzstmes, and Syrians.\\nAre ye not as the children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of\\nIsrael saith the Lord. Have I not brought up Israel out of the land\\nof Egypt and the Philistines from Caphtor and the Syrians from Kir\\nIsrael indeed God s peculiar people, but only that they might be a holy\\nnation. If they become a sinful people, and so God s judgment must\\nneeds fall upon them, then they are no dearer to Him than any other\\npeople (BT i. 189).\\n4. Israel Warned. (1) Two things condemned by Amos\\nin Jewish national life (2) Two-fold misapprehension at bot-\\ntom of Israel s infatuation (3) Words of prophet in substance\\nhis answer to implied reasoning of people (4) In this connec-\\ntion, of what hope of theirs does he expose the futility? (5)\\nBy what comparison does he describe thoughtlessness and lux-\\nury of the women f (6) Passage considered by many modern\\nwriters to be opposed to traditional view of Levitical legisla-\\ntion? (7) In foretelling judgments upon nation, notable ex-\\npression used, suggested by one of common visitations (8) To\\nwhich kingdom prophecy of Amos addressed (9) Nation that\\nwas to serve as Jehovah s instrument in punishing Israel (10)\\nProfound influence of Assyria on prophecy? (il) Charge that\\nhas been brought against tone of Amos? (12) With what\\nprophet contrasted in this respect? (13) How difference to be\\nexplained\\n(i) Its civilization and its religion (BT 42 f.) (2)\\nThat God cared for Israel only among nations that", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0068.jp2"}, "69": {"fulltext": "Amos. 6 1\\nrighteousness not necessary part of His worship (CB 108).\\n(3) You only have I known of all the families of the\\nearth therefore I will visit upon you all your iniquities\\n(iii. 2).\\nIt must have been a rude shock to the easy-going security of the\\nIsraelites to learn that just because they were Jehovah s people He in-\\ntended to punish them (DP 96).\\n(4) From trusting to the Day of Jehovah.\\nWoe unto you that desire the day of the Lord Wherefore would\\nye have the day of the Lord? It is darkness and not light (v. 18).\\nWhat God required was justice and righteousness, not feasts and solemn\\nassemblies (BT i. 169 f.j.\\n(5) By comparing them with cattle (iv. 1.: kine of\\nBashan heavy, heedless animals, trampling in their\\nanxiety for food upon every frail and lowly object in the\\nway (BT i. 148) (6) Did you bring unto me sacri-\\nfices and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O house\\nof Israel (v. 25). Not that there were no sacrifices in\\nthose times only, that ritual then but modification of\\nthat common to all Semites (BT 103 f. (7) I will\\nsend a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a\\nthirst for water, but of hearing the words of the L,ord\\n(viii. n)BTi. 186. (8) Northern. (9) Assyria. (10)\\nAppearance of Assyria strengthened faith in God s pur-\\npose of bringing unrighteousness into judgment; thought\\nof immense power of Assyria being under Divine control\\nadded to sense of Jehovah s greatness elimination, 03-\\nAssyria s resistless advance, of all tribal gods prepared\\nway for acknowledgment of o?ie true God community\\nof suffering led to feeling of oneness of men (BT 44, 51,\\n54). (II) Austerity (CB no f.) (12) Hosea. (13) By\\ndifference in (a) circumstances of two men Amos from\\ndesert; Hosea s own troubles (b) nature of two men.\\n5. Against Nations, (i) Unusual position of oracles for\\nforeign nations Why (2) What condemned in these\\nnations", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0069.jp2"}, "70": {"fulltext": "62 Jonah.\\n(i) Before, not after prophecy against Israel herself.\\nTo show that if other nations bad, Israel worse (BT 121).\\n(2) Inhumanity as such (BT i. 122 cf. 133).\\n6. Epilogue, (i) Question disputed regarding Epilogue\\n(ix. n-15) and few preceding verses? (2) Considerations as\\nto non-fulfilme?it of these and similar prophecies\\n(i) Whether by Amos or by another hand. In main,\\nbecause of strong contrast offered by Epilogue s bright\\npicture of future to whole tone of severity through rest\\nof book.\\nIt is at least to be borne in mind that restored Israel is a very different\\nIsrael from Israel condemned by the prophet that prophets usually close\\nwith allusions to happy future and that they are poets, often moved\\nby impulse rather than logic (CB 119 ff.; BT 181 f. 189 ff. 194 f.).