THE HIGHWAY LAW; OF NEW YORK STATE { CHAPTER HI OF THE GENERAL LAIS * (Laws 1890, Chap. 568.) TOGETHER WITH ALL OTHER STATUTES OF THE STATE, GENERAL AND MIS¬ CELLANEOUS, RELATING TO THE SUBJECT OF HIGHWAYS. [AS AMENDED TO JANUARY 1, 1901.] ANNOTATIONS AND FORMS. Ye -r* oXk. ) urs; : . A ,0 - .'VwY't. • . *. Edited by H. NOYES GREENE, (Of the Troy Bar.) Author of “ Practice Time Table,” “ Daw of Taxable Transfer” and " Daw of Negotiable Instrument*.” ALBANY, N. Y. MATTHEW BENDER, PUBLISHER, 511-513 Broadway. 1900. TWO COPIES HECEIVED, L/brsry °f Congrotfc OIIIcg of the JUN 2-1900 Register of Copyrights a, /3/JT2. C tftucu 2 J? /J&O F, *ST copy. Copyright, 1898, By MATTHEW BENDER, Copyright, 1899, By MATTHEW BENDER. Copyright, 1900, By MATTHEW BENDER. 00 - 367 ? PREFACE. Before the passage of the general Highway Act of 1890, the law of this state in regard to highways was a confused and conflicting mass of Revised Statute provisions, inde¬ pendent general statutes and special acts. The legislature, by its attempt to codify all these into one act, accom¬ plished a great deal in the way of simplification and elimination, but it failed to be thorough, leaving a num¬ ber of statutes still standing upon their own foundations as highway laws. Succeeding legislatures have served only to complicate matters further by a seeming disregard of Chapter XIX of the General Laws in their enactments. Moreover, many of the special acts passed both before and since the year 1890, applicable only under certain conditions of population and location, have no place in a general highway act; while other provisions of law, though pertinent to the subject of highways, belong more properly and are found in the various chapters of the general laws. To gather all these widely scattered parts into one comprehensive whole, has been the endeavor of the editor in the preparation of this volume. While the Highway Law proper has received the more careful treatment, in that it has been exhaustively annotated in all its parts, yet it is believed that no one provision of any unrepealed statute has escaped notice and insertion in that part of the book called the Appendix, with references thereto wherever necessary in the body of the work. Being finished, the book, if good for anything at all, should be equally useful to both lawyer and layman. To the former, it should be an aid in showing the interpreta- (iii) iv The Highway Law of IS Jew York. Preface. tion given by the courts to each part of the statute; to the latter, it should be a compendium of their rights and duties in relation to highways, whether they be officials charged with the care thereof or mere travelers thereon. That such a degree of excellence has been attained, how¬ ever, is for the reader, not the editor, to determine. In the digesting of more than one thousand court decisions, acknowledgment should be made of valuable assistance rendered by Mr. Andrew P. McKean of the Troy bar. The forms have been carefully selected from those most approved by long usage. Troy* HL Y., June 1, 1898, Jti. N. G. Table of contents. Page Table of Cases Cited . xiii The Highway Law. 1 ARTICLE I. Highway officers, their general powers and duties. ... 1 Section 1. Short title. 2 2. Treasurer of highway commissioners. 2 3. Powers of one commissioner. 3 4. General powers of commissioners. 3 5. Mile-stones and guide-boards. 9 6. Road machines and implements. 10 7. Stone-erushers and materials. 12 8. Custody of stone-crushers. 13 9 Additional tax. 13 10. Extraordinary repairs of highways or bridges. 14 11. Auditing expense thereof. 15 12. Accounts, how made out. 16 13. Unsafe toll-bridge. 17 14. Drainage, sewer and water pipes in highways. 18 15. Actions for injuries to highways. 19 16. Liability of towns for defective highways,... 20 17. Action by town against commissioners. 26 18. Audit of damages without action.....; 27 19. Reports of commissioners........ 28 20. General duties of overseers.. * 29 2 i. Opening obstructed highways..*.. *.* 30 22. Penalties against overseers...... * * 31 23. Penalties, how collected. 4 ....... 32 24. Compensation of overseers.*. 4 .*- 33 25. Division of "town into highway commissioner dis¬ tricts.*. 33 26* Duties of commissioner in each district.. 34 VI The Highway Law of New York. Table of contents. ARTICLE II. Page Assessment for highway labor. 35 Section 30. Meetings of commissioners. 36 31. Lists of inhabitants. 36 32. Non-resident lands. 36 33. Assessments of highway labor, how made. 37 34. Copies of lists delivered to overseers. 40 35. Names omitted. 41 36. Appeals by non-residents. 41 37. Credit on private roads. 42 £ 8 . Certain assessments to be separate. 42 89. Tenant to deduct assessment. 42 40. Reassessment in case of neglect. 43 41. Omissions of assessors corrected. 43 42. New assessments by overseers. 48 43. Sidewalks and trees. 44 44. Abatement of tax for shade trees. 45 45. Sidewalk tax anticipated. 46 46. Certificate of anticipation. 46 47. Transfer of certificate. 47 48. Abatement of tax for watering trough. 47 49. System of taxation defined. 48 50. Town may change its system. 48 51. Vote thereon. . .. 40 52. When change to take effect. 48 53. Annual tax under money system; certain villages exempt therefrom. 49 54. (Adoption of county road system.). 59 55. (County engineer.). 56. (Expenses, how paid.). 57 (Issue of bonds, etc.). 58. (County roads under charge of supervisors and county engineer.). g 2 59a. (Proceeds of county bonds.). 53 ARTICLE III. The duties of overse way labor 54 The Highway Law of New York. vii Table of contents. Page Section 60. Notice to work. . 54 61. Notice to non-residents. 55 62. Commutation .. 55 63. Teams and implements. 56 64. Substitutes. 57 65. Penalties for neglect to work or commute. 57 66 . Assessment for unperformed labor. 58 67. Penalty for refusal of overseer to provide list. 59 68 . Collection of arrearages for unperformed labor. 59 69. Annual return of overseers. 60 70. Noxious weeds in highway. 61 71. Overseers to notify occupant to remove weeds. 61 72. Abatement of tax for removal of fence. 62 73. Abatement of tax for street lamps. 62 74. Rebate of tax for using wagon tires of certain width 63 ARTICLE IV. Laying out, altering and discontinuing highways and laying out private roads... 64 Section 80. Highways by dedication. 65 81. Survey. 17 1 82. Application. 73 83. Application for commissioners. 73 84. Appointment of commissioners, and their duties .... 75 85. Notiee of meeting. 77 86 . Decision of commissioners in favor of application.... 78 87. Damages in certain cases, how estimated. 81 88. Decision of commissioners denying application . 83 89. Motion to confirm, vacate or modify. 83 90. Limitation upon laying out highways. 87 91. Laying out highways through burying grounds. 91 92. Costs, by whom paid . 92 93. Damages assessed, and costs to be audited. 92 94. When officers of different towns disagree about high¬ way . 94 95. Difference about improvements. 95 96. Highways in two or more towns. 97 The Highway Law of New York. vin Table of contents. Page Section 97. Laying out, dividing and maintaining highway upon town line. $7 98. Final determination, how carried out. 99 99. Highways abandoned. ,. SO 100. Highways by use. . 101 101. Fences to be removed. 113 102. Penalty for falling trees. 114 103. Fallen trees to be removed.114 104. Penalty for obstruction or encroachment. 114 105. How removed, and liability for not removing. 118 106. Private road. 124 107. Jury to determine necessity, and assess damages .... 125 108. Copy, application and notice delivered to applicant.. 125 109. Copy and notice to be served...125 110. List of jurors. 126 111. Names struck off. 126 112. Place of meeting.126 113. Jury to determine and assess damages. 127 114. Their verdict. 127 115. Value of highway discontinued.128 116. Papers to be recorded in the town clerk’s office.128 117. Damages to be paid before opening the road. 128 118. Fees of officers. 129 119. Motion to confirm, vacate or modify. 129 120. Costs of new hearing. 130 121. For what purpose private road to be used. 130 122. Highways or roads along division lines. 131 123. Adjournments. 131 ARTICLE V. Bridges. 132 Section 130. When town or county expense . 132 131. Additional county aid. 135 132. Statement of expenses.. 136 133. Supervisors to levy tax. 136 134. Joint liabilities of towns, and their joint contracts... 136 13'). Refusal to repair. 133 136. Proceedings in Gourt. 139 The Highway Law of New Yoke. ix Table of contents. Page Section .137. Commissioners to institute proceedings. HO 138. Their duty. 140 139. Commissioners to report. 141 140. Appeals. 141 141. Power of court on appeal. 141 142. Refusal to repair bridge. 142 143. Penalty, and notice on bridge. 143 144. Offence. 143 145. Iron bridges. 143 ARTICLE VI. Miscellaneous provisions...144 Section 150. Papers, where filed. 144 151. When commissioners do not act. 145 152. Costs on motion. 145 153. Injuries to highways. 14") 154. When town not liable for bridge breaking. 147 155. Steam traction engines on highway. . 147 156. Trees, to whom they belong. 148 157. Carriages meeting to turn to the right. 149 158. Intemperate drivers not to be engaged. 151 159. Drivers, when to be discharged. 152 160. Leaving horses without being tied. 152 161. Owners of certain carriages liable for acts of drivers. 153 162. Term “carriage” defined. 153 163. Entitled to free use of highways. 154 164. Penalties, how recovered. 155 165. ^Extent of this chapter. 165. Stone and rubbish not to be dumped in highways... 156 ARTICLE VII. Regulation of ferries. Section 170. Licenses. ^ 171. Undertaking. ^ * So in the original. X The Highway Law of New York. Table of contents. Page Section 172. Appendages for rope ferries. 160 173. Superintendent of public works may lease right of passage. 160 174. When schedules to be posted. 161 ARTICLE VIII. Repealing and other laws. 163 Section 180. Laws repealed. 163 181. Saving clause. 163 182. Construction. 164 183. When to take effect. 164 Schedule. 165 Appendix.169 General Laws :. 171 Constitution. 171 Code of Civil Procedure. 174 County Law. 193 Town Law. 205 Village Law... 218 Transportation Corporations Law.235 Navigation Law. 260 Canal Law.265 Railroad Law. 271 Indian Law. 275 Miscellaneous Laws :. 278 Laws 1817, ch. 83. £78 Laws 1835, ch. 300. 279 Laws 1853, ch. 62. 279 Laws 1862, ch. 220 . 281 Laws 1869, ch. 131. 281 Laws 1870, ch. 311. ggg Laws 1871, ch. 171. 284 Laws 1879, ch. 317. egg Laws 1831, ch. 314. 9 gg Laws 1883, ch. 113. ggy Laws 1890, ch. 291. The Highway Law of New York. xi Table of contents. Page Laws 1390, ch. 332. 291 Laws 1890, ch. 555 . 292 Laws 1891, ch. 309. 301 Laws 1893, ch. 239. 302 Law r s 1893, ch. 419.&)4 Laws 1893, ch. 582. 305 Laws 1893, ch. 607 . 311 Laws 1893, ch. 655 . 314 Laws 1894, ch. 266 . 315 Laws 1895, ch. 499 . 317 Laws 1895, ch. 611. 320 Laws 1895, ch. 717. 321 Laws 1896, ch, 309 . 322 Laws 1896, ch. 423 . 324 Laws 1896, ch. 464 . 325 Laws 1897, ch. 269. 326 Laws 1897, ch. 286. 328 Laws 1897, ch. 481. 342 Laws 1897, ch. 483. 344 Laws 1897, ch. 596. 346 Laws 1898, ch. 45 . 349 Laws 1898, ch. 71. 351 Laws 1898, ch. 102. 353 Laws 1898, ch. 115. 354 Laws 1898, ch. 133 . 361 Laws 1898. ch. 224. 362 Laws 1898, ch. 277. 367 Forms. Index fABLE OF CASES CITED. A. Page Abbott v. Cottage City. 66 Adams v. Rivers. 117 v. R. R. Co... 102 Adler v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 10 » Allen v. Buffalo, &c. Co. 19 v. Northville . 72 Alpaugh v. Bennett.105, 122 American Bank Note Co. v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 109 Amsbry v. Hinds. 100 Anderson v. Van Tassel. 30 Astor v. New York. 82 Atkinson v. Oelsner. 150 Ausable Co. v. Hargraves.. 105 B. Babcock v. Gifford. 22 v. Lamb. 76, 105 v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. 26 Baker v. Braman. 124 v. Oneonta. ... 71 Baldwin v. Buffalo. 80 Ballard v. Dyson. 102 Bank of Ithaca v. King. 40 Barker v. Loomis.8, 15, 23, 24 v. Oswegatehie. 134 v. Railroad Co. 150 v. Savage. 15 ) Barnes v. New York. 93 Bartlett v. Crozier.4, 30, 32 Bateman v. Black. 102 Baumann v. Gilmour. 151 Bayard v. Healy. 40 Baylis v. Roe. 122 (xiu) xiv The Highway Law of New York. ____ —- Table of cases cited. Page Beardslee v. Dolge. 86 Beck v. Carter. Becker v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. . 109 Beckwith v. Whalen. 68, 138, 140 Beekman v. Railroad Co. 103 Belton v. Baxter . 150 Benedict v. Calkins . 89 v. Goit. 102, 103, 111, 123 Bentley v. Phelps. 7 Berlin Bridge Co. v. Wagner. 14, 15, 29, 131, 134, 135 Betts v. Williamsburgh. 82 Bidelman v. State. 20 Bid well v. Town of Murray.21, 22, 24 Birge v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co. 8, 14 Birket v. Knickerbocker Ice Co. 150 Bisbee v. Mansfield. 122 Bischoff v. N. Y. Elevated R. It. Co.109, 110 Bishop v. Barton.. 4, 135 Blackman v. Riley. 101 Blanchard v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. 162 Blashfield v. Tel. & Tel. Co. 110 Bliss v. Johnson. 45, 107, 115 v. Schaub . 116 Bogart v. New York. 86 Bohm v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 Bookman v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. HO Boots v. Washburn.8, 15, 131 Borries v. Horton. 120 Borst v. Town of Sharon. 23 Bouton v. Brooklyn. v. Neilson. go Brace v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. 101 102 Bradley v. Blair.116, 12l| 155 Bresky v. Railroad Co. Brick Co. v. Haverstraw. Bridge Co. v. Barnett. Igl Briggs v. Doughty. . '■'vr.rsrTrr'TTs..-.,>r*-- The Highway Law of New York. xv Table of cases cited. Page Brinkman v. Eisler. 118 Brodhurst v. Turnpike Co. 82 Broezel v. Brooklyn. 71 Broiestadt v. Railroad Co. 108 Brooklyn v. Meserole. 86 v. Nassau R. R. Co..... 112 Brooks v. Schwerin. 150 Bronson v. Mann. 119 Bruner v. Lewis. 15 Brush v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 109 Bruyu v. Graham. 72 Bryan v. Landon... 23 Bryant v. Town of Randolph.4, 19, 21, 24, 109 Bucholz v. Railroad Co.19, 71 Buckley v. Drake.76, 81 Buell v. Lockwood. 85 Buffalo v. Hoff eld.100, 101 Buffalo Plank Road Co. v. Commissioners of Highways. 39 Buhrens v. Railroad Co. 150 Bullard v. Harrison. 112 Bullock v. Town of Durham.22, 26 Burns v. Yonkers.2>, 24 Buyce v. Buyce. 181 Byrne v. Knickerbocker Ice Co. 151 C. Cadwell v. Arnheim. 149 Callanan v. Gilman.115, 117 Canal Appraisers v. People. 106 Bank v. Albany.81, 82, 87 Commissioners v. People. 106 Carpenter v. Cohoes.25, 26 v. Railroad Co. 108 Carrisv. Commissioners.'I?* 00 Cary v. Marston. 86 Case v. Thompson.78, 93, 114, 120 Case of Irondequoit and Penfield. 140 Caven v. City of Troy. 104 xvi The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Page Cemetery v. Railroad Co. 106 Central Park Case. 70 Chamberlain v. Taylor. 40 Chapman v. Gates. 75, 78, 81, 115 v. R. R. Co. 108 v. Swan.71, 104 Cheney v. Railroad Co. 106 Christy v. Newton. 71, 100, 120, 122 Church v. Railroad Co. 108 City of Cohoes v. D. & H. C. Co. 66 , 68 , 104 City of Utica v. Utica Telephone Company.. 110 Clapp v. Town of Ellington. 21, 23, 26,188 Clapper v. Town of Waterford. 21, 23, 24, 26, 45 Clark v. Miller. 81 v. Phelps. 84, 89 v. Stillman. 81 Clarke v. Crimmins. 117 Clements v. West Troy. 66 , 72 Cleveland v. Cleveland. 112 Colden v. Thurber. 105 Cole v. Van Keuren. 5 , 105 Coles v. Williamsburgh. 79 Colman v. Shattuck. 37,41, 59, 60 Commissioners v. Claw. 84 v. Judges. 81, 87, 90 v. Kempshall.... 106 v. Meserole. 73 v. Peck. 8 , 121, 155 v. Van Allen.119, 122 Conkling v. Phoenix Mills. 103 Cook v. Covil.119, 120 v. Harris. 66 , 67, 119 v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 110 Cooper v. Bean. 79 , H 4 ? 117 Corbett v. Troy. 102 Corey v. Rice.137, 139 Corning v. Gould. 100 The Highway Law of New York. xvii Table of cases cited. - r - Page Cortelyou v. Van Brunt. 105 Cotanch v. Grover. 4, 30 Cousins v. Carncross. 22 Coutant v. Catlin. 80 Cowan v. Snyder. 150 Coykendall v. Durkee. 124 Crabtree v. Otterson. 150 Craig v. Railroad Co.108, 110 v. Supervisors.128, 130 Crain v. Fox. 100 Cunningham v. Fitzgerald. 70 Curry v. Buffalo. 23 Curtis v. Keesler... 103 Cuyler v. Rochester. 71 D. Darker v. Beck. 107 Davis v. Kallfelz. 152 v. Mayor.106, 115 Day v. Day.60, 137, 138 De Camp v. Thomson. 68, 103 Denning v. Roome. 66, 105 De Peyster v. Mali. 10l Detnold v. Drake. 106 Devenpeck v. Lambert. 104 De Witt v. Van Schoyk. 107 Dexter v. Alfred. 80 v. Broat. HI v. Riverside Mills. 107 Disosway v. Winant. 86 Dominick v. Hill. 72, 119 Donnelly v. Brooklyn. 71 Dorn v. Town of Oyster Bay. 21, 23 Doughty v. Brill. 122 Drake v. Rogers. 84, 114, 115, 122, 124, 125, 131 Driggs v. Phillips. 68, 100, 115, 119 Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 109 xvm The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Dudley v. Bolles . Duntz v. Duntz... Durant v. Lipsius Duryea v. Smith.. Dygert v. Schenck E. Earing v. Lansing. Eckerson v. Haverstraw. Edwards v. Ford. Edsall v. Howell. Eelsy v. American T. & T. Co. Egerer v. Railroad Co. El wood v. Rochester. Engleman v. Longhorst. Ensign v. Barse. v. Supervisors. Etz v. Daily. Eveleigh v. Hounsfield. Evers v. Hudson River Bridge Co. Excelsior Brick Co. v. Haverstraw. Ex parte Albany . Central Park. Clapper. Commissioners. Department of Parks. Department of Public Works De Wint. Jennings. Kerr. Manhattan Co. Sanders. F. Falvey v. Bridges. Farman v. Town of Ellington. Farrell v. New York. Fash v. Railroad Co. Page . 149 . 121 . 150 . 4 26, 116, 117, 123, 135 .149, 150 . 67 . 137 . 45, 148, 163 110 ... 69, 108 71, 82, 83, 90 .... 72, 81 .... 37, 40 .... 25, 135 124 23 36 71 . 82 . 68, 85 . 89 68, 76, 80, 85, 87, 140 . 80 .I.... 79 . 80 . 103 . 91 . 71 . 86 .100, 106 4, 21, 23, 30, 44 .116, 118 . 110 The Highway Law of New York. xi s Table of cases cited. Page Fearing v. Irwin. 69, 70 Fellows v. Denniston. 40 Fettrick v. Dickenson. 112 Fisher v. Cambridge . 117 v. New York. 80 v. Richardson. 107 Fishkill v. Plankroad Co. 21 Fitch v. Commissioners. 71, 119, 120 Flack v. Green Island. 104 Fleet v. Youngs. 116, 121, 124 Fletcher v. Railroad Co. 108 Flood v. Van Wormer . 121, 122 Flynn v. Hurd. 187, 138 v. Railroad Co. 117 v. Taylor.116, 117 Fobes v. Railroad Co. 109 Foels v. Town of Tonawanda. 21 Foot v. Stiles. 71 Ford v. Nichols. H? Fowler v. Lansing. 180 v. Mott. 89, 102, 103, 111, 122 v. Westervelt. 86, 37, 40, 56 Fraser v. Freeman. 163 Frasier v. Town of Tompkins. 26 Freeholders v. Glen and Florida. 101 Freel v. County of Queens. 8 Freeman v. Cornwall. 68 Friedlander v. D. &. IT. C. Co.*.11G 124 Fuller v. Redding. Furman v. Taylor. G. Gailor v. Herrick. 21 Galatian v. Gardner. 104 ’ 105 Gale v. Railroad Co. 1°9 Garlinghouse v. Jacobs. 131 Gaslight Co. v. Calkins. m XX The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Gedney v. Earl. Genet v. Brooklyn. Getty v. Hamlin. Ghiglione v. Marsh. Gilbert v. Havemeyer. Glasier v. Town of Hebron Gould v. Booth. v. Glass. Granger v. Syracuse. Graves v. Otis. Gray v. Manhattan Ry. Co Greenberg v. Kingston_ Griffith v. McCullum. Guest v. Brooklyn. Gulliver v. Blauvelt. Page . 106 . 79, 83 . 24, 25, 137 . 14 . 82 . 21, 24 . 23 4, 69, 73, 90, 121, 155 . 80 . 4, 123 . 110 . 117 . 123 . 86 . 152 H. Haberman v. Baker. 106 Haden v. Clarke. 117 Haight v. Littlefield. 107 Hallock v. Woolsey. 72 Hampton v. Hamsher. 40, 43 Hand v. Klinker. 117 Hannersly v. New York. 106 Hannon v. Agnew. 26 Harlow v. Humiston.105, 112 Harpell v. Curtis. 149 Harriman v. Howe.104, 105 Harrington v. People. 73, 89, 90, 104 Harris v. Houck. 137 ? 139 v. Whitney. 37 Harrower v. Ritson. ^03 Hathaway v. Jenks.H 9 } 139 Havermans v. Troy. 73 Hawkins v. Rochester. 79 Hawxliurst v. Mayor. Igg Hayward v. Mayor. n no The Highway Law of Hew York. xxi Table of cases cited. Haywood v. Wheeler. Heacock v. Sherman. Heath v. Barman. Hegan v. Railroad Co. Henderson v. Knickerbocker Ice Co. Hergert v. Union Ry. Co. Herrick v. Stover. Herrington v. Phoenix.. Hibbard v. R. R. Co. Hickok v. Trustees. Hicks v. Chaffee.. Higgins v. Reynolds. Hill v. Supervisors. Hines v. City of Lockport. v. Hamburger. Hoey v. Gilroy. . Holdame v. Cold Spring. Holloway v. Delano. v. Southmayd. Horey v. Haverstraw. Houghtaling v. Shelley.. . Hover v. Barkhoof. Huber v. Nassau R. R. Co. Hudson River Telephone Co. v. Watervliet Ry. Co Huggans v. Riley.. Hughes v. Bingham. v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. Hunt v. Fitchburg R. R. Co. Hunter v. Trustees. Hyatt v. Bates. I. In re Howland Bridge. Ins. Co. v. Stevens.*. Ireland v. Plank Road Co.. Isaacs v. Railroad Co. Iselin v. Starin. Ivory v. Town of Deerpark. Page 7 26 ... 101, 103 ... 112, 150 150 151 90, 127, 130 26 153 102 . 106 . 14 . 24 . 104 .116, 113 . 66 . 70 . 107 . 100 . 117 . 22, 24 . 151 . 110 .131, 134 . 21, 68 . 109 . 109 . 112 . 66 . 121 . 105 . 69 . Ill . 153 . 67 5, 8, 22, 25, 105 xxii The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Page J. Jackson v. Hathaway. 44 James v. Sammis... 5 , 104, 120, 122 , 124 Jennings v. Bates. 128 v. Van Schaick. 118 Johnson v. Friel. 117 v. Loveless. . 72 Johnston v. Supervisors. 79 Jones v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 110 v. City of Utica. 26, 99 K. Kane v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 109 Kearney v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 Kellinger v. Railroad Co. 110 Kelly v. Horton. 73 , 123 Kelsey v. Burgess. 5 , 73, 104 v. King. 107 Kennedy v. Troy. 86 Kernochan v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 109 Kerr v. Hammer. 120 v. Joslin. 25 Ketchum v. Edwards. 124 Kiernan v. Newton. H 3 King v. Brooklyn. 77 v. Reed. 34 v - Tr °y. ns Kline v. Hibbard. 120 Koester v. Decker. 15 Q L. Lahr v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 Lambert v. Hoke. 13 Q Lament v. Haight. 22 Lancaster v. Richardson. 123 Lane v. Cary. 12 q v. Town of Hancock. 21 24 v. Wheeler. 23 The Highway Law of New York. XXlll Table of cases cited. Page Langlois v. Cohoes. 26 Lansing v. Caswell. 89 v. Wiswall.105, 121 Lapham v. Rice. 137 Lavery v. Hannigan.116, 118 Lawrence v. New York. 70 Lawson v. Woodstock. 22 Lechner v. Village of Newark. 155 Ledyard v. Ten Eyck. 102 Lee v. Sandy Hill. 67 Le Roy v. New York. 85 Lewis v. Railroad Co. 105 Little v. Denn. 116 Livingston v. New York. 80, 82, 107 Lord v. Atkins. 107 Loudoun v. Railroad Co. 150 Lowell v. Railroad Co.*. 109 Lowerre v. New York. 83 Lozier v. Railroad Co. 108 Ludlow v. Oswego. 100 Lyon v. Munson. 101 M. Mackey v. Locke... 22 Maginnis v. Brooklyn. 26 Mahon v. Railroad Co. 108 Mali v. Lord. 153 Manger v. Harrison. 116 Mann v. Worrall. 106 Marble v. Whitney. 66, 72, 73, 89, 101 Mark v. West Troy. 104 Markey v. County of Queens. 25, 135 Martin v. Brooklyn . 70 Marvin v. Pardee. 122 Mather v. Crawford. 15, 131 Matter of 17th St. 107 127th St. 80 XXVI The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Page Matter of Pearl Street. 81, 85 Pierce. 80 Pugh. 76, 85 Riverside Park. 82 Rochester Railway Co. 109 R. R. Co. 69 Shawangunk Kill Bridge. 104 Srniddy. 70 Southern Boulevard. 75, 76, 85 South Seventh Street. 72, 76, 85 Spier. 140 Spuyten Duyvil Parkway. 70, 74, 82 Summit Street. 71 Taylor & Allen. 86 the Terrace. 79 Third Street. 85 Town Board. 14 Town of Hampton. 90 Trustees of Olean. 105 Twenty-ninth Street. 79 Twenty-sixth Street. 75 Union Avenue. 85 Wall Street. 69 Washington Park. 70, 86 Washington Street. 71 William Street. 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85 Woolsey. 82 Mayer v. New York. 73 Mayor v. Railroad Co. 110 McCaffrey v. Smith. 116 McCamus v. Gaslight Co. 117 McCarthy v. Syracuse. 107 v. Whalen. 72, 73, 89, 102, 145 McCormack v. Brooklyn. 71 McCormick v. City of Amsterdam. 66 McCruden v. Rochester Ry. Co. 108, 148 McDermott v. Conley. 117 The Highway Law of New York. xxvii Table of cases cited. Page McFadden v. Kingsbury. 30, 33, 123 McGean v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 McGuinness v. Town of Westchester. 26 McMahon v. Town of Salem... 24 McMannis v. Butler. 66 McVee v. Watertown. 67, 100 Merrill v. Brooklyn. 82, 86 Metcalf v. Garlinghouse. 84 Metropolitan Exhibition Co. v. Newton. 124 Milhau v. Sharp . 106, 107, 115 Military Parade Ground. 70 Miller v. Brown. 71 v. Garlock. 104 Mills v. Hall. 115 Mitchell v. Metropolitan Ry. Co . 109 v. White Plains. 80 Moebus v. Herman. 150 Monk v. Town of New Utrecht. 22, 24 Mooney v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. HO v. Trow, &c. Co.140, 150 Moore v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 109 v. Village of Fairport.123, 124 Moran v. McClearne. 80 Morey v. Town of Newfane. 21 Morgan v. King.103, 112 Morrison v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 107 Mortimer v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 109 Mott v. Clayton.105, 107 v. Commissioners.119, 120 v. Consumers’ Ice Co. 153 v. New York. 100 Munson v. Hungerford. 103 Murphy v. Brooklyn. 102 v. Orr. I 50 Murray v. Graham. N. Naylo v. Glazier. I 24 XXX The Highway Law of New York People Table of cases cited. v. Goodwin.. v. Gray. v. Green. v. Greene. v. Griswold. v. Hall. v. Harris. v. Haverstraw. v. Heddon. v. Hildreth. v. Horton. v. Hudson. v. Hunting. v. Hynds. v. Ireland.. v. Jones. v. Judges. v. Keck. v. Kellogg. v. Kerr. v. Kingman. v. Kniskern. v. Law. . v. Lawrence. v. Lawson. v. Lambier. v. Lewis. v. Loehfelm. v. Lohnas. v. May. v. McDonald. v. McIntyre. v. McNeil. v. Meach. v. Melville. v. Mills. v. Mohawk Bridge Co Page 85, 89 78 74 70 70 39 87 87 ... 86, 87 86 ... 89,117 131 ... 122, 124 ... 71, 89 89 ... 70, 84 .. 5, 71, 85 . 73, 74, 97 67 ... 106, 107 89, 102, 105 77, 87 106 84 84, 105 102 81 66, 104 69 91 69, 134 14 70 134 86 70, 73 22 The Highway Law of New York xxxi People Table of cases cited. Page v. Moore. 86, 89, 90, 130 v. Hosier. 72, 74, 78, 99 v. Mott. 77, 80 y. Nash. 72, 86 v. New York.118, 162 v. Nichols. 70, 85 v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. 100 v. Osborn. 78, 84, 104, 105 v. Pierce. 41 &c. v. Pierce. 40 v. Pike. 70 v. Plainfield. 87 v. Potter. 76, 81 v. Railroad Co. 106 ex rel. Lovett v. Randall. 3 v. Robertson. 87 v. Robinson.81, 128, 130 v. Schellenger. 81, 89 v. Scott. 76, 90 v. Sherman. 87 v. Sly. 6 v. Smith.15, 16, 77, 134 ex rel. Slater v. Smith. 143 v. Stedman. 78, 86 v. Strevell. 87, 90 v. Supervisors 8, 15, 21, 23, 69, 71, 73, 77, 79, 80, 81, 86, 93, 94, 97, 103, 134, 136. ex rel. Bevins v. Supervisors. 92, 93 ex rel. Everett v. Supervisors. 44 ex rel. Keene v. Supervisors. 135 ex rel. Root v. Supervisors. 135 ex rel. Sammis v. Supervisors. 90 ex rel. Scott v. Supervisors. 56 v. See. 81 v. Supervisors of Kings County. 86 v. Sweet. 87 v. S} r racuse. 70, 76, 83 The Highway Law of New York. XXX11 Table of cases cited. People v. Tallman.. v. Talmadge. v. Taylor. v. Temple.. v. Thayer. v. Town Board . v. Underhill... ... v. Vail. v. Van Alstyne. v. Watertown. v. Wend. v. White . v. Whitney. v. Whitney’s Point. v. Williams. Peters v. Carleton. v. Kendall. v. New York. Phelps v. Hawle} r . Phillips v. Macedon. v. Schumacher. Pike y. Bosworth. Plank Road v. Railroad. Plant v. R. R. Co. Pollock v. Morris.. Pond v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. Porter v. Village. Port Jervis v. National Bank . Post v. Hazlett.„. v. Ry. Co. v. West Shore R. R. Co.. Potter v. Benniss. Pratt v. People. Presbyterian Society v. Railroad Co Pugsley v. Anderson. Purroy v. Schuyler.. Page . 78 . 87 ..124, 127 . 84, 89, 90 . 85, 86 ... 15, 16, 131 . 66 . 73 84, 87, 102, 105 . 87 . 81 . 81 . 80 , 86 . 72, 78 .... 71, 120 70 ... 103, 111 71 137, 139, 140 26 71, 90, 119, 145 ..149, 150 . 108 .107, 108 . 80 . 109 . 104 . 117 . 107 . 104 . 19 58 72 106 124 123 The Highway Law of New York. xxxm Table of cases cited. R. Page Radway v. Briggs. 102 Railroad Co. v. Artcher.125, 126 v. Brownell. 69, 91 v. Brunnell. 91 v. Greenbush. 91 v. Kane. 82 v. Kerr. 91 v. Morrisania. 82 v. Northern Turnpike Co. 108 v. Railroad Co. 124 v. Silverstone. 91 v. Utica. 116 v. Williamson. 91 Railway Co. v. Supervisors. 40 Ramsden v. Railway. 110 Rankert v. Town of Junius. 25 Rauenstein v. Railroad Co. 70 Read v. Buffalo. 26 Re Bogart’s Estate. 80 Rector v. Clarke. 87 v. Pierce. 23 Rex v. County. 101 Rexford v. Knight. 93, 103, 106 Rex v. Lyon. 101 v. Railway Co. 103 Rhines v. Town of Royalton.. 24 Richardson, &c. Co. v. Barstow Stove Co. 117 Rich v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 110 Riker v. New York. 80 Riley v. Town of Eastchester. . 21, 26 Rinehart v. Young. 36, 40, 41, 55, 58 Roberts v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 109 Robbins v. Gorham. 119 Robinson v. Chamberlain. 103 v. Fowler. 21 v. Railroad Co. 108 XXXIV The Highway Law of New York Table of cases cited. Page Robinson v. Town of Fowler. 25 Roe v. Elmendorf. 26 Rounds v. Railroad Co. 153 Rozell v. Andrews. 67, 119 Rue y. Sprague. 121 Rugby Charity v. Merriweather. 102 Rummell v. Railroad Co. 107 Rush v. Manhattan Ry Co. 109 S. Sage v. Brooklyn.. Satterly v. Winne. Saunders v. Townsend. Schild v. Railroad Co. Schimpf v. Sliter. Schomer v. Rochester. Schreiber’s Appeal. Scott y. Hough. Seneca Road Co. v. Railroad Co... Shea v. Railroad Co. Sherman v. Kane. Simmonson v. Stellenmerf. Simmons v. Sines. Slater v. Manhattan Ry. Co. Smith v. Bailey. v. Dygert. y. Ferris. v. Helmer. v. Mayor. v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co v. Ryan. .. v. Town of Clarkstown .... v. Village of White Plains v. Wright. Snyder v. Plass. v. Trumpbour. . 71, 79 .125, 128 .102, 121 . 19, 109 . 150 .. 25, 26 . 76 . 117 . 108 .151, 153 . 73 .149, 150 . 71 . 109 . 151 . 149 . 93 . 9 . 25 . ... 110 . 117 . 26, 117 . 70 22, 24, 30, 131 5, 90, 104, 105 .... 78, 87. 90 The Highway Law of New York. XXXV Table of cases cited. Page Speir v. New Utrecht. 104, 105 Sperb v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 Spicer v. Slade.119, 120 Splittorf v. State. 25 Stacy v. Phelps. 23 Starr v. Rochester . 71 Stebbins v. Kay. 82, 83, 93 Steimmetz v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 Sterry v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 109 Stewart v. Porter Mfg. Co. 117 v. Railroad Co. 153 v. Waller. 72 Stone v. Town of Poland. 26 Storck v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. 109 Story v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co . 109 Strickland v. Woodworth. 124 Striker v. Kelly. 87, 93 Sun Publishing Assn. v. The Mayor. 103 Supervisor of Galway v. Stimson.121, 155 Surdam v. Fuller. 138 Sutphen v. Town of Hempstead. 23 Syracuse Salt Co. v. Railroad Co. 108 T. Talmage v. Huntting.105, 122 Taylor v. Porter. 124, 128, 131 v. Town of Constable. 26, 30 Terpenning v. Smith. 87 Thacher v. Supervisors...... 184 Thayer v. Lewis.*. 58 Theall v. Yonkers..... 23 Thompson v. Allen. 116 v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 109 Tierney v. Troy. 26 Tiffany v. Gifford. 81 XXXVI The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Page Tingue v. Port Chester. 83 Todd v. Birdsall. 121 v. Todd. 72 Tompkins v. Hodgson ... 107, 116 Town of Corning v. Head. 66 , 104, 116, 122 Galen v. Plankroad Co. 21 Gallatin v. Loucks. 21 Kirkwood v. Newbury. 13^ Palatine v. Railroad Co. 19 Salamanaca v. Cattaraugus Co. 135 Sardinia v. Butler.120, 122 Weekfield v. Shasley.119, 123 Windsor v. D. & H. C. Co. 19 Wirt v. Supervisors... 134 Treanor v. Eichhorn. 135 Trustees of Jordon v. Otis. 102, 117, 155 y. Morse. 40, 41 v. Railroad Co. 108 Tucker v. Rankin. 5, 72 Turner v. Williams. 80 Turnpike Co. v. Buffalo. 20 v. Smith. 106 V. Van Alstyne v. Freday.... 8 , 15 Van Amringe v. Barnett. 106 Van Bergen v. Bradley. 144 Van Brundt v. Town of Flatbush. Ill Vandemark v. Porter.100, 105 Vanderbeck v. City of Rochester. 101 Vandermark v. Porter. 104 Van Gassbeck v. Saugerties. 24 Van Valkenburgh v. New York. 77 Van Wyck v. Lent. 119 Village of Canandaigua v. Benedict. 108 Fulton v. Tucker. 45 Voorhees v. Martin. H 9 The Highway Law of New York. xxxv ii Table of cases cited. W. Page Wager v. Railroad Co.108, 110 Wakeman v. Wilbur. 67, 105, 123 Walker v. Cay wood. 100, 103, 105, 115, 122 v. Moseley. 58 Wallace v. Karlenowefski. 69 Waller v. Town of Hebron.21, 24, 26 Walsh v. New York. . . 26 v. Trustees. 26 Warmer v. Village of Randolph. 25 Washburn v. Mt. Kisco. 26 Watrous v. Shear. 8 Weber v. Buffalo Ry. Co. 25 Weed v. Village of Ballston Spa. 44 Weinckie v. Railroad Co. 71 Welch v. Wilson. 115 Wells v. Sibley. 118 v. Town of Salina. 14 Westlake v. Koch. 112 West v. McGurn . 130 Wetmore v. Atlantic &c., Co. 102 v. Tracy. 114, 119, 123 Whitaker v. Railroad Co. 112, 150, 153 Whitcher v. Water Works Co. Ill White v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 110 v. Town of Ellisburgh. 143 v. Wiley. 112 Whitesides v. Green. 105 Whitlock v. Town of Brighton. 15, 24 Whitmore v. Village of Tarry town. 70 Whitney v. Town of Ticonderoga. 12, 21 Wicks v. Thompson. 105 Wiggin v. New York. 69 Wiggins v. Tallmadge. 67, 102, 104, 105 Wilbrandt v. Railroad Co. 112 Wildreck v. Hagar. 73 Wiley v. Smith. 19 xxxviii The Highway Law of New York. Table of cases cited. Page Williams v. Hynes. 118 v. Railroad Co. 108 v. Safford. 112 Wilson v. Railroad Co. 69 Winnegar v. Roe. 7 Woodman v. State. 25 Woodruff v. Paddock.100, 106 Wood v. Watertown. 26 Woolsey v. Tompkins. 72, 76 Worster v. Railroad Co. 110 Wright v. Wilcox. 153 Wyman v. New York. 82 Y. Yates v. Hathaway.105, 106 Young v. Town of Macomb. 24 THE HIGHWAY LAW. CHAPTER 568, LAWS 1890. An Act in Relation to Highways, Constituting Chapter Nineteen of the General Laws. CHAPTER NINETEEN OF THE GENERAL LAWS. The Highway Law. Article I. Highway officers, their general powers and duties. (§§1-24.) II. Asssessment for highway labor. (§§ 30-53.) III. The duties of overseers of highways, and the performance of highway labor. (§§ 60-73.) IV. Laying out, altering and discontinuing highways and laying out private roads. (§§ 80-133.) V. Bridges. (§§ 130-145.) VI. Miscellaneous provisions. (§§ 150-164.) VII. The regulation of ferries. (§§ 170-174.) VIH. Repealing and other clauses. (§§ 180-183.) ARTICLE I. Highway Officers, Their General Powers and Duties. Section 1. Short title. 2. Treasurer of highway commissioners. 3. Powers of one commissioner. 4. General powers of commissioners. 5. Mile-stones and guide-boards. 6 . Road machines and implements. 2 The Highway Law of New York. Treasurer of highway commissioners. Section 7. Stone-crushers and materials. 8. Custody of stone-crushera. 9. Additional tax. 10. Extraordinary repairs of highways or bridges. 11. Auditing expense thereof. 12. Accounts, how made out. 13. Unsafe toll-bridge. 14. Drainage, sewer and water pipes in highways. 15. Actions for injuries to highways. 16. Liability of towns for defective highways, 17. Action by town against commissioners. 18. Audit of damages without action. 19. Reports of commissioners. 20. General duties of overseers. 21. Opening obstructed highways. 22. Penalties against overseers. 23. Penalties, how collected. 24. Compensation of overseers. 25. Division of town into highway commissioner districts. 26. Duties of commissioner in each district. Section 1. Short title* —This chapter shall be known as the highway law. New. See notes under § 100, post, as to what constitutes a highway. See L. 1893, ch. 655, Appendix, post. § 2. Treasurer of highway commissioners .—When there is more than one commissioner of highways in any town, they shall designate one of their number to be treasurer. If they fail so to do, the commissioner longest in office shall be the treasurer; and all money collected & for highway purposes, or belonging to the highway fund of the town, shall be paid to him. Before receiving such money, he shall execute to the town an undertaking, to be approved by the supervisor, to the effect that he will faithfully account and pay over to any officer or person The Highway Law of New York. 3 Powers of one commssioner. entitled thereto, any money that may^come into his hands as such treasurer. Revised from L. 1873, eh. 395, \ 5. As to the election of highway commissioners, see Town Law, §§ 12, 13, 15, Appendix, post; oath of office, Town Law, §§ 51, 56, Appendix, post; regular undertaking required to be given by each commissioner, in addi¬ tion to the one required by this section, Town Law, §§ 63, 66, Appendix, post; official oath and undertakings, Public Officers Law, §§ 10, 15; an officer lawfully holding over, Public Officers Law, § 5; vacancy in office, Town Law, § 65, Appendix, post; highway commissioners as fence viewers, Town Law, § 21, Appendix, post, and \\ 100, 102-105, 108, 124, 125, 127- 130; commissioners to resign to town clerk, Public Officers Law, § 21; re¬ moval from office for misconduct, &c., Public Officers Law, § 25a. See L. 1897, ch. 481, § 21, Appendix, post, amending Town Law as to election of highway commissioners. As to term of office of highway commissioner. ( People ex rel. Lovett v. Randall, 151 N. Y. 497.) § 3. Powers of one commissioner. —When any town has but one commissioner of highways, the term, commis¬ sioners of highways, when used in this chapter, shall mean such one commissioner. Practically new. A somewhat similar provision was found in L. 1873, ch. 395, § 6, hereby repealed. That section was amendedby L. 1881, ch. 644, but the amendment was subsequently repealed by L. 1883, ch. 196. For similar provisions, see Town Law, § 15, Appendix, post, and Statu¬ tory Construction Law, § 18. § 4. General poivers of commissioner .—The com¬ missioners of highways in the several towns, shall have the care and superintendence of the highways and bridges therein, except as otherwise specially provided in relation to incorporated villages, cities and other localities; and they shall 4 The Highway Law of New York. General powers of commissioner. 1. Cause such highways and bridges to be kept in repair, and give the necessary directions therefor; Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 1. See §§ 16, 17, post, and notes thereunder as to liability of town and high¬ way commissioners for defective highways. As to powers and duties of highway commissioners as water com¬ missioners of their towns, see R. S. part III, ch. 8, tit. 16, § 16; as to care and preservation of town sewers, drains or culverts by the highway commis¬ sioners, see L. 1893, ch. 545, § 8; as to improvement of village streets by officers thereof, see Village Law, §§ 140-169, Appendix, post; as to care of highways on tribal lands, see Indian Law, §§ 12, 73, 80, Appendix, post. Because the statute imposes upon the overseers of highways the duty of keeping them in repair, the commsssioners are not relieved from that duty also and from giving the requisite directions to the overseers. And they must also use reasonable diligence to see that their directions are observed. (Bartlett v. Crozier, 17 Johns. 437; Farman v. Town of Ellington, 46 Hun, 41; Bryant v. Town of Randolph, 44 St. Rep. 86.) Powers of highway commissioners discretionary; no absolute and imper¬ ative duty to repair is imposed. ( Peck v. Batavia, 32 Barb. 641.) Commissioners of highways have no authority to lay out new roads through wild or unimproved lands. ( Goidd v. Glass, 19 Barb. 179.) Commissioners of highways may take gravel within the bounds of the highway for the purpose of repairing the road in other places. ( Duryea v. Smith, 42 St. Rep. 565.) Highway officers may not take soil from the land of an owner to use for highway purposes at other places than on his land. ( Cotanch v. Grover 57 Hun, 272.) The provisions of the statute intended for the government of citizens and do not pertain to the affairs of Indians. ( Bishop v. Barton , 2 Hun, 436.) The statute which prescribes the powers and duties of commissioners of highways should, when applied to village trustees, who are declared com¬ missioners, be liberally construed and their acts under it indulgently re¬ garded. (Gh'aves v. Otis, 21 Hill, 466.) 2. Cause such highways as shall have been laid out, but not sufficiently described, and such as shall have been The Highway Law op New York. 5 General powers of commissioner. used for twenty years, but not recorded, to be ascertained, described and entered of record in the town clerk’s office; Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 1. See notes under § 100, post. What constitutes a proper description. (Tucker v. Rankin, 15 Barb. 471.) No authority is conferred upon commissioners to adjudge what was originally intended in relation to the width or location of the road, further than such intention is manifested by actual user. (.People v. Judges, 24 Wend. 491.) Cannot enlarge or change location of road. {Snyder v. Plass, 28 N. Y. 4C5; Colev. Van Keuren, 41 Hun, 262; Ivory v. Town of Deerpark, 116 N. Y. 476; James v. Sammis, 132 N. Y. 239.) Where the commissioners of highways have ascertained and described a road under this section, their certificate is not a defence to an action against an overseer of highways for trespass, where such certificate did not purport to be based either upon a record or upon an adjudication of user for twenty years; and proof is admissible on behalf of the plaintiff that the road was not a public highway either by use or by dedication. {Kelsey v. Burgess, 12 Supp. 169.) 