\\n(2) (a) Are conditional, (b) largely ideal, and (c) af-\\nfected by limitations of Jewish religion (CB 226).\\n7. Date. In whose reign did Amos prophesy Date\\nJeroboam II. About B.C. 750.\\nOn Amos, see E (3) v. 161 ff., vi. 161 ff. {A. B. Davidson). Prophecy\\nin Israel, BW vii. 1 ff. Gen. facts regarding O. T. prophecy, vii. 124 ff.\\n199 ff. Prophecy before Conquest of Canaan, 273 ff., in United Kingdom,\\n352 ff.; Ideal elements in prophecy, viii. 211 ff.; Essential elements, v.\\n321 ff. Strophical Arrangement of Amos, xii., 81 ff., 179 ff., 251 ff, 333 ff.\\nJONAH.\\n1. Historical Interpretation. Reasons for\\n{a) This the natural sense, (b) objections to historical\\ninterpretation regarded as due only to rejection of the\\nmiraculous, {c) method j ustified on ground that our L,ord s\\nreference to book sanctions natural sense.\\n2. Objections to this Method. (1) Strangeness of book,\\neven apart from distinctly miraculous element (2) Objec-\\ntions on score of omissions f (3) From silence of other parts\\nof Scripture", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0070.jp2"}, "71": {"fulltext": "Jonah. 63\\n(1) (a) Book as whole gives such impression, just as\\nfeeling produced, e. g. in Pilgrim s Progress that we are\\nnot dealing with real life. E (4) vi. 2 f. (b) Special\\nfeatures have same effect, e. g. sudden conversion of\\nvast population and representation of king very differ-\\nent from what we should expect from his character as we\\nknow it from other sources (LOT 303).\\nThough it is only right to bear in mind extreme susceptibility of\\nOrientals to religious influences (MP 240. Wright, Bibl. Ess. p. 67 f.).\\n(2) Narrative silent as to many things we should have\\nexpected to find mentioned\\nSuch as, (1) locality of Jonah s release from fish, (2) name of Assyrian\\nking, (3) account of journey to Nineveh, (4) what were sins of Nineveh,\\n(5) things referred to, indeed, but omitted from their natural place (BT\\nii. 499).\\n(3) No allusions to remarkable conversion of Nineveh\\nin writings of succeeding prophets. K (4) vi. 4.\\nFirst mention of Jonah is in Tobit, about 450 years after Jonah. But\\nTobit says nothing about repentance of Nineveh {ibid.) No doubt, argu-\\nment from silence requires caution but evidence is cumulative.\\n3. Misapprehensions. (1) As to charge that Historical\\nInterpretation rejected only through dislike of miracle, what to\\nbe said? (2) How objection met that our Lord s language\\nimplies historic truth of Jonah narrative\\n(i) (a) That, as matter of fact, Allegorical View ac-\\ncepted by many who do not disbelieve in miracles, (b)\\nthat true question not at all whether these miracles\\ncould have happened, but only whether there is not\\nmore reason for understanding book allegorically than\\nliterally, (c) that it is felt these particular miracles are so\\nunlike other miracles of Scripture that this dissimilarity\\nis itself enough to suggest they are not to be taken as\\nactual occurrences.\\nStories have been related of men swallowed by sharks and of their\\nhaving been recovered alive (Wright, Bibl. Ess. 36 ff.).", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0071.jp2"}, "72": {"fulltext": "64 Jonah.\\n(2) In two different ways, (a) By some is consid-\\nered that our Lord expresses no judgment at all as to\\ncharacter of story, but merely uses story as illustration\\n(BT 507 ff. MP 234 f.). {b) By others, that our Lord\\nin assuming our nature assumed also the limitations of\\nthe human mind in other words, that in matters not\\naffecting His office of Divine Teacher His knowledge\\nwas knowledge of men of His day. (See LI 413 ff.).\\nAll those points on which there may seem to be any collision between\\nthe language used by Christ and modern inquiry are not of the nature\\nof direct affirmation or explicit teaching, and were in no way essential to\\nHis Messianic office (ibid. 417). Jesus Himself told us He was igno-\\nrant of one thing, of the time, namely, of the day of judgment. There-\\nfore ignorance for Him was a possibility. So the question is not, Could\\nHe be ignorant of anything but, To what did His ignorance extend\\nPlummer in E (4) iv. 10. Let us abide by the fact that there is a re-\\nmarkable silence in Scripture respecting the all but limitless knowledge\\nwhich reverent minds often think it necessary to attribute to Jesus Christ.