3. From time to time, not oftener than once a year, divide the town into so many highway districts as they shall judge convenient, by writing, under their hands, to be filed with the town clerk, and by him to be entered in the town book, at least ten days before an annual town meeting. A territory not exceeding one square mile, con¬ taining a population of not less than one hundred and fifty, and not including a part of a city or village, may be established as a separate highway district in the following manner: A verified petition of two-thirds of the electors of such territory representing two-thirds of the taxable property therein and describing the territory, may be pre¬ sented to the highway commissioner at least twenty days before the annual town meeting. The petition shall state the population of the proposed district, and the taxable persons and property as appears by the last preceding 6 The Highway Law of New York. General powers of commissioner. assessment roll of the town. A farm or lot shall not be divided in the formation of such district. Within ten days after the presentation of such a petition, the highway commissioner shall establish the district in the manner above required for other highway districts. The highway district so established shall not be abolished, except upon the petition or written consent of two-thirds of the electors representing two-thirds of the taxable property of the district. The highway commissioner may extend the highway district, so established, not more than half a mile in any direction, and if it is so extended an order shall be entered accordingly. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 1. Amended by L. 1897, ch. 782. See People v. Sly, 4 Hill, 593. 4. Assign to each of the highway districts such of the inhabitants and corporations liable to work on highways, as they shall think proper, having regard to proximity of residence as much as may be; Revised from 1 R. S ., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 1, as amended by L. 1853, ch. 63. See § 31, post, as to lists of taxable inhabitants and corporations, how furnished to commissioners, and § 33, post, as to method of assessment of labor on highways. 5. On the fifteenth day of April of each year, make and file with the town clerk, a written appointment of a resident of each district, to be overseer of highways therein. The town clerk shall notify each overseer of his appointment, within ten days after the filing thereof: and the person so appointed and notified, shall thereupon become and be the overseer of highways within his district for one year, and until his successor shall be ap¬ pointed. If any person so appointed overseer, shall refuse to The Highway Law of Hew York. 7 General powers of commissioner. serve, or his office shall become vacant, the commissioners shall in like manner appoint some other person to be overseer; Revised from L. 1865, eh. 522, sec. 7, as amended by L. 1880, eh. 503, and from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, sec. 14. Amended by L. 1900, eh. 399, taking effect April 12, 1900. Person appointed overseer liable to a penalty of $10 for refusal to serve. (Town Law, sec. 55; Winnegar v. Roe, 1 Cow. 258; Haywood v. Wheeler, 11 Johns. 432; Bentley v. Phelps, 27 Barb. 524.) 6. "Require overseers of highways to warn all persons and corporations assessed to work on highways, to come and work thereon, with such teams and implements, and at such times as the said commissioners, or any one of them shall direct; Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art • 1, § 1» See 60, 61, post, as to overseers giving warning. 7. Expend all moneys raised and collected from the town at large for highway purposes, upon the highways and bridges situated in, or upon the borders of the town, or highway districts assigned to the town in which such moneys were raised and collected, in such proportion as they may deem just and proper; Revised from L. 1878, ch. 377, § 2, superseded hereby. See §§ 16, 17, post , and notes thereunder as to liability of town and high¬ way commissioners for defective highways. See L. 1895, ch. 717, Appendix, post, providing [that highway commis¬ sioners, where the money system of highway labor has been adopted, must file their contracts with the town clerk. See Town Law, § 182, as to con¬ tracts being in name of town. See L. 1890, ch. 332, Appendix, post, as to certain moneys received from licenses to be paid over to the highway com¬ missioners. The collector of taxes in each district is required to pay over to the highway commissioners the moneys raised for the support of the highways and bridges of the town. (Tax Law, § 56.) Discretion of commissioners of highways regarding expenditures of The Highway Law of New York. General powers of commissioner. money in their hands must be reasonably exercised. (Ivory v. Town of Deerpark, 116 N. Y. 476 ) Commissioners have no authority to borrow money or give promissory note binding upon successors. ( Van Alstyne v. Freday , 41 N. Y. 174; Barker v. Loomis , 6 Hill 464; People v. Supervisors, 93 N. Y. 39 <; People v. Burrell, 14 Misc. 217.) Commissioners must be sued as such upon their contracts; there is no personal liability. ( Boots v. Washburn, 79 N. Y. 207.) When a town meeting votes to raise money for a bridge, the commis¬ sioner of highways is charged with the duty to erect it. ( Birge v. Ber¬ lin Iron Bridge Company, 16 Supp. 596.) The power of commissioners of highways to loan moneys in their hands and to enforce the collection of securities taken therefor, is fairly deriv¬ able from their general powers and duties. ( Commissioners v. Peck, 5 Hill. 215.) See Watrous v. Shear, 25 W. D. 164; People v. Genge, 38 St. Rep. 345; Furman v. Taylor, 41 St, Rep. 791; Freel v. County of Queens, 9 App. Div. 186. 8. Have power to enter upon the lands of any person adjoining any of the rivers, streams or creeks of the state, drive spiles, throw up embankments, and perform such other labor as may be necessary upon the banks of such rivers, streams or creeks tor the purpose of keeping them or any of them within their proper channels and prevent¬ ing their encroachment upon any of the highways of the state, also to enter upon any lands adjoining any highway, and which lands during the spring freshets or any time of high water are subject to overflow from such rivers, streams or creeks, and to remove or change the position of any fence or other obstruction which prevents the free flow of water under or through any highway, bridge or culvert, whenever the same may be necessary for the protection of any highway, and to protect such highways and the prop¬ erty of the town from damages by reason of such rivers, streams or creeks washing away their embankments, or changing the location of the channels, and to agree with the owner of any such lands upon the amount of damages, if any, sustained by him in consequence of such entry upon his lands and the performance of the work herein author¬ ized, and the amount of the damages so agreed upon shall be a town charge, and shall be audited and paid in the same manner as other town charges. If the commissioners are unable to agree with such owner upon the amount of The Highway Law op New York. 9 Mile-stones and guide-boards. damage thus sustained, the amount thereof shall be ascer¬ tained and determined and paid in the same manner as damages for the laying out and opening of highways are required by law to be ascertained, determined and paid, where the commissioners and land owner are unable to agree upon the amount thereof. Added to/ X,. 1891, ch. 212, and amended by L. 1899, chap. 344, taking effect April 17, 1899. See §§ 83-89, post , as to method of ascertaining damages in case of dis¬ agreement. An act authorizing the taking of private property for public purposes, and providing for a just compensation to the owner, is not unconstitu¬ tional because it omits to make the assessment and payment of damages a condition precedent to an entry upon and occupation of the premises. (Smithy . Helmer , 7 Barb. 416.) § 5. Milestones and guide-boards .—Commissioners of highways may cause mile-boards or stones to be erected upon the highways in their town as they think proper; they shall also cause guide-posts, with proper inscriptions and devices, to be erected at the intersectings of such highways therein, as they may deem necessary, which shall be kept in repair at the expense of the town, by the overseers of the highways of the districts in which they are respectively located. Upon the written application of five resident taxpayers of any town or twenty resident taxpayers of the county in which any such town is located to the commissioners of highways, requesting the erection of one or more guide-boards at the intersection of high¬ ways in such town, the commissioner of highways shall cause to be erected at the intersections mentioned in such application such guide-boards, indicating the direction, distances and names of the towns, villages or cities to or through which such intersecting highways run. Such application shall designate the highway intersections at which such guide-boards are requerted to be erected and 10 The Highway Law op New York. Road machines and implements. may contain suggestions as to the inscriptions and devices to be placed upon such boards. The cost of the erection and maintenance of such boards shall be a town charge. If the commissioner of highways refuses or neglects for a period of sixty days after receiving within application to comply with the request contained in such application, he shall for such neglect or refusal forfeit to the town the sum of twenty-five dollars to be recovered by the supervisor in the name of the town, and the amount so recovered shall be set apart for the erection of such guide-boards. Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, §§ 5, 9, 10; qmended by L. 1895, ch. 330. See notes under § 153, post , as to penalties for injuring mile-stones and guide-posts. As to the erection of mile-stones and guide-posts by turnpike or plank- road corporations, see Transportation Corporations Law, § 136, Appendix, post. § 6. Road machines and implements .—Commis¬ sioners of highways may, upon the request of one or more overseers of the highway districts of their town, con¬ tract for and purchase for such district or districts, upon credit or otherwise, a good and sufficient scraper and plow, or either of them, and if a majority of the tax¬ payers of one or more highway districts in any town, rep¬ resenting more than one-half of the* taxable property in such district or in each or such districts, to be ascertained by the last preceding assessment roll and certified to as such by the town clerk of the town, petition the commis¬ sioner or commissioners of highways of such town there¬ for, ;such commissioners may together with the super¬ visor and overseer or overseers of such district or districts contract for and purchase upon credit or otherwise, a road machine for the use of such district or districts, which implements shall be used, cared for and owned by such The Highway Law of New York. 11 Road machines and implements. district or districts jointly. Such implements shall bo paid for out of the highway tax of the district or districts for which they are purchased, and may be paid for in annual installments, not exceeding five. If purchased for more than one district the amount paid by each shall be in proportion to the amount of highway tax; a copy of the note or contract issued upon the purchase of such imple¬ ments, shall be filed in the office of the town clerk of the town in which such town or road district is situated, and it shall be the duty of said town clerk to present a state¬ ment of the sum due thereon to the town board at each annual meeting thereafter for the audit of town charges, and the town board shall audit such sum and certify the same to the board of supervisors of the county. Not more than one-half of the highway tax of any district shall be applied in payment therefor, in any one year. The por¬ tion of such tax so applied, shall be required to be paid in money, and be assessed and levied upon the property of such district or districts, and collected in the same manner as other town charges are assessed, levied and collected, except that the amount thereof shall be put in a separate column upon the tax roll, and the board of supervisors of the county shall cause the sum certified by the town board, to be levied upon the taxable property of such highway district. Such commissioner of highways shall with the assistance of the overseers of highways, in any road district which is to be charged with the payment for such machine after the completion of the assessment roll, and ten days before the meeting of the board of supervisors of the county, make and deliver to the super¬ visor of such town a list of the persons in such district or districts who are named in the last assessment roll of the town and chargeable with the payment of a tax for such machine. The commissioner or commissioners of high¬ ways may, also, with the approval of the town board, 12 The Highway Law op New York. Stone crushers and materials. purchase and hold for the use of the town at large, one oi more road machines, and pay for the same with money appropriated and set apart for highway purposes. It shall be the duty of the commissioner or commissioners of highways of each town to keep the road machines belong¬ ing to such town, or any road district or districts in such town in repair, if such repairs are reasonable, and pay the expenses thereof out of the general highway funds of the town, and also to provide a suitable place for housing and storage of all tools, implements and machinery that are owned by the town or by the several highway districts and cause these tools and implements and machinery to be stored therein when not in use. When such repairs upon any road machine belonging to any road district or dis¬ tricts shall exceed the sum of eight dollars in any one year, such expense shall be assessed and levied upon the property of such districts in the same manner as above provided for the collection of the purchase money of said machines, and when collected shall be paid to the com¬ missioner or commissioners of highways of said town. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 11, and various amendments thereto. Amended by L. 1895, ch. 586, by L. 1896, ch. 987, and by L. 1898, ch. 155. See L. 1895, ch. 717, Appendix, post, providing that highway commis¬ sioners, where the money system of highway labor has been adopted, must file their contracts with the town clerk. See Town Law, § 182, as to contracts being in name of town. Road scraper left in road by commissioner, held to be an obstruction. {Whitney v Town of Ticonderoga, 127 N. Y. 40.) § 7 Stone crushers and materials _The town hoard and commissioner or commissioners of highways of any town may, when authorized by a majority vote of the electors voting thereon, by ballot, at the annual or at a special town meeting, purchase a machine for crushing The Highway Law of New York. 13 Custody of stone crushers. stone, to be used, under the direction of the commis¬ sioner or commissioners of highways of said town, for the improvement of the highways thereof, and the commis¬ sioners of highways of any such town may, in any year, when authorized by a majority vote of the electors voting thereon, by ballot, at the annual or at a special town meeting, expend in said year a sum not exceeding two thousand dollars, for the purpose of purchasing stone, and quarrying, breaking, crushing and placing the same on the highways, in such road district or districts as the town board may direct and defraying the expenses of operating such machine, and shall present the account and vouchers for said purchases and expenses to the town board for audit, and the amount audited, together with the cost of such stone crushing machine, when not before included, shall be levied and collected as other town audits. Revised from L. 1884, ch. 220. Amended by L. 1895, ch. 411. See L, 1895, ch. 499, Appendix, post, authorizing town boards and high¬ way commissioners to expend additional sums for grading and macada¬ mizing highways. See L. 1891, ch. 809, Appendix, post , as to the acquisition of gravel beds by condemnation or purchase. § 8. Custody of stone crushers. —Such machine, when purchased, shall be under the care and custody of the commissioners of highways of the town; and where there is an incorporated village constituting a separate high¬ way district, in any town, they may, by an agreement with the trustees of the village, permit an equitable use of the machine to such separate village district. Revised from L. 1884, ch. 220. § 9. Additional fate.—Whenever the commissioners of highways of any town shall determine, that the sum of five hundred dollars will be insufficient to pay the ex- The Highway Law of New York. 14 Extraordinary repairs of highways or bridges. penses actually necessary for the improvement of highways and bridges, they may cause a vote to be taken by ballot at any town meeting, to be duly called, authorizing such additional sum to be raised as they may deem necessary for such purpose, not exceeding one-third of one per centum upon the taxable property of the town, as shown by the last assessment roll thereof. Revised from L , 1832, eh. 274, and L. 1857, eh. 615, § 1. See Town Law, §§ 33-34, as to method of taking vote. See § 130 ff . post, and County Law, § 60 ff., Appendix, post, as to joint liability of counties and towns for the improvement of bridges. See L. 1890, ch. 291, Appen¬ dix, post, as to the raising of an additional tax of $300 for the erection of wire fences to prevent snow drifting in highway. As to power of supervisors to authorize a town, under the County Law, to issue bonds for moneys raised to improve its highways. ( Ohiglione v. Marsh, 23 App. Div. 61; People v. McIntyre, 154 N. Y. 628; Berlin Bridge Go. v. Wagner, 57 Hun, 346; County Law, §§ 12, 13, 14.) Power of town to raise money by immediate taxation by vote at open town meeting for improvement of its roads and bridges. ( Birge v. Berlin Bridge Co., 133 N. Y. 477; Berlin Bridge Co. v. Wagner, 57 Hun, 346; Hill v. Supervisors, 12 N. Y. 58.) Towns have no general power to borrow money for municipal purposes or to pay town charges. ( Wells v. Toivn of Salina, 119 N. Y. 280.) The act of 1857, ch. 615. (Matter of Town Board , 26 St. Rep. 285.) § 10. Extraordinary repair* of highways or bridges .—If any highway or bridge shall at any time be damaged or destroyed by the elements or otherwise, or become unsafe, the commissioner of highways of the town in which such highway or bridge may be, may cause the same to be immediately repaired or rebuilt, if consented to by the town board, but if the expense thereof exceed five hundred dollars, it shall be done under a written contract therefor, which must be ap¬ proved by the town board, and the commissioners of highways shall present the proper vouchers for the expense thereof to the town board, at their next annual The Highway Law of New York. 15 Auditing expense thereof. meeting, and the same shall be audited by them and col¬ lected in the same manner as amounts voted at town meetings. Revised from L. 1858, ch. 103, § 1, as amended by L. 1865, ch. 442, § 1. Amended by L. 1895, ch. 606; amended by L. 1899, ch. 84, takinq effect March 14, 1899. ^ See § 142, post, as to repairing bridges for which two or more towns are jointly liable; § 145, post, as to the erection of iron bridges; notes under §§ 16, 130, 134, post, as to liability of towns for the repair of bridges. Commissioners of highways have no power to contract a debt against the town by borrowing money for the repair of roads and bridges. {Barker v. Loomis, 6 Hill, 464; Van Alstyne v. Freday, 41 N. Y. 174; People v. Supervisors, 93 N. Y. 397; People v. Burrell, 14 Misc. 217.) A commissioner of highways has no authority to bind a town, except such as is expressly conferred by statute. {Mather v. Crawford, 36 Barb. 565.) Power of highway commissioners under this section to borrow money upon the credit of the town to pay for bridges {Boots v. Washburn, 79 N. Y. 207.) Commissioners of highways have no general authority to bind a town by their contracts save in exceptional cases prescribed by statute. {People ex rel. Everett v. Supervisors, 93 N. Y. 397; Berlin Bridge Co. v. Wagner, 57 Hun, 346.) As to what constitutes “consent of town board.” {People ex rel. State v. Smith, 64 St. Rep. 420.) Commissioners of highways must show that they have attempted to avail themselves of this statutory provision, if town is to be relieved from liability to one injured by their neglect to repair a defect in a highway known to them. {Whitlock v. Town of Brighton, 2 App. Div. 24.) Commissioner of highways has exclusive control of the construction of a bridge, after it is ordered by the town board. {People ex rel. Groton Bridge Co. v. Town Board, 92 Hun, 587.) When town board consents that a commissioner of highways shall con¬ struct a bridge, it becomes its duty to audit his bill on the merits when duly presented. {People v. Smith, 83 Hun, 432.) See Bruner v. Lewis, 22 St. Rep. 93. § 11. Auditing expense thereof \—The town board may be convened in special sessions by the super¬ visor, or in his absence, by the town clerk, upon 16 The Highway Law of New York. Accounts, how made out. the written request of any commissioners of high¬ ways, and the bills and expenses incurred in the erection or repairs of any such highways or bridges, may then be presented to, and audited by the town board; and the supervisor and town clerk shall issue a certificate, to be subscribed by them, setting forth the amount so audited and allowed, and in whose favor, and the nature of the work done and material furnished, and such certificate shall bear interest from its date, and the amount thereof, with interest, shall be levied and collected in the same manner as other town expenses. Revised from, L. 1858, ch. 103, § 2. Mandamus will lie to compel a town board to audit a claim for moneys expended in rebuilding a bridge by a commissioner of highways who was authorized so to do under the provisions of § 10 of the Highway Law. (People v. Smith , 83 Hun, 432; People v. Town Board, 92 Hun, 585.) A town board acts judiciously in determining its liability, and its action cannot be reviewed or controlled by the courts through a writ of man¬ damus. {People v. Barnes , 114 N. Y. 317.) Where a town board has consented to the repairing of a bridge it must allow the reasonable expense thereof. ( People v.' Smith, 83 Hun, 432.) § 12. Accounts 9 how made out .—No account for ser¬ vices rendered, or material furnished according to the provisions of this chapter, shall be allowed by such board unless the same shall be verified in the same man¬ ner as town accounts are required by law to be verified, nor unless the commissioners of highways shall certify that the service has been actually performed, and the ma¬ terial was actually furnished, and that the same was so performed or furnished by the request of such commis- sioners; and the town board may require and take such other proof as they may deem proper, to establish any claim for such labor and material, and the value thereof. Revised from L. 1858, ch. 103, § 3. See Town Law, § 167, as to verification of accounts. The Highway Law of New York. 17 Unsafe tollb-ridge. § 13. Unsafe toll-bridge .— Whenever complaint in writing, on oath, shall be made to the commissioners of highways of any' town in which shall be, in whole or in part, any toll-bridge belonging to any person or corpora¬ tion, representing that such toll-bridge has from any cause become, and is unsafe for the public use, such commis¬ sioners of highways shall forthwith make a careful and thorough examination of such toll-bridge, and if upon the examination thereof, they shall be of the opinion that the same has from any cause become dangerous or unsafe for public use, they shall thereupon give immediate notice to the owners of such toll-bridge, or to any agent of such owners, acting as such agent, in respect to such bridge, that they have on complaint made, carefully and thoroughly examined the bridge, and found it to be unsafe for the public use. Such owners shall thereupon immediately commence repairing the same, and cause such repairs to be made within one week from the day of such notice given, or such reasonable time thereafter as may be nec¬ essary to thoroughly repair the bridge, so as to make it in all respects, safe and convenient for public use; and for neglect to take prompt and effective measures so to repair the bridge, its owners shall forfeit twenty-five dollars; and shall not demand or receive any toll for using the bridge, until the same shall be fully repaired; and the commissioners of highways shall cause such repairs to be made, and the owners of the bridge shall be liable for the expense thereof, and for the services of the commissioners at two dollars per day; and upon the neglect or refusal to pay the same upon presentation of an accouut thereof, the commissioners of highways may recover the same by action, in the name of the town. Revised from L. 1873, eh. 448. ' 2 18 The Highway Law of New York. Urainage, &c., pipes in highway. § 14. Drainage 9 sewer and water pipes in high¬ ways .—The commissioners of highways may upon written application of any resident of their town, grant permis¬ sion to lay and maintain drainage, sewer and water pipes and hydrants under ground, within the portion therein described, of any highway within the town, but not under the traveled part of the highway, except to cross the same, for the purposes of sewerage, draining swamps or other lands, and supplying premises with water, upon condition that such pipes and hydrants shall be so laid as not to interrupt or interfere with public travel upon the highway. The consent of the commissioner shall be executed in duplicate, signed by him and indorsed with the written approval of the supervisor and the acceptance of the applicant, and one of such duplicates shall be delivered to the applicant and the other filed with the town clerk. The consent shall also contain a provision to the effect that it is granted on the condition that the appli¬ cant will replace all earth removed, and leave the high¬ way in all respects in as good condition as before the laying of said pipes; that the applicant will keep such pipes and hydrants in repair and save the town harmless from all damages which may accrue by reason of their location in the highway; that upon notice by the commissioner, the applicant will make any repairs required for the protection or preservation of the highway; that upon his default such repairs may be made by the commissioner at the expense of the applicant, and that such expense shall be a lien prior to any other lien upon the land benefited by the use of the highway for such pipes or hydrants; and that the commissioner may also, upon the applicant’s default, revoke the permission for the use of the highway, and remove therefrom such pipes or hydrants. Revised from L. 1873, ch. 63, as amended by L. 1886, ch. 452. Amended by L. 1897, ch. 204. See note under § 100, post, as to “Uses of Highways.” See Nicoll v. Sands, 131 N. Y. 19. The Highway Law of New York. 19 Actions for injuries to highways. § 15. Actions for injuries to highways .—The com¬ missioners of highways may bring an action, in the name of the town, against any person or corporation, to sustain the rights of the public in and to any highway in the town, and to enforce the performance of any duty enjoined upon any person or corporation in relation thereto, and to recover any damages sustained or suffered or expenses incurred by such town, in consequence of any act or omis¬ sion of any such person or corporation, in violation of any law or contract in relation to such highway. Revised from L. 1855, eh. 255, and L. 1878, cli. 49. See § 153, post , and notes thereunder as to penalties for injuries to high¬ ways; § 164, post, as to actions by commissioners to recover penalties. See Town Law, § 182, providing that actions be begun in name of town; Railroad Law, §11, Appendix, post, as to duty of railroad at intersection with highway. See note under § 100, post, as to “Uses of Highways;” note under § 157, post, as to duties of railroads at crossings. As to duty of railroad in restoring and maintaining highway. {Allen v. Buffalo, &c. Co., 151 N. Y. 434.) A railroad corporation, having its rails in a public highway, must lay and keep them so as to cause as little injury as possible. ( Schild v. R. R. Co., 133 N. Y. 449; Wiley v. Smith, 25 App. Div. 351.) The restoration of a highway to its 'former state is a continuous duty, and the right to enforce it is not barred by the Statute of Limitations. {Town of Windsor v. D. & H. C. Co., 92 Hun, 127.) Commissioner of highways has no power to dictate to a railroad com¬ pany how it shall restore a highway to its original condition, but is authorized to maintain an action to enforce the performance of this duty. {Post v. West Shore R. R., 123 N. Y. 580.) Duty of a railroad to restore a highway to its former state does not relieve a highway commissioner from caring for the approaches to the railroad crossing. {Bryant v. Town of Randolph, 133 N. Y. 70; Buchholtz v. Railroad, 66 Hun, 377.) Sufficiency of a complaint by a town to compel a railroad company, which has given notice of its abandonment of a highway, to surrender the whole. {Town of Palatine v. Railroad Co., 22 App. Div. 181.) 20 The Highway Law of New York. Liability of towns for defective highways. The town has a right of action for any injury caused to its bridges, even though such injury be caused by the state. ( Bidelman v. State, 110 N. Y. 282 .) As to the liability of a municipal corporation for injuries to a bridge it has ordered removed. ( Turnpike Co. v. Buffalo , 58 N. Y. 639.) See People v. Dettmer, 26 App. Div. 327, as to right of Brooklyn park commissioners to bring an action under this section. § 16. Liability of towns for defective highways .— Every town shall be liable for all damages to person or property, sustained by reason of any defect in its high¬ ways or bridges, existing because of the neglect of any commissioner of highways of such town. No action shall be maintained against any town to recover such damages, unless a verified statement of the cause of action shall have been presented to the supervisor of the town, within six months after the cause of action accrued; and no such action shall be commenced until fifteen days after the service of such statement. Revised f rom L. 1881, ch. 700, § 1. This section was evidently intended to preserve the law as established by the statute of 1881. See § 4, subd. 1 and 7, ante, as to duty of highway commissioners to repair highways. See §§ 104, 105, post, as to liability for encroachments upon highway. The town in its corporate character has no control over the highways. It cannot lay out a highway or discontinue one. It is not liable for failure to keep highways in repair. Highways are not the property of the town, and the use is in the public not for the benefit of the inhabitants of the town alone, but of the whole community. The town exercises but two important functions in respect to highways; it elects the commissioners of highways and determines, through the electors in town meeting, what snm .shall be laised by taxation for the improvement of highways and bridges. The election of commissioners of highways by the town is a convenient method of designating suitable public agents to discharge the duties imposed for general public purposes upon those officers, and the state has committed to the portion of the public residing in the locality to The Highway Law of New York. 21 Liability of towns for defective highways. determine within certain limits what amount of taxation shall be imposed for the support of highways. These circumstances do not, however, make highway officers the agents of the town, so as to subject the town to lia¬ bility for their acts. ( People v. Auditors of Esopus, 74 N. Y. 310; Morey v. Town of New fane, 8 Barb. 645; Town of FishJcill v. Plankroad Co., 22 Barb. 645; Town of Gallatin v. Loucks, 21 Barb. 578; Town of Galen v. Plankroad Co., 27 Barb. 543; Gailorv. Herrick , 42 Barb. 79; Peoples. Super¬ visors, 93 N. Y. 397; Robinson v. Fowler, 80 Hun, 101; Hughes v. Bingham, 135 N. Y. 347.) The impairment of a public highway may be no less such by an obstruc¬ tion placed in it than by a physical disturbance. ( Whitney v. Ticonderoga, 127 N. Y. 40.) Duty of a town to see that its streets and highways are in a safe con¬ dition, is measured by circumstances. ( Glasier v. Town of Hebron, 131 N. Y. 447.) Same held regarding duty of commissioners of highways. (Dow v. Town of Oyster Bay , 84 Hun, 510; Clapp v. Town of Ellington, 87 Hun, 542; Waller v. Town of Hebron, 5 App. Div. 577; Foels v. Town of Tonaivanda, 75 Hun, 363.) The responsibility of the town is measured by the responsibility of the commissioner, who is chargeable only where the injury is due to his failure to exercise ordinary care in the performance of his duties. ( Lane v. Toivn of Hancock, 142 N. Y. 510; Riley v. Town of Eastchester, 18 App. Div. 94.) Town is not liable unless upon the same facts its commissioner of high" ways wmuld have been liable before the passage of the act. ( Clapper v. Town of Waterford, 131 N. Y. 382; Bryant v. Town of Randolph, 133 N. Y. 70; Lane v. Town of Hancock, 142 N. Y. 510.) When from the facts of the case a town could not recover over against the commissioner of highways, the plaintiff in an action to recover damages for an injury sustained by reason of an alleged defect in the highway, could not recover against the town. {Waller v. Town of Hebron, 5 App. Div. 577.) It is the negligence of the highway commissioners which gives the right of action against their respective towns. ( Bidwell v. Town of Murray, 40 Hun, 190; Farman v. Town of Ellington, 46 Hun, 41.) As to evidence of negligence of town not being evidence of negligence of highway commissioner. {Glasier v. Town of Hebron , 41 St. Rep. 752.) Liability of city or village not measured by liability of its highway com¬ missioners as in case of town. {Burns v. I onkers, 8o Hun, 211.) 22 The Highway Law of New York. Liability of towns for defective highways. However it may be in cities and in incorporated villages, in towns there may be defects in highways, very serious ones, without negligence on the part of the commissioner of highways. Where a commissioner has not enough money to repair all the roads in his town, a mistake in judgment after such careful consideration as the circumstances require is not negli¬ gence. ( Patchen v. Town of Walton, 17 App. Div. 158.) If highway commissioners err in judgment in expending such funds as they have, when the same are not sufficient to make all needed repairs, the town is not liable. {Monk v. Town of New Utrecht , 104 N.Y. 552.) This discretion must be reasonably exercised. ( Ivory v. Town of Deer- park, 116 N. Y. 476.) Highway commissioners are not chargeable with negligence unless they had knowledge of the necessity of repairing bridges; but they must inspect all bridges and use due diligence to ascertain defects, ( Hicks v. Chaffee, 13 Hun, 293; Lawson v. Woodstock, 20 Weekly Dig. 570; Cousins v. Carncross, 21 Weekly Dig. 435; Bidwell v. Murray, 40 Hun, 190.) Commissioners of highways having the requisite funds in hand or under their control, are bound to repair bridges which are out of repair, they having notice of their condition; and they are bound to repair them with reasonable and ordinary care and diligence, and if they omit this duty, they are liable to individuals who sustain special damages from such neglect. Notice to the commissioners may be constructive notice. {Hover v. Barklioof, 44 N. Y. 113; Smith v. Wright, 24 Barb. 176; Mackey v. Locke, 28 St. Rep. 218.) Highway commissioners are liable individually for any injury resulting from their own neglect to repair a highway, if they have funds provided for such a purpose, to any person who has sustained damages. {People v. Board of Town Auditors, 75 N. Y. 316; Bullock v. Town of Durham, 64 Hun, 380.) Individual liability of commissioners for injuries received in conse¬ quence of failure to repair a highway. {Babcock v. Gifford, 29 Hun, 186; Lament v. Haight, 44 How. Pr. 1.) Highway commissioners are liable to persons injured on a bridge out of repair, when there are funds on hand with which to repair. {Smith v. Wright, 24 Barb. 170; s. c., 27 Barb. 621. As to the indictment of highway commissioners for failing to repair a bridge. {People v. Adsit, 2 Hill, 619; People v. Mohawk Bridge Co., 7 Alb. Law Jour. 232.) The Highway Law of New York. 23 Liability of towns for defective highways. Liabitily of commissioners for the acts of their predecessors. ( Gould v. Booth, 66 N. Y. 62.) For failure to repair a bridge between adjoining towns the highway commissioners of such towns are jointly liable. ( Bryan v. Landon, 3 Hun, 500; Theall v. Yonkers, 21 Hun, 265.) Where two towns are jointly liable for the care of a bridge under a legislative act, an action will lie against them jointly for failure to repair. {Oakley v. Mamaroneck, 39 Hun, 448.) It is not necessary to sue two towns jointly, although they are jointly liable for the negligence of their highway commissioners. ( Clapp v. Town of Ellington, 87 Hun, 542.) A highway commissioner is negligent in leaving a bridge partly unfinished and in a dangerous condition, even though he be out of funds for its completion. {Rector v. Pierce, 3 S. C. 416; see, also, Stacy v. Phelps, 47 Hun, 54, and Lane v. Wheeler , 35 Hun, 606.) Liability of town for existence of snowdrift within one day after ceasing of storm. {Dorn v. Town of Oyster Bay , 84 Hun, 510.) Commissioners of highways owe no greater duty in the matter of keep¬ ing a road in repair, to bicyclists than to other travelers. {Sutphen v. Town of Hempstead, 80 Hun, 409.) The filing with the supervisor of the statement required by this section is a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action. {Borst v. Town of Sharon, 24 App. Div. 599; Reining v. Buffalo, 102 N. Y. 308; Curry v. Buffalo, 135 N. Y. 366.) No substitute for the statement or waiver thereof will be of effect. {Borst v. Town of Sharon, 24 App. Div. 599.) Condition that a verified statement of the cause of action shall have been presented to the supervisor within six months, is not unconstitu¬ tional. {Olmsteed v. Town of Pound Ridge, 71 Hun, 25.) In an action against a town for damages, the complaint must allege that the town had or could obtain funds for repairing its bridges. {Eveleigli v. Hounsfield, 34 Hun, 140; but see Oakley v. Mamaroneck, 39 Hun, 448 ) It is a defense to an action for damages against a commissioner of high¬ ways for injuries sustained in consequence of a defective highway to show that he was without the necessary funds to make the repairs and without the power to raise such funds. {Clapper v. Town of Waterford » 131 N. Y. 382; Barker v. Loomis, 6 Hill, 463; People ex rel. v. Supervisors, 24 The Highway Law of New York. Liability of towns for defective highways. 93 N. Y. 397; Hover v. Barkhoof, 44 N. Y. 113; Hines v. City of Lockport, 50 N. Y. 236; Monk v. Toivn of New Utrecht, 104 N. Y. 552.) Lack of funds to repair is a good defense on the part of highway com¬ missioners, and the burden is on them to show it. (Bidwell v. Murray, 40 Hun, 190; Getty v. Hamlin, 48 Hun, 1.) The lack of funds for repairs is an affirmative defense to be alleged and proven by the defendant. (Lane v. Town of Hancock, 87 Hun, 623.) Where the highway commissioners of a town are not furnished with sufficient funds to repair all the highways and bridges of a town, it is within their discretion as to which they shall repair and they cannot be held responsible in a civil action for damages resulting from the fact that certain highways or bridges are out of repair. (Garlinghouse v. Jacobs, 29 N. Y. 297; Smith v. Wright, 27 Barb. 627.) Commissioners not bound to repair either roads or bridges until neces¬ sary funds are provided. (Barker v. Loomis, 6 Hill, 464.) In order to make the defense as to funds complete, it must appear not only that there was a lack of funds, but an inability, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, to obtain them. Section 10 of this act provides for the raising of funds for extraordinary repairs. (Clapper v. Town of Waterford, 151 N. Y. 389; Whitlock v. Town of Brighton, 2 App. Div. 23; Young v. Town of Macomb, 11 App. Div. 480; McMahon v. Town of Salem, 25 App. Div. 1.) It is no defense in an action for damages, caused by a defective high¬ way, that the funds in the hands of the commissioner had been designed for payment upon ordinary contracts for work. (Rhines v. Town of Royalton, 40 St. Rep. 662.) The necessity of barriers along a road is usually a question of fact for the jury. {Waller v. Town of Hebron, 5 App. Div. 577; Glasier v. Hebron, 82 Hun, 311; Burns v. City of Yonkers, 83 Hun, 211; Van Gassbeck v. Saugerties, 82 Hun, 415; Lane v. Town of Hancock, 67 Hun, 623.) The fact that a road which ascends gradually, which is in excellent con¬ dition and which experience has not shown to be dangerous, has no guards upon its sides, does not necessarily charge the town with negligence. (Patchen v. Town of Walton, 17 App. Div. 158.) Duty of highway commissioner to care for approaches to a railroad crossing. {Bryant v. Town of Randolph, 133 N. Y. 70.) The defendant, a contractor with the state, held liable for failing to The Highway Law of New York. 25 Liability of towns for defective highways. properly safeguard the highway, while constructing a bridge. (Weber v. Buffalo Ry. Co., 20 App. Div. 292.) Discussion of the liability of a village for failing to guard a dangerous portion of a highway by a railing. ( Warner v. Village of Randolph, 18 App. Div. 458.) The existence of an unguarded sluiceway open on each side of a village highway, which has existed for a number of years and has caused nurner" ous accidents is itself sufficient evidence of the negligence of the high¬ way commissioner. ( Rankert v. Town of Junius, 25 App. Div. 470.) The fact that before the occurrence of an accident at a defective bridge, the highway commissioners had procured materials for its repair, and did repair it on the following day, warrants the inference that they had funds, or means to procure funds, to repair the bridge. (Getty v. Toivn of Hamlin, 8 Supp. 191.) t The fact that a road has been used as a public highway for many years and has been so recognized by town officers, renders the town liable to a traveller for injuries sustained by reason of negligence of highway com¬ missioners to keep it in repair. (Ivory v. Town of Deerparh, 116 N.Y. 476.) Town is not liable for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the highway commissioner, to a workman, engaged by him, to repair the road. (Robinson v. Town of Fowler, 80 Hun, 101.) Where a highway commissioner in making repairs to a highway found it necessary to shut off water from plaintiff's mill and it was shown that he prosecuted his work with diligence, he is not held liable in damages for the loss to the mill owner. (Kerr v. Joslin, 49 St. Rep. 257.) As to the liability of the State in regard to its bridges. (Carpenter v. Cohoes , 81 N. Y. 21; Schomer v. Rochester, 15 Abb. N. C. 57; Splittorf v. State. 108 N. Y. 205; Woodman v. State, 127 N. Y. 397.) A county is not liable for its neglect to keep a public bridge in repair. (Ensign v. Supervisors of Livingston, 25 Hun, 20.) Although the duty of maintaining a bridge is imposed upon a county by special act, the county is not liable for damages for injuries arising from the neglect of the county to make repairs. (Ensign v. Supervisors, 25 Hun, 20; see also notes under § 130, post; Markey v. County of Queens, 154 N. Y. 675.) A city must keep its streets in reasonable repair. (Smith v. Mayor, 17 App. Div. 438.) As to the liability of villages incorporated under Laws 1870, cli. 291, to 26 The Highway Law of New York. Action by town against commissioners. repair bridges within their corporate limits. ( Washburn v. Mt. Kisco, 35 Hun, 329.) Bridges erected by private corporations must be kept in repair by such corporations; there is no liability of the town. (Roe v. Elmendorf, 52 How. Pr. 232, Evers v. Hudson River Bridge Co ., 18 Hun, 144; Babcock v. N. Y C. R. R. Co., 20 Weekly Dig. 477; Heacockx. Sherman, 14 Wend. 58; Dygert v. Schenck, 23 Wend. 446.) As to the liability for injuries received upon the New York and Brooklyn Bridge. (Walsh v. New York, 107 N. Y. 220; Hannon v. Agnew, 96 N. Y. 439; Walsh v. Trustees, &c., 96 N. Y. 427.) As to what evidence is admissible to show that a bridge forming part of a city street was controlled by the city. ( Scliomer v. Rochester, 15 Abb. N. C. 57.) When this statute will not be construed to act retrospectively. (Frasier v. Town of Tompkins, 30 Hun, 168; Bullock v. Town of Durham, 46 St. Rep. 460.) Further cases as to the liability of towns and cities for damages arising from defective and unsafe highways and bridges. ( JSlaginnis v. Brooklyn, 26 St. Rep. 689; Herrington v. Phoenix, 41 Hun, 270; Langloisx. Cohoes, 58 Hun, 226; Wood v. Watertoivn, 58 Hun, 298; Clapp v. Ellington, 51 Hun, 58; Phillips v. Macedon, 27 Weekly Dig. 331; Taylor v. Constable, 57 Hun, 371; Schomer v. Rochester, 15 Abb. N. C. 57; Carpenter v. Cohoes, 81 N. Y. 21; Tierney v. Troy, 41 Hun, 140; Farman v. Town of Ellington , 46 Hun, 41; Clapper v. Town of Waterford, 62 Hun, 170; Stone v. Toivn of Poland, 58 Hun, 21; Bullock v. Town of Durham, 64 Hun, 380; McGuinness v. Town of Westchester, 66 Hun, 356; Smith v. Town of Clarkstown, 69 Hun, 155; Oakley v. Town of Mamaroneck, 39 Hun, 448; Read v. Buffalo, 20 Alb. Law Jour. 55.) See Waller v. Toivn of Hebron, 5 App. Div. 577; Riley v. Toivn of East- chester, 18 App. Div. 94; Jones v. Utica, 16 Hun, 441. § 17. Action by town against commissioners .—If a judgment shall be recovered against a town for damages to person or property, sustained by reason of any defect in its highways, or bridges, existing because of the neglect of any commissioner of highways, such commissioner shall be liable to the town for the amount of the judgment, and The Highway Law of New York. 27 Audit of damages without action. interest thereon; but such judgment shall not be evidence of the negligence of the commissioner in the action against him. Revised from L. 1881, ch. 700, §§ 2, 3. See § 4, subd. 1 and 7, ante, as to duty of highway commissioners to repair highways. See notes under § 16, ante. Code of Civil Procedure, § 1931, as to judgments against highway com¬ missioners: § 1931. When execution against officer not to issue. —An execu¬ tion cannot be issued upon a judgment for a sum of money, rendered against an officer in an action or special proceeding brought by or against him, in his official capacity, pursuant to this article; except where it is rendered against the trustee or trustees of a school district, or the com¬ missioner or commissioners of highways of a town. In either of those cases, an execution may be issued against and be collected out of the property of the officer, and the sum collected must be allowed to him, in the settlement of his official accounts, except as otherwise specially pre¬ scribed by law. § 18. Audit of damages without action .—The town board of any town may audit as a town charge, in the same manner as other town charges are audited, any one claim not exceeding five hundred dollars, for damages to person or property, heretofore or hereafter sustained by reason of defective highways or bridges in the town, if in their judg¬ ment it be for the interest of the town so to do; but no claim shall be so audited, unless it shall have been pre¬ sented to the supervisor of the town, within six months after it accrued, nor if an action thereon shall be barred by the statute of limitations. The town board may also audit any unpaid judgment heretofore or hereafter recov¬ ered against a commissioner of highways for any such damages, if such town board shall be satisfied that he acted in good faith, and the defect causing such damage did not exist because of the negligence or misconduct of 28 The Highway Law of New York. Reports of commissioners. the commissioner, against whom such judgment shall have been recovered. Revised from L. 1881, eh. 700, § 4, as amended by L. 1889, ch. 146. See § 154, post, as to liability of town for bridge breaking. See Town Law, §§ 162-170, as to auditing of town charges. No absolute liability imposed upon towns for all judgments recovered against a sole commissioner of highways in actions prosecuted by him in his official name. The board of town auditors have power to determine whether the action was rightfully prosecuted. In determining as to the liability of the town the board acts judicially, and its action cannot be reviewed or controlled by the courts through a writ of mandamus. (.People v. Barnes , 114 N. Y. 317.) § 19. Reports of commissioners ,—The commissioners of highways of each town shall make to the town board, at its first meeting in each year, a written report stating, 1. The labor assessed and performed, 2. The sum received by them for penalties, commuta¬ tions and all other sources, and an itemized account of all moneys paid out during the year, with receipts in full by the respective parties to whom such money was paid; 3. The improvements which have been made on the highways and bridges, during the year immediately pre¬ ceding such report, and the state of such highways and bridges; they shall also make at the second meeting of said board in each year, a statement of the imorovements necessary to be made on such highways and bridges, and an estimate of the probable expense thereof, beyond what the labor to be assessed in that year will accomplish; a duplicate of which shall be delivered by the commissioners to the supervisor of the town, who shall present such duplicate statement to the board of supervisors, who shall cause the amount so estimated, not exceeding five hundred dollars in any one year, to be assessed, levied The Highway Law of New York. 29 General duties of overseers. and collected, in such town, in the same manner as other town charges. Revised f rom, 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1. §§ 3, 4, as amended by L. 1884, ch. 396, and from L. 1873, ch. 395, § 7. See Town Law, §§ 161-162, as to annual meetings of town board. See § 69, post , as to reports of overseers to commissioners. See Berlin Bridge Co. v. Wagner, 57 Hun, 346. § 20. General duties of overseers .—Each overseer of highways in every town, shall 1. Repair and keep in order the highways within his district. 2. Warn all persons and corporations assessed to work on the highways in his district, to come and work thereon. 3. Cause the noxious wmeds within the bounds of the highway within his district, to be cut down or destroyed twice in each year, once before the first day of July, and again before the first day of September; and the requisite labor therefor shall be considered highway work. 4. Collect all fines and commutation money, and execute all lawful orders of the commissioners. 5. Cause all loose stone lying in the beaten track of every highway within his district, to be removed once in every month, from the first day of April until the first day of December, in each year. Stones so removed shall not be thrown into the gutter, nor into the grass adjoining such highways, but they shall be conveyed to some place, from which they will not work back or be brought back into the track by the use of road machines or other implements used in repairing such highways. Amended by L. 1898, ch. 352. 6. Cause the monuments erected or to be erected, as the boundaries of highways, to be kept up and renewed, so 30 The Highway Law of New York. Opening obstructed highways. that the extent of such highway boundaries may be publicly known. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, §§ 6, 7. See § 4, subd. 5, 6, ante, as to appointment and duties of overseers; also, §§ 21-24, 31, 34, 35, 42, 46, 60-71, post; Town Law, §§ 51, 56, Appendix, post, and Public Officers Law, §§ 10-20, as to official oath and undertaking of overseer; Town Law, § 55, Appendix, post, as to penalty for refusal to serve; County Law, § 72, Appendix, post, as to erection of highway monu¬ ments by supervisors; §§ 70, 71, post, as to noxious weeds generally; Town Law, § 22, sub. 5, Appendix, post, as to regulation of noxious weeds by town meeting, and County Law, § 12, sub. 7, Appendix, post, as to regu¬ lation by supervisors; L. 1801, ch. 309, Appendix, post, as to the acquisi¬ tion of gravel for highway purposes by overseers. Overseers of highways are subordinate officers acting under the direction of the commissioners, who have the general supervision of the subject of the repair and maintenance of the highways. ( Farman v. Town of Elling¬ ton, 46 Hun, 41; Bartlett v. Crozier , 17 Johns. 439; Smith v. Wright, 27 Barb. 621; Day v. Day, 94 N. Y. 159.) The duty of overseers of highways does not depend upon the direction of the commissioners to do it. The statute changes the former with it. (McFadden v. Kingsbury, 11 Wend. 667; Farman v. Town of Ellington, 46 Hun, 41.) Highway officers may not take soil from the land of an owner to use for highway purposes at other places than on his land. ( Cotanch v. Grover, 57 Hun, 272.) The jurisdiction of overseers in the performance of their duty as to repairing extends over every part of the highway. ( Anderson v. Van Tassel, 53 N. Y. 631.) An overseer has no right in making repairs to change a water-course so as to flood the lands of an abutting owner. ( Moran v. McClearne, 63 Barb. 185.) As to duty of overseer to keep bridge in repair. ( Taylor v. Town of Con¬ stable, 57 Hun, 371.) § 21. Opening obstructed highways .—Whenever the labor in any district lias been worked out, commuted for, or returned to the supervisor, and the highways are The Highway Law of New York. 31 Penalties against overseers. obstructed by snow, or otherwise, and notice has been given to the overseer, in writing, by any two or more in¬ habitants of the town, liable to payment of highway tax, requesting the removal of such obstruction, the overseer of highways in such district, shall immediately call upon all persons and corporations liable to highway tax therein to assist in removing such obstructions; and such labor, so called for by the overseer, shall be assessed upon those liable to perform the same, in proportion to their original assessments. And all persons so called out and failing to appear at the place designated by the overseer, or to com¬ mute at a dollar a day, within twenty-four hours after due notice, shall be liable to a fine at the rate of one dollar and fifty cents a day, for each day’s labor they may be required to perform, which fine shall be collectible by the overseer, as such, by action in justice’s court, and shall be applied to the purposes specified in this section. The overseer shall be liable to a penalty of five dollars per day for every day he neglects, without good and sufficient rea¬ sons, to have such highway opened without delay after receiving such written notice, the penalty to be collected in justice’s court, by the person first suing for the same, and the penalty shall be paid over to the commissioners of highways for the use of the town. Prevised from L. 1868, ch. 791, $ 3, as amended by L. 1869, ch. 593. See § 72, post, as to abatement of highway tax by the removal of fences to prevent snow-drifting. See L. 1890, ch. 291, Appendix, post, as to the erection of wire fences for same purpose. § 22. Penalties against overseers .—Every overseer of highways who shall refuse or neglect, 1. To warn the persons and corporations assessed to work on the highways, when he shall have been required so to do, by the commissioners or either of them. 32 The Highway Law of New York. Penalties, how collected. 2. To collect the moneys that may arise from fines or commutations. 3. To perform any of the duties required by this chap¬ ter, or which may be enjoined on him by the commissioners of highways of his town, and for the omission of which no other penalty is provided, shall for every such refusal or neglect, forfeit the sum of ten dollars. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 16. The only remedy for an injury sustained on account of the neglect of the overseer to repair a bridge is an action for the penalty. A civil action will not lie. (Bartlett v. Crozicr, 17 Johns. 439.) An overseer of highways may, upon his own motion, continue to litigate an action brought against him for an official act, after judgment against him, and demand indemnity from the town for the costs thereafter in¬ curred. (People v. Auditors of Esopus , 74 N. Y. 310.) § 23. Penalties, liow collected .—The commissioners of highways shall prosecute, in the name of the town, every overseer of highways, for any penalties known to the commissioners to have been incurred by the overseer. They shall also upon the complaint of any resident of the town, that any such penalty has been incurred, prose¬ cute such overseer therefor, if satisfied that the com¬ plaint is well founded. The costs and expenses incurred . by the commissioners in good faith, in such proceedings, shall be a town charge, to be audited by the town board. If the commissioners refuse or neglect to prosecute for any such penalty for thirty days after such complaint shall have been made, the complainant may prosecute therefor in the name of the town upon indemnifying the town for the costs and expenses of such prosecution, in such man¬ ner as the supervisor may approve. If the commissioner shall neglect or refuse to prosecute for any such penalty, knowing that the same has been incurred, he shall be liable to a penalty of ten dollars for every such neglect or The Highway Law jSiew York. 33 Compensation of overseers. refusal, to be recovered by action, in the name of the town, brought by the supervisor, or by any taxpayer of the town who may indemnify the town, for the costs and expenses of the action, in such manner as the supervisor may approve. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, §§ 16, 17, 18. See McFadden v. Kingsbury , 11 Wend. 667. § 24. Compensation of overseers .—If any overseer 9hall bo employed more days iu executing the several duties enjoined upon him by this chapter, than he is assessed to work on the highways, he shall b3 paid for the excess, at the rate of twelve and a half cents per hour for each day, and be allowed to retain the same out of the money which may come info his hands under this chapter; but he shall not be permitted to commute for the days he is assessed, nor be entitled to receive any greater sum as compensation, pursuant to this section, than the amount of money in his hands applicable thereto. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 1, § 13, as amended by L. 1830, ch. 803. $ 1. A mended by L. 1899, ch. 78 , taking effect March 14, 1899. S ?3 L. 1870, ch. 311, Appendix, post, as to employment of overseers in dividing a highway on the line between cities or towns. > § 25. Division of town into highway commissioner districts. —When a town has determined upon having three commissioners of highways, the town board may at a regular or special meeting thereof divide the town into three highway commissioner districts, and assign one of such districts to each commissioner of highways. Notice of such division, containing a brief and accurate description of the boundaries of each district and the name of the commissioner assigned thereto, shall be published once a week for two succcessive weeks in a newspaper published in such town, or if no newspaper be published therein, such notice shall be posted in at least six conspicu¬ ous places in such town. After a town is divided, the 3 34 The Highway Law of New York. Duties of commissioner in each district. commissioner shall be elected or appointed, so that at all times one commissioner shall reside in each district. Added by L. 1898, ch. 127, § 26. Duties of commissioner in each district .— When a town is so divided, the commissioners shall appor¬ tion to each district the moneys raised and collected from the town at large for highway purposes and the commis¬ sioner assigned to or residing in a district shall expend the money so apportioned to his district upon the high¬ ways and bridges situated in or upon the borders thereof. Each commissioner shall cause the highways and bridges in his district to be kept in repair, and shall perform all the duties relating thereto, which the commissioners of highways of the town, except for such division, would perform. His powers and duties as to the supervision, repair, construction and improvements of the highways and bridges within his district shall be exclusive. As to all other powers and duties he shall act in conjunction with the other commissioners. Added by L. 1898, ch. 127. f l / i The Highway Law op Hew York 35 Assesessment for highway labor. ARTICLE II. Assessment for Highway Labob# n. Section 30. Meetings of commissioners. 31. Lists of inhabitants. 32. Non-resident lands. 33. Assessments of highway labor, how made#' 34. Copies of lists delivered to overseers. 35. Names omitted. 36. Appeals by non-residents. 37. Credit on private roads. 38. Certain assessments to be separate. 89. Tenant to deduct assessment. 40. Reassessment in case of neglect 41. Omissions of assessors corrected. 42. New assessments by overseers. 43. Sidewalks and trees. 44. Abatement of tax for shade trees. 45. Sidewalk tax anticipated. 46. Certificate of anticipation. 47. Transfer of certificate. 48. Abatement of tax for watering trough# 49. System of taxation defined. 60. Town may change its system. 51. Vote thereon. 62. When change to take effect. 53. Annual tax under money system; certain villages exempt therefrom. 54. (Adoption of county road system.) 55. (County engineer.) 66. (Expenses, how paid.) 57. (Issue of bonds, etc.) 58. (County roads under charge of supervisors and county engineer.) (59a. Proceeds of county bonds.) 36 The Highway Law of New York. Meetings of commissioners. Section 30. Meetings of commissioners ,—The com¬ missioners of highways of each town shall meet within eighteen days after the annual town meeting, at the town clerk’s office, on such day as they shall agree upon, and afterwards at such other times and places as they shall think proper. Revised f rom 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 2, § 2 r . r $ 31. T/ists of inhabitants, —Each of the overseers of highways shall deliver to the clerk of the town, within sixteen days after his appointment, a list subscribed by him, of the names of all the inhabitants in his highway district, who are liable to work on the highways; and the town clerk shall deliver such lists to the commissioners of highways. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 2, §§ 21, 23. See notes under § 33, post, as to exemptions from highway taxes. The provision requiring the overseer to deliver a list to the town clerk is merely directory. His omission to do so does not avoid the assessment made by the commissioners against persons^liable. (. Rinehart v. Young, 2 Lans. 354.) See Fowler v. Westervelt, 17 Abb. Pr. 59. § 32. Non-resident lands, — The commissioners of highways in each town, before making the assessment of highway labor, shall make out a list and statement, of the contents of all unoccupied lots, pieces or parcels of land within the town, owned by non-residents; every lot so designated, shall be described in the same manner as is required from assessors, and its value shall be set down opposite to the description; such value shall be the same as was affixed to the lot in the last assessment-roll of the town; and if such lot was not separately valued in such roll, then in proportion to the valuation which shall have The Highway Law of New York. 37 Assessments of highway labor, how made. been affixed to the whole tract, of which such lot shall be a part. Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 2, § 22, as amended by L. 1835, eh. 154, § 2. See notes under § 33, post. Highway taxes on the lands of non-residents are not required either to be assessed or to be put on the rolls or to be valued or verified by the board of assessors. ( Colman v. Shat tuck , 2 Hun, 497.) Nor to be covered by the warrant of the supervisors. ( Id .) See Ensign v. Barse, 107 N. Y. 329; Fowler v. Westervelt, 17 Abb. Pr. 59. o' 33. Assessments of highway labor, how made .— The commissioners of highways shall, at their first or some subsequent meeting, ascertain, assess and apportion the highway labor to be performed in their town, in the then ensuing year, as follows: 1. The whole number of days work to be assessed in each year, shall be ascertained, and shall be at least three times the number of taxable inhabitants in the town. 2. Every male inhabitant being above the age of twenty- one years (excepting all honorably discharged soldiers and sailors who lost an arm or a leg in the service of the United States, during the late war, or who are unable to perform manual labor by reason of injuries received, or disabilities incurred in such service, members of any fire company formed or created pursuant to any statute and situated within such town, persons seventy years of age, clergymen and priests of every denomination, paupers, idiots and lunatics), shall be assessed at least one day. 3. The residue of such days work, shall be apportioned and assessed upon the estate, real and personal, of every inhabitant of the town, including corporations liable to taxation therein, as the same shall appear by the last assessment-roll of the town, and upon each tract or parcel of land owned by non-residents of the town contained in 38 The Highway Law of New York. Assessments of highway labor, how made. the list made by the commissioners, excepting such as are occupied by an inhabitant of the town, which shall be assessed to the occupant. The assessment of labor for personal property, must be in the district in which the owner resides, and real property in the district where it is situated, except that the assessment of labor upon the property of corporations, may be in any district or districts of the town, and such labor may be worked out or com¬ muted for, as if the corporation were an inhabitant of the district, but the real property within an incorporated vil¬ lage or city, exempted from the jurisdiction of the com¬ missioners of highways of the town, and personal property of an inhabitant thereof, shall not be assessed for high¬ way labor by the commissioners of highways of the town. Whenever the assessors of any town shall have omitted to assess any inhabitant, corporation or property therein, the commissioners of highways shall assess the same, and apportion the highway labor as above provided. 4. The commissioners shall affix to the name of each person named in the lists furnished by the overseers, and of assessable corporations, and to the description of each tract or parcel of land contained in 'the list prepared by them of non-resident lands, the number of days which such person or tract shall be assessed for highway labor, as herein directed, and the commissioners shall subscribe such lists, and file them with the town clerk. 6. If the commissioners of highways shall neglect for one year, after any highway shall have been laid out, and title thereto acquired, to open or work the same, or any part thereof, and any inhabitant or corporation of the town, in or through which the highway runs, shall give ten days’ notice to the commissioners of the town, that they desire to apply the whole or any part of their high¬ way labor to the working of such highway, the commis¬ sioners shall assign such inhabitants and corporations to The Highway Law of New York. 39 Assessments of highway labor, how made. such highway district, direct the highway labor for which they are annually assessed to be applied to the same, and cause the same to be worked and put in good order for vehicles and travelers within one year, under the direction of any of such inhabitants, whom such commissioners may appoint as an overseer of the labor so to be applied to such highway; and when the number of days labor assessed in the current year to such inhabitants, as the annual highway tax, is not sufficient to put such highway in good order, the inhabitants and corporations may antici¬ pate the whole or any part of the highway labor assessed, and to be assessed against them, for a period not exceed¬ ing three years, but from no one of the districts of the town shall more than one-half of its annual labor be taxed and applied to any highway not embraced in such district. Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 2, §§ 19, 22, 24, 32, as variously amended. Amended by L. 1898, [eh. 353. See § 62, post, as to the rate per day for labor commuted; L. 1871, ch. 171, Appendix, post, as to the assessment of persons owning property partly within city or village; L. 1862, ch. 220, Appendix, post, as to exemption of officers of State Asylum for Idiots; Transportation Corpora¬ tions Law, § 150, Appendix, post, as to highway labor on line of turnpike road; Indian Law, § 94, Appendix, post, as to labor on Indian lands; County Law, § 93, as to employment of prisoners in county jail upon the highways; L. 1894, ch, 266, Appendix, post, as to the employment of state prison convicts upon highways; L. 1898, ch. 133, Appendix, post, as to employment of convicts upon highways in Clinton county. Where an application is made to commissioners of highways by citizens under the act of 1853, to be allowed to work out their apportionment of highway labor upon a plank road, the power to grant the application is discretionary with the commissioners, and they cannot be compelled to grant it. (Buffalo Plank Road Co. v. Commissioners of Highways, 10 How. Pr. 237.) A tenant living upon the line of a plank road may make such applica¬ tion. (People v. Hall, 15 How. Pr. 76.) The state cannot tax Indian reservation lands for highway purposes# 40 The Highway Law of New York. Copies of lists delivered to overseers. (.Fellows v. Denniston , 72 U. S. 761; s. c., 23 N. Y. 420; Indian Law, § 6.) The validity of an assessment for highway labor is not dependent upon the validity of the last assessment-roll of the towns, for the highway com¬ missioners have no discretion in making their assessment for highway labor to omit any real or personal estate appearing upon the assessment roll. So though the assessment by the assessors may have been void yet the assessment by the commissioners will stand. {Trustee s v. Morse , 56 Barb. 380.) Lands of nonresidents may be assessed for highway tax though they be wild and unimproved and not occupied or improved by the owner or his agent or servant. {Chamberlain v. Taylor, 36 Hun, 24; Ensign v. Barse, 107 N. Y. 329.) Where the commissioner in levying his tax follows the assessment-roll as herein provided, he is not liable to a plaintiff for the value of labor ren¬ dered by him in satisfaction of an assessment, although an error had been made by the assessors. {Hampton v. Hamsher, 124 N. Y. 634.) In respect to all his land in the town, each inhabitant is to be assessed for highway labor in the particular road district in which he resides. {Rinehart v. Young , 2 Lans. 354.) It was formerly held that the commissioners could tax only those corpor¬ ations which were assessed on the last assessment-roll of the town. {People, St. Rep. 881; People v. Commissioners, 42 Hun, 463.) The county court can not modify the decision of the commissioners so as to designate the width of the highway. (Matter of Feeney, 20 Misc. 272.) An order directing the laying out of a new road is not void because part of it is upon the bed of an old road two rods wide. {Snyder v. Plass, 28 N. Y. 465; Snyder v. Trumpbour , 38 N. Y. 355.) Motion to confirm order of county court laying out a highway denied on ground proof fails to show its necessity. {Matter of Town of Hampton, 21 App. Div. 628.) As to who may oppose the confirmation of the order of the county court by the appellate division {Matter of Oakley Avenue, 85 Hun, 446.) Where the order laying out the highway does not comply with the requirements of the statute in the matter of stating the width, courses, etc., the order will be reversed upon appeal. {People v. Diver, 19 Hun, 263.) A certificate, approved by the county court and general term, is nevertheless not conclusive of the right to locate the road. {People v. Temple, 27 Hun, 128.) As to the power of the board of supervisors to authorize the laying out of a highway of a less width than is now required by statute. {People v. Dains , 38 Hun, 43; Phillips v. Schumacher, 10 Hun, 411.) As to the power of a board ^of supervisors to appoint special commis¬ sioners to lay out a road through a building, under L. 1838, ch. 314, and L. 1848, ch. 164. {People ex rel. Sammis v. Supervisors, 12 Supp. 21; s, c., 58 Hun, 371.) See Matter of James, 43 Hun, 67; Elwood v. City of Rochester, 43 Hun, 109; s. c., 122 N. Y. 229; Snyder v. Plass, 28 N. Y. 465; Snyder v. Trump¬ bour, 38 N. Y. 355; People v. Scott, 8 Hun, 566; People v. Strevell, 27 Hun, 218; Matter of Oakley Avenue, 85 Hun, 446; Commissioners v. Judges, 7 Wend. 264; Herrick v. Stover, 5 Wend. 580; Gould v. Glass, 19 Barb. 179; People v. Commissioners, 27 Barb. 94; Harrington v. People, 6 Barb. 607; Carris v. Commissioners, 2 Hill, 443; Patchin v. Brooklyn , 2 Wend. 377, The Highway Law of New York. 91 Laying out highways through burying grounds. Highways Crossing Railroads. A public highway may be laid out across the track of a railroad com¬ pany, without ^compensation, though the company has purchased the fee. ( Railroad Co. v. Greeribush, 5 Lans. 461; Railroad Co. v. Kerr, 45 Barb. 1S8; Fx parte Kerr, 42 Barb. 119; Railroad Law, post; Railroad Co. v. SiJverstone, 46 St. Rep. 141.) This right extends to the whole roadbed. ( D. & H. C. Co. v. White¬ hall , 10 N. Y. 21.) But not to land condemned for depot purposes, or where tracks are laid for storing cars. ( Railroad Co. v. Greenbush, 52 N. Y. 510; Railroad Co. v. Williamson, 91 N. Y. 552; Railroad Co. v. Brunnell, 24 N. Y. 345; Matter of Alexander Avenue, 44 St. Rep. 546.) Such an act will be restrained by injunction. (Railroad Co. v. Brownell, 24 N. Y. 345; Railroad Co. v. Williamson , 18 W. D. 257.) The legislature, under the constitution, may require a railroad company to construct a bridge to carry a turnpike road over its track. ( People v. Boston & Albany R. R. Co., 70 N. Y. 569.) I See as to an incorporated village opening a street through a railroad “yard.” (Mattel' of Folts Street, 18 App. Div. 568.) A railroad company may appeal from an order laying out a street across its track. (People v. May, 27 Barb. 238.) See L. 1853, ch. 62, Appendix, post, regulating the construction of roads over railroad tracks. See notes under § 100, post, as to “Uses of Highways.” § 91. Laying out highways through burying grounds .—No private road or highway shall be laid out or constructed upon or through any burying ground, un- unless the remains therein contained are first carefully removed, and properly reinterred in some other burying ground, at the expense of the persons desiring such road or highway, and pursuant to an order of the county court of the county in which the same is situated, obtained upon notice to such persons as the court may direct. Revised from L. 1868, ch. 843, § 1. For a discussion as to the general policy of the legislature in regard to the taking of cemeteries and burying grounds for public purposes, see Mailer of Board of Street Opening, 62 Hun, 499. 92 The Highway Law of New York. Costs, by whom paid. § 92. Costs, by whom paid .—In all cases of assess¬ ments of damages by commissioners appointed by the court, the costs thereof shall be paid by the town except when reassessment of damages shall be had on the appli¬ cation of the party for whom the damages were assessed, and such damages shall not be increased on such reassess¬ ment, the costs shall be paid by the party applying for the reassessment; and when application shall be made by two or more persons for the reassessment of damages, all per¬ sons who may be liable for costs under this section shall be liable in proportion to the amount of damages respec¬ tively assessed to them by the first assessment, and may be recovered by action in favor of any person entitled to the same. Each commissioner appointed by the court, for each day necessarily employed as such, shall be entitled to four dollars and his necessary expenses. Revised from L. 1847, cli. 455, § 7. Amended by L. 1S97, ch. 344, § 2. See § 152, post, as to costs on motions. “ Costs” as referred to in this section are costs which may be allowed to one of the parties under the provisions of section 152. ( People ex rel. Bevins v. Supervisors, 82 Hun, 298.) The term ‘ ‘ costs ” cannot be deemed to apply to a bill for legal services rendered by an attorney employed by the highway commissioner. A highway commissioner cannot bind the town except under a power expressly conferred by statute and so would be personally liable for such a bill. {People ex rel. Bevins v. Supervisors , 82 Hun, 298.) When the commissioners report in favor of a proposed highway and assess the damages but the proceeding fails because of the absence of the necessary consent of the owner or certificate of the highway commis¬ sioners, the costs of the proceeding and the fees of the commissioners should be borne by the applicant. {Matter of Miller, 9 App. Div. 260; see § 83 of Highway Law, ante.) Fees of commissioners are not a charge upon the town where the proceeding to lay out a highway fails. {Matter of Miller, 9 App. Div. 206.) § 93. Damages assessed, and costs to be audited .— All damages to be agreed upon, or which may be finally The Highway Law op New York. 93 Damages assessed, and costs to be audited. assessed, and costs against the town, as herein provided, shall be laid before the board of town auditors, or in towns not having a board of town auditors, before the town board, to be audited with the charges of the commissioners, jus¬ tices, surveyors or other persons or officers employed in making the assessment, and for whose services the town snail be liable, and the amount shall be placed upon the town abstract and levied and collected in the town in which the highway is situated, and the money so collected shall be paid to the commissioners of highways of such town, who shall pay to the owner the sum assessed to him, and appropriate the residue to satisfy the charges aforesaid. Revised from L. 1847, eh. 455, § 23. Amended by L. 1898, eh. 106. The amendment of 1898 removes the auditing of the assessed damages from the board of supervisors to the town board. See notes under § 86, ante. See notes under § 92, ante, on People ex rd. Bevins v. Supervisors, 82 Hun, 298. See notes under § 87, ante, on “ Assessment of Benefits.” The legislature has power to lay a tax for the opening of a highway and may confer power to sell real estate in order to pay an assessment. {Strikers. Kelly , 7 Hill, 9; Rexford v. Knight, 15 Barb. 627; Stebbins v. Kay, 51 Hun, 589; s. c., 123 N.Y. 31.) Damages can be assessed as provided in the highway act and no more can be levied and collected of the town. ( People v. Supervisors, 28 N. Y. 116.) The payment or assessment of damages, held not to be a condition pre¬ cedent to the right to open the road. ( Case v. Thompson, 6 Wend. 634.) It is not a good objection to a bill for damages presented against a town that the road was built for state purposes. (. People v. Supervisors , 20 N. Y. 253.) Who is the owner in a legal sense. ( Smith v. Ferris, 6 Hun, 553.) Liability for interest on award of damages in city. {Barnes v. New York, 27 Hun, 236.) Municipal assessment for widening a street is a lien upon the^premises. {New York v. Colgate, 12 N. Y. 140.) 94 The Highway Law of New York. When officers of different towns disagree about highways. Municipal assessment in New York city under act of 1869. (Master of Broadway , 49 N. Y. 150.) Board of supervisors adjourning without acting upon claim for dam¬ ages. (People v. Supervisors , 20 N. Y. 252.) See People v. Supervisors , 5 Cow. 292; Matter of Lexington Avenue , 3 Hun, 221; People v. Supervisors, 16 Wend. 520. § 94. When officers of different towns disagree about highway .— When the commissioners of highways of any town, or officers of any village or city having the powers of commissioners of highways, shall differ with the commissioners of highways of any other town, or with the officers of such a village or city having the powers of commissioners of highways in the same county, relating to the laying out of a new highway or altering an old highway extending into both towns, or a town and a vil¬ lage or city, or when commissioners of highways of a town in one county, shall differ with the commissioners of highways of a town, or the officers of a village or city having the powers of commissioners of highways, in another county, relating to the laying out of a new high¬ way, or the alteration of an old highway, which shall extend into both counties, the commissioners of highways of both towns, or the officers of the village or city having such powers, shall meet on five days’ written notice, specifying the time and place, within some one of such towns, villages, or cities, given by either of such commis¬ sioners or officers having powers of commissioners of high¬ ways, to make their determination in writing, upon the subject of their differences. If they cannot agree, they or either of them may certify the fact of their disagreement to the county court of the county, if the proposed highway is all in one county, or if in different counties, or if the county judge is disqualified or unable to act, to the supreme court; such court shall thereupon appoint three commissioners, freeholders of the county, not residents The Highway Law of New York. 95 Difference about improvements. of the same town, village or city where the highway is located; or if between two counties, then freeholders of another county, who shall take the constitutional oath of office, and upon due notice to all persons interested, view the proposed highway, or proposed alteration of a high¬ way, administer all necessary oaths, and take such evi¬ dence as they shall deem proper, and shall decide (subject to the approval of the court, as hereinafter provided) all questions that shall arise on the hearing, as to the laying out or altering of such highway, its location, width, grade and character of road-bed, or any point that may arise relating thereto; and if they decide to open or alter such highway, they shall ascertain and appraise the dam¬ ages, if any, to the individual owners and occupants of the land through which such new or altered highway is proposed to pass, and shall report such evidence and decis¬ ion to such court, with their assessment of damages, if any, with all convenient speed. On the coming in of such report, the court may, by order, confirm, modify or set aside the report in whole or in part, and may order a new appraisal by the same or other commissioners, and shall decide all questions that may arise before it. And all orders and decisions in the matter shall be filed in the county clerk's office of each county where the highway is located, and shall be duly recorded therein. Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 72, as amended by L. 1881, ch. 513. An order of the special term setting aside a report of highway commis¬ sioners of different counties is appealable where it does not appear that the commissioners first met and certified to the fact of their disagree¬ ment. {Matter of Barrett, 7 App. Div. 482.) § 95. Difference about improvements .— When the commissioners of highways of a town, or the officers of a village or city having the powers of commissioners of high- 96 The Highway Law of New York. Difference about improvements. ways therein, shall desire to make a new or altered high¬ way extending beyond the bounds of such town, village or city, a better highway than is usually made for a com¬ mon highway, with a special grade or road-bed, drainage or improved plan, and are willing to bear the whole or a part of the expense thereof beyond such bounds, but can¬ not agree in regard to the same, upon written applica¬ tion of either of the commissioners or officers, and notice to all parties interested, such court shall make an equit¬ able adjustment of the matters, and may direct, that in consideration of the payment of such portion of the addi¬ tional expense by the town, village or city that desires the improved and better highway, shall be equitable, its officers, contractors, servants and agents may go into such town, village or city, and make the grade and road¬ bed, and do whatever may be necessary and proper for the completion of such better highway, advancing the money to do it; the amount of damages to each owner or occupant, shall be ascertained and determined by com¬ missioners, who shall be appointed, and whose proceed¬ ings shall be conducted in the manner provided by the last preceding section; and upon the coming in of their report of damages, and of the expenses paid, such court shall, on notice to all parties interested, direct that the amount of damages assessed to each owner or occupant, if any, and all such expenses be paid by each, any or all of such towns, villages or cities as shall be just and equitable, and the damages and expenses assessed and allowed, as in this and the last preceding sections, shall be paid and collected as if fixed by the commissioners of highways of the towns, or the officers of such villages or cities having the powers of such commissioners. Every commissioner appointed as herein provided, shall be The Highway Law of New York. 97 Highway in two or more towns. paid six dollars for each day actually and necessarily employed in such service and necessary expenses. Revised from! R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 72, as amended by L. 1881, eh. 513. § 96. Highway in two or more toivns, —When ap¬ plication is made to lay out, alter or discontinue a high¬ way located in two or more towns, all notices or proceed, ings required to be served upon the commissioners of high¬ ways, shall be served upon the commssioners of highways of each town; and the commissioners appointed by the court, shall determine the amount of damages to be paid by each town, and when the towns are in different counties, the application for the appointment of commis¬ sioners shall be made to a special term of the supreme court held in the district where the highway or some part of it is located; and the same proceedings shall thereafter be had in the supreme court of such district as are author¬ ized by this chapter to be had in the county court. Neio. If a person living in one cown initiates proceedings to lay out a high¬ way lying partly in that and partly in another town, and complies with all the statutory requirements, and the towns are in the same county, the county court is authorized to appoint commissioners in the matter. (People v. Keck , 90 Hun, 499.) The only notice of proceeding required to be served upon the commis¬ sioners is the application to lay out the highway; the statute nowhere requires the petitioner to serve notice of his application to the county court for the appointment of commissioners upon the highway commis- sioner of the town or towns. ( People v Keck , 90 Hun, 497.) See People v. Supervisors, 112 N. Y. 585. § 97. Laying out, dividing and maintaining high - ivay upon town line.— An application to lay out a high¬ way upon the line between two or more towns shall be 98 The Highway Law of New York. Highways upon town line. made to the commissioners of highways of each town, who shall act together in the matter; and, upon laying out any such highway, they shall divide into two or more highway districts, in such manner that the labor and expense of opening, working and keeping the same in repair through each of such districts may be equal, as near as may be, and to allot an equal number of the dis¬ tricts to each of the towns; each district shall be con¬ sidered as wholly belonging to the town to which it shall be allotted, for the purpose of opening and improving the highway and for keeping it in repair; and the commis¬ sioners of highways shall cause the highway and the parti¬ tion and allotment thereof to be recorded in the office of the town clerk in each of the respective towns. If such highway be upon a line between one or more towns and a city or incorporated village, such application shall also be made to the officers of such city or village having the powers of commissioners of highways, and such officers may agree with the highway commissioners of such towns as to the division of the labor and expense of opening, working and maintaining such highway. Whenever such officers shall disagree as to such division, application may be made for the appointment of commissioners, and the same procedure shall be had as is prescribed in this article for the settlement of disagreements between the highway officers of different towns. All highways here¬ tofore laid out upon the line between any two towns or between a town and a city or an incorporated village shall be divided and allotted or redivided and re-allotted, re¬ corded and kept in repair, in the manner above directed. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, §§ 73-76. Amended by L. 1894, ch. 727, and by L. 1895, ch. 181. See L. 1870, ch. 311, Appendix, post , as to allotment of parts of highway on town line to be maintained by respective towns. The omission to record the agreement or allotment of districts as The Highway Law of New York. 99 Final determination, how carried out. required by this section does not effect its validity. ( Jones v. City of Utica , 16 Hun, 441.) See People v. Hosier , 56 Hun, 64. § 98. Final determination, how carried out .— The final determinatiion of commissioners appointed by any court, relating to the laying out, altering or discontinu¬ ing a highway, and all orders and other papers filed or entered in the proceedings, or certified copies thereof from the court where such determination, order and papers are filed and entered, shall be forthwith filed and recorded in the town clerk’s office of the town where the highway is located; and every such decision shall be carried out by the commissioners of highways of the town, the same as if they had made an order to that effect. New. See notes under § 81, ante . Whenever it shall be finally determined that a highway shall be laid out, it is made the duty of the '.commissioner of highways to carry out such determination, and thereafter he has general charge of the same. But until such determination is finally made, he has no part or duty in the proceedings. Upon a review by certiorari of the proceedings in county court relative to laying out a highway, the highway commissioner is not properly a party defendant. ( People , ;c. v. County Court , 92 Hun, 13.) § 99. Highways abandoned .—Every highway that shall not have been opened and worked within six years from the time it shall have been dedicated to the use of the public, or laid out, shall cease to be a highway; but the period during which any action or proceeding shall have been, or shall be pending in regard to any such high¬ way, shall form no part of such six years; and every high¬ way that shall not have been traveled or used as a high¬ way for six years, shall cease to be a highway, and every public right of way that shall not have been Used for said period, shall be deemed abandoned as a right of way. The commissioners of highways shall file, and cause to be 100 The Highway Law of New Yoke. Highways abandoned. recorded in the town clerk’s office of the town, written description, signed by them, of each highway so aban¬ doned, and the same shall thereupon be discontinued. Revised f rom L. 1853, ch. 174, § 15, and 1 R. S., ch. 16, lit. 1, art. 4, § 99, is amended by L. 1861, ch. 311, § 1. Amended by L. 1899, ch. 622, in effect May 18, 1699. See L. 1895, ch, 611, Appendix, post, as to the abandonment of highways by towns which have expended three hundred thousand dollars or more for macadamizing purposes; and see, also, L. 1896, ch 464, Appendix, post, as to the payment of damages in such case. See notes under § 80, ante. Declaratory of the statute. {Ludlow v. Oswego, 25 Hun, 260; Horey v. Haverstraw, 124 N. Y. 273; People v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 166.) Once established, a highway does not cease to be such until it has been discontinued by the proper authorities. ( Driggs v. Phillips, 103 N. Y. 77.) The public may abandon its claim to a public highway, and non-user for twenty years is some evidence of such intent. When in connection with non-user there is affirmative evidence of a clear determination to abandon, the public interest is extinguished. {Crain v. Fox, 16 Barb. 184; Coming v. Could, 16 Wend. 531; Amsbry v. Hinds, 46 Barb. 622; s. c., 48 N. Y. 57; Woodruff v. Paddock, 56 Hun. 288; Matter of Opening of Beck Street, 19 Misc. 571; Falvey v. Bridges, 40 St. Rep. 732.) When a road is laid out as an entirety and only a part is opened and worked, and the remainder remains entirely closed, the public loses its rights therein after the lapse of six years, and such rule is applicable to a city street where an easement only is acquired. {Buffalo v. Hoffeld 6 Misc. 197.) Under this section, it is not necessary that the highway should be worked in every part so long as it is passable for travelers. {McVee v. Walertoum, 92 Hun, 306.) The failure to open and work a portion of a highway would not invali¬ date so much thereof as had been opened and worked in compliance with the statute. {Vandemark v Porter, 40 Hun, 397; Walker v. Caywood, 31 N. Y 51.) That part of a highway not opened and worked ceases to be a highway for any purpose. {Christy v. Newton, 60 Barb. 332.) Where a road was partly opened and worked during the year it was laid out, and was partly worked throughout the route and more or less traveled asery year thereafter for twelve years, it was held to have been The Highway Law of New Yoke. 101 What are highways. opened and worked within six years. ( Marble v. Whitney, 28 N. Y. 297.) Effect of compulsory abandonment by the public, (Freeholders v. Glen and Florida, 20 St. Rep. 394.) Abandonment by plank road company. ( Heath v. Barman, 49 Barb. 496.) This section held not to apply to streets laid out in the cities of the state. (Matter of Lexington Ave., 29 Hun, 305; s. c., 92 N. Y. 629; Van- derbeck v. City of Rochester, 46 Hun, 87; s. c., 122 N. Y. 285; but see Buffalo v. Hoff eld, 6 Miso. 197.) See Lyon v. 3Iunson, 2 Cow. 426, construing the act of 1813 as to the abandonment of highways. See Matter of Opening of Beck Street, 19 Misc. “71; De Peyster v. Mali, 27 Hun, 439; s. c., 92 N. Y. 262; Blackman v. Riley, 138 N. Y. 318. § 100. Highways by use* —All lands which shall have been used by the public as a highway for the period of twenty years or more, shall be a highway, with the same force and effect as if it had been duly laid out and recorded as a highway, and the commissioners of highways shall order the overseers of highways to open all such high¬ ways to the width of at least two rods. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, §§ 100, 101. J What Are Highways. Definition of Highway. A highway may be defined as any place open and free to the public for passage either on foot or by vehicle. In such manner did the Englishfiaw construe the term. Mr. Cook, in his Manual of Highway Laws, says: ‘‘The term ‘highway’ extends to all public ways, and includes carriage¬ ways, horseways, footways, streets, turnpike and plank roads, railroads, ferries, canals and navigable rivers.” Abundant authority for such state¬ ment may be found in the common law and the case law of this state. The term “road” in the New York statutes is used synonymously with “highway.” (Brace v. N . Y. C. R* R. Co., 27 N. Y. 269.) A highway may be of any size or width; it need not be wide enough to permit vehicles to pass each other. (Rex v. Lyon, 3 Dow. & R. 497). It may be a footpath or bridleway only. (Rex v. County , 13 East, 95.) 102 The Highway Law of New York. What are highways. Piers. A public pier or landing place is a highway. {Radway v. Briggs , 37 N. Y. 256; People v. Lambier, 5 Den. 9; Fowler v Mott, 19 Barb. 204.) Driftway. © A way on which cattle are driven, formerly termed a “ driftway,” is a highway, as cattle may be driven over any public highway. {Ballard v. Dyson , 1 Taunt. 285.) Streets. City and village streets, open to the public, are public highways. {Brace v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 27 N. Y. 271; Benedict v. Qoit, 3 Barb. 259; Adams v. R. R. Co., 11 Barb. 449.) See, also, Corbett v, Troy, 53 Hun, 228. Shores. The margins of navigable lakes and rivers in this state are not highways except by express grant or prescription. {Ledyard v. Ten Eyck, 36 Barb. 102.) And a private wharf extending into a navigable river does not become a highway thereby (Wetmore v. Atlantic & C. Co., 37 Barb. 70), unless such wharf or bulk-head forms the termination of a public highway {People v. Lambier , 5 Den. 9.) The seashore is not a public highway. The right to pass over may exist, but no claim for damages for a defect therein can lie. {Murphy v. Brooklyn , 98 N. Y. 642; s. c., 118 N. Y. 575.) Cul de Sac. It is now well settled that a highway need not be a thoroughfare. A cul de sac may be a highway. {Rugby Charity v. Merriweather, 11 East, 375; Bateman v. Black, 14 Eng. Law & Eq. 69: People v. Kingman, 24 N. Y. 559; People v. Van Alstyne , 3 Keyes, 35; Hickok v Trustees, 41 Barb. 457; McCarthy v. Whalen. 19 Hun, 503; Saunders v. Townsend, 26 Hun, 308; contra, Trustees v. Otis , 37 Barb. 50.) A highway terminating in a navigable river is not a cul de sac , as there is still a thoroughfare, the right of passage extending from one kind of highway to another. {People v. Lambier, 5 Denio, 9.) See, also, Wiggins v. Tallmadge, 11 Barb. 457. Ferries. A ferry is a public highway and the public have a right to embark and The Highway Law of New York. 1 C ®\ What are highways. disembark at the landing places, provided the landing places be highways, (Fowler v. Mott, 19 Barb. 204; Peters v. Kendal, 6 Barn. & Cress. 703.) Turnpikes. A highway does not cease to be such for general purposes by being con¬ verted into a turnpike or plank road. Benedict v. Goit, 3 Barb. 459; Walker v. Caywood, 31 N. Y. 51.) Where a plank road company abandons its road, such road passes to the town, though not originally a public highway. ( Heath v. Barnaul, 49 Barb. 496; People v. Supervisors, 151 N. Y. 190.) Railroads. A railroad is a public highway to be used in a particular manner. ( Rex v. Railway Co., 2 Barn. & Aid. 646; Beekman v. Railroad Co., 3 Paige, 74; Sun Publishing Assn. v. The Mayor , 152 N. Y. 257.) When a railroad company abandons its road it becomes a public high¬ way. {Hayward v. Mayor, 7 N. Y. 314; Rexford v. Knight, 11 N. Y. 308.) Canals. Canals, authorized by public law, are public highways, with the right of toll attached. {Robinson, v. Chamberlain, 34 N. Y. 389; Conkling v. Phoenix Mills, 62 Barb. 229.) Navigable Rivers. A navigable river is a public highway. (10 Mod. 382.) At common law, a river was navigable in which the tide ebbed and flowed. {Ex parte Jennings , 6 Cow. 518; Morgan v. King, 35 N.Y. 458.) In this state it seems to be the law that a navigable river is one navig¬ able in fact. {People v. Canal Appraisers, 33 N. Y. 461.) A river, navigable in fact, is, in this state, one that is so far navigable in its natural state as to be of public use in the transportation of property, {Morgan v. King , 35 N. Y. 454; Munson v. Hungerford, 6 Barb. 265; Curtis v. Keesler, 14 Barb. 511.) Capacity of a stream to float logs, as affecting its character as a public highway. {DeCamp v. Thompson, 16 App. Div. 528.) Use of waterway for floating logs. {Matter of Bums, 155 N. Y. 23.) Rivers and streams as public highways. (Navigation Law, §§ 70-76, Appendix, post.) It is the general rule that public streets which lead to navigable waters 104 The Highway Law of New York. Highways by use. keep even pace with the extension of the land; but where it was the evident intention of the one who dedicated the land for the street that the highway should terminate at a ferry landing, land redeemed from the waters by the ferry owners does not become part of the highway. (Mark v. West Troy , 151 N. Y. 453.) Particular Cases. When streets become highways under charter of city of Troy. ( Caven v. City of Troy , 15 App. Div. 163.) New York and Albany post road preserved forever as a public highway (L. 1896, ch. 423, Appendix, post.) Way by Necessity . See Hines v. Hamburger , 14 App. Div. 577. Highways by Use. Premises used as highways by the public for twenty years, even without dedication, become public highways. (Town of Corning v. Head , 86 Hun, 12; City of Cohoes v. Railroad Co., 134 N. Y. 397; James v. Sammis, 132 N. Y. 239; City of Cohoes v. D. & H. C. Co., 134 N. Y. 397; Snyder v. Plass, 28 N. Y. 465; Porter v. Village of Attica, 33 Hun, 605; Galatian v. Gardner, 7 Johns. 106; Devenpeck v. Lambert, 44 Barb. 596; Chapman v. Sivan, 65 Barb. 210; Matter of Shawangunk Kill Bridge, 100 N. Y. 642; Wiggins v. Tallmadge , 11 Barb. 457; Miller v. Garlock , 8 Barb. 153; People v. Fowler, 43 St. Rep. 415; Kelsey v. Burgess , 35 St. Rep. 369; Post v. Ry. Co., 34 St. Rep. 487.) The mere fact that a portion of the public travel over a road for twenty years cannot make it a highway, and the burden of making highways and sustaining bridges cannot be imposed upon the public in that way. The user must be like that of highways generally. The road must not only be traveled upon, but it must be kept in repair or taken in charge and adopted by the public authorities. ( Speir v. New Utrecht, 121 N. Y. 420; People v. Osborn, 84 Hun, 441; Flack v. Green Island, 122 N. Y. 107; Matter of Hand Street, 52 Hun, 206; People v. Loehfelm, 102 N. Y. 1; Vandermark v. Porter, 40 Hun, 397; Harriman v. Howe, 78 Hun, 280.) A particular place, claimed to be a public highway, cannot be proven to be such by parol evidence alone. (Harrington v. People, 6 Barb. 607.) A private way opened by the owners of land through which it passes for their own use does not become a public highway merely because the The Highway Law of New York. 105 Highways by use. public are also permitted for many years to travel over it. {Speir v. New Utrecht, 121 N. Y. 420; Harriman v. Howe, 78 Hun, 280; People v. Osborn, 84 Hun, 441; see, also, In re Howland Bridge, 14 Supp. 845.) It seems to have been formerly the doctrine that a highway by use must be limited in width and location to the actual use thereof, and that commissioners could not widen or otherwise alter the boundaries. {People v. Cortland, 24 Wend. 491; Talmadge v. Huntling, 29 N. Y. 447; Wakeman v. Wilbur, 21 St. Rep. 556.) As to the right to open an old road to the width of two rods. {Snyder v. Plass, 28 N. Y. 465.) The failure of the highway commissioners to open an old highway to its proper width for thirty years does not extinguish the rights of the public in the parts not opened. {Walker v. Caywood, 31 N. Y. 51.) A highway by use not laid out according to statute may be less than four rods wide. {Harloxv v. Humiston, 6 Cow. 189.) The failure to record is immaterial, as recording does not establish or create a right, but perpetuates the evidence of such right. {Galatian v. Gardner , 7 Johns. 106; Cole v. Van Keuren, 4 Hun, 262; Lewis v. Railroad Co., 123 N. Y. 496.) A cul de sac may become a public highway by dedication and accept¬ ance, arising principally through user. {Vandemark v. Porter, 40 Hun, 397; People v. Kingman, 24 N. Y. 559; Wiggins v. Tallmadge, 11 Barb. 457; People v. Van Alstyne, 3 Abb. Ct. of App. Dec. 575.) See note to Whitesides v Green, 57 American State Reports, 740. See also, Alpaugh v. Bennett, 59 Hun, 45; People v. Lawson, 17 Johns. 277; Ausable Co. v. Hargraves, 16 St. Rep. 318; s. c., 121 N. Y. 695; Matter of Trustees of Olean, 37 St. Rep. 350; Wicks v. Thompson, 38 St. Rep. 340; Denning v. Roome, 6 Wend. 651; Colden v. Thurber, 2 Johns. 424; Ivory v. Deer Park, 116 N. Y. <1/6; Lansing v. Wiswall, 5 Den. 213. The Uses oj Highways and Ownership of the Fefw The Fee of the Highway. The ownership of the fee of a highway under the Dutch law was in the public. Subsequently it became vested in the English government and was only transferred by grant. {Mott v. Clayton , 9 App. Div. 181.) The ownership of the fee of a highway remains in the original owner; the public have but a right of way. (C ortelyou v. Van Brunt, 2 Johns. 357; Yates v. Hathaway, 15 Johns, 447; Babcock v. Lamb, 1 Cow. 238; 106 The Highway Law of New York. Ownership of the fee. Gedney v. Earl, 12 Wend. 98; Presbyterian Society v. Railroad Co., 9 Hill k 567; Higgins v. Reynolds, 31 N. Y. 151; Mann v. Worrall, 53 N. Y. 44; Turnpike Co. v. Smith, 15 Barb. 355; People v. Law, 34 Barb. 494; Cemetery v. Railroad Co., 7 Hun, 655; Matter of City of Buffalo , 131 W,- Y. 293; Woodruff v. Paddock, 130 N. Y. 618.) A grant of land by the state describing such land as abutting upo* a highway conveys to the center thereof. ( Cheney v. Railroad Co., 8 Afc.y. Div. 620.) The rule that an owner of lands bounded by a highway has a fee t* *he center of the road subject only to the public easement is applicable t* the streets of New York city. ( Mott v. New York, 2 Hilt. 358.) In the city of New York, the fee of the streets is 'held to be in the *4ty, and the legislature may appropriate them to such public use as a rail¬ road. ( People v. Kerr, 27 N. Y. 188.) But such grant may not be made by the common council of the city except for the purposes of carrying out the legislative grant. ( Milhau v. Sharp, 27 N. Y. 611; Davis v. Mayor, 14 N. Y. 506; People v. Railroad Co., 30 How. 121.) When the title of the owner to lands taken for the opening ©f streets in the city of New York under the acts of 1813 and 1818, was divested. {Det- nold v. Drake, 46 N. Y. 318; Hannersly v. New York, 67 Barb. 35.) Where an old road is vacated, the fee is in the adjoining owners and not in the public. ( Van Amringe v. Barnett, 8 Bos. 357; Matter of John St., 19 Wend. 659; Yates v. Hathaway, 15 Johns. 447; Falvey v. Bridges, 40 St. Rep. 732; s. c., 133 N. Y. 663.) Navigable rivers, being public highways, the bed of the stream belongs to the state. Otherwise as to non-navigable streams. {People v. Canal Appraisers, 33 N. Y. 461.) The state has no right, without compensation to destroy the property of individuals by making by artificial means a stream navigable. {Canal Commissioners v. People, 5 Wend. 423; Canal Appraisers v. People, 17 Wend. 571; Commissioners v. Kempshall, 20 Wend. 404.) Canals, though public highways, belong to the state. The fee of the lands taken for them is in the state, and upon abandonment does not revert to the original owner. {Rexford v. Knight, 11 N. Y. 308.) Where a highway has been laid out upon the margin of a grantor’s land, the ownership of the fee therein passes by his subsequent grant. (Habcrman v. Baker , 128 N. Y. 253.) The Highway Law of New Yoke. 1(7 Ownership of the fee. Adverse possession of a highway does not ripen into title unless exclu¬ sive and continuous for twenty years. ( Bliss v. Johnson, 94 N. Y. 235.) Title to a portion of a public highway cannot be acquired by adverse possession. (Morrison v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 74 Hun, 398.) Where the conveyance of land describes it as bounded by a highway, the particular circumstances of the case must determine whether or not an ownership to the center of the highway was intended to be granted. (Post v. Hazleti, 36 St. Rep. 219; Dexter v. Riverside Mills, 39 St. Rep. 933; De Witt v. Van Schoyk, 110 N. Y. 7: Mott v. Clayton, 9 App. Div. 181; Haight v. Littlefield, 71 Hun, 285; Holloway v. Southmayd, 139 N. Y. 390; Lord v. Atkins, 138 N. Y. 184.) Where land is granted bounded by a contemplated street only, a fee to the middle of the street is not passed; but the grantees have a perpetual right of way over it. (Matter of 17th St., 1 Wend. 262; Livingston v. New York , 8 Wend. 85.) Where land is taken for the laying out of a street, the owner of the fee may excavate the soil beneath the surface of the road provided he does not interfere with the public easement. (McCarthy v Syracuse, 46 N.Y. 194; Rummell v. Railroad Co., 30 St. Rep. 235; Darker v. Beck, 32 St. Rep. 193.) Materials taken from a street in making city improvements belong neither to the city nor to the contractor, but to the owner of the fee. (Fisher v. Richardson, 6 Lans. 225.) fundamental idea of a highway is a place for the uninterrupted passage of men, animals and vehicles, and to afford light, air and access to the property of abutting owners; in the latter respect, an abutting owner has a greater interest in the highway than the general public; con¬ sequently any permanent or exclusive use of any part of the highway by any person or corporation is illegal. (Palmer v. Larchmont Electric Co., 6 App Div. 12.) Although streets in a city and roads in a country district are equally public highways, yet the former are subject to more burdens and uses than the mere right of passage. City highways may be used for the laying down of "water mains, gas mains, sewers, lamps, etc., while such a use cannot be made of country highways without legislative enactment. This use of city streets has been extended to the erection of a soldiers monument. (Milhau v. Sharp, 15 Barb- 210; People v. Kerr, 27 N. Y. 202; Kelsey v. King, 32 Barb. 410; Tompkins v. Hodgson, 4 Supp. 435; Plant v, 108 The Highway Law of New York. Uses of highways. R. R. Co ., 10 Barb. 16; Chapman v. R. R. Co ., 10 Barb. 360.) It seems, however, that this doctrine is not applicable to highways acquired by dedication. ( Williams v. R. R. Co., 16 N. Y. 97.) A further easement for public use may be imposed upon land already used as a public highway. ( Village of Canandaigua v. Benedict , 24 App. Div. 348.) Where a street is taken for other municipal uses than the mere right of passage, an abutting owner who has a fee therein is entitled to substantial damages. {Matter of City of Buffalo, 131 N. Y. 293.) Steam Railroads. The easement of an owner in fee is not lost by his dedication of the land for a public highway, and he is entitled to compensation for use thereof by a railroad. {Syracuse Salt Co. v. Railroad Co., 67 Hun, 153, and cases cited.) A railroad laid in a public highway or street is a new burden upon the owners of the fee and they are entitled to compensation therefor. {Williams v. Railroad Co., 16 N. Y. 97; Trustees v. Railroad Co., 3 Hill, 567; Fletcher v. Railroad Co., 25 Wend. 462; Mahon v. Railroad Co., 24 N. Y. 658; Robinson v. Railroad Co., 27 Barb. 512; Wager v. Railroad Co., 25 N. Y. 526; Carpenter v. Railroad Co., 24 N. Y. 655; Broiestadt v. Railroad Co., 55 N. Y. 220; McCruden v. Rochester Ry. Co., 5 Misc. 59.) An action of ejectment, or of trespass for damages, or in equity for an injunction, will lie where a railroad has used a street or highway without compensating the owner of the fee. {Wager v. Railroad Co., 25 N. Y. 526; Lozier v. Railroad Co., 42 Barb. 465; Church v. Railroad Co., 3 Hill, 567; Craig v. Railroad Co., 39 N. Y. 404.) An abutting owner of land on a street closed for railroad purposes is deprived of an easement and should be compensated therefor even though the fee to the street be in the city. {Egerer v. Railroad Co., 130 N. Y. 108.) Where a railroad company constructs its road over or along a turnpike or plank road, the company operating the latter is entitled to damages. {Plank Road v. Railroad, 20 Barb. 644; Seneca Road Co. v. Railroad Co., 5 Hill, 170; Railroad Co. v. Northern Turnpike Co., 16 Barb. 100; Matter of Hamilton Avenue, 14 Barb. 405; Matter of Flatbush Avenue, 1 Barb. 286.) The Highway Law of New York. 109 Uses of highways. As to the consent of highway commissioners'to the'construction'of a rail¬ road upon a highway. (L. 1835, ch. 300, Appendix, post.) The consent of the highway commissioners is an essential prerequisite to the right to maintain a proceeding for taking a highway for railway purposes. ( Matter of Rochester Railway Co., 123 N. Y. 351.) A railroad crossing a highway. (Railroad Law, §§ 4,11, 20, Appendix, post.) Duty of a railroad company to maintain a highway at a crossing in a safe condition for public use. (. Lowell v. Railroad Co., 15 App. Div. 218; Gale v. Railroad Co., 76 N. Y. 594; Bryant v. Town of Randolph, 133 N. Y. 77; Schild v. Railroad Co., 133 N. Y. 446.) As to highway crossing railroad, see § 90, ante', as to duties of railroads at crossings, § 157, post. Elevated Railroads. The erection of elevated railroad structures without the consent of the abutting owners is illegal; and an abutter may recover damages even though the premises are in the possession of tenants. ( Story v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 90 N. Y. 122; Fobes v. Railroad Co., 121 N. Y. 505; Kemochan v N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 559; Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 128 N. Y. 436: Kearney v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 129 1$. Y. 76; Mortimer v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 129 N. Y. 81; Bohm v. Metro¬ politan Ry. Co., 129 N. Y. 576; Sterry v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 129 N. Y. 619; Hughes v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 130 N. Y. 14; Hughes v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 40 St. Rep. 581; Kane v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 125 N. Y. 164; Thompson v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 130 N. Y. 360; Moore v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 130 N. Y. 523; Lalir v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 104 N. Y. 269; Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 106 N. Y. 157; American Bank Note Co. v. N, Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 129 N. Y. 252; Becker v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 131 N. Y. 509; Storck v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 131 N. Y. 514; Roberts v. N. Y Elevated R. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 455; McGean v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 133 N. Y. 9; Mitchell v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 45 St. Rep. 318; Pond v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 112 N. Y. 186; Ottinger v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 43 St. Rep. 817; Slater v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 45 St. Rep. 153; Sperb v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 61 Hun, 539; Adler v. Metro¬ politan Ry. Co., 46 St. Rep. 523; Steimmetz v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., 18 Supp. 209; Brush v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 13 Supp. 908; Bischoff v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. , 46 St. Rep. 863; Rush v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 44 St. Rep. 110 The Highway Law of New Yoke. Uses of highways. Ill J Gray v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 35 St. Rep. 32; Jones v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 45 St. Rep. 667; Smith v N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 44 St, Rep. 875; Rich v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 46 St. u Rep. 673; Bookman v. N. Y. Ele¬ vated R. R. Co., 137 N. Y. 302; Cook v N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 3 Misc. 248; Mooney v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 3 Misc. 612; White v. Manhat¬ tan Ry. Co., 139 N. Y. 19; Bischojf v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 138 N. Y. 257.) Street Railroads. For statutory provisions, see Railroad Law, Article IV. As to street surface railroad’crossing track of steam railroad. (L. 1893, ch. 239, Appendix, post.) The same rule applies to horse railroads as to those operated by steam. A new burden is imposed and there must be additional compensation to the owners of the fee. (Craig v. Railroad Co., 39 N. Y. 404; Wager v Railroad Co., 25 N. Y. 526; Ramsden v. Railway, 1 Exch. 723; Kellinger v. Railroad Co., 50 N. Y. 206.) A street railroad company is bound to lay its tracks in a proper manner and keep them in repair. (Fash v. Railroad Co., 1 Daly, 148; Worster v. Railroad Co., 50 N.Y. 203; Mayor v. Railroad Co., 3 Lans. 270.) Telegraph and Telephone Lines. For statutory provisions as to construction of telegraph and telephone lines, see Transportation Corporations Law, § 102; see, also, the series of American Electrical Cases. As to the right to erect poles for telephone wires in city streets under § 102 of the Transportation Corporations Law, see City of Utica v. Utica Telephone Company, 24 App. Div. 361. Neither the state nor any corporation can appropriate any portion of a rural highway by setting up poles for the support of telegraph or telephone wires. (Eelsyv. American T. & T. Co., 143 N. Y. 133; Blash- judd v. Tel & Tel. Co., 18 Supp. 250, and cases cited; s. c., 71 Hun, 532.) The light of a telephone company to string its wires along a street is subordinate to that of a street railroad company to operate its road thereon, and the latter cannot be enjoined from using an electric wire in such street to propel its cars, although there is an interference with the electric current of the former company. (Hudson River Telephone Co. v. Tl atervliet Ry. Co., 135 N. Y. 393, and cases cited.) The Highway Law op New York. Ill Uses of highways. Electric Light Companies. As to use of highway by electric light company, see Transportation Corporations Law, § 61; see, also, American Electrical Cases An electric company cannot ereet poles on a country highway without the consent of the abutting owners. {Palmer v. Larchmont Electric Co., 6 App. Div. 12.) Pipes. See § 14, ante , as to drainage, sewer and water pipes in highways. See Transportation Corporations Law, §§ 83, 43, 45, 61, 80, 82, Appendix, post, for statutory provisions as to the use of highways by various pipe line corporations. See Village Law, § 226, Appendix, post, as to the laying of water pipes in highways outside of villages. See L. 1897, ch. 317, Appendix, post, as to laying of pipes in highways for heating purposes. A gas company has no authority to lay its pipes in a country highway without the consent of the abutting owners. {Gaslight Co. v. Calkins, 62 N. Y. 386.) Water pipes may be laid in a village street without compensation. {Whitcher v. Water Works Co., 66 Hun, 619; s. c., 142 N. Y. 626.) Sewers may not be laid in highways without the consent of the abutting owners. {Van Brandt v. Town of Flatbush, 128 N. Y. 50.) Turnpike Corporations. For statutory provisions, see Transportation Corporations Law, §§ 120- 151, Appendix, post. A turnpike or plank road company which has acquired the right to use a public highway for the construction and location of its road stands in the place of the town highway commissioners and is subject to all their duties and liabilities to the public. {Benedict v. Goit, 3 Barb. 459; Dexter v. Broat, 16 Barb. 337; Ireland v. Plank Road Co., 13 N. Y. 526.) Ferries. It is not an extra burden upon a highway for the public to land thereon from a ferry. {Fowler v. Mott, 19 Barb. 204; Peters v. Kendal , 6 Barn. & Cress. 703.) 112 The Highway Law op New York. Uses of highways. Extra Vi am. The right of the public to pass along a highway extends also to unin- dosed lands adjacent thereto ( Cleveland v. Cleveland , 12 Wend. 172), and to any lands adjacent to a highway that has become impassable. ( Williams v, Safford, 7 Barb. 309.) But the impassable highway must be a public, not a private way. ( Bullard v. Hamison, 4 M. & S. 387.) And the public must travel as near the highway and use as little of the adjacent laud as possible. ( White v. Wiley, 36 St. Rep. 102.) Miscellaneous Rights and Uses. See notes under § 157, post, as to the law of the road and of crossings, and § 163, post, as to the free use of highways by all persons and vehicles. See Railroad Law, § 53, as to the right to walk upon railroad tracks. See Indian Law, §§ 15, 26. as to freedom of Indians from paying toll. See L. 1897, ch. 483, Appendix, post, as to passage of timber and logs over rivers. All the land within a highway fence is not necessarily subject to the right of way and may be occupied by the owner, {Harlow v. Humiston, 6 Cow. 189.) The public have a right of way over every stream capable of transport¬ ing property. {Morgan v. King, 35 N. Y. 454.) The public have a right to use the tracks of a horse railroad for travel with horses and wagons. {Fettrich v. Dickenson, 22 How. 248.) But one driving on the tracks is bound to use greater care than on the rest of the road as the company has the right of way for its cars. {WUbrand v. Rail¬ road Co., 3 Bos. 314; Hegan v. Railroad Co., 15 N. Y. 380; Whitaker v. Railroad Co., 51 N. Y 295.) Discussion as to rate of speed at which trains may pass over country highways. {Hunt v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 212.) The regulation of the rate of speed of cars in streets and highways can¬ not be the subject of contract either by legislature or common council. {Brooklyn v. Nassau R. R. Co., 20 App. Div. 31.) See Westlake v, Koch, 45 St. Rep. 481; Nicoll v. Sands, 131 N. Y. 19. Penal Code Provisions. § 275. Definition of the offense.— The following acts, or any of them, except as permitted by chapter four hundred and seventy-nine of the laws of eighteen hundred and eighty-seven or the acts amendatory thereof, constitute a disturbance of a religious meeting: The Highway Law of New York. 113 Fences to be removed. 3. Obstructing in any manner without authority of law, within the like distance, free passage along a highway to the place of such meeting. (“The like distance” is two miles.) § 666. Running Horses on Highway, a Misdemeanor. — A person driving any vehicle upon any plank road, turnpike or public highway, who unjustifiably runs the horses drawing the same, or causes, or permits them to run, is guilty of a misdemeanor. § 674d. Unlawfully exacting ' toll of a member of the national guard. — Any person, master or keeper of a toll-gate, toll-bridge or ferry, or any person in charge thereof who wilfully hinders or delays any mem¬ ber of the national guard or refuses free passage to any such member going to or returning from any parade, encampment, drill or meeting which he may be by law required to attend, or wilfully hinders, delays or refuses free passage to any conveyance or military property of the state in charge of a member of said guard, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Military Code Provision. § 148. Exemption of members of national guard from arrest ; RIGHT OF WAY ; FREE PASSAGE OF TOLL-GATES, BRIDGES AND FERRIES.— No person belonging to the military forces of this state shall be arrested on any civil process while going to, remaining at, or returning from any place at which he may be required to attend for military duty. Any por¬ tion of the national guard and militia parading, or performing any duty, according to law, shall have the right of way in any street or highway through which they may pass, provided the carriage of United States mails, the legitimate functions of the police, and the progress and opera¬ tions of fire engines and fire departments, shall not be interfered with thereby. Any person belonging to the military forces of the state, going to or returning from any parade, encampment, drill or meeting which he may be required by law to attend, shall, together with his conveyance and the military property of the state, be allowed to pass free through all toll- gates and over all toll-bridges and ferries. § 101. Fences to be removed.r—WheneveY a highway shall have been laid out through any inclosed, cultivated or improved lands, in conformity to the provisions of this chapter, the commissioners of highways shall give to 8 114 The Highway Law of New York. Penalty for falling trees. the owner or occupant of the land through which such highway shall have been laid, sixty days’ notice in writ¬ ing to remove his fences; if such owner shall not remove his fences within the sixty days, the commissioners shall cause them to be removed, and shall direct the highway to be opened and worked. Revised from 1 R. S., ch . 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 96. See notes under §§ 104, 105, post, as to the removal of fences as encroach¬ ments ; village trustees as fence viewers, Village Law, § 88, sub. 14. See Drake v. Rogers, 3 Hill, 608; Wetmore v. Tracy, 14 Wend. 250; Case v. Thompson, 6 Wend. 634; Cooper v. Bean , 5 Lans. 318. * § 102. Penalty for falling trees.— If any person shall cut down any tree on land not occupied by him, so that it shall fall into any highway, river or stream, unless by the order and consent of the occupant, the person so offending shall forfeit to such occupant, the sum of one dollar for every tree so fallen, and the like sum for every day the same shall remain in the highway, river or stream. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 5, § 111. § 103. Fallen trees to be removed .—If any tree shall fall, or be fallen by any person from any inclosed land into any highway, any person may give notice to the occupant of the land from which the tree shall have fallen, to remove the same within two days; if such tree shall not be removed within that time, but shall continue in the highway, the occupant of the land shall forfeit the sum of fifty cents for every day thereafter, until the tree shall be removed. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 5, § 110. § 104. Penalty for obstruction or encroachment . —Whoever shall obstruct or encroach upon any highway, The Highway Law of New York. 115 Penalty for obstruction or encroachment. or shall unlawfully fill up or place any obstruction in any ditch for draining the water from any highway, shall for¬ feit for every such offense the sum of five dollars. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 5, § 102. See notes under next section. See § 153, post , as to damages for injuries to highways; § 164, post, as to recovery of penalties not specially provided for. The owner of land abutting upon a public street is permitted to en¬ croach on the primary right of the public to a limited extent and for a temporary purpose, owing to the necessity of the case. Two facts, how¬ ever, must exist to render the encroachment lawful; the obstruction must be reasonably necessary for the transaction of business; it must not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public. {Welch v. Wilson, 101 N. Y. 254; Callanan v. Gilman, 107 N. Y. 360; Flynn v. Taylor, 127 N. Y. 596.) As to what is a reasonable use of or encroachment upon a street. ^Flynn v. Taylor, 127 N. Y. 596.) It seems to be the settled law that the long continuance of an encroach¬ ment, although for more than twenty years, cannot destroy the public right or take away the authority of the public officers to remove and abate it. {Orphan Asylum v. City of Troy, 76 N. Y. 108; Walker v. Cay wood, 81 N. Y. 51; Mills v. Hall, 9 Wend. 315; Milhau v. Sharp, 27 N. Y. 611; Driggs v. Phillips, 103 N. Y. 77; Bliss v. Johnson, 94 N. Y. 235.) Contra, Peckham v. Anderson, 27 Barb. 207. An obstruction placed in a private road cannot be removed by the highway commissioners. {Drake v. Rogers. 3 Hill, 604.) An owner of land has no right to obstruct a public highway because damages for taking the same had not been paid him. {Chapman v. Gates, 54 N. Y. 132.) Any permanent or habitual obstruction in a public highway is an in¬ dictable nuisance, although there be room enough left for carriages to pass. {Davis v. Mayor, 14 N. Y. 524.) There is no provision in the statute which authorizes the commissioners of highways of two towns to unite as plaintiffs and bring an action to re¬ cover the penalty or forfeiture for an encroachment upon a highway. The authority of such officers to maintain actions is given by statute, and 116 The Highway Law of New York. Penalty for obstruction or encroachment. is confined to those of the town where the offense has been committed. ( Bradley v. Blair, 17 Barb. 480.) It is not necessary under this section to give a defendant notice of the obstruction, specifying the extent and location thereof, and direct him to remove the same within sixty days, before an action can be brought to recover the penalty prescribed. ( Town of Corning v. Mead, 86 Hun, 12.) It is a good answer to a suit brought to recover the penalty prescribed by this section in justice’s court to plead title to the land and deny that the place is a highway. ( Little v. Denn. 34 N. Y. 452; Sage v. Barnes, 9 Johns. 365; Fleet v. Youngs, 7 Wend. 291.) In an action for injuries resulting from the obstruction of a street, the question of defendant’s negligence is immaterial. ( Manger v. Harrison, 14 W. D. 201.) Where an obstruction was placed in a ditch draining a highway by the owner of adjoining land who was being injured by the flow of water from the ditch, such injury was properly set up as a defence in an action for penalty under this section. ( Thompson v. Allen, 7 Lans. 459.) It is the duty of municipal authorities to keep the streets and sidewalks open and unobstructed. ( Railroad Co. v. Utica, 3 Alb. L. J. 151; Lavery v. Hannigan, 20 J. & S. 463.) As to whether municipal authorities may legalize the obstruction of a public highway. ( Railroad v. Utica, 3 Alb. L. J. 151; Lavery v. Hanni¬ gan, 20 J. & S. 463; Farrell v. New York, 22 St. Rep. 469; McCaffrey v. Smith, 41 Hun, 117; Hoey v. Gilroy, 129 N. Y. 132; People v. Fowler, 43 St. Rep. 415.) Village authorities have no right to authorize the using of a highway for a hack-stand without the consent of the adjoining owner. ( McCaffrey v. Smith, 41 Hun, 117.) Village trustees may authorize the erection of a work of art in a public highway. ( Tompkins v. Hodgson. 2 Hun, 146.) A common council of a city have no right to license a citizen to enclose a part of a public street, and such an inclosing is an eucroachment. The only way that such a permission may be given is by statutory proceedings to alter or diminish the width of the street. ( Orphan Asylum v. City of Troy, 76 N. Y. 108.) An individual or municipal corporation who maintains an obstruction in a highway in the nature of an excavation is liable for any damage thereby sustained. ( Bliss v. Schaub , 48 Barb. 339; Dygert v. Schenck , 23 The Highway Law of New York. 117 Obstructing sidewalks in cities and villages. Wend. 446; Johnson v. Friel, 50 N. Y. 679; McCamus v. Gaslight Co., 40 Barb. 380; Osborne v. Union Ferry Co., 53 Barb. 629; Scott v. Hough, 14 St. Rep. 401; Flynn v. Railroad Co., 17 J. & S. 60; Por£ Jeiuris v. National Bank, 90 N. Y. 550; Beard v. Karst, 32 St. Rep. 159; Clarke v. Crimmins, 32 St. Rep. 978; Smith v. Town of Clarkstown, 69 Hun, 155; Greenberg v. Kingston, 22 Supp. 511; Pec7c v. Carter, 68 N. Y. 283.) The liability of one who placed a stone heap along a highway from which an accident resulted. ( Houghtaling v. Shelley, 51 Hun, 598.) The liability of one who left steam boilers lying in the street. ( Stewart v. Porter Mfg. Co., 13 St. Rep. 220.) The liability of one who obstructs a highway by placing logs thereon. (McDermott v. Conley, 33 St. Rep. 560.) The liability of one who built a toboggan slide across a city street. (Haden v. Clarke , 32 St. Rep. 478.) See People v. Horton, 64 N. Y. 610, as to what is not an obstruction of a canal by a floating elevator. See Trustees of Jordan v. Otis , 37 Barb. 50; Dygert v. Sehenck, 23 Wend. 446; Cooper v. Bean, 5 Lans. 318 ; Friedlander v. D. & H. C. Co., 34 St. Rep. 650. Obstructing Sidewalks in Cities and Villages. A pedestrian may not stop in front of a person’s house and use abusive language towards such person; he becomes a trespasser thereby. ( Adams v. Rivers, 11 Barb. 390.) As to the obstruction of a sidewalk by the use of skids or platforms leading to a wagon or by the vehicles themselves for the purpose of load¬ ing and unloading merchandise. ( Hand v. Klinker, 7 St. Rep. 21; Fisher v. Cambridge, 51 Hun, 296; Flynn v. Taylor, 53 Hun, 167; Flynn v. Taylor, 127 N. Y. 596; Callanan v. Gilman, 107 N. Y. 360; Richardson, &c. Co. v. Barstow Stove Co., 36 St. Rep. 983.) One who obstructs a sidewalk for his private ends and fails to restore it to a safe condition is liable for an injury sustained thereby. {Smith v. Ryan, 29 St. Rep. 672.) In an action for negligence for obstructing a sidewalk evidence as to the nature and appearance of such obstruction a few hours after the accident is admissible. {Ford v. Nichols, 36 St. Rep. 729.) As to the liability of one who tilted a heavy counter up against his 118 The Highway Law of New York. How removed and liability for not removing. house and allowed it to remain for several days when an accident occurred from its fall. ( King v. Troy, 21 W. D. 558.) Awnings as obstructions. (Farrell v. New York, 20 St. Rep. 12; Hoey v. Gilroy, 41 St. Rep. 181; Lavery v. Hannigan, 20 J. & S. 463; Brinkman v. Eisler, 40 St. Rep. 865.) Basement entrances as obstructions. (Williams v. Hynes, 23 J. & S* 86 .) Coal holes as obstructions. (Jennings v. Van Schaick, 108 N. Y. 530; Wells v. Sibley, 31 St. Rep. 40.) Show cases as obstructions. (People v. New York, 18 Abb. N. C. 123.) Storm doors as obstructions. (Kiernan v. Newton, 20 Abb. N. C. 398.) Signs as obstructions. (New York v. Wood, 15 Daly, 341.) § 105. How removed and liability for not remov¬ ing .—The commissioners of highways shall serve upon the owner or occupant of lands adjoining that part of a highway within their town, in which any obstruction or encroachment may exist, a notice specifying the extent and location of such obstruction or encroachment, and directing such owner or occupant to remove the same within a specified time, not more than sixty days after the service of the notice. If such owner or occupant shall neglect or refuse to remove such obstruction or encroach¬ ment within such time, he shall forfeit to the town the sum of twenty-five dollars; and the commissioners may remove such obstructions or encroachments at the expense of the town, which may be recovered by action, of such owner or occupant; or the said commissioners may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction, to com¬ pel such owner or occupant to remove such obstruction or encroachment. Actions by commissioners of highways, as in this section provided, shall be in the name of the town. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 5, §§ 103-108, as amended by L. 18-10, ch. 300, and by L. 1878, ch. 245. The Highway Law of New York. 119 How removed and penalty for not removing. See § 15, ante, as to actions by commissioners for injuries to highways, and § 164, post, as to actions to recover penalties. See notes under § 104, ante . See notes under § 16, ante, as to liability of towns for defective highways. The scope of this provision of the highway law considered. ( Town of Weekfield v. Shasley, 23 Misc. 100.) The highways of the state are made for and devoted to public travel, and the whole public have the right to their use in their entirety, and when obstructions to public travel are found within their bounds, the commissioners of highways are clothed with power to remove them with¬ out waiting for the slow process of law, even though travel be not abso¬ lutely and entirely prevented. ( Van Wyck v. Lent, 33 Hun, 301; Cook v. Harris, 61 N. Y. 448; Wetmore v. Tracy, 14 Wend. 250; Hathaway v. Jenks, 67 Hun, 289.) Commissioners of highways have no remedy in equity, by mandamus or injunction, to remove encroachments from a highway. ( Rozell v. An¬ drews, 103 N. Y. 150.) The commissioners of highways may summarily remove from a high¬ way a building as an obstruction to public travel. ( Cook v. Harris , 61 N. Y. 448; Driggs v. Phillips, 103 N. Y. 77.) Obstructions in a ditch at the side of a highway may be summarily re¬ moved when they cause the overflowing of the road. ( Dominick v. Hill, 6 St. Rep. 329.) The old statute referred only to the removal of encroaching fences. (Cook v. Covil, 18 Hun, 288.) It provided also for a trial by jury of the question of encroachment. (Commissioners v. Van Allen, 32 Hun, 61; Briggs v. Doughty, 7 Hun, 82; Bronson v. Mann, 13 Johns. 460; Mott v. Commissioners, 2 Hill, 472; Voorhees v. Martin, 12 Barb. 508; Robbins v. Gorham, 26 Barb. 586.) The commissioners should all meet and deliberate together on the sub¬ ject of the alleged encroachment; and then, if they, or a majority of them, should deem it necessary, they are to order the obstruction removed. (Spicer v. Slade, 9 Johns. 359; Bronson v. Mann, 13 Johns. 460.) Under the old statute any two commissioners might order the removal of an encroachment provided all were notified to be present at a meeting to consider such removal. (Phillips v. Schumacher, 10 Hun, 405; Fitch v. 120 The Highway Law of New York. How removed and penalty for not removing. Commissioners, 22 Wend. 132; People v. Williams, 36 N. Y. 441; Christy v. Newton, 60 Barb. 332.) The order of the commissioners of highways is not final and conclu¬ sive. ( Borries v. Horton, 16 Hun, 139.) Commissioners are not confined to the statutory remedy in removing encroachments, and may give a mere informal notice. ( Kline v. Hib¬ bard, 80 Hun, 50.) The purpose of the notice is to inform the one served of the particulars of the encroachment. ( Town of Sardinia v. Butler , 78 Hun, 527; Spicer v. Slade, 9 Johns. 359; Briggs v. Doughty, 7 Hun, 82; Fitch v. Commis¬ sioners, 22 Wend. 132.) Formerly it was necessary to state in the notice the breadth the high¬ way was originally intended to have. ( Cook v. Covil, 18 Hun, 288; Spicer v. Slade, 9 Johns. 359; Mott v. Commissioners, 2 Hill, 472.) As to what is a sufficient description of an encroachment, in order that the notice may comply with the statute. ( Town of Sardinia v. Butler, 78 Hun, 527; Spicer v. Slade, 9 Johns. 359; Mott v. Commissioners, 2 Hill, 472; Kerr v. Hammer, 39 St. Rep. 708.) Where an order complying with the statutory requirements is annexed to the notice, it supplements the notice and should be deemed a part thereof. Both need :i not contain a description of the encroachment* {James v. Sammis, 132 N. Y. 239; Olendorf v. Sullivan, 36 St. Rep. 74.) It is a question whether the sufficiency of the notice to remove an en¬ croachment can be attacked in an action against the highway commis¬ sioners for trespass. {Hathaway v. Jenks, 67 Hun, 289.) Notice must be given independent of whether the road was established by alteration or originally laid out by the commissioners. {Case v. Thomp¬ son, 6 Wend. 634.) Actual notice must be shown. It will not be presumed. {Case v. Thomp¬ son, 6 Wend. 634) It is not necessary that one who has been ordered to remove an encroach¬ ment deny the existence of such to the commissioners. {Borries v. Hor¬ ton , 16 Hun, 139.) But see Lane v. Cai'y, 19 Barb. 537. An action of trespass will not lie against a highway commissioner for removing an encroachment after notice. {Hathaway v. Jenks, 67 Hun, 289.) An owner of a house who has been ordered to remove it as an obstruc- The Highway Law of New York. 121 How removed and penalty for not removing. tion to a public highway, may, upon proof that it does not encroach, maintain an action to restrain interference therewith. (Flood v. Van Wormer , 147 N. Y. 2S4.) Where a fence has been properly found to be an encroachment upon the highway, an injunction will not lie to restrain its removal. (Hyatt v. Bates, 40 N. Y. 164.) Where a highway commissioner has ordered a building to be removed as an encroachment, an injunction may issue against him. (Flood v. Van Wormer , 70 Hun, 415.) The penalty for encroachment should be recovered by suit and not by a summary proceeding. (Rue v. Sprague, 1 Johns. 510.) Commissioners of highways cannot maintain a suit in their official names or titles; but must use their individual names, annexing their offi¬ cial titles. (Supervisor of Galway v. Stimson, 4 Hill, 136; Commissioners v. Peck, 5 Hill, 215; Overseers v. Overseers, 18 Johns. 407; Todd v. Birdsall, 1 Cow. 260; Gould v. Glass, 19 Barb. 179.) But when actions are thus brought, the pleading should, by proper aver¬ ments, show that the claim is made by the officer, and not by the indi¬ vidual. (Gould v. Glass, 19 Barb. 179.) The highway commissioners of two towns cannot sue jointly for a pen¬ alty for an encroachment upon a highway which forms the boundary between the towns. (Bradley v. Blair, 17 Barb. 480. Commissioners of highways are authorized to prosecute for the recovery of penalties for encroachments on highways; and are, of course, competent to adjust controversies in relation to such encroachments by amicable settlement. If, in so doing, they deem it advisable, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to take security for the payment of money at a further day, there can be no reasonable objection to such an arrangement. (Com¬ missioners v. Peck, 5 Hill, 215.) Special damages must be alleged and proven in an action for obstruct¬ ing a public highway. (Lansing v. Wiswall, 5 Den. 213.) Commissioners may employ counsel in their legal proceedings. (Huntz v. Duntz, 44 Barb. 459.) As to whether the defendant in an action for the penalty for obstruct¬ ing a highway may interpose a plea of title. (Sage v. Barnes, 9 Johns. 365; Parker v. Van Houten, 7 Wend. 145; Fleet v. Youngs, 7 Wend. 291; Saunders v. Townsend, 26 Hun, 308.) As to whether an appeal will lie to the county court in proceedings by 122 The Highway Law of New York. How removed and penalty for not removing. commissioners to remove encroachments. ( Commissioners v. Van Allen , 32 Hun, 61.) The proceeding herein provided for the removal of encroachments is applicable to all highways, including a highway by user; and the remedy is available although it did not exist at the time of the encroachment. {James v. Sammis, 132 N. Y. 239; Town of Sardinia v. Butler , 78 Hun, 527; Town of Corning v. Head, 86 Hun, 12; People v. Hunting, 39 Hun, 452; Alpaugli v. Bennett, 59 Hun, 45; Baylis v. Roe, 5 Supp. 279; Fowler v. Mott, 19 Barb. 204.) Contra: Doughty v. Brill, 36 Barb. 488; Christy v. Newton , 60 Barb. 332. An obstruction placed in a private road cannot be removed by the highway commissioners. ( Drake v. Rogers, 3 Hill, 604.) Although a plank road has been located thereon, yet the local authori¬ ties still have jurisdiction to remove obstructions from a highway. {Walker v. Caywood, 31 N. Y. 51.) A highway used by the public for many years and thereafter used as a plank road was held to be a public highway only to the extent of its public use, and a structure not upon the land actually so used was not an encroachment. {Flood v. Van Wormer, 70 Hun, 415.) The penalty for encroachment cannot be recovered unless the high¬ way has been properly described and bounded as required by law; whether or not this has been done is a question not for the jury but for the commissioners of highways. {Talmage v. Huntting, 29 N. Y. 447.) Commissioners may not remove a fence as an encroachment unless the road has been properly laid out and recorded under the highway law. {Marvin v. Pardee, 64 Barb. 353.) Where a road was closed by resolution of municipal authorities, no action could lie to recover a penalty for encroachment. {Bisbee v. Mans¬ field, 6 Johns. 84.) An order of a highway commissioner directing the removal of a build¬ ing encroaching upon a highway, being recorded in the office of the town clerk is a cloud upon the title of the owner of such building and the land on which it stands. {Flood v. Van Wormer, 70 Hun, 415.) Shade trees lawfully planted by the owner of the fee in the highway dedicated by him to the public and which did not encroach upon that part of the highway used by the public for thirty years, are not an encroach¬ ment under this section and may not be removed in an action brought by The Highway Law of New York. 123 How removed and penalty for not removing. the highway commissioners. ( Town of Weekfield v, Shasley, 23 Misc. 100 .) Where the owner of the fee in a public highway builds a race-way across the road, he must restore the road to proper condition or be liable in damages for any injury sustained thereby. ( Dygert v. Schenck, 23 Wend. 451.) Where a plank road corporation has taken a public highway it succeeds to the rights and duties of the town commissioners of highways; although, therefore, in making proper and reasonable repairs, a citizen may suffer expense or inconvenience, the corporation is not liable in damages. {Benedict v. Goit, 3 Barb. 459; Graves v. Otis, 2 Hill, 466.) Overseers may not remove fences without an order from the commis¬ sioner and without the sixty days’ notice, even if the road be already laid out. {Kelley v. Horton and Smith, 2 Cow. 424; contra, McFadden v. Kings¬ bury, 11 Wend. 667.) The remedy here given for the removal of encroachments does not abro¬ gate the common law remedy of abatement of nuisances by individuals or abolish the proceeding by indictment, {Wetmore v. Tracy, 14 Wend. 250.) But a private individual cannot remove an encroachment unless it interferes with the use of the road by the public. {Harrower v. Ritson, 37 Barb. 301.) An obstruction of a highway is a public nuisance and the individual who has sustained a private injury therefrom may maintain an action to abate it and recover special damages. {Wakeman v. Wilbur, 147 N. Y. 657.) A land owner may remove an obstruction from a highway where it amounts to a nuisance. {Griffith v. McCullum, 46 Barb. 561; Jennings v. Bates, 26 W. D. 33.) An abutting owner will be granted an injunction to prevent the obstruction of a highway. {Newman v. Nellis, 97 N. Y. 285; Purroy v. Schuyler , 15 St. Rep. 337.) An owner of land may remove shade trees in front of his premises, {Lancaster v. Richardson, 4 Lans. 156.) As to whom the timber, obtained from cutting trees standing on the street, belongs. {Bridge Co. v.^Bachman, 66 N. Y. 261.) The trustees of a village may, as highway commissioners, order the removal of a sidewalk which encroaches upon the highway. {Moore v, Village of Fairport , 11 Misc. 146.) 124 The Highway Law of New York. Private road. Who may remove obstructions in the city of New York. ( Metropolitan Exhibition Co. v. Newton, 21 St. Rep. 73; Naylo v. Glazier, 5 Duer, 161.) Power of trustees of village of Fairport to order obstructions to side¬ walks and streets removed. ( Moore v. Fairport, 11 Misc. 146.) See Fleet v. Youngs ,7 Wend. 291; Pugsley v. Anderson , 3 Wend. 468; James v. Sammis, 31 St. Rep. 192; Freidlander v. D. & H. C. Co., 34 St. Rep. 650; People v. Hunting, 39 Hun, 452; Sage v. Barnes, 9 Johns. 365; Strickland v. Woodworth, 3 S. C. 286; Etzx. Daily, 20 Barb. 32; Railroad Co. v. Railroad Co., 67 Barb. 315; Coykendall v. Durkee, 13 Hun, 260; Paine v. East, 15 W. D. 281; New York v. Heuft, 2 How. Pr. (N. S.) 149; Ketchum v. Edwards, 6 App. Div. 160. § 106. Private road .—Au application for a private road shall be made in writing to the commissioners of highways of the town in which it is to be located, specify¬ ing its width and location, courses and distances, and the names of the owners and occupants of the land through which it is proposed* be laid out. *(R. S. pp. 1379, 1383; post, pp. 882-893.) Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 77, and from L. 1853, cli. 174, § 1. See Constitution, Art. 1, § 7, Appendix, post, as to opening private roads. In the light of the Constitution, if not that of a law which lies at the foundation of all governments, this statute must be read with the proviso that the owner consent. Such consent need not be in writing but may be oral. The bringing of an action for the damages assessed is the clearest manifestation of con¬ sent. ( Baker v. Braman, 6 Hill, 47; Taylor v. Porter, 4 Hill, 140.) As to what evidence would show a road to be a private and not a public highway. ( Drake v. Rogers, 3 Hill, 604.) As to what the application should contain. ( People v. Taylor, 34 Barb. 481.) As to the sufficiency of the description of the proposed private road, * So in the original. The Highway Law of New York. 125 Jury to determine necessity, &c. where it refers to an old road or a private way used for a number of years but never legally laid out. ( Satterly v. Winne, 101 N. Y. 218.) A private road cannot be laid out across the inclined plane of a railroad. (Railroad Co. v. Artcher, 6 Paige, 83.) An obstruction placed in a private road by the owner of the land over which it is laid out, cannot be lawfully removed by one having no right to use the road. ( Drake v. Rogers, 3 Hill, 604.) See O'Rourke v. Hart, 9 Bos. 301. § 107. Jury to determine necessity and assess dam¬ ages. —One or more of the commissioners to whom the application shall be made, shall appoint as early a day as the convenience of the parties interested will allow, when, at a place designated in the town, a jury will be selected for the purpose of determining upon the necessity of such road, and to assess the damages by reason of the opening thereof. Revised from L. 1853, cli. 174, § 2. § 108. Copy application and notice delivered to applicant. —Such commissioners shall deliver to the applicant a copy of the application to which shall be added a notice of the time and place appointed for the selection of the jury, addressed to the owners and occu¬ pants of the land. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, §3. § 109. Copy and notice to be served. —The applicant on receiving the copy and notice shall, on the same day, or the next day thereafter, excluding Sunday and holidays, cause such copy and notice to be served upon the persons to whom it is addressed, by delivering to each of them who reside in the same town a copy thereof, or in case of his absence, by leaving the same at his residence, and 126 The Highway Law of New York. List of jurors. upon such as reside elsewhere, by depositing in the post- office a copy thereof to each, properly inclosed in an envelope, addressed to them respectively at their post- office address, and paying the postage thereon, or, in case of infant owners, by like service upon their parent or guardian. Revised from L. 1853, ch. 174, § 4. The land-owner must be served with a written notice; but he may waive it by appearing. ( Railroad Co. v. Artcher, 6 Paige, 83.) § 110. List of jurors .—At such time and place, on due proof of the service of the notice, one or more of the commissioners shall present a list of the names of eighteen resident freeholders of the town, in no wise of kin to the applicant, owner or occupant, or either of them, and not interested in such lands. Revised from L. 1853, ch. 174, § 5, as amended by L. 1859, ch, 373, and L. 1860, ch. 468. § 111. Names struck off .—The owners or occupants of the land, may strike from the list not more than six names, and the applicant a like number; and of the num¬ ber which remain, the six names standing first upon the list shall be the jury. Revised from L. 1853, ch. 174, § 6. § 112. Place of meeting .— The commissioner or commissioners present, shall then appoint some conven¬ ient time and place for the jury to meet, and shall sum¬ mon them accordingly. Revised from L. 1853, ch. 174, § 7. The commissioners have no right to delegate the summoning of the juiors, but such summons will not be held invalid if the owner of the land The Highway Law of New York. 127 Jury to determine and assess damages. proposed to be taken is present at the meeting of the jury and does not object to the proceeding. ( People v. Commissioners of Greenbush, 24 Wend. 367.) § 113. Jury to determine and assess damages .—At least one commissioner and all the persons named and summoned on such jury, shall meet at the time and place appointed; but if one or more of the six jurors shall not appear, the commissioner or commissioners present shall summon so many qualified to serve as such jurors as will be sufficient to make the number present six, to forth¬ with appear and act as such; and when six shall have so appeared, they shall constitute the jury, and shall be sworn well and truly to determine as to the necessity of the road, and to assess the damages by reason of the open¬ ing thereof. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, £§ 8, 9. It is necessary to take an objection to any of the jurors that they are not freeholders or they will be deemed to be such. (People v. Taylor , 34 Barb. 481.) § 114. Their verdict .—The jury shall view the prem¬ ises, hear the allegations of the parties, and such wit¬ nesses as they may produce, and if they shall determine that the proposed road is necessary, they shall assess the damages to the person or persons through whose land it is to pass, and deliver their verdict in writing to the com¬ missioners. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, § 10, and from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 78. As to what is sufficient evidence in the record of the breadth of the road. (Herrick v. Stover , 5 Wend. 580.) An assessment of damages on the laying out a private road is not subject 128 The Highway Law of New York. Value of highway discontinued. to the revision or correction of a board of supervisors. ( Craig v. Super¬ visors, 10 Wend. 585.) See People v. Commissioners, 24 Wend. 367; Taylor v. Porter , 4 Hill, 142. § 115. Value of highway discontinued. —If the ne¬ cessity of such private road has been occasioned by the alteration or discontinuance of a public highway running through the lands belonging to a person through whose lands the private road is proposed to be opened, the jury shall take into consideration the value of the highway so discontinued, and the benefit resulting to the person by reason of such discontinuance, and shall deduct the same from the damages assessed for the opening and la 3 7 ing out of such private road. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, § 11. § 116. Papers to be recorded in the town clerU’s office. —The commissioners shall annex to such verdict the application, and their certificate that the road is laid out, and the same shall be filed and recorded in the town clerk’s office. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, § 12. The order of the commissioners laying out the highway after the decision of the jury, is sufficient if it refers to the description of the road contained in the application. ( Satterly v. Winne, 101 N. Y. 218.) See People v. Robinson, 29 Barb. 80. § 117. Damages to be paid before opening the road . —The damages assessed by the jury shall be paid by the party for whose benefit the road is laid out, before the road is opened or used; but if the jury shall certify that the necessity of such private road was occasioned by the The Highway Law of New York. 129 Fe^s of officers. alteration or discontinuance of a public highway, such damages shall be paid by the town, and refunded to the applicant. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, § 14. § 118. Fees of officers .—Every juror, in proceedings for a private road, shall be entitled to receive for his ser¬ vices one dollar and fifty cents; and commissioners, of highways, their per diem compensation, to be paid by the applicant. Revised from L. 1880, oh. 114, § 4. § 119. 3£otion to confirm, vacate or modify .— Within thirty days after the decision of the jury shall have been filed in the town clerk’s office, the owner or'occupant may apply to the county court of the county wherein such pri¬ vate road is situated, for an order confirming, vacating or modifying their decision; and such court may confirm, vacate or modify such decision as it shall deem just and legal. If the decision is vacated, the court may order another hearing of the matter before another jury, and remit the proceeding to the commissioners of highways of the same town for that purpose. If no such motion is made, the decision of the jury shall be deemed final. The motion shall be brought on, upon the service of papers on the adverse party in the proceeding, according to the usual practice of the court in actions and special proceed¬ ings pending therein, and the decision of the county court shall be final, except that a new hearing may be had, as herein provided. If the final decision shall be adverse to the applicant, no other application for the same road shall be made within two years. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, § 5, as amended by L. 1859, oh. 373, and L. 1860, eh. 468. 9 130 The Highway Law of Hew York. Costs of new hearing. An order of the county court, affirming the decision of the jury, is not appealable. ( Matter of DeCamp, 77 Hun, 478.) Formerly no appeal would lie to the county judge from the decision of the jury. ( People v. Robinson, 29 Barb. 77.) But otherwise under the act of 1860. (West v. McGurn, 43 Barb. 198.) See Craig v. Supervisors, 10 Wend. 585. § 120. Costs of new hearing .—If upon a new hearing, the damages assessed are increased, the applicant shall pay the costs and expenses thereof, otherwise the owner shall pay the same. New. § 121. Yonvhat purpose private road to be used .— Every such private road when so laid out, shall be for the use of such applicant, his heirs and assigns; but not to be converted to any other use or purpose than that of a road; nor shall the occupant or owner of the land through which said road shall be laid out, be permitted to use the same as a road, unless he shall have signified such intention to the jury who assessed the damages for laying out such road, and before such damages were assessed. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 79. According to the true construction of the statute, a person on whose application a private road is laid out, has the sole and exclusive right to use it, unless the occupant of the land at the time when it is laid out signify his intention to made use of it. (Lambert v. Hoke, 14 Johns. 384.) The penalty provided by statute for obstructing a highway is not appli¬ cable to a private road. (Folder v. Lansing, 9 Johns. 349.) As to the use of private roads laid out upon its own land by a corpora¬ tion for its employees. (People v. Moore, 50 Hun, 356.) The original owner of the land should so locate his fences as not to encroach upon the width of the road; but the new owner shall be deemed to have assented to such encroachment if he allows such fences to be so located without objection. (Herrick v. Stover, 5 Wend. 580.) The Highway Law of New Yoke. 131 Highways or roads along division lines. An obstruction placed in a private road by the owner of the land over which it is laid out, cannot be lawfully removed by one having no right to use the road. (Drake v. Rogers , 3 Hill, 604.) See Taylor v. Porter, 4 Hill, 142. § 122. Highways or roads along division lines .— Whenever a highway or private road shall be laid along the division line between lands of two or more persons, and wholly upon one side of the line, and the land upon both sides is cultivated or improved, the persons owning or occupying the lands adjoining such highway or road, shall be paid for building and maintaining such addi¬ tional fence as they may be required to build or maintain, by reason of the laying out and opening such highway or road; which damages shall be ascertained and determined in the same manner that other damages are ascertained and determined in the laying out of highways or private roads. Revised from L. 1853, cli. 174, § 16. § 123. Adjournments .—If any accident shall prevent any of the proceedings required by this chapter relating to the laying out, altering or discontinuing of a highway, or the laying out a private road, to be done on the day assigned, the proceedings may be adjourned to some other day, and the commissioner shall publicly announce such adjournment. Revised from L. 1853, eh. 174, § 13. 132 The Highway Law of New York. Bridges. ARTICLE V. Bridges. Section 130. When town or county expense. 131. Additional county aid. 132. Statement of expenses. 133. Supervisors to levy tax. 134. Joint liabilities of towns, and their joint contracts. 135. Refusal to repair. 136. Proceedings in court. 137. Commissioners to institute proceedings. 138. Their duty. 139. Commissioners to report. 140. Appeals. 141. Power of court on appeal. 142. Refusal to repair bridge. 143. Penalty, and notice on bridge. 144. Offense. 145. Iron bridges. Section 130. When town or county expense .—The towns of this state, except as otherwise herein provided, shall be liable to pay the expenses for the construction and repair of its public free bridges constructed over streams or other waters within their bounds, and their just and equitable share of such expenses when so con¬ structed over streams or other waters upon their bound¬ aries, except between the counties of Westchester and New York; and when such bridges are constructed over streams or other waters forming the boundary line of towns, either in the same or adjoining counties, such towns shall be jointly liable to pay such expenses. Each of the counties of this state shall also be liable to pay for the construe- The Highway Law of New York. 133 When town or county expense. tion, care, maintenance, preservation and repair of pub¬ lic bridges, lawfully constructed over streams or other waters forming its boundary line, not less than one-sixth part of the expenses of such construction, care, mainte¬ nance, preservation and repair. Revised from L. 1883, ch. 346. Amended by L. 1895, cli. 416. See Constitution, art. 3, § 18, Appendix, post; § 145, post, as to iron bridges; County Law, § 60 ff. Appendix, post, as to liability of county; § 16, ante, as to liability of town in the matter of bridges; Canal Law, §§ 113-118, 176, Appendix, post, as to canal bridges; Transportation Corpor¬ ations Law, §§ 120-151, Appendix, post , as to construction of bridges by corporations; Village Law, § 142, Appendix, post , as to care of bridges by village; L. 1897, ch. 269, Appendix, post, as to construction of bridges over waters between cities, towns or villages; see also L. 1893, ch. 419, Appen¬ dix, post. In the absence of any other valid provision for the erection of a bridge, the commissioners of highways are charged with the power and duty to erect it. (. Berlin Iron Co. v. Wagner, fu Hun, 346.) Commissioners of highways are not obliged to build bridges when they have no money in their hands for such purpose. ( People v. Hudson, 7 Wend, 474; Garlingliouse v. Jacobs, 29 N. Y. 297; Smith v. Wright , 27 Barb. 621.) The power given to a highway commissioner to repair highways in¬ cludes the power to build a bridge to connect two parts of a highway. ( Mather v. Crawford, 36 Barb. 564; Huggans v. Riley, 125 N. Y. 88.) As to the power of highway commissioners to build a new bridge, where the old one has been destroyed, without waiting for action by the people at a town meeting. ( Roots v. Washburn, 79 N. Y. 207; Buyce v, Buyce, 48 Hun, 433.) Where a bridge had not been destroyed but was deemed insufficient by the highway commissioner, he was held to have no power even with the consent of the town board to erect a new one. (. Bridge Co. v. Barnett, 1 St. Rep. 600; s. c., 12 St. Rep. 194.) After a town board has given its consent to the erection or repair of a bridge, its powers and duties in relation thereto are at an end, and it may not give directions to the highway commissioners as to the manner of construction. ( People v. Town Board, 92 Hun, 585.) 134 The Highway Law of New York. When town or county expense. Where the town has authorized the construction of a bridge, any one highway commissioner may proceed to contract for its erection. (. Berlin Bridge Co. v. Wagner, 57 Hun, 346.) Where a town board by resolution authorizes a highway commissioner to repair bridges broken down since last town meeting, he may erect an iron bridge if he deems it best. ( People v. Smith, 83 Hun, 432.) Where an act required the highway commissioners to build a bridge “upon or near the site” of an old one, they had no power to change the location of the highway. (. People v. Finger, 24 Barb. 341.) It>will not render the erection of a bridge illegal Jthat when determined upon there was no highway leading to its site. (. People v. Meach, 14 Abb. [N. S]. 429.) As to the power of the supervisors to build bridges under the act of 1869. ( People v. Meach , 14 Abb. [N. S.] 429; Huggans v. Riley, 125 N. Y. 88 .) Prior to the act of 1890 the burden of supporting the bridges within the towns was cast upon the towns alone. The counties could not be com¬ pelled to contribute toward such support. ( Town of Wirt v. Supervisors , 90 Hun, 205.) Before the repealing act of 1895 the towns could compel the counties to contribute in certain cases toward the expense of constructing and repair¬ ing bridges. After such repeal, however, such right was lost even though it had accrued priorJto the passing of the repealing act. ( Town of Wirt v. Supervisors, 90 Hun, 205; but see Thacher v. Supervisors, 21 Misc. 271.) The board of supervisors of a county having within it two towns sep¬ arated by a stream, may, upon the proper application of one of such towns, enact a law authorizing and compelling the erection of a bridge over said stream to connect highways in said towns, and impose taxes upon said towns to pay the expense thereof, though a majority of the taxpayers of one\)f such town and its officers are opposed to\it, however such opposi- sition may be indicated. ( People v. Supervisors, 51 N. Y. 401; People v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401; People v. McDonald, 69 N. Y. 32; Town of Kirk- ivood v. Newbury, 122 N. Y. 571.) Duty of counties under this section may be enforced by mandamus. {People v. Supervisors, 142 N. Y. 271.) As to the power of the supervisors, under the County Law, to permit a town to issue bonds for the construction of a bridge. {Ba?‘ker v. Oswe - The Highway Law of New York. 135 Additional county aid. gatchie, 10 Supp. 834; 16 Supp. 727; Berlin Bridge Co. v. Wagner, 57 Hun, 346; County Law, § 12, subs. 6, 13, 14.) A county is not liable at the suit of a private individual for personal injuries received from a defective bridge, though the county is charge¬ able with the maintenance thereof. ( Markey v. County of Queens , 154 N. Y. 675; Ensign v. Supervisors, 25 Hun, 20.) Bridges erected within the Indian reservation need not be repaired by the highway commissioner. ( Bishop v. Barton, 64 N. Y. 637.) When the approach to a bridge has been destroyed for over twenty- four years, the court will presume the highway thereover to have been abandoned and will not require the bridge to be rebuilt. ( Matter of Free¬ holders of Owasco, 46 Hun, 620.) L. 1892, ch. 493, not unconstitutional. ( Treanor v. Eichhorn, 74 Hun, 58.) See People ex rel. Root v. Supervisors, 146 N. Y. 107, 81 Hun, 216, con¬ struing the above section before its amendment in 1895. See also Town of Salamanca v. Cattaraugus Co., 81 Hun, 282; People ex rel. Keene v. Supervisors, 142 N. Y. 271; Dygert v. Schenck, 23 Wend. 446. § 131. Additional county aid *—When it shall appear to the board of supervisors of any county that any one of the towns in their county will be unreaonably burdened by erecting or repairing any necessary free bridges in such town or upon its borders, such board of supervisors may cause such sum of money, not exceeding two thou¬ sand dollars in any one year, in addition to the amounts provided for in the last preceding section, to be raised and levied upon the county to be used to pay such portion of the expenses of erecting or repairing such bridge as such board may deem proper. Repealed by County Law, L. 1892, ch. 686. Section 63 of the County Law was evidently intended to be a substitute for the above section. It provides as follows: § 63. County aid to towns for the construction and repair of bridges.— If the board of supervisors of any county shall deem any town in the county to be unreasonably burdened by its ’expenses for the con- 136 The Highway Law of New Yoek. Statement of expenses. struction and repair of its bridges, the board may cause a sum of money, not exceeding two thousand dollars in any one year, to be raised by the county and paid to such town to aid in defraying such expenses. See People v. Supervisors, 1 Hill, 50. § 132. Statement of expenses. —The commissioners of highways of every town in which the whole or any part of any free bridge may be, shall make and deliver to the supervisor of the town, on or before the first day of November in each year, a written statement, verified by one of them, containing a description of such bridge, the whole expense in items incurred by the town during the year preceding for its construction or repair. Revised from L. 1883, ch. 346. See notes under § 130, ante. § 133. Supervisors to levy tax. —Every supervisor to whom such statement is delivered shall present the same to the board of supervisors of his county at its next annual session thereafter, and the board of supervisors shall levy upon the taxable property of the county a sum sufficient to pay its proportion of such expense, and the same when collected shall be paid to the commissioners of highways of such town to be applied toward the payment of such expense. Revised from L. 1883, ch. 346. See notes under § 130, ante. § 134. Joint liabilities of towns, and their joint con- tracts. —Whenever any two or more towns shall be liable to make or maintain any bridge or bridges, the same shall be built and maintained at the joint expense of such towns, without reference to town lines. The commis¬ sioners of highways of all the towns, or of one or more The Highway Law of Hew Yoek. 137 Joint liabilities of towns, and their joint contracts. of such towns, the others refusing to act, may enter into a joint contract for making and repairing such bridges. Revised from L. 1841, ch. 225, as amended by L. 1857, ch. 383. See notes under § 16, ante, as to the joint liability of towns and high¬ way commissioners for defective and unsafe bridges. The duty of the commissioner of highways to divide a town into road districts for the purpose of keeping the highways in repair, does not include the duty to repair bridges. Such latter duty is separately imposed by this and the following sections. ( Day v. Day, 94 N. Y. 153.) The duty to keep and maintain bridges is a joint one imposed by the legislature. ( Oakley v. Town of Mamaroneck, 39 Hun, 448.) The liability of commissioners of highways under a bridge contract is a joint one. ( Corey v. Rice, 4 Lans. 141.) This section is made to include all towns in which any part of the bridge is located. (Lapham v. Rice, 55 N. Y. 472.) The expense of maintenance is to be borne equally, by the towns liable without regard to the portion of the bridge located in either. ( Lapham v. Rice, 55 N. Y. 472.) Where a bridge has been constructed; under a joint contract by the commissioners of several towns and been accepted, the liability of the towns is not only joint but several. (. Harris v. Houck, 57 Barb. 619.) The liability of adjoining towns to make and maintain bridges cannot be changed by a submission of the case to arbitration. ( Corey v. Rice, 4 Lans. 141.) As to whether one of two towns can relieve the other from responsibility for the care of a bridge for which they are jointly liable. ( Getty v. Hamlin, 46 Hun, 1.) Where three towns were liable for the repairing of a bridge and one of them paid one-half the expense, it could not recover back the excess so paid. (Flynn v. Hurd, 118 N. Y. 19.) As to approval by town of informal contract by commissioners. (Ed¬ wards v. Ford, 22 App. Div. 277.) Where two towns are liable to maintain a bridge they’are also liable to maintain the approaches thereto. (Edivards v. Ford, 22 App. Div. 2/7.) Where a county by special act is required to maintain a bridge between adjoining towns, no act of their highway commissioners could bind such towns for repairs to the bridge. (Phelps v. Hawley, 52 N. Y. 23.) A highway legally laid out will be presumed to be continued so as to make 138 The Highway Law of New York. Refusal to repair. two towns separated by a stream, jointly liable for the erection of a bridge in the line of the highway. An abandonment is not shown by the fact that part of the road has not been worked for six years, but one town may show that the approach to the bridge on its side has never been opened. (Beckwith v. Whalen , 65 N. Y. 332; reversed in 70 N. Y. 432.) See Surdam v. Fuller, 31 Hun, 500; Matter of Freeholders of Monte¬ zuma, 38 St. Hep. 970; Clapp v. Town of Ellington, 87 Hun, 542. § 135. Refusal to repair .—If the commissioners of highways of either of such towns, after notice in writing from the commissioners of highways of any other of such towns, shall not within twenty days give their consent in writing to build or repair any such bridge, and shall not within a reasonable time thereafter do the same, the com¬ missioners of highways giving such notice may make or repair such bridge, and then maintain an action in the name of the town, against the town whose commissioners neglect or refuse to join in such making or repairing, and in such action, the plaintiffs shall be entitled to re¬ cover so much from the defendant, as the town would be liable to contribute to the same, together with costs and interest. Revised from L. 1841, ch. 225, as amended by L. 1857, ch. 383. See § 142, post, as to refusal to repair bridge; see notes under §§ 16, 17, ante. It is essential to the maintenance of an action as herein prescribed that the statutory notice be given. (Flynn v. Hurd, 118 N. Y. 19.) An absolute refusal by the commissioner of one town to assist in the repair of a bridge amounts to a waiver of the twenty days’ notice required by this section. (Day v. Day, 94 N. Y. 153; Clapp v. Town of Ellington, 87 Hun, 542.) An action will lie under this section where the commissioners ofone of several liable towns, though having met with the other commissioners and agreed to join in the repair, yet have neglected to pay their share of the expense. (Surdam v. Fuller, 31 Hun, 500.) An allegation in the complaint that the defendant towns had money The Highway Law of New Yoke. 139 Proceedings in court. with which to do the duty imposed upon them by law is not necessary to the complaint. ( Oakley v. Town of Mamaroneck, 39 Hun, 448.) If two of three commissioners have paid the indebtedness of a third, they must sue separately for the portions paid by them respectively; where the action is joint by the two to recover the whole amount paid for the third, and the complaint does not show otherwise, the presumption is in favor of a payment from joint funds. ( Corey v. Rice, 4 Lans. 141.) See Harris v. Houck, 57 Barb. 619; Phelps v. Haivley, 3 Lans. 160; Hawx~ hurst v. Mayor, 43 Hun, 588. § 136. Proceedings in court* —Whenever any adjoin- ing towns shall be liable to make or maintain any bridge over any streams dividing such towns, whether in the same or different counties, three freeholders in either of such towns may, by petition signed by them, apply to the commissioners of highways in each of such towns, to build, rebuild or repair such bridge, and if such com¬ missioners refuse to build, rebuild or repair such bridge within a reasonable time, either for want of funds or any other cause, such freeholders, upon affidavit and notice of motion, a copy of which shall be served on each of the commissioners, at least eight days before the hear¬ ing, may apply to the supreme court at a special term thereof, to be held in the judicial district in which such bridge, or any part thereof, shall be located, for an order requiring such commissioners to build, rebuild or repair such bridge, and the court upon such motion may, in doubtful cases, refer the case to some disinterested person to ascertain the requisite facts in relation thereto, and to report the evidence thereof, to the court. Upon the coming in of the report, in case of such reference, or upon or after the hearing of the motion, in case no such reference shall be ordered, the court shall make an order thereon as the justice of the case shall require. If the motion be granted in whole or in part, whereby funds shall be needed by the commissioners to carry the order 140 The Highway Law of New York. Commissioners to institute proceedings. into effect, such court shall specify the amount of money required for that purpose, and how much thereof shall be raised in each town. Revised from L. 1857, ch. 639, §§1,2. Decisions under the act of 1857, ch. 639, authorizing the supreme court to order the building of a bridge over a steam forming the boundary be¬ tween two towns. ( Matter of Mt. Morris and Castile, 41 Hun, 29; Matter of Commissioners of Glen v. Florida, 20 St. Rep. 394; Ex parte Commis¬ sioners of Allegany and Carrolton, 59 N. Y. 313; Case of Irondequoit and Penfield, 68 N. Y. 376; Matter of Spier, 115 N. Y. 665; s. c., 20 St. Rep. 389.) § 137. Commissioners to institute proceedings .— The commissioners of highways of any such town, may institute and prosecute proceedings under this chapter, in the name of the town, to compel the commissioners of such adjoining towns, to join in the building, rebuilding or repair of any such bridge, in like manner as freeholders are hereby authorized. Revised from L. 1857, eh. 639, § 3. See Beckwith v. Whalen, 65 N. Y. 322; Phelps v. Hawley, 3 Lans. 160. § 138. Their duty .—The order for building, rebuilding or repairing a bridge being made, and a copy thereof being served on the commissioners of highways of such adjoining towns respectively, the commissioners of high¬ ways of such towns shall forthwith meet and fix on the plan of such bridge, or the manner of repairing the same, and shall cause such bridge to be built, rebuilt or repaired out of any funds in their hands applicable thereto; and if an adequate amount of funds are on hand, they shall cause the same to be built, rebuilt or repaired upon credit, or in part for cash and in part upon credit, according to the exigency of the case; and the commissioners may enter into a contract for building, rebuilding or repairing such The Highway Law of New York. 141 Commissioners to report. bridge, pledging the credit of each town for the payment of its appropriate share, so far as the same shall be upon credit. Revised from L. 1857, eh. 639, § 4. § 139. Commissioners to report .—The commissioners of highways of each town, shall make a full report of their proceedings in the premises to the town board, at the time of making their annual report. They shall attach to the copy of the order granted by the supreme court, an accurate account under oath, of what has been done in the premises, and deliver the same to the supervisor of their town. The board of supervisors at their annual meeting, shall levy a tax upon each of such towns, when in the same county, and upon the appropriate town when in different counties, for its share of the costs of building, rebuilding or repairing such bridge, after deducting all payments actually made by the commissioners thereon; which tax, including prior payments, shall in no case exceed the amount specified in the order. Revised from L. 1857, eh. 639, § 5. § 140. Appeals .—Either party aggrieved by the grant¬ ing or refusing to grant such order by the court at special term, may appeal from such decison to the general term of the supreme court for the review of the decision. The general term may alter, modify or reverse the order, with or without costs. Revised from L. 1857, eh. 639, $ 6. § 141. JPowcr of court on appeal .—The special term may grant or refuse costs as upon a motion, including also witnesses' fees, referees' fees and disbursements. The appeal provided for in the last preceding section, shall conform to the practice of the supreme court, in case of 142 The Highway Law of New York. Refusal to repair bridge. appeal from an order of a special term, to the general term. Revised, from L. 1857, ch. 639, § 7. § 142. Refusal to repair bridge .—Whenever any such bridge shall have been or shall be so out of repair as to render it unsafe for travelers to pass over the same, or whenever any such bridge shall have fallen down, or been swept away by a freshet or otherwise, if the commis¬ sioners of highways of the adjoining towns after reasonable notice of such condition of the bridge, have neglected or refused, or shall neglect or refuse to repair or rebuild it, then whatever funds have been or shall be necessarily or reasonably laid out or expended in repairing such bridge, or in rebuilding the same, by any person or corporation, shall be a charge on such adjoining towns, each being liable for its just proportion; and the person or corpora¬ tion who has made such expenditure, or shall make such expenditures, may apply to the supreme court, at a special term, for an order requiring such towns severally to reim¬ burse such expenditures, which application shall be made by serving papers upon the commissioners of highways of each of such towns at least eight days; and the court may grant an order requiring each of the adjoining towns to pay its just proportion of the expenditures, specifying the same; and the commissioners of highways in each of such towns shall forthwith serve a copy of such order upon the supervisor of each of their - tofcns, who shall present the same to the board of supervisors, at their next annual meeting. The board of supervisors shall raise the amount charged upon each town by the order, and cause the same to be collected and paid to such persons or corporation as incurred the expenditure. The order shall be appealable. Revised from L. 1857, ch. 639, § 8. See § 10, ante, where bridge lies wholly within a town; and notes under | 135, ante. The Highway Law of New York. 143 Penalty, and notice on bridge. § 143. J Penalty, and notice on bridge. —The commis¬ sioners of highways may fix and prescribe a penalty, not less than one, nor more than five dollars, for riding or driving faster than a walk on any bridge in their town, whose chord is not less than twenty-five feet in length and put up and maintain in a conspicuous place at each end of the bridge, a notice in large characters, stating each penalty incurred. Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 1, art. 6, § 122, as amended by L. 1875, ch. 22, § 1, and from L. 1878, eh. 477, §§ 1, 2. § 144. Offense. —Whoever shall ride or drive faster than a walk over any bridge, upon which notice shall have been placed, and shall then be, shall forfeit for every offense, the amount fixed by such commissioners, and specified in the notice. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 6, §§ 123, 124, as amended by L. 1875, ch. 22, § 2, and from L. 1873, ch. 477, § 3. § 145. Iron bridges. —No town or its officers shall be compelled to accept or pay for an iron or steel bridge exceeding two hundred feet in length, or having a span or spans exceeding one hundred feet in length, constructed therein or upon its borders, until the state engineer and surveyor shall certify to the completion of the bridge, pursuant to the contract under which it shall have been constructed, with his approval of the manner of its con¬ struction and the material thereof; and all contracts made for the construction of any such bridge, shall be subject to the provisions of this section. New. See White v. Town of Ellisburgh, 18 App. Div. 514; People , ex red. Slater v. Smith, 83 Hun, 432. 144 The Highway Law of New York. Miscellaneous provisions. ARTICLE VI. Miscellaneous Provisions. Section 150. Papers, where filed. 151. When commissioners do not act. 152. Costs on motion. 153. Injuries to highways. 154. When town not liable for bridge breaking. 155. Steam traction engine on highway. 156. Trees, to whom they belong. 157. Carriages meeting to turn to the right. 158. Intemperate drivers not to be engaged. 159. Drivers, when to be discharged. 160. Leaving horses without being tied. 161. Owners of certain carriages liable for acts of drivers. 162. Term “carriage” defined. 163. Entitled to free use of highways. 164. Penalties, how recovered. 165. Extent of this chapter.* 165. Stone and rubbish not to be dumped in highways. Section 150. Papers, ivhere filed .—All applications, certificates, appointments and other papers relating to the laying out, altering or discontinuing of any highway shall be filed by the commissioners of highways as soon as a decision shall have been made thereon in the town clerk’s office of their town. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 4, § 83. Where an application to lay out a highway had been duly filed as pre¬ scribed in this section, it was held that further proof of the signatures to the application was not necessary. The paper was a public record and proved itself. ( Van Bergen v. Bradley , 36 N. Y. 316.) * So in the original. The Highway Law of New York. 145 When commissioners do not act. See McCarthy v. Whalen , 19 Hun, 503; Phillips v. Schumacher, 10 Hun, 405; Patterson v. New York , 1 Paige, 114. § 151. When commissioners do not act .—When any commissioner or other officer appointed by a court under this chapter shall neglect or be prevented from serving, the court which appointed him shall appoint another in his place. New. § 152. Costs on motion .—Costs of a motion to confirm, vacate or modify the report of commissioners appointed by the court to lay out, alter or discontinue a highway may be allowed in the discretion of the court not exceed¬ ing fifty dollars. Costs of any other motion in a proceed¬ ing in a court of record, authorized by this chapter, may be allowed in the discretion of the court not exceeding ten dollars. Neiv. See § 92, ante, and notes thereunder, as to costs, by whom paid. § 153. Injuries to highways .—Whoever shall injure any highway or bridge maintained at the public expense by obstructing or diverting any creek, water-course or sluice, or by dragging logs or timber on its surface, or by any other act, or shall injure, deface or destroy any mile¬ stone or guide-post erected on any highway, shall for every such offense, forfeit treble damages. Revised' from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 7, §§ 128-130. See §§ 104, 105, ante, and notes thereunder as to obstructions in high¬ way, and how removed; § 15, ante, and notes thereunder as to actions for injuries to highways; § 164, post, as to actions by commissioners to recover penalties. 10 146 The Highway Law of New York. Injuries to highways. Penal Code Provisions. § 373. Floating logs or defacing marks thereon.— A person who: 1. Floats, runs or assists in floating or running any lumber, logs or other timber upon or over any river not excepted by law, within this state, recognized by law or use as a public highway for the purpose of floating and running lumber, logs and other timber therein, without first filing the bond executed and approved as required by law; • ••»•*• • • • Is guilty of a misdemeanor. § 385. “Public nuisance” defined. —A public nuisance is a crime against the order and economy of the state, and consists in unlawfully doing an act, or omitting to perform a duty, which act or omission; • •••• ••••• 3. Unlawfully interferes with, obstructs, or tends to obstruct, or renders dangerous for passage, a lake, or a navigable river, bay, stream, canal or basin, or a public park, square, street or highway; • ••••••••• § 429. Ice cuttings and bridges.— ... A person who cuts, loosens or detaches from any bay, estuary, inlet, or main, or island shore of the St. Lawrence river, within the jurisdiction of this state, any field of ice, or large body of ice, used or suited for use, as a bridge or passage way between an island of the river and the main shore, or between any islands of such river, is guilty of a misdemeanor. § 431. Noisome or unwholesome substances, etc., in highway.— A person, who deposits, leaves or keeps, on or near a highway or route of public travel, either on the land or on the water, any noisome or unwhole¬ some substance, or establishes, maintains or carries on, upon or near a public highway or route of public travel, either on the land or on the water, any business, trade or manufacture which is noisome or detrimen¬ tal to public health, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less that one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment not less than three nor more than six months, or both. § 639, Injuring highway boundary, pier, sea wall, dock, rock, BOUY,, LANDMARK, MILE .BOARD, PIPE, MAIN, SEWER, MACHINE, TELEGRAPH, etc.—A person who wilfully or maliciously displaces, removes,injures, or destroys, The Highway Law of New York. 147 When town not liable for bridge breaking. 1. A public highway or bridge, or a private way laid out by authority of law, or a bridge upon such public or private way; or, • ••••• •••• 6. A mile board, mile stone, or guide post, erected upon a highway, or any inscription upon the same; • • «••••••• Is punishable by imprisonment for not more than two years. § 661. Throwing substance injurious to animals in public place, a misdemeanor. —A person who wilfully throws, drops or places, or causes to be thrown, dropped or placed, upon any road, highway, street or public place, any glass, nails, pieces of metal or other substance which might wound, disable or injure any animal, is guilty of a misdemeanor. § 154. When town not liable for bridge breaking . —No town shall be liable for any damage resulting to person or property, by reason of the breaking of any bridge, by transportation on the same, of any vehicle and load, together weighing four tons or over; but any owner of such vehicle or load, or other person engaged in trans¬ porting or driving the same over any bridge, shall be lia¬ ble for all damages resulting therefrom. Revised from L. 1837, ch. 526, § 1, as amended by L. 1890, cli. 210. See § 16, ante, and notes thereunder as to liability of town for defective highway. § 155. Steam traction engines on highway —The owner of a carriage, vehicle or engine, propelled by steam, his servant or agent, shall not allow, permit or use the same to pass over, through or upon any public highway or street, except upon railroad tracks, unless such owneis, or their agents or servants, shall send before the same, a person of mature age, at least one-e'ghtli of a mile in advance, who shall notify, and warn persons traveling or using such highway or street, with horses or other domes¬ tic animals, of the approach of such carriage, vehicle or 148 The Highway Law of New York. Trees, to whom they belong. engine; and at night such person shall carry a red light, except in incorporated villages and cities. Revised from L. 1886, eh. 269. Penal Code Provision. § 640 Malicious injury and destruction to property.—A person who wilfully, 11. Drives or leads along a public]highw T ay a wild and dangerous animal, or a vehicle or engine propelled by steam, except upon a railroad, along a public highway, or causes or directs such animal, vehicle or engine to be so driven, led, or to be made to pass, unless a person of mature age shall precede such animal, vehicle or engine by at least one-eighth 0 f a mile, carrying a red light, if in the night-time, and gives warning to all persons whom he meets traveling such highway, of the approach of such animal vehicle or engine; Shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. § 156. Trees, to whom they belong .—All trees stand¬ ing or lying on any land over which any highway shall be laid out, shall be for the proper use of the owner or occu¬ pant of such land, except such of them as may be requisite to make or repair the highway or bridges on the same land. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 7, § 126. See notes under § 105, ante, as to the removal of trees as encroachments; L. 1881, ch. 344, Appendix, post, as to prevention of mutilation of shade trees; Village Law, § 89, sub. 8, as to power of village trustees to protect shade trees. See Edsall v. Howell, 86 Hun, 424, as to the ownership of trees set out by an abutting owner after the laying out of a highway and as to the measure of damages for their destruction. Where, in a grant of land, there is a presumption that the grantee owns to the center of the street, all shade trees in front of the premises belong to such grantee. (McCruden v. Rochester Ry. Co., 5 Misc. 59.) The Highway Law of New York. 149 i Carriages meeting to turn to the right. § 157. Carriages meeting to turn to the right .— Whenever any persons traveling with any carriages, shall meet on any turnpike road or highway, the persons so meeting shall seasonably turn their carriages to the right of the center of the road, so as to permit such carriages to pass without interference or interruption, under the pen¬ alty of five dollars for every neglect or offense, to be recovered by the party injured. Revised from 1 R. S., eh. 20, tit. 13, § 1. See notes under § 100, ante , as to the uses of and right of passage over highways. See § 163, post, as to the free use of highways; Railroad Law, § 33, Appendix, post, as to the duties of railroads at crossings; see, also, Thorn¬ ton on Railroad Fences. It is extremely doubtful whether the law in regard to keeping to the right on a public highway applies to any one except the drivers of vehicles of some kind; and even as to them there are many exceptions. ( Mooney v. Trow, ( fee. Co., 2 Misc. 238; Newman v. Ernst, 31 St. Rep. 1; Harpell v. Curtis, 1 E. D. Smith, 78; Pike v. Bosworth, 7 St. Rep. 665; Smith v. Dygert, 12 Barb. 613.) Runaway horses should be guided to the right side of the road to avoid a collision. But if the horses are beyond the control of the driver and he uses due diligence and the best of his ability as a skillful driver to control them, the law of the road does not apply. ( Cadwell v. Arnheim, 81 Hun, 39; s. c,. 152 N. Y. 182.) The centre of the road means the centre of the worked part of the road; it is immaterial that one side was rougher than the other. {Earing v. Lansing , 7 Wend. 185; Simmonsonv. Stellenmerf, Edm. S. C. 194; Pike v. Bosworth, 7 St. Rep. 665.) And when snow is upon the ground it is sufficient to keep to the centre of the beaten track. {Smith v. Dygert, 12 Barb. 613.) The rule does not apply to a traveller on horseback meeting another horseman or a vehicle; reasonable care is all that is required in such case. {Dudley v. Bolles , 24 Wend. 465.) A person driving upon a public highway in advance of another vehicle is not bound to give way or give facilities to the overtaking vehicle to enable it to pass; but he is bound to refrain from any manoeuvre calculated 150 The Highway Law of New York. Carriages meeting to turn to the right. to embarass an overtaking vehicle in its attempt to pass. ( Crabtree v. Otterson, 22 App. Div. 393.) Where obstructions of a serious nature exist on one side of the road, the rule may be said not to apply. ( Mooney v. Trow Directory , cfee. Co., 2 Misc. 238; Earing v. Lansing, 7 Wend. 185; Pike v. Bosworth, 7 St. Rep. 665; Simmonson v. Stellenmerf, Edm. S. C. 194.) In an action brought for negligence causing a collision upon a highway, the plaintiff is bound to show that although upon the right side of the highway he endeavored to avoid collision. ( Schimpf v. Sliter, 64 Hun ? 463.) One who is on the wrong side is presumptively negligent; but the other party must show his injury as a result of such negligence and also his own freedom from contributory negligence. {Newman v. Ernst, 31 St. Rep. 1.) And it is no excuse when one is driving on the wrong side that he had no time to turn out. {Simmonson v. Stellenmerf, Edm. S. C. 194; Pike v. Bos¬ worth, 7 St. Rep. 665.) This section is of necessity inapplicable to street railway vehicles when meeting common vehicles in the streets of a city. {Hegan v. Railroad Co., 15 N. Y. 380; Whitaker v. Railroad Co., 51 N. Y. 295.) So with a steam railroad company. {Barker v. Railroad Co., 4 Daly, 274.) And a street railway has the right of way in respect to vehicles passing between their tracks either way; but in crossing other streets than that upon which their tracks are laid, street car companies have no rights superior to other vehicles. {Buhrens v. Railroad Co., 125 N. Y. 702; O'Neil v. Railroad Co . 129 N. Y. 125.) Foot passengers and vehicles have equal rights in the highways and especially at street crossings; they are bound not only to use reasonable care as to their own safety, but also to avoid doing injury to others. {Barker v. Savage, 45 N. Y. 191; Belton v. Baxter, 54 N. Y. 245; Atkinson v. Oelsner, 32 St. Rep. 1088; Moebus v. Herman , 108 N. Y. 349; Durant v. Lipsius, 5 St. Rep. 841; Murphy v. Orr, 96 N. Y. 14; Birket v. Knicker¬ bocker Ice Co., 110 N. Y. 504; s. c., 41 Hun, 404; Cowan v. Snyder, 5 Supp. 340; Henderson v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 23 St. Rep. 530; s. c., 119 N. Y. 619; Brooks v. Schiverin, 54 N. Y. 343.) Where two vehicles approach each other on streets running at a right angle, neither has the right of way; the one first signalling his intention to proceed, has a right to expect that his signal will be obeyed. {Koester v. Decker, 22 Misc. 353.) As to two street cars. {Loudoun v. Railroad Co., The Highway Law of New York. 151 Intemperate drivers not to be engaged. 16 App. Div. 152); and as to a motor car and vehicle ( Bresky v. Railroad Co., 16 App. Div. 83; Hergert v. Union Ry. Co., 25 App. Div. 218; Huber v. Nassau R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 426.) Penal Code Provision as to Railroad Crossings. § 421. Duties of locomotive engineers. —A person acting as engineer, driving a locomotive on any railway in this state, who fails to ring the bell, or sound the whistle, upon such locomotive, or cause the same to be rung or sounded, at least eighty rods from any place where such railway crosses a traveled road or street on the same level (except in cities) or to con¬ tinue the ringing of such bell or sounding such whistles at intervals, until such locomotive, and the train to which the locomotive is attached, shall have completely crossed such road or street, or any officer of a corporation who shall wilfully obstruct, or cause to be obstructed, any farm or high¬ way crossing with any locomotive or car for a longer period than five con¬ secutive minutes, is guilty of a misdemeanor. As to the right of way of an ambulance in preference to an ice wagon. {Byrne v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 21 St. Rep. 469; s. c., 121 N. Y. 700.) Penal Code Provision as to Ambulance. § 432. Ambulances. —A person who wilfully stops or obstructs the pas¬ sage of any ambulance or vehicle used for the transportation of sick or wounded persons or animals upon any public street, highway or place, or who wilfully injures the same, or wilfully drives any vehicle into collis- sion therewith, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Care required of one driving in a public street, as to street sweepers, &c. {Smith v. Bailey, 14 App.[Div. 283.) Where a railway car obstructs the crossing of a public street, a traveller has a right to pass over its platform. {Shea v. Railroad Co., 62 N. Y. 180.) See Baumann v. Gilmour, 31 St. Rep. 283; O'Neil v. Railroad Co., 3 Misc. 521. § 158. Intemxierate drivers not to be engaged .— No person owning any carriage for the conveyance of passengers, running or traveling upon any highway or road, shall employ, or continue in employment, any per¬ son to drive such carriage, who is addicted to drunken¬ ness, or to the excessive use of spirituous liquor; and if 152 The Highway Law of New Yoke. Drivers, when to be discharged. any such owner shall violate the provisions of this section, he shall forfeit at the rate of five dollars per day, for all the time during which he shall have kept any such driver in his employment. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 20, tit. 13, § 2. § 159. Drivers 9 when to be discharged .—If any driver, while actually employed in driving any such car¬ riage, shall be guilty of intoxication, to such a degree as to endanger the safety of the passengers in the carriage, the owner of such carriage shall, on receiving written notice of the fact, signed by any one of said passengers, and certified by him on oath, forthwith discharge such driver from his employment; and every such owner, who shall retain, or have in his service within six months after the receipt of such notice, any driver who shall have been so intoxicated, shall forfeit at the rate of five dollars per day, for all the time during which he shall keep any such driver in his employment after receiving such notice. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 20, tit. 13, § 3. § 160. Leaving horses without being tied .—No driver of any carriage used for the purpose of conveying passengers for hire, shall leave the horses attached thereto, while passengers remain in the same, without first making such horses fast with a sufficient halter, rope or chain, or by placing the lines in the hands of some other person, so as to prevent their running; and if any such driver shall offend against the provisions of this section, he shall forfeit the sum of twenty dollars. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 20, tit. 13, § 5. See Code of Civil Procedure, .’§§ 3082-3115, Appendix, post, as to action or special proceeding relating to an animal straying upon the highway. Cow obstructing highway by her tethering rope. (< Gulliver v. Blauvelt , 14 App. Div. 523.) See Davis v. Kallfelz, 22 Misc. 602. The Highway Law of New York. 153 Owners of certain carriages liable for acts of drivers. § 161. Owners of certain carriages liable for acts of drivers .—The owners of every carriage running or traveling upon any turnpike road or highway, for the con¬ veyance of passengers, shall be liable jointly and severally, to the party injured, for all injuries and damages done by any person in the employment of such owners, as a driver, while driving such carriage, whether the accident* occa¬ sioning such injury or damage be willful or negligent, or otherwise, in the same manner as such driver would be liable. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 20, tit. 13, § 6. At common law the liability of the owner of a vehicle, used for the transportation of persons for injuries resulting from the acts of his driver, extends to those injuries only which result from the driver’s misjudgment or negligence while engaged for the owner in his vocation as a driver. (Whitaker v. Railroad Co., 51 N. Y. 295; Wriglit v. Wilcox, 19 Wend. 344; Hibbard v. R. R. Co., 15 N. Y. 467; Mali v. Lord, 39 N. Y. 383; Fraser v. Freeman, 43 N. Y. 566; Isaacs v. R. R. Co., 47 N. Y. 122.) This section held not to apply to the driver of a street railway company. Whitaker v. Railroad Co., 51 N. Y. 295.) Nor to the conductor. ( Isaacs v. Railroad Co., 47 N. Y. 122.) See, also, Rounds v. Railroad Co., 64 N. Y. 129; Mott v. Consumers' Ice Co., 73 N. Y. 543; Shea v. Railroad Co., 62 N. Y. 180; Stewart v. Railroad Co., 90 N. Y. 588. § 162. Term “carriage” defined .—The term “car¬ riage/ ’ as used in this article, shall be construed to include stage-coaches, wagons, carts, sleighs, sleds and every other carriage or vehicle used for the transportation of persons and goods, or either of them, and bicycles, tricycles and all other vehicles propelled by manumotive or pedimotive power. Revised from 1 R. S., ch. 20, tit. 13, § 7, and from L. 1887, ch. 704, g 1. *So in the original. 154 The Highway Law of New York. Entitled to free use of highways. § 163. Entitled to free tise of highways .—The commissioners, trustees, or other authorities having charge or control of any highway, public street, parkway, drive¬ way or place, shall have no power or authority to pass, enforce, or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation, by which any person using a bicycle or tricycle, shall be excluded or prohibited from the free use of any highway, public street, avenue, roadway, driveway, parkway or place, at any time when the same is open to the free use of persons having and using other pleasure carriages; but nothing herein, shall prevent the passage, enforce¬ ment or maintenance of any regulation, ordinance or rule, regulating the use of bicycles or tricycles in highways, public streets, driveways, parkways and places, in such manner as to limit and determine the proper rate of speed with which such vehicles may be propelled, nor in such manner as to require, direct or prohibit the use of bells, lamps and other appurtenances, nor to prohibit the use* any vehicle upon that part of the highway, street or park¬ way, commonly known as the foot path or sidewalk. Revised from L. 1887, ch, 704. See notes under § 100, ante, as to the uses of and right of passage over highways. See § 157, ante, and notes thereunder, as to the law of the road and crossings. Penal Code Provisions. § 652. Driving vehicles, et cetera, on sidewalks.— A person who wilfully and without authority or necessity drives any team, vehicle, cat¬ tle, sheep, horse, swine or other animal along upon a sidewalk is punish¬ able by a fine of fifty dollars, or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding thirty days, or both. 1. A person who wilfully and without authority or necessity drives any team or vehicle, except a bicycle, upon a side path, or wheelway, con- *So in the original. The Highway Law of New York. 155 Penalties, how recovered. structed by or exclusively for the use of bicyclists, and not constructed in a street of a city, is punishable by a fine of not more than fifty dollars, or imprisonment not exceeding thirty days, or both. § 654a. Placing injurious substances on roads, etc.— Whoever, with intent to prevent the free use of a cycle thereon, shall throw, drop or place, or shall cause or procure to be thrown, dropped or placed, in or upon any cycle path, avenue, street, sidewalk, alley, road, highway or public way or place, any glass, tacks, nails, pieces of metal, brier, thorn or other substance which might injure or puncture any tire used on a cycle, or which might wound, disable or injure any person using such cycle, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction be fined not less than five nor more than fifty dollars. See Lechner v. Village of Newark , 19 Misc. 452, as to ordinance allowing bicycles upon sidewalks. See also Fuller v. Redding , 13 App. Div. 61. § 164. Penalties, how recovered .—All penalties or forfeitures given in this chapter, and not otherwise specially provided for, shall be recovered by the commis¬ sioners of highways, in the name of the town in which the offence shall be committed; and when recovered, shall be applied by them in improving the highways and bridges in such town. Revised from \ R. S., ch. 16, tit. 1, art. 7, § 131. See \ 15, ante , as to actions by commissioners for injuries to highways, and § 105, ante , as to actions to compel the removal of encroachments. There is no provision in the statute which authorizes the commissioners of highways of two towns to unite as plaintiffs and bring an action to recover the penalty or forfeiture for an encroachment upon a highway. The authority of such officers to maintain actions is given by statute, and is confined to those of the town where the offense had been committed. {Bradley v. Blair , 17 Barb. 480.) Commissioners of highways cannot maintain a suit in their official names or titles; but must use their individual names, annexing their official titles. {Supervisor of Galway v. Stimson, 4 Hill, 176; Commis¬ sioners v. Peck , 5 Hill, 215; Gould v. Glass, 19 Barb. 179.) See Commissioners v. Peck, 5 Hill, 215; Trustees of Jordon v. Otis, 37 Barb. 50. 156 The Highway Law of New York. Stone and rubbish not to be dumped in highways. § 165. Stone and rubbish not to be dumped inhigh- tvays .—No stone or other rubbish shall be drawn to and deposited within the limits of any highway, except for the purpose of filling in a depression or otherwise improv¬ ing the highway, with the consent of the commissioner of highways and under the direction of a commissioner or overseer of highways. Added by L. 1898, ch. 352. The Highway Law of New York. 157 Regulation of ferries. ARTICLE VII. Regulation of Ferries. Section 170. Licenses. 171. Undertaking. 172. Appendages for rope ferries. 173. Superintendent of public works may lease right of passage. 174. When schedules to be posted. * Section 170. Licenses . —The county court in each of the counties of this state, or the city court of a city, may grant licenses for keeping ferries in their respective counties and cities, to such persons as the court may deem proper, for a term not exceeding five years. No license shall be granted to a person, other than the owner of the land through which that part of the highway adjoining to the ferry shall run, unless the owner is not a suitable person or shall neglect to apply after being served with eight days’ written notice from such other person of the time and place at which he will apply for such license, or having obtained such license, shall neglect to comply with the conditions of the license, or maintain the ferry. Every license shall be entered in the book of minutes of the court by the clerk; and a certified copy thereof shall be delivered to the person licensed. When the waters over which any ferry may be used, shall divide two counties or cities, or a county and city, a license obtained in either of the counties or cities shall be sufficient to authorize transportation of persons, goods, wares and merchandise, to and from either side of such waters. Revised from, 1 R. S., eh. 16, tit. 2, §§ 1-3, 5-9. See County Law, \ 78, Appendix, post , as to regulation of ferries by board of supervisors; notes under § 100, ante , as to ferries as highways. 158 The Highway Law of New York. Licenses. Penal Code Provision. § 415. Ferries.—A person who: 1. Maintains a ferry for profit or hire upon any of the waters of this state without authority of law; or, 2. Having entered into a recognizance to keep or maintain a ferry, vio¬ lates the condition of such recognizance, Is guilty of a misdemeanor. Where such ferry is upon waters dividing two counties, the offender may be prosecuted in either county. As to the granting of ferry licenses or rights by the legislature being in violation of the state constitution. ( Matter of the Union Ferry Co., 98 N. Y. 139.) The legislature has power to regulate, control and define the powers of persons or corporations under ferry franchises. (i Spader v. New York Elevated Railroad Co., 3 Abb. N. C. 467; Power v. Athens, 99 N. Y. 592; Matter of Union Ferry Co., 98 N. Y. 139; New York v. Starin, 106 N. Y. 1.) The right to license ferries carries with it the right to grant exclusive privileges. ( Costar v. Brush, 25 Wend. 628.) A ferry license, however, will not be held to be exclusive, unless there is something therein show¬ ing plainly that exclusive rights were intended to be granted. (Power v. Athens, 99 N. Y. 592.) The grant of a ferry right by the state is not necessarily exclusive of the right to grant similar privileges to other parties. ( Thompson v. New York and Harlem Railroad Co., 3 Sand. Ch. 625.) A ferry license may not be granted without the notice to the land owner required by this section ; the owners of a rival ferry may complain of the lack of notice. (Matter of Talcott, 31 Hun, 464.) Notice need not be given in applying for a ferry license to persons who have obtained a license for a ferry at the same place. (Wiswall v. Wan- dell, 3 Barb. Ch. 312.) It is not illegal for the grantees of an exclusive ferry right to agree to try to prevent the establishment of a third ferry. (Costar v. Bmish 25 Wend. 628.) As to when it is proper to establish and operate ferries. (New York v. Steamboat Co., 106 N. Y. 28.) A ferry maintained without objection for a number of years will be presumed to have been lawfully established. (Jordan v. Gas Light Co. 65 How, Pr. 255.) The Highway Law of New York. 159 Licenses. Circumstances not amounting to a violation of the statutes in reference to maintaining a ferry without authority of law. {People v. 3Iago, 69 Hun, 559.) Where a ferry franchise has been granted and accepted it partakes of the nature of a contract, and as such is protected by the United States con¬ stitution. {Benson v. New York, 10 Barb. 223.) Ferry rights are not to be construed strictly against the grantees there¬ of. {New York v. Starin, 106 N. Y. 1.) As to the leasing of ferry rights or licenses. {Deivint v. Wiltsie, 9 Wend. 325 ; Starin v. New York, 42 Hun, 549 ; Staten Island Rapid Transit Co. v. New York, 2 Supp. 680 ; s. c., 110 N. Y. 96.) The grantees of ferry rights are obliged to maintain a ferry with suit¬ able accommodations for the public. {New York v. Starin , 106 N. Y. 1.) A municipal corporation may require ferry property to be repaired and put in safe condition. {Jordan v. Gas-Light Co., 65 How. Pr. 255.) A grant of land under water, with a reservation of a portion thereof “for the uses and purposes of public streets, avenues and highways,” includes in such reservation a use of the land for ferry purposes. {Jordan v. Gas-Light Co., 65 How. Pr. 255.) When a railroad has been granted the right to transfer its passengers to a public ferry it has no right to transfer other persons to the injury of the ferry owners. {Aikin v. Western Railroad Co., 20 N. Y. 370.) The city of New York has the exclusive right to establish and regulate ferries from its shores to opposite ones, such as Long Island, Staten Island, &c. {New York v. Longstreet, 64 How. Pr. 30; Benson v. New York, 10 Barb. 223; Darlington v. New York, 31 N. Y. 202; New York v. New York and Staten Island Ferry Co , 49 How. Pr. 250; People v. New York and Staten Island Ferry Co., 49 How. Pr. 511; New York v. Starin, 106 N. Y. 1; New York v. New Jersey Steamboat Nav. Co., 106 N. Y. 28.) But see as to ferries over the East River, Matter of Union Ferry Co., 98 N. Y. 139. See, also, Cunard Steamship Co. v. Voorhies, 18 J. & S. 253; s. c., 104 N. Y. 525. The Niagara common pleas has power to grant licenses for ferries over the Niagara river, though the jurisdiction of the state extends only to the centre of the river. {People v. Babcock, 11 Wend. 586.) The city of Albany has exclusive control of all ferries within its limits. {Aikin v. Western Railroad Corporation, 20 N. Y. 370.) 160 The Highway Law of New York. Undertaking. As to the right of ferriage between Hudson and Athens on the Hudson river. ( Power v. Athens , 99 N. Y. 592.) Cases treating of negligence of ferry proprietors or corporations. ( Wyckoff v. Queens County Ferry Co., 52 N. Y. 32; Loftus v. Union Ferry Co., 22 Hun, 33; s. c., 84 N. Y. 455; Bartlett v. Transportation Co., 29 St. Rep. 357; Hoffman v. Union Ferry Co., 68 N. Y. 385; Ferris v. Union Ferry Co., 36 N. Y. 312; Hazman v. Hoboken, &e. Co., 50 N. Y. 53; Hawks v. Winans, 10 J. & S.451; s. c., 74 N. Y. 609; Tonkins v. New York Ferry Co., 47 Hun, 562; Fitzpatrick v . Garrisons Ferry Co., 49 Hun, 288; Bar¬ tholomew v. Ferry Co., 28 St. Rep. 388; Snelling v. Ferry Co., 128 N. Y. 579; s. c., 37 St. Rep. 184.) § 171. JJndertaking .—Every person applying for such license shall, before the same is granted, execute and file with the clerk of the court his undertaking, with one or more sureties, approved by the court, to the effect that he will attend such ferry with sufficient and safe boats and other implements, and so many men to work the same as shall be necessary during the several hours in each day, and at such rates as the court shall direct. Revised from 1 R. S., cli. 16, tit. 2, § 4. See Penal Code, § 415, under § 170, ante, as to violation of condition of undertaking. § 172. Appendages for rope ferries .—Any person licensed to keep a ferry may, with the written consent of the commissioners of highways of the town where such ferry may be, erect and maintain within the limits of the highway, at such point as shall be designated in such consent, a post or posts, with all necessary braces and appendages, for a rope ferry. Revised from L. 1861, eh. 30, § 1. § 173. Superintendent of public works may lease right of passage .—The superintendent of public works may where ferries are now maintained at tide-water, lease The Highway Law of New York. 161 When schedules to be posted. the right #f passage for foot passengers across state lands adjoiuiug tide water for a period not exceeding ten years, on such conditions as he may deem advantageous to the state. Revised from L. 1884, ch. 359, § 1. § 174. When schedules to be posted .—Every person licensed to operate or control any ferry in this state, or between this state and any other state, operating from or to a city of fifty thousand inhabitants or over, shall post in a conspicuous and accessible position outside and adja¬ cent to each entrance to such ferry, and in at least four accessible places, in plain view of the passengers upon each of the boats used on such ferry, a schedule plainly printed in the English language, of the rates of ferriage charged thereon, and authorized by law to be charged for ferriage over such ferry. If any such person shall fail to comply with the provisions of this section, or shall post a false schedule, he shall he guilty of a misdemeanor. A. similar provision was found in L. 1888, ch. 260, repealed by L. 1889, ch. 489, sec. 3. Amended by L. 1900, ch. 313, taking effect April 6, 1900. See Transportation Corporations Law, sec. 6, as to posting of schedule by corporations. Penal Code Provision. Sec. 415a. Penalty for neglect to post schedule of ferry rates.— A person, corporation or association operating any ferry in this state, or between this state and any other state, operating from or to a city of five hundred thousand inhabitants or over, posting a false schedule of ferry rates, or neglecting to post in a conspicuous and accessible place in each of its ferry-houses, in plain view of the passengers, a schedule, plainly 162 The Highway Law of New York. When schedules to be posted. printed in the English language, of the rates of ferriage charged thereon and authorized by law to be charged for ferriage over such ferry, is guilty of a misdemeanor. The provision as to posting a schedule of ferry rates does not apply to foreign corporations. {Blanchard v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co .. 6 Sapp. 279.) As to the right of a municipal government to fix the maximum rates of ferriage. {People v. New York , 32 Barb. 102.) I I The Highway Law op New York. 163 Repealing and other laws. ARTICLE VIII. Repealing and Other Laws Section 180. Laws repealed. 181. Saving clause. 182. Construction. 183. When to take effect. Schedule. Section 180. Laws repealed .—Of the laws enumerated in the schedule hereto annexed, that portion specified in the last column is repealed. Such repeal shall not revive a law repealed by any law hereby repealed, but shall include all laws amendatory-of the laws hereby repealed. § 181. Saving clause .—The repeal of a law, or any part of it specified in the annexed schedule, shall not effect or impair any, act done, or right accruing, accrued, or acquired, or penalty, forfeiture, or punishment incurred prior to the time when this act takes effect, under or by virtue of the laws so repealed, but the same may be asserted, enforced, prosecuted, or inflicted, as fully and to the same extent, as r if such laws had not been repealed; and all actions or proceedings, civil or criminal, com¬ menced under or by virtue of the laws so repealed and pending February twenty-eighth, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, may be prosecuted and defended to final effect in the same manner as they might under the laws then existing, unless it shall be otherwise specially provided by law. See Edsall v. Howell, 86 Hun, 424, as to the operation of this section in regard to repealing L. 1863, ch. 93. 164 The Highway Law of New York. Construction. § 182. Construction .—The provisions of this chapter, so far as they are substantially the same as those laws existing on February twenty-eighth, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, shall be construed as a continuation of such laws, modified or amended, according to the langu¬ age employed in this chapter, and not as new enactments; and references in laws not repealed, to provisions of law incorporated into this chapter and repealed shall be con¬ strued as applying to the provisions so incorporated; nothing in this chapter shall be construed to amend or repeal any provision of the Penal or Criminal Code. § 183. When to take effect .—This chapter shall take effect on the first day of March, eighteen hundred and ninety-one. i i The Highway Law of New York. 165 Schedule of laws repealed. SCHEDULE OF LAWS REPEALED. Revised Statutes, Part I, chapter 16. Revised Statutes, Part I, chapter 20, title Laws of Chapter 1832 . 107 . 1833 . 149 . 1832. 274 . 1834 . 267 . 183.5 _ 154_ .All 13.All Sections .All .All .All .All .All 1836. . 122. .All 1837. . 431. .All 1840 . 300 . .All 1841 . 225 . .All 1845. . 180. . 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14 1847. . 455. 3, 4, 5. 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23 1853. . 63. .All 1853 _ 135. .All 1853 . 174. .All 1855 ... 255 . .All 1857 . 383 . .All 1857 _ 491. ..All 1857 .... 615 . ... 1 1857 _ 639 . .All 1858 . ... 51 . .All 18.58 .. 103 . .All ISfirt 61. .All 18firt _ 468 . . .All IRfil 30. .All IRfil ... 3H. .All 18A9 _ 243 . .All 18A3 93. .All . 444 . .All 18A4 ... 395 . .All 186a. . 442 . .All 166 The Highway Law of New York Schedule of laws repealed. Laws of 1865.. .. 1868.. .. 1860.. .. 1868.. .. 1868.... 1860.. .. 1869.. .. 1869.. .. 1870.. .. 1872.. . 1873.. .. 1873.... 1873 ... 1873.... 1873.... 1873.. .. 1874.. .. 1874.. .. 1875.. .. 1875.... 1875.. .. 1876.. .. 1876.. .. 1877.. .. 1877.. .. 1878.. . 1878.. .. 1878.... 1878.. .. 1879.. .. 1880.. .. 1880.... 1880.... 1880.... 1881.... 1881.... 1881.... Chapter 522 .... 180 .... 770 ... 791 .... 843 .... 24 .... 131 .... 593 .... 461 .... 274 .... 63 .... 69 .... 395 .... 448 .... 477 .... 773 .... 169 .... 570 .... 22 .... 196 .... 341 .... 340 .... 348 .... 197 .... 344 .... 44 .... 49 .... 114.... 245 .... 67 ... 114 .... 305 _ 308 .... 503 .... 233 .... 513 .... 696 .... Sections . 7 .All .All .All .All .All . 1 All 1 All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All .All All .AH All .All All .All .All .All .All .All All The Highway Law of New York 167 Schedule of laws repealed. Laws of 1881.... 1883.... 1883.... 1883.. .. 1884.. .. 1884.... 1884.... 1884.... 1884.. .. 1886.. .. 1886.... 1886.... 1886.. . 1887.... 1887.... 1887.. .. 1888.. .. 1888.... 1889.. .. 1889.. . ■^ 89 .... Chapter 700 .... 346 .... 371 .... 398 .... 220 .... 251 .... 359 .... 396 .... 479 .... 269 .... 344 .... 422 ... 452 .... 471 .... 526 .... 704 .... 240 .... 260 .... 120 .... 146 .... 259 .... Sections .All .All ... .AH .All . ...All .AH .All .All ....All .... All .All .All .All .All ... .All .All .All .All .All .All .All n !■' ' <• « fyvyi! r r-. •/. • i appendix. I - The Highway Law of New York. 171 General laws relating to highways. GENERAL LAWS RELATING TO HIGHWAYS. <• » » t CONSTITUTION. ARTICLE I. § 7. When private property shall be taken for any pub¬ lic use, the compensation to be made therefor, when such compensation is not made by the state, shall be ascer¬ tained by a jury, or by not less than three comirassioners appointed by a court of record, as shall be prescribed by law. Private roads may be opened in the manner to be prescribed by law; but in every case the necessity of the road and the amount of all damage to be sustained by the opening thereof shall be first determined by a jury of free¬ holders, and such amount, together with the expenses of the proceeding, shall be paid by the person to be bene¬ fited. General laws may be passed permitting the owners or occupants of agricultural lands to construct and main¬ tain for the drainage thereof, necessary drains, ditches and dykes upon the lands of others, under proper re¬ strictions and with just compensation, but no special laws shall be enacted for such purposes. ARTICLE III. § 18. The legislature shall not pass a private or local bill in any of the following cases: , • • • • • • • • • Laying out, opening, altering, working or discontinuing 172 The Highway Law of New York. Constitution. roads, highways or alleys, or for draining swamps or other low lands. Granting to any corporation, association or individual the right to lay down railroad tracks. • •••••••*• Providing for building bridges, and chartering com¬ panies for such purposes, except on the Hudson river below Waterford, and on the East river, or over the waters forming a part of the boundaries of the state. • •••••••• • But no law shall authorize the construction or operation of a street railroad except upon the condition that the con¬ sent of the owners of one-half in value of the property bounded on, and the consent also of the local authorities having the control of, that portion of a street or highway upon which it is proposed to construct or operate such rail¬ road be first obtained, or in case the consent of such prop¬ erty owners cannot be obtained, the appellate division of the supreme court, in the department in which it is pro¬ posed to be constructed, may, upon application, appoint three commissioners who shall determine, after a hearing of all parties interested, whether such railroad ought to be constructed or operated, and their determination, confirmed by the court, may be taken in lieu of the consent of the property owners. ARTICLE XIII. § 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as shall be by law exempted shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the follow¬ ing oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) The Highway Law of New York. 173 Constitution. that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the state of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of-, according to the best of my abilityand all such officers who shall have been chosen at any election shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the oath or affirmation above prescribed, together with the following addition thereto, as part thereof: “And I do further solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly or indirectly paid, offered or promised to pay, contributed, or offered or promised to contribute any money or other valuable thing as a consideration or reward for the giving or withholding a vote at the elec¬ tion at which I was elected to said office, and have not made any promise to influence the giving or withholding any such vote,” and no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust. 174 The Highway Law of New York. Selections from Code of Civil Procedure. SELECTIONS FROM THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. TITLE X. Action or Special Proceeding, Relating to an Animal Straying upon the Highway. Section 3082. Action against person suffering animals to stray 3083. Penalties to be recovered. 3084. Certain officers to seize animals straying. 3085. When private person may seize such animals. 3086. Officer or person seizing to present petition. 3087. Precept thereupoi 3088. Id. ; how served. 3089. Proof of service of precept. 3090. Answer ; trial. 3091. Decision in favor of petitioner ; warrant to sell: execution thereof. 3092. Application of proceeds of sale. 3093. Disposition of surplus. 3094. Id. ; when no claim made within a year. 3095. Order upon claims for surplus ; appeal therefrom. 3096. Proceedings upon decision in favor of person answering. 3097. Demand of possession before trial. Proceedings thereupon. 3098. Id. ; when animal wilfully set at large by third person 3099. Action by owner in such case. 3100. Action by petitioner and by officer. 3101. Demand of possession after final order and before sale. 3102. Order upon demand of possession ; appeal therefrom. 3103. Id. ; stay of proceedings. 3104. Appeal from final order. 3105. Id. ; by claimant; stay of proceedings and delivery of possession. The Highway Law of New York. 175 Action against person suffering animals to stray. Sebtion 3106. Proceedings upon affirmance. 3107. Limitation of action for seizing animals. 3108. Certain actions can not be maintained. 3109. Where several animals are trespassing, damages are entire. Proceedings in such cases. 3110. Proceedings in other cases, where there are different owners. 3! 11. Surplus, where there are different owners. 3112. When one action, etc., supersedes any other. 3113. Rights of officer when private person fails to prosecute. 3114. Persons having a special property deemed owner. 3115. Agent may act for his principal. § 3082. Action against person suffering animals to stray .—Any person, who suffers or permits one or more cattle, horses, colts, asses, mules, swine, sheep, or goats, to run at large, or to be herded or pastured, in a public street, highway, park or place, elsewhere than in a city, incurs thereby the penalty or penalties specified in the next section; and any resident of the town, or the officer to whom a fine or penalty is to be paid for the benefit of the poor, as prescribed in section 2875 of this act, or the overseer or superintendent of the poor of the town or district, in which one or more of those animals are found so running at large, herded, or pastured, may maintain an action against him, in a justice’s court, held in that town or district, to recover the penalty or penalties so incurred. Where the action is brought by a private person, the justice must pay the proceeds of an execution, issued upon a judgment therein in favor of the plaintiff, after deducting the costs, to the officer, who might have brought the action, as prescribed in this section, to be applied by him to the support of the poor within his town or district. § 3083. Penalties to be recovered .—If the plaintiff recovers judgment, in an action brought as prescribed in 176 The Highway Law of New York. Certain officers to seize animals straying. the last section, the justice must award to him the follow¬ ing sums, by way of penalties, besides the costs of the action: 1. For each horse, colt, ass, mule, swine, bull, ox, cow, or calf, five dollars. 2. For each sheep or goat, one dollar. The entire amount of the penalties may be recovered, in one action, although it exceeds the sum, for which a jus¬ tice can render a judgment in an ordinary action. § 3084. Certain officers to seize animals straying . —Where one or more cattle, horses, colts, asses, mules, swine, sheep, or goats are found running at large, or being herded or pastured, in a public street, highway, park, or place, elsewhere than in a city, the overseer of highways of the road district, or, if they are so found within an incorporated village, the street commissioner thereof, having personal knowledge or being notified of the fact, must immediately seize the animal or animals, and keep it or them in his possession, until disposed of as prescribed in the following sections of this title. § 3085. When private person may seize such ani¬ mals .—Any person may seize one or more animals speci¬ fied in the last section, then running at large, or being herded or pastured, in a public street, highway, park, or place, elsewhere than in a city, bordering upon real prop¬ erty owned or occupied by him; or then trespassing upon real property so owned or occupied, having entered there¬ upon from such a public street, highway, park, or place. The person making the seizure, must keep the animal or animals seized, in his possession, until disposed of as prescribed in the following sections of this title. § 3086. Officer or person seizing to present peti¬ tion .—An officer or other person, who seizes an animal The Highway Law of New York. 177 Precept thereupon. or animals, as prescribed in either of the last two sections, must immediately file, with a justice of the peace of the town in which the seizure was made, a written petition, verified by his oath; setting forth the facts, which bring the case within either of those sections; briefly describing the animal or animals seized; stating either the name of the owner, or that his name is not known to the petitioner, and can not be ascertained by him with reasonable dili¬ gence; and praying for a final order directing the sale of the animal or animals seized, and the application of the proceeds thereof, as prescribed in this title. Where the petition alleges, that any animal or animals seized, were then trespassing upon real property owned or occupied by the petitioner, it must state the amount of the damages, if any, which the petitioner has sustained thereby. In that case, the decision of the justice, or, where the issues are tried by a jury, the verdict must fix the amount of the damages. § 3087. Precept thereupon .—Upon the presentation of the petition, the justice must issue a precept under his hand; directed to the owner, if his name is stated in the petition, or, if it is not so stated, directed generally to all persons having an interest in the animal or animals seized; briefly reciting the substance of the petition; de¬ scribing the animal or animals seized, and requiring the person or persons, to whom the precept is directed, to show cause before the justice, at a time and place specified therein, not less than ten or more than twenty days, after the issuing of the precept, why the prayer of the petition should not be granted. § 3088. Id*; how served .—The precept must be served upon the person, to whom it is directed by his name, 12 178 The Highway Law of New York. Proof of service of precept. within the same time, and in like manner as a summons is required to be served, as prescribed in section 2910 of this act. Where it is directed generally to all persons, having an interest in the animal or animals seized, it may be served by a constable of the town, or by an elector thereof, specially authorized so to do by a written indorse¬ ment upon the precept, under the hand of the justice, by posting a copy thereof in at least six public and conspicu¬ ous places in the town where the seizure was made: one of which places must be the nearest district school-house, or, if the seizure was made within an incorporated vil¬ lage, having schools in charge of a board of education, a building in which such a school is kept. Each copy must be posted, within two days after the precept is issued. Where the precept is directed to a person by his name, and proof is made by affidavit, to the satisfaction of the justice, that it cannot, with reasonable diligence, be per¬ sonally served upon that person, within the county, at least six days before the return day thereof, the justice may, by a written order, direct that service thereof be made, by posting copies thereof, at least five days before the return day, as prescribed in this section; in which case, service thereof may be made accordingly. § 3089. Proof of service of precept .—At the place where the precept is returnable, and at the expiration of the time specified in section 2893 of this act, the petitioner must, unless the precept is directed to a person by his name, and he appears, furnish proof of the service of the precept, as prescribed in the last section. If it was served by a constable, either personally or by posting, his writ¬ ten return upon the precept is sufficient proof of the facts relating to the service, as stated therein. If it was served by a private person, proof of service must be made by affidavit. The Highway Law of Hew York. 179 Answer: trial. § 3090. Answer; trial .—The owner, or a person hav¬ ing an interest in any animal seized, may appear upon the return of the precept, and thereby make himself a party to the special proceeding. The person so appearing may, upon the return of the precept, tile a written an¬ swer, subscribed by him or his attorney, and verified by oath of the person subscribing it, denying, absolutely or upon information and belief, one or more material allega¬ tions contained in the petition. His answer must also set forth his interest in the animal or animals seized. The subsequent proceedings must be the same as in an action in a justices’ court, wherein an issue of fact has been joined, except as otherwise specially prescribed in this title. § 3091. Decision in favor of petitioner; warrant to sell; execution thereof —If no person appears and answers, or if the decision of the justice, or the verdict of the jury, where the issues were tried by a jury, is in favor of the petitioner, the justice must make a final order, directing the sale of the animal or animals seized, and the application of the proceeds thereof, as prescribed in this title. Thereupon the justice must issue a warrant, under his hand, directed generally to any constable of the county, commanding him to sell the animal or animals seized, at public auction, for the best price which he can obtain therefor; and to make return thereof to the justice, at a time and place therein specified, not less than ten or more than twenty days thereafter. The sale must be made upon the like notice, and in like manner, as a sale of property, by virtue of an execution issued by a justice of the peace; and the constable must make return, as required by the warrant, and must pay the proceeds of the sale to the justice, deducting therefrom his fees, at 180 The Highway Law of New York. Application of proceeds of sale. the rate allowed by law for the collection of such an execu¬ tion. § 8092. Application of proceeds of sale ,—The justice must apply the proceeds of the sale as follows: 1. He must pay the costs of the petitioner, as taxed by the justice, at the same rates as the costs of an action brought before him, including the justice's fees in such an action; and also the fees for the service of the precept, either personally or by posting, at the rate allowed by law for personal service of a summons by a constable. 2. Out of the remainder of the proceeds, he may retain to his own use, a fee of one dollar, for each animal sold. 3. Out of the remainder of the proceeds, he must pay to the officer, or other person making the seizure, the follow¬ ing fees, for the seizure of each animal seized and sold, to wit: One dollar for each horse, colt, ass, or mule; fifty cents for each bull, ox, cow, or calf; and twenty-five cents for each goat, sheep, or swine; together with a reasonable compensation, fixed by him, for the care and keeping of each animal, from the time of the seizure to the time of the sale; and, also, where any animal sold was seized, while trespassing upon real property owned or occupied by the petitioner, the damages sustained by the petitioner in consequence thereof, as ascerained by the decision of the justice, or the verdict of the jury upon which the final order was made. 4. Out of the remainder of the proceeds, he must pay to the officer, to whom a fine or penalty is to be paid for the benefit of the poor, as prescribed in section 2875 of this act, the following penalties, to wit: five dollars for each horse, colt, ass, mule, bull, ox, cow, calf, or swine, seized and sold; and one dollar for each sheep or goat, seized and sold; which penalties must be received by the officer, for the benefit of the poor of his town or district. The Highway Law of New York. 181 Disposition of surplus. 5. If any surplus remains, he must pay the same to the person or persons entitled thereto, as prescribed in the following sections of this title. § 3098. Disjjosition of surplus .—Any person may, within ten days after the return of the warrant, file, with the justice, a written claim to the surplus of the proceeds of the sale, or to any part thereof. On the eleventh day after the return, or, if it is a Sunday or a public holiday, on the first day thereafter, which is neither Sunday nor a public holiday, the justice must proceed to inquire into the claims so filed; and, for the purpose of determining them, he must hear the allegations and proofs of each claimant; and he may issue 'subpoenas, as upon the trial of an action. He may, upon the applica¬ tion of any claimant, and for good cause shown, adjourn the hearing, from time to time, but not more than thirty days in all. After hearing the allegations and proofs of all the claimants, he must decide the claims, and enter an order accordingly. If no claim is filed; or if the right to the surplus money, or any part thereof, is not estab¬ lished, to the satisfaction of the justice, as prescribed in this section; any person, whose claim was not determined upon the hearing, may file a claim thereto, at any time before the expiration of a year from the return of the war¬ rant; and, thereupon, the justice must proceed, as pre¬ scribed in this section with respect to a claim filed within the ten days. § 3094. Id.; When no claim made within a year .— If, at the expiration of one year after the return of the warrant, any portion of the surplus remains, a claim to which has not been established to the satisfaction of the justice, pursuant to the provisions of the last section, the justice must pay it, for the benefit of the poor, to the 182 The Highway Law of New York. Order upon claim for surplus; appeal therefrom. officer to whom a fine or penalty is to be paid for the benefit of the poor, as prescribed in section 2875 of this act; and, thereupon, all persons are forever barred from any claim thereto. But if a claim, filed as prescribed in the last section, remains undetermined at the expiration of the year, the justice must determine it within ten days thereafter; and, for that purpose, he must retain the sur¬ plus in his hands until the determination. § 3095. Order upon claim for surplus; appeal therefrom .—An appeal from an order determining a claim, as prescribed in the last two sections, may be taken to the county court, by a claimant, within ten days after the making of the order, as from a judgment of a justice in an action to recover a sum equal to the claim; and the proceedings thereupon are the same, except that an undertaking is not necessary for any purpose. Upon such an appeal, each other claimant, whose interest is affected by the order appealed from, must be made a respondent. If there is no such claimant, the officer entitled to the surplus must be made respondent; but costs cannot be awarded against him, unless he appears upon the appeal; in which case, the costs are in the discretion of the appel¬ late court. Where an appeal, taken as prescribed in this section, is perfected, the county judge may, in his dis¬ cretion, make an order extending the time, within which payment of the surplus must be made, as prescribed in the last section, and staying payment accordingly. Unless such an order is made, and a copy thereof is served upon the justice, payment must be made as prescribed in the last section, notwithstanding the appeal; and upon proof of the payment, the appeal must be dismissed. Where an appeal is taken to the supreme court, from the determination of the county court, the county judge, or The Highway Law of New York. 183 Proceedings upon decision in favor of person answering. a justice of the supreme court may make a like order, and with like effect. § 3096. Proceedings upon decision in favor of per¬ son answering .—If the decision of the justice, or the verdict of the jury, where the issues are tried by a jury, is in favor of the person answering, it must fix the value of each animal seized. If the justice or the jury find that the seizure was malicious, and without probable cause, the decision or verdict must assess the damages sustained by the person answering, by means of the seizure and detention. The justice must thereupon make a final order, awarding to the person so answering, the return of the animal or animals seized, or the value thereof if a return cannot be had; together with his costs, at the rates allowed by law in an action brought before him to recover a chattel; and, also, twice the sum assessed as his damages, if any. Thereupon a warrant must be issued by the justice to a constable, to the same effect, as an execution issued, in an action to recover a chattel, upon a judgment in favor of the defendant, where the chattel has not been delivered to him; and each provision of this chapter, relating to a judgment and an execution in such a case, applies to a final order made, aud a warrant issued thereupon, as prescribed in this section. § 3097. Demand of possession before tried; proceed¬ ings thereupon .—At any time after the precept is issued, and before the commencement of the trial, the owner of any animal seized may file with the justice a written demand of the possession thereof. Thereupon he is entitled to the possession, upon complying with the fol¬ lowing terms: 1. He must pay to the justice, for the use of the peti¬ tioner, the costs of the proceedings, to the time of filing 184 The Highway Law of New York. Id.; when animal wilfully set at large by third person. the demand, as prescribed in subdivison first of section 3092 of this act, and, also, the sums payable on account of each animal, whereof possession is so demanded, as prescribed in subdivison third of the same section; which sums must be fixed by the justice, after hearing the alle¬ gations and proofs of the parties. 2. He must also pay to the justice, a fee of one dollar for each animal, whereof possession is so demanded. 3. If the petitioner is an officer, to whom a fine or penalty is to be paid for the benefit of the poor, as pre¬ scribed in section 2875 of this act, the claimant must also pay to the justice, for the petitioner’s use, the sum specified therein on account of each animal, whereof possession is 90 demanded. 4. The claimant must also prove, to the satisfaction of the justice, by affidavit or other competent evidence, that he is the owner of each animal, whereof possession is so demanded. Each person who has appeared must have notice of, and may oppose, the claim. § 3098. Id.; when animal wilfully set at large by th ird person .—But where, in a case specified in the last section, the person filing a demand, presents therewith to the justice sufficient proof, by affidavit or otherwise, that the running at large, herding, pasturing, or trespassing, by reason whereof the animal or animals, of which he demands possession, were seized, was caused by the wilful act, intended to effect that object, of a person other than the owner; and also makes the proof specified in subdivision fourth of that section, he is entitled to possession, pursu¬ ant to his demand,upon paying to the petitioner, or to the justice for his use, a reasonable sum, to be fixed by the justice, after hearing the allegations and proof, of the pai ties, as compensation for the care and keeping of the animal or animals, whereof possession is so demanded, The Highway Law of New York. 185 Action by owner in such a case. and without paying any other sum, specified in the last section. § 3099. Action by owner in such a case .—The owner of an animal, seized in consequence of a wilful act specified in the last section, may recover, in an action against the person who committed it, all damages sus¬ tained by him, in consequence thereof, including the sum paid in order to recover possession of the animal, as pre¬ scribed in the last section; and, in addition thereto, the sum of twenty dollars for each animal seized. § 3100. Action by petitioner and by officer .— Where the possession of an animal has been delivered, as pre¬ scribed in the last section but one, an action may also be maintained, by the petitioner in the special proceeding before the justice, against the person who committed the wilful act, to recover, in addition to all other damages sus¬ tained by the plaintiff in consequence of the wilful act, all sums, to which the plaintiff would have been entitled out of the proceeds of the sale, as prescribed in section 3092 of this act, other than the compensation paid for the care and keeping of the animal. In the like case, if the petitioner is a private person, the officer, to whom a fine or penalty is to be paid for the benefit of the poor, as prescribed in section 2875 of this act, may maintain an action against the person, who committed the wilful act, to recover the penalties to which the plaintiff would have been entitled, out of the proceeds of the sale, as prescribed in that subdivision. Neither of the actions specified in this or the last section is affected by the pendency of, or the recovery of judgment in, either of the others. § 3101. Demand of possession after final order and before sale.—A person, entitled to demand the pos- 186 The Highway Law of New York. Order upon demand of possession; appeal therefrom. session of an animal, as prescribed in section 3097 of this act, who did not appear upon the return of the precept, or upon the trial, may file, with the justice, a written demand of the possession, at any time after the final order, and not less than three days before the time appointed for the sale; and, thereupon, he is entitled to the possession, upon complying with the following terms: 1. He must furnish, by affidavit or other competent evi¬ dence, a sufficient excuse, to the satisfaction of the justice, for his failure to appear. 