\\nIt would be rash to assert that He did not possess it still more rash to\\nassert that He could not have possessed it. But such evidence as has\\nbeen granted to us seems to point to a limitation of His knowledge very\\nmuch more considerable than many people are willing to admit [ibid. 11).\\nAgain, It is at least conceivable that Jesus so emptied Himself of\\nthe attributes of His Divinity as to be dependent for knowledge upon\\nHis earthly experience and the information He obtained from others.\\nIn that case He would know no more about the authorship of the Sacred\\nwritings than His Jewish instructors could tell Him, and He would share\\ntheir ignorance as He shared their customs and climate (ibid. 13). Speak-\\ning of the self-emptying of the Son of God, Canon Mason says, Any\\nattempt to minimise it and explain it away, seems to impair the com-\\npleteness of the Incarnation (Faith of the Gospel, 154). See on this\\nsubject, TC 25 ff., and Swayne, Our Lord s Knowledge as Man.\\n4. Allegorical Interpretation. (1) Reasons for taking\\nbook as Allegorical (2) What regarded as confirmatory of\\nallegorical view (3) Show analogy between Israel and Jo?iah.\\n(4) Advantages of Allegorical interpretation? (5) How view\\nqualified", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0072.jp2"}, "73": {"fulltext": "Jonah. 65\\n(i) Didactic purpose appears from structure of book.\\nWhat aids this purpose is mentioned, while information\\nis withheld that might have been expected if history had\\nbeen what author was writing (LOT 303). For example,\\nstory ends abruptly as soon as (on modern view) moral\\nperfectly clear (BT ii. 499 f. (2) That nations of\\nworld spoken of by prophets as the sea or sea-monsters,\\nand Exile as Israel s being swallowed up (BT ii. 503 f.)\\nIs. xxvii. 1 In that day the Lord with His sore and great and strong\\nsword shall punish leviathan the swift serpent, and leviathan the crooked\\nserpent and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea (ibid. 504 n.).\\nTo the Jew, the sea was a symbol of arrogance and futile defiance to\\nthe will of God. The Semites had filled it with turbulent monsters,\\nsnakes and dragons who wallowed like its own waves, or rose to\\nwage war against the gods in heaven and the great lights which they had\\ncreated. G. A. Smith tells of a survival of this idea which he wit-\\nnessed in Palestine on the occasion of an eclipse of the moon. There\\nwas a hideous din of drums, etc. for the purpose of frightening the\\ngreat fish swallowing the moon, and to make him disgorge it. By these\\nnature-myths the prophets illustrated God s dominion over the heathen\\nconquerors of His people. Chiefly so, from the Exile onward. Jer. (Ii.\\n34, 44) describes Exile as a swallowing of Israel by the king of Babylon\\nwhom God compels to disgorge his victim Nebuchadrezzar the king\\nof Babylon hath devoured me, he hath crushed me, he hath\\nswallowed me up like a dragon. And Jehovah says, I will do judg-\\nment upon Bel in Babylon, and I will bring forth out of his mouth that\\nwhich he hath swallowed up. (BT 524 f.).\\n(3) Israel like \u00c2\u00a5ona/i, in that was to set forth God s\\ntruth to world. This task Israel would not perform, but\\nwas unfaithful to God, following its own ways. At\\nlength it was swallowed up by world power Babylon.\\nThereupon it sought the Lord, and was permitted to ob-\\ntain release. Even then it remained ignorant of Divine\\npurpose to bless all nations of the earth, if only they would\\nturn to the Lord. (LOT 304, BT ii. 502 f.). (4) (a)\\nGrotesqueness of book not so great when accepted as\\npopular poetry as when understood literally (BT ii. 495 f.,\\n526). {b) makes work a prophetic sermon from first to\\nlast (ibid. 494). (5) By supposition that work has his-\\ntoric basis of fact (LOT 303).", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0073.jp2"}, "74": {"fulltext": "66 Jonah.\\n5. Purpose of Book. What author s aim to teach\\nBook not meant, as some suppose, to illustrate variety\\nof truths (though may do so incidentally), but has one\\ngeneral design to teach mission of Prophecy to Gentiles\\n(BT ii. 500 f.).\\nBy Dean Stanley, Jonah styled the first Apostle to the Gentiles.\\nE (4) vi. 6. In this book, the national wall of separation is broken\\ndown and the whole heathen world is thrown open as a mission-field\\nfor the messengers of Jehovah {Orelli, in Straek and Zoeekler, Kgf.\\nComm., S. 287) cf. BT ii. 495.\\n6. Prayer of Jonah. (1) Character as composition? (2)\\nForm? (3) Two views regarding its place here? (4) A\\nnatural interpretation on Allegorical view\\n(I) Consists almost wholly of passages parallel to\\nothers in Psalter (BT ii. 510). (2) Not petition for\\ndeliverance, but thanksgiving (LOT 304). Yet may be\\nthat Jonah regarded as already saved (BT ii. 512). (3)\\n(a) That was part of original work, (b) that was inserted\\nby later hand (ibid. 511, 527. Cf. LOT 304). (4) That\\nis psalm of nation as a whole (BT ii. 527).\\n7. Closing Passage. Its striking character\\nIrony blended with pathetic representation of God s\\ncare for His creatures (iv. 10) Thou hast had pity for\\nthe gourd, should not I have pity on Nineveh,\\nthat great city wherein are more than sixscore thou-\\nsand persons that cannot discern between their right\\nhand and their left hand; and also much cattle?\\nGod s pity for cattle is the last word of the unknown\\nwriter E (4) vi. 16 f.\\n8. Authorship and Date. (1) When have we mention of\\nanother prophecy of Jonah (2) Its subject? (3) On what\\ngrounds book supposed to have been written long after Jonah\\n(i) Circ. B.C. 780, in beginning of reign of Jeroboam\\nII. (LOT 300). (2) Jeroboam s success against Syrians.\\nUtfC.", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0074.jp2"}, "75": {"fulltext": "General Questions. 67\\n(3) From (a) language, (b) Psalm in Chapter 2. If had\\ncome ixom. JonalV s age, would, it is considered, have been\\nmore original, [c) general thought of book, which is re-\\ngarded as presupposing teaching of great prophets. 5th\\nCentury B.C. proposed as date (LOT 301. Cf. BT 497 f.).\\nSee E (4) vi. iff. (Dale) BE 34-98.\\nGENERAL QUESTIONS.\\nI. Function of the Higher Criticism, and with what the name\\ncontrasted 2. Why no reproach to say the Bible not inerrant f\\n3. Church definition of Inspiration? 4. Fundamental differ-\\nence between old method and modern of determining authorship\\nof Old Testament books 5. Show superiority, broadly consid-\\nered, of the new over the old 6. (a) In support of Traditional\\nview, the New Testament is appealed to How? (Jb) Two-fold\\nanswer 7. An obviously strong presumption in favor of modern\\nview, speaking generally 8. An ancient designation of the\\nBible disposes of some objections to modern conception of\\nspecial books, or parts of books what this name 9. What\\nunfair course frequently followed by defenders of traditional\\nview A natural inference 10. Some principal founders of\\nmodern biblical criticism have been disbelievers in supernatural\\nreligion ought not this to have put Christian scholars on their\\nguard? II. How do Christians, without intending it, often\\nimitate these disbelievers 12. Why to have been expected\\nthat ground should first have been broken by men out of\\nsympathy with ideas predominant in Christian world 13. Is\\nit not unlikely that opponents of Christianity should in some\\nrespects arrive at truer views of Scripture than earnest Chris-\\ntians 14. Does, or does not, the fact that for so many centu-\\nries the Christian Church has held certain views regarding the", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0075.jp2"}, "76": {"fulltext": "68 General Questions.\\nOld Testament prove truth of these views? Why? 15. What\\nwould 3 ou say as to our Lord s promise to be with His Church\\n16. And what as to seeming strangeness of new ideas about\\nBible being so modern? 17. The real question at issue re-\\ngarding the Bible as revelation 18. Respecting preconceived\\nideas as to form of revelation, what caution to be borne in\\nmind?\\n1. To investigate conte?its of Sacred Writings, as dis-\\ntinguished from the text. Investigation of text consti-\\ntutes Textual Criticism.\\nThe Higher Criticism seeks to determine such points, e. g. as author-\\nship, character of composition (e. g. whether literal history, or allegory, or\\npoetry), and other matters which are recognised to fall within the province\\nof Criticism in case of ordinary writings. To a greater or less degree, the\\nSacred books are ordinary writings. This is but another way of acknowl-\\nedging the presence of a human element. So far as this side of Scripture\\nis concerned, it is just as evidently proper to apply to the Bible the usual\\nprinciples of literary criticism as it would be to depend upon the ordinary\\ntext-books of anatomy and physiology if we were studying the physical\\norganization of the prophets. There is another and vastly more im-\\nportant side the Divine element in Scripture. So far as this other side\\nis concerned, a simple ploughman may be better able to understand the\\nSacred writers than the keenest critic. Just as the simple ploughman\\nmay know more about the constellations in the heavens than a far abler\\nman who has spent all his time peering into the tube of his microscope.\\nThe acquisition of spiritual truth is dependent upon spiritual discernment.\\nBut of this, many of the critics are deeply sensible.\\n2. Because it was not intended to teach science, but re-\\nligion. 3. There is none. 4. \\\\a) By Jewish tradition;\\nby studying facts presented in books themselves. 5.\\nLoyalty to tradition is loyal ty to a theory loyalty to\\ntruth, loyalty to God. 6. {a) Our Lord is supposed to\\nsanction Mosaic authorship of Pentateuch, {b) There is\\nno reason to suppose He intended to decide question of\\nauthorship. By others, it is considered that our Lord in\\ntaking upon Him our human nature took upon Him its", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0076.jp2"}, "77": {"fulltext": "General Questions. 69\\nlimitations (LOT xviii. Vide supra, (2) p. 64). 7.\\nMany devout Christian scholars have (in main) aban-\\ndoned old views for the new. 8. Divine Librae (Cf.\\nLOT xv. f. 9. (a) Speaking of extreme men as if fair\\nrepresentatives of modern scholars, (b) That it indi-\\ncates very great ignorance or very great disingenuous-\\nness. 10. Most assuredly but one may be on guard\\nagainst error yet not object to acceptance of truth. II.\\nBy refusing to believe anything but what we like to be-\\nlieve. 12. These men free from traditional notions and\\nindifferent to good opinion of religious community. 13.\\nNot more so than that bad men using their eyes should\\nsee what good men fail to see who think it a duty no t to\\nuse theirs. 14. Does not. Nothing is true because\\nbelieved, nor false because disbelieved. For example,\\nlong-continued universal Atheism would not prove non-\\nexistence of God. 15. Does not show beliefs of past to\\nbe all true, and growing beliefs of present, untrue.\\nPromise was to be with Church always, not merely for\\ncertain centuries. 16. It has pleased God to reveal\\ntruths even of great moment very gradually. 1 7. Not\\nas to fact, but as to form of revelation (LOT xv). 18.\\nWe are not competent to judge what kind of Bible would\\nbest serve God s purpose.\\nYet for centuries we have settled in our own minds, and (one might\\nalmost say) have dictated to the Almighty, what kind of a Bible He must\\nhave given us, what kind of a Christ He must have sent us, instead of care-\\nfully and patiently investigating the actual characteristics of the inspired\\nwritings which have come down to us, and of the incarnate Son whom\\nthey make known to us. We are wandering into a region in which human\\nlogic is no safe guide, when we say that the Bible is the word of God,\\nand therefore cannot have this or that mark of imperfection. Plummer\\nin E (4) iv. 12.\\nSee on Interpretation of O.T., BW v. 88 ff.; Uniqueness of O T. Hist.,\\n81 ff.; Chronol. of O.T. Liter, v. 290 ff.; O. T. N.T., 401 ff.; What\\nHigher Crit. is not, vi. 22 ff, 189 ff, 35 t ff Proper Attitude towards\\nB.C., 81 ff.; Functions of H.C., 224 f.; Christ the O.7., vii. 296 f.,\\n307 f", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0077.jp2"}, "78": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0078.jp2"}, "79": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0079.jp2"}, "80": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0080.jp2"}, "81": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0081.jp2"}, "82": {"fulltext": "", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0082.jp2"}, "83": {"fulltext": "nl*", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0083.jp2"}, "84": {"fulltext": "Wm\\nf\\nan\\nf m\\nKiss!\\nHH8P\u00c2\u00bb\\nSW\\nHI\\nffiUlBl", "height": "4300", "width": "2704", "jp2-path": "oldtestamentlite00mcki_0084.jp2"}}