2. He must, in all respects, comply with the provisions of section 3097 of this act; except that it is necessary for him to pay only one-half of the justice’s fee, as prescribed in subdivision second of that section; and one-half of the fees payable to the petitioner, for the seizure of each an¬ imal, as prescribed in subdivision third of section 3092 of this act. § 3102. Order upon demand of possession; appeal therefrom .— Where a demand for the return of the pos¬ session of an animal is filed, as prescribed in either of the last five sections, the justice must, at the request of either party thereto, make, and enter in his minutes, an order determining the same. An appeal from such an order may be taken to the county court, by the person making the demand, or by either party to the special proceeding, at any time before the final order in the special proceeding is made; and each person or party so entitled to appeal, must be made a respondent upon an appeal taken by one of the others. The appeal must be taken in like manner, as an appeal from a judgment of the justice in an action to recover a chattel; and the proceedings thereupon are the same, except as otherwise prescribed in the next section. 3103. Id.; stay of proceedings .—An appeal from The Highway Law of New York. 187 Appeal from final order. an order, specified in the last section, is not effectual for any purpose, unless the appellant procures from the county judge an order, directing a stay of the proceedings upon the petition, and a stay of the execution of the order ap¬ pealed from, and files it with the justice, within the time allowed for the appeal. The order may be granted or refused, in the discretion of the county judge, or granted upon such terms, as to security or otherwise, as he thinks proper; and it may be vacated or modified, either abso¬ lutely, or unless further security is given, in his discretion. § 3104. Appeal from final order .—Within ten days after a final order upon a petition is made, as prescribed in this title, an appeal therefrom may be taken by the petitioner, or by the person answering, in like manner as an appeal from a judgment of the justice in an action to recover a sum of money, equal to the value of the animal or animals, and the proceedings thereupon are the same, except as otherwise prescribed in the next section. § 3105. Id,; by claimant; stay of proceedings and delivery of possession .—An appeal from a final order, taken, as prescribed in the last section, by the person answering, is not effectual for any purpose, unless the ap¬ pellant files, with the notice of appeal, an order of the county judge, or, if he is absent from the county, of a jus¬ tice of the supreme court, reciting that the appeal has been perfected, and that security has been given thereupon, as prescribed in this section, and directing a stay of proceed¬ ings upon the final order appealed from, and that the pos¬ sesion of the animal or animals seized be delivered to the appellant. The order can be made only where an under¬ taking is given by the appellant, as required for the pur¬ pose of perfecting an appeal from a judgment, and staying the execution thereof; and also an undertaking, in the same 188 The Highway Law of New York. Proceedings upon affirmance. or another instrument, to the effect that, if the final order appealed from is affirmed, or if the appeal is dismissed, the appellant will pay all sums which the justice awards against him, upon the hearing after the determination of the appeal, as prescribed in the next section, not exceed¬ ing a sum specified therein; which must be, at least, twice the amount of all the sums, which might be deducted from the proceeds of the sale, as prescribed in section 3092 of this act. The sum must be fixed, and the undertaking must be approved, by the judge who grants the order. Upon filing the order with the justice, the appellant is forthwith entitled to the possession of the animal or amimals seized. § 3106. Proceedings upon affirmance .—If the final order appealed from is affirmed, upon an appeal taken by the person answering, the county court must appoint a time and place, at which the justice must fix the sums payable by the appellant, pursuant to his undertaking. The justice may adjourn the hearing to another place, and to another time, not exceeding three days after the time so appointed. The justice must fix the sum so payable, as if a warrant for the sale of the animals seized had been re¬ turned, and the proceeds thereof paid to him by the con¬ stable, as prescribed in section 3092 of this act. The undertaking upon the appeal enures to the benefit of each officer, to whom any sum is payable, as prescribed in that section; and with respect to any of those sums, the respon¬ dent is a trustee for the officer entitled thereto. § 3107. Limitation of action for seizing animals . —Where an animal is seized, upon the ground that it was running at large, or was being herded or pastured, or was trespassing, contrary to the provisions of this title; and the officer or other person making the seizure, immediately The Highway Law of New York. 189 - Certain actions can not be maintained. files his petition, and diligently prosecutes the same, as prescribed in this title; an action to recover the animal so seized, or to recover damages for the seizure, or for any act subsequent thereto, must be commenced within one year after the cause of action accrues. § 3108. Certain actions can not be maintained .— A person, to whom the precept was directed by his name, and who was personally served therewith, or a person who has appeared and answered in the special proceeding, or demanded the return of any animal seized, can not main¬ tain an action against the officer or other person seizing an animal, or a person acting by his command, or in his aid, in a case specified in the last section. But, except as specified in this section, the owner of an animal seized or detained, under color of any provision of this title, may maintain an action to recover the animal, or its value, or damages, for the seizure or detention, or for any unlawful act subsequent, thereto, if, in fact, the animal was not, at the time of the seizure, running at large, or being herded or pastured, or trespassing, as the case may be, as specified in the foregoing provisions of this title. § 3109. Where several animals are trespassing , damages are entire. Proceedings in such cases. For the purpose of determining the damages sustained by the petitioner, where two or more animals are found simul¬ taneously trespassing upon real property, owned or occu¬ pied by him, all the damage done by all the animals seized, is to be regarded as done by them jointly; and the petition¬ er's remedy therefor is entire, and must be enforced against all the animals, and the proceeds of the sale thereof. Where different persons, who are known, own different animals seized, the precept must be directed to all of them by their names. If one or more of the owners are known, 190 The Highway Law of New York. Proceedings in other cases, where there are different owners. and the others are unknown, and can not be ascertained with reasonable diligence, the precept roust be directed to each known owner, by his name, and, also generally to all persons having an interest in those animals, the owners of which are unknown. In a case specified in this section, a demand of the possession of an animal seized can not be made, as prescribed in section 3097 or 3101 of this act, . unless it is made with respect to all the animals seized, and by persons entitled to the possession of all of them. But a separate demand may be made, as prescribed in section 3098 of this act, by each owner of one or more animals seized; in which case, if possession is delivered to him, as prescribed in that section, the petitioner’s remedy for his damage is the same, with respect to the animal or animals, of which possession is not so delivered, and against the proceeds of the sale thereof, as if those, whereof possession is so delivered, had not been trespassing upon the property. § 3110. Proceedings in other cases, ivhere there are different owners .—Where the petitioner does not allege, that the animals seized, were trespassing upon real prop¬ erty owned or occupied by him, and different persons own different animals seized, a seperate special proceeding may be instituted, as prescribed in this title, against each owner, or against any two or more owners, with respect to the animals owned by him or them. Or the proceedings may be taken against all the owners jointly; in which case, each person to whom the precept is directed by his name, and each person having an interest in an animal seized, has the same right to demand the possession of the animal owned by him, and the same right to answer separately, as if the special proceeding was against him separately; and the final order may be in favor of one or more of the persons so answering, with respect to the animal or animals owned by him or them, and for his or their costs; The Highway Law of New t York. 191 Surplus where there are different owners. and against the remainder of the persons answering, or to whom the precept was directed, or for the sale of the re¬ mainder of the animals, in like manner, as if the former persons had not answered, or had not been named in the precept. But the person, first making a demand of the possession of any animal seized, must pay all the costs to the time of the demand; and a person, subsequently mak¬ ing a demand, is excused from the payment of any costs, except those which have accrued since the former demand. § 3111. Surplus where there are different owners. —Where proceedings are taken jointly against different persons, who own different animals seized, as prescribed in either of the last two sections, the surplus, remaining in the justice’s hands, must be distributed between them, in proportion to the value of the animals owned by each, to be determined by the justice. Any owner may claim separately his proportion of the surplus; and sections 3093 and 3094 of this act apply to a claim made, and to the dis¬ position of the surplus arising, as prescribed in this sec¬ tion. § 3112. When one action, etc.; {supersedes any other. _Where two or more persons, or an officer and a private person, are authorized, by this title, to bring an action, oi to seize an animal, and take the proceedings pi escribed in this title for the disposition thereof, the commencement of an action, or the seizure of the animal, by either of them, supersedes the right of any of the otheis to biing such an action, or to make such a seizure, with respect to the ani¬ mal seized, or in question in the action. But the justice mav, in his discretion, allow an officei oi othei peison who’is interested in the recovery, or in the application of the proceeds of the sale, to appear in the action or special proceeding, for the purpose of protecting his interest, and 192 The Highway Law of New York. Rights of officer when private person fails to prosecute. to take such part in the proceedings therein as the justice thinks proper. § 3113. Hights of officer when private person fails to prosecute. —Where a seizure is made by a private per¬ son, as prescribed in this title, and the possession of an animal seized is abandoned by him, without filing a peti¬ tion; or where an action, brought by a private person, as prescribed in this title, is settled or discontinued by the plaintiff; the officer, to whom a penalty is payable, as prescribed in section 3083 of this act, or in subdivision fourth of section 3092 of this act, may, unless he has assented to the abandonment, settlement, or discontinu¬ ance, maintain an action against the owner of the ani¬ mal in question, to recover the penalty so payable to him; and, upon proof of the facts, which would have entitled the plaintiff in the former action, or the petitioner in the special proceeding, to recover, he is entitled to judgment accordingly. § 3114. j Person having a special property deemed owner. —Where a person is, at the time of the seizure, entitled to the possession of an animal, as against the general owner thereof, by virtue of a special property therein, he is deemed, for all the purposes of this title, the owner thereof. § 3115. Agent may act for his principal. —The duly authorized agent of the owner or person entitled to the possession of an animal, as specified in the last section, may, in his own name, answer, make any demand, or take any other proceeding, which the owner or person so en¬ titled may take, as prescribed in this title. The Highway Law of New York. 193 County \aw. COUNTY LAW. § 12. General powers ,—The board of supervisors shall: 7. Make such laws and regulations as they may deem necessary for the destruction of wild and noxious animals find weeds, within the county. (§§ 60-80 do not appiy to bridges on the Hudson River below Waterford or on the East River, or on waters forming boundaries of the State.' § 01. County highivays and.* bridges .—A board of supervisors shall, on the application of twenty-five resi¬ dent tax-payers, when satisfied that it is for the interest of the county, lay out, open, alter, or discontinue a county highway therein, or cause the same to be done, and con¬ struct, repair, or abandon a county bridge therein, or cause the same to be done, when the board shall deem the authority conferred on commissioners of highways in¬ sufficient for that purpose, or that the interests of the county will be promoted thereby. All expenses so in¬ curred shall be a county charge. Such powers shall not be exercised unless the applicants therefor shall prove to the board the service of a written notice, personally or by mail, on a commissioner of highways of each town in the county, at least twelve days prior to the presentation of such application, specifying therein the object thereof; and when the application is to lay out a highway, or construct a bridge, the route or location thereof; and in all other cases, a designation of the highway or bridge to be affected thereby. 13 194 The Highway Law of New York. j . _ Location and construction of bridges. § 62. Location and construction of bridges .—The board may authorize the location, change of location and construction of any bridge, applied for by any town or towns, jointly, or by other than a municipal corporation, created under a general law, or by any corporation or in¬ dividual for private purposes; and if a public bridge, erected other than by a municipal corporation, establish the rates of toll for crossing such bridge; but if such bridge is to cross a navigable stream, provision shall be made in the resolution or permission authorizing the same, for the erection and maintenance of a suitable draw, to prevent any obstruction of the navigation of such stream; and if a private bridge, provision shall be made that the draw shall be kept open as may be required to permit all vessels to pass without loss of headway. When such bridge shall be intersected by the line of counties, the action of the board of supervisors of each county shall be necessary to give the jurisdiction herein permitted. But this section shall not apply to a pier bridge erected or to be erected over the Mohawk river above the state dam by a cor¬ poration organized under the transportation corporations law, provided such corporation shall comply with all the provisions of said transportation corporations law appli¬ cable thereto; such a corporation, without further proceed¬ ing, shall have the right to erect and maintain piers in said river for the purposes of such a bridge. Amended by L. 1895, ch. 235. i § 63. County aid to towns for the construction and repair of bridges m —If the board of supervisors of any county shall deem any town in the county to be unreason¬ ably burdened by its expenses for the construction and re¬ pair of its bridges, the board may cause a sum of monev. »/ * Dot exceeding two thousand dollars in any one year, to be The Highway Law of New York. 195 Construction by county of destroyed bridges. raised by the county and paid to such town to aid in de¬ fraying such expenses. § 64. Construction by county of destroyed bridges. —If any bridge within a county, or intersected by any boundary line of a county, shall be destroyed by the ele¬ ments, and the board of supervisors of the county shall deem that the expenses of the construction of a new bridge at or near the site of the bridge so destroyed would be too burdensome upon the town or towns within such county, which would otherwise be liable therefor, the board of supervisors of any such county may provide for the con¬ struction and completion of a bridge and all necessary approaches thereto, at or near the site of the bridge so destroyed. If the bridge so destroyed shall have been con¬ structed by a corporation created under a general law, and the site thereof, and of the approaches thereto, or either, shall be the property of such corporation, such board of supervisors may purchase the interest of such corporation, or any other person, in such site or approaches, if such purchase can be accomplished upon reasonable terms; but if such site or approaches can not be lawfully acquired by such purchase, or otherwise, upon reasonable terms, such board may acquire title to premises on either side of such site, and provide for the construction of a bridge and approaches thereto, at such place, at the expense of the county, or of the two counties jointly, as the case may be, provided such bridge shall be so located as not to increase the distance to be traveled upon the highway to reach each end of such bridge more than five rods. Any board of supervisors providing for the construction of any such bridge may determine by resolution whether the expenses of the maintenance and repair thereof shall thereafter be a county charge, or a charge upon such town or towns. 196 The Highway Law of New York. Apportionment of expenses. § 65. Apportionment of expenses when a bridge is intersected by town or county lines .—If any public free bridge, intersected by the boundary line of a county, shall also be intersected by the boundary line of two or more towns in such county, the board of supervisors of such county shall apportion as it shall deem equitable, be¬ tween such towns, their respective shares of the expenses of the construction, maintenance and repair of such bridge, and the amount to be received by each town, of the money raised by the counts to be paid toward defraying the ex¬ penses of constructing and repairing such bridge. § 66. County’s share of expenses to be raised and paid to the commissioners of highways of the tow > —The boar 1 of supervisors shall cause to be raised and collected the amount to be paid by the county to any town toward the expenses of a bridge and when collected the same sh ill be paid to the commissioners of highways of the town, to be applied by them toward the payment of such expenses. § 67. May authorize a town to construct a bridge outside of a boundary line .—The board of supervisors of any counfy may authorize any town, on a vote of a majority of the electors thereof voting at a regular town meeting, to appropriate a sum, or pledge its credit, to aid in, or wholly construct and maintain a bridge outside the boundaries of the town or county, or from or within the boundary line of any town into another town or county, but forming a continuation of highways leading from such town or county, and deemed necessary for the public con¬ venience. § 68. Bridges over county lines .—The board shall provide for the care, maintenance, preservation and repair The Highway Law of New York. 197 Bridges over county lines. of any draw or other bridge intersecting the boundary line of counties or towns, and which bridge is by law a joint charge on such counties or towns, or on the towns in which it is situated; and to severally apportion, as it may deem equitable, the expense thereof on the towns respec¬ tively liable therefor, or on the respective counties when liable; but when such bridge shall span any portion of the navigable tide-waters of this state, forming, at the point of crossing, the boundary line between two counties, such expense shall be a joint and equal charge upon the two counties in which the bridge is situated, and the board of supervisors in each of such counties shall apportion such expense among the several towns and cities in their respective counties, or upon any or either of such towns and cities, as in their judgment may seem proper; and if there be in either of said counties, a city, the boundaries of which are the same as the boundaries of the county, then it shall be the duty of the common council of such city, to perform the duty hereby imposed upon the boards of superivsors; but no town or city not immediately ad¬ jacent to such waters, at the points spanned by said bridge, shall be liable for a larger proportion of such expense than the taxable property of such town or city bears to the whole amount of taxable property of such county. The board of supervisors of such counties or in any city em¬ bracing the entire county, and having no board of super¬ visors, the common council shall have full control of such bridges. No such bridge shall be constructed unless the board of superivsors in each of such counties, and the com¬ mon council of the city whose boundaries are the same as the boundary of the other county adjacent to such waters, shall first by resolution determine that such bridge is necessary for public convenience, in which case such common council, with the consent of the mayor, may authorize the issue of bonds for the purpose of construct- 198 The Highway Law of New York. Authorize towns to borrow money. ing such bridge, to be issued as other bonds are issued in said city. Whenever any bridge now spanning any such navigable tide-waters or hereafter erected across any such navigable tide-waters shall be condemned by the United States authorities as an obstruction to navigation, and shall be ordered removed, the county and city authorities having charge of such bridge, if they shall determine that such bridge shall be rebuilt, shall, as soon as practicable after such determination, cause plans to be prepared for the erection of the new bridge and the removal of any bridge so condemned as aforesaid, and within a reason¬ able time after the approval of any such plans by the United States authorities, the proper officers shall proceed with the construction of said new bridge. In case of any unreasonable delay on the part of the officer or officers charged with the duty of construction of such new bridge, such duty may be enforced by mandamus upon the appli¬ cation of any citizen interested in its performance. Amended by L. 1896, ch. 995. § 69. Authorize tow ns to borrow money .—The board may, upon the application of any town liable or to be made liable to taxation in whole or in part for construct¬ ing, building, repairing or discontinuing any highway or bridge therein or upon its borders, pursuant to a vote of a majority of the electors of any such town at an annual town meeting, or special town meeting, called for that purpose, or upon the written request of the commissioners of highways and town board of such town or towns, au¬ thorize such town or towns to construct, builds repair or The Highway Law of Hew York. 199 The raising and expenditure of moneys. discontinue such highway or bridge, and if such town is within a county adjoining a city of the first class, authorize said town to build, construct or repair a public dock or bulkhead within its boundaries and to borrow such sums of money for and on the credit of such town or towns, as may be necessary for said pur¬ poses, to lay out, widen, grade, discontinue or macadamize such highway, or to purchase for public use any plankroad, turnpike, tollroad or tollbridge in such town or towns, and may authorize the company owning the same to sell the same, or any part thereof, or the franchises thereof, or to pay any debt incurred in good faith by or in behalf of such town or towns for such pur¬ poses. If such highway or bridge shall be situated in two or more towns in the same county, the board shall apportion the expenses among such towns in such proportion as shall be just. Amended hy L. 1894, ch. 163, L. 1896, eh. 178, and L. 1900, ch. 12. § YO. The raising and expenditure of moneys .— The board shall, from time to time, impose upon the tax¬ able property of such towns sufficient tax to pay such obli¬ gations as they shall become due. The supervisor and town clerk shall each keep a record, showing the date and amount of the obligations issued, the time and place of their payment, and the rate of interest thereon. The obli- igations shall be delivered to the supervisor of the town, who shall dispose of the same for not less than par, and pay the proceeds thereof to the commissioners of high¬ ways of the town, or to such other officer as shall be des¬ ignated by the board of supervisors, to be used by them for the purposes for which the same were appropriated; but not more than five hundred dollars of such proceeds shall be expended upon any highway or bridge, except in pursuance of a contract made by a contractor with the 200 The Highway Law of New York. Streets outside of city limits. commissioners of highways of the town, or other officer designated by the board of supervisors, and approved by the town board, no member of which shall be interested therein. If such highway or bridge shall be wholly or partly within the limits of an incorporated village, the con¬ sent of a majority of the trustees of such village shall be necessary for the action of the board of supervisors as herein provided. § 71. Streets outside of city limits .— When any terri¬ tory in a county containing an incorporated city of one hundred thousand inhabitants, excepting the towns of Flatbush and New Lots in the county of Kings, has been mapped into streets and avenues, pursuant to law, the board of supervisors may authorize the establishment of a plan for the grade of such streets and avenues, laying out, opening, grading, constructing, closing and change of line of any one or more of them, and provide for the assess¬ ment on property intended to be benefited thereby, and fixing assessment districts therefor, and of the levy, col¬ lection and payment of the amount of damages sustained and the charges and expenses incurred, or which may be necessary to incur in carrying out such provisions, but such last named power in regard to laying out, opening, grading, constructing and change of line, of such streets or avenues or defraying the expenses thereof, shall only be exercised on the petition of the property owners, who own more than one-half of the frontage on any such street or avenue, or on a certificate of the town board and com¬ missioners of highways of the town, that the same is, in their judgment, proper and necessary for the public interest. If the streets and avenues, in respect to which such action is proposed to be taken, shall lie in two or more towns, a like certificate shall be required of the town board and commissioners of highways of each town. The Highway Law of New York. 201 Survey and records of highways. Before making such certificate, such town board, or boards and commissioners of highways, shall give ten days' notice by publication in one of the daily papers of the county, and by conspicuously posting in six public places in each of such towns, of the time and place at which they will meet to consider the same, at which meeting the public, and all persons interested, may appear and be heard in relation thereto. No such street or avenue shall be laid out, opened or constructed, upon or across any lands acquired by the right of eminent domain, and held in fee for depot purposes by any railroad corporation, or upon or across any lands now held by a corporation formed for the purpose of improving the breed of horses, without the consent of such corporations. No town officer shall charge anything for his services under this section, nor shall any charge be made against any such town or the property therein, for the expense of the publication of the notice herein required. § 72. Survey and records of highways .—The board may authorize and direct the commissioners of highways of any town, to cause a survey to be made, at the expense of the town, or* any or all of the highways therein, and to make or complete a systematic record thereof, or to re¬ vise, collate and rearrange existing records of highways, and correct and verify the same by new surveys and to establish the location of highways by suitable monuments. Such records so made, or revised, corrected and verified shall be deposited with the town clerk of the town, and shall thereafter be the lawful records of the highways which they describe; but shall not affect rights pending in any judicial proceeding commenced before the deposit of such revised records with the town clerk. * So in the original. 202 The Highway Law oe New York. Regulation of toll rates. § 73. Regidation of toll rates .—Such boards shall have power, by a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to authorize an alteration, reduction or change of the rates of toll charged or received by any turnpike, plank or gravel road, or other toll road within such county, or by any bridge company or ferry within such county, or, if within more than one county, then by joint action with the supervisors of such counties, provided such alteration shall be asked for by the directors, trustees or owners of such road, bridge or ferry; but that no increase of toll shall be so authorized unless notice of intention to apply for such increase shall have been published in each of the newspapers published in such county, once in each week for six successive weeks next before the annual election of supervisors in such county; and any alteration in rates of toll authorized by any board of supervisors may be changed or modified by any subsequent board, on their own motion, by alike vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to such board; but nothing herein contained shall affect or abridge the powers of any city. § 74. Highways in counties of more than 300,000 acres of unimproved land .—The board may establish separate highway districts in counties containing more than three hundred thousand acres of unimproved unoccu¬ pied forest lands, for the purpose of constructing highways through such lands; such highway districts to be estab¬ lished upon the application of the owners of more than one- half of the non-resident lands therein. Any such highway district shall consist of contiguous tracts or parcels of land, and may include parts of one of* more towns; and they may be changed, altered or abolished at any time by the board. Such board may appoint one or more commission- * So in the original. The Highway Law of New York. 203 Appropriation of non-resident taxes. ers to lay out and construct such highways in any such district, and prescribe the powers and duties, and direct the manner in which highway taxes shall be assessed, levied and collected upon the lands within the district, and the manner of expenditure thereof. They may also authorize such commissioners to borrow money on such terms as they may deem just, but not ex¬ ceeding the amount of ten years’ highway taxes upon such lands; and may, for the purpose of repaying such loan, set apart and appropriate the highway taxes upon such lands, for a period not exceeding ten years from the time of making such loan. § 75. Appropriation of certain non-resident high¬ way taxes .—The board may, upon the application of the owners representing a majority in value, as shall be ascer¬ tained from the last annual assessment-roll of the real estate lying along the line of any highway, laid out through unimproved lands, in the cases not provided for in the last preceding section authorize the appropriation of the non-resident highway tax on the lands lying along such line, for the improvement of such highways. § 76. Balance of state appropriations.—The board may direct the expenditure of any non-resident highway or bridge tax, set apart by an act of the legislature, in counties wherein such non-resident lands are situated, when the official life of commissioners appointed to receive and expend such taxes has expired. § 77. Alteration of state roads .—The board may authorize the commissioners of highways of any town in their county to alter or discontinue any road or highway therein, which shall have been laid out by the state under 204 The Highway Law of Hew York. Powers in certain counties. the same conditions that would govern their actions in relation to highways that have been laid out by local authorities. § 78. Farther powers .—The board may make such other local and private laws and regulations concerning highways, alleys, bridges and ferries within the county, and the assessment and apportionment of highway labor or taxes therefor, not inconsistent with law, as it may deem necessary and proper, when the purposes of such laws and regulations can not be accomplished under the fore¬ going provisions, or general laws of the state. § 79. Powers as to tires on vehicles .—The board of supervisors may enact local and private laws regulating the width of tires used on vehicles built to carry a weight of fifteen hundred pounds or upwards, and may provide penalties for the violation thereof. Added by L. 1894, ch. 644, and amended by L. 1899, ch. 155, taking effect March 28, 1899. > § 80. Boards of supervisors shall have power to provide for the use of abandoned turnpike, plank or macadamized roads within any town as public highways; but jurisdic¬ tion in such a case shall not be exercised without the assent of two-thirds of all the members elected to such board, to be determined by yeas and nays, which shall bo entered on its minutes. Added by L. 1895, ch. 750, The Highway Law of New York. 205 Town law. TOWN LAW. § 12. Election of officers .—There shall be elected at the biennial town meeting in each town by ballot, . . one, or three commissioners of highways, . . . At town meetings held at the same time as general elections, the names of all candidates for town offices shall be voted for in the same manner and on the same ballot as candidates for other offices voted for thereat. At such town meetings no person shall be allowed to vote for candidates for town offices who is not registered and entitled to vote at such general election. Amended by L. 1893, ch. 344, by L. 1897, ch. 481, and by L. 1898, ch. 363. See L. 1898, ch. 474, post, as to the election of highway commissioners in the years 1898, 1899, 1900 and thereafter. § 13. Term of office .— . . . commissioners of highways, . . . when elected, shall hold their respective offices for two years. But whenever there is or shall be a change in the time of holding town meetings in any town, persons elected to such offices at the next biennial town meeting after such change shall take effect, shall enter upon the discharge of their duties at the expiration of the term of their prede¬ cessors, and serve until the next biennial town meeting thereafter or until their successors are elected and have qualified. Whenever the time for holding town meetings in any town is changed to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, the town officers elected thereat shall take office on the first day of January succeeding their election. Amended by L. 1893, ch. 344, by U 1897, ch. 481, and by L. 1898, oh. 363. § 15. Commissioners of highways .—The electors of each town may, at their biennial town meetings, deter- 206 The Highway Law of New York. Fence viewers. mine by ballot whether there shall be elected in their town one or three commissioners of highways. Whenever any town shall have determined upon having three commis¬ sioners of highways and shall desire to have but one, the electors thereof may do so by a vote by ballot taken at a biennial town meeting, and when such proposition shall have been adopted no other commissioner shall be elected or appointed until the term or terms of those in office at the time of adopting the proposition shall expire or become vacant; and they may act until their terras shall severally expire or become vacant as fully as if three continued in office. When there shall be but one commissioner of high¬ ways in any town, he shall possess all the powers and dis¬ charge all the duties of commissioners of highways as pre¬ scribed by law. Amended by L. 1895, ch. 239, and by L. 1897, ch. 481. § 21. Fence viewers .— The assessors and commis¬ sioners of highways elected in every town shall, by virtue of their offices, be fence viewers of their town. Renumbered by L. 1897, ch. 481. § 22. Powers of biennial town meetings .— The electors of each town may, at their biennial town meeting: • •••• • • ••• 5. Make provisions and allow rewards for the destruc¬ tion of noxious weeds and animals, as they may deem necessary, and raise money therefor. Amended by L. 1897, ch. 481. • § 23. Special town meetings .—Special town meetings shall also be held whenever twenty-five taxpayers upon the last town assessment-roll shall, by written application addressed to the town clerk require a special town meeting to be called, for the purpose of raising money for the sup¬ port of the poor; or to vote upon the question of raising and The Highway Law op New York. 207 Electors in incorporated village not to vote on highway questions. appropriating money for the construction and maintenance of any bridges which the town may be authorized by law to erect or maintain; or for the purpose of determining in regard to the prosecution or defense of actions, or the raising of money therefor; or to vote upon any proposition which might have been determined by the electors of the town at the last annual town meeting, but was not acted upon thereat; or to vote upon or determine any question, proposition or resolution which may lawfully be voted upon or determined at a special town meeting. Special town meetings may also be held upon the like application of the supervisor, commissioners of highways, or overseers of the poor, to determine questions pertaining to their repsective duties as such officers, and which the electors of a town have a right to determine. An application and notice heretofore made and given for a special town meet¬ ing to be hereafter held for a purpose not heretofore authorized by law, but now authorized by law, shall be as valid and of the same force and effect as if such purpose had been authorized by law at the time of such application and notice. Amended by L. 1894, ch. 280. § 36. balloting; electors in incorporated village when not to vote on highway questions .—When the electors vote by ballot, except in towns where the biennial town meetings are held at the time of gen¬ eral elections, all the officers voted for shall be named in one ballot, which shall contain written or printed, or partly written or partly printed, the names of the per¬ sons voted for, and the offices to which such persons are intending to be elected, and shall be delivered to the pre¬ siding officers so folded as to conceal the contents, and shall be deposited by such officers in a box to be con¬ structed, kept and disposed of, as near as may be, in the 208 The Highway Law of New York. Oath of office. manner prescribed in the general election law. When any town shall have within its limits an incorporated village, constituting a separate road district, exempt from the supervision and control of the commissioners of highways of the town, and from payment of any tax for the salary or fees of said commissioners, and from payment of any tax for the opening, erection, maintenance and repair of any highway or bridge of said town, without the limits of said village, no residents of such village shall vote at any biennial or special election in such town for any com¬ missioner of highways for said town, nor for or against any appropriation for the opening, laying out, mainten¬ ance, erection or repair of any highway or bridge in said town, without the limits of said village. At the biennial elections in such towns, the names of candidates for the office of highway commissioner shall be printed on a different ballot from the one containing the names of candi¬ dates for other town offices. Such ballots shall be in¬ dorsed “commissioner of highways,” and shall be de¬ posited, when voted, in a separate ballot box, which also shall be marked “commissioner of highways.” Such bal¬ lots and ballot box shall be furnished by the officers now charged by law with that duty at town elections. A poll list shall be kept by the clerk of the meeting on which shall be entered the name of each person voting by ballot. Amended by L. 1895, ch. 262, by L. 1897, ch. 481, and by L. 1898, ch. 362. § 51. Oath of office .—Every person elected or ap¬ pointed to any town office, except justice of the peace, shall before he enters on the duties of his office, and within ten days after he shall be notified of his election or appointment, take and subscribe before some officer authorized by law to administer oaths in his county, the constitutional oath of office, and such other oath as may be required by law, which shall be administered and certi- The Highway Law of New York. 209 Refusal to serve as overseer of highways. fied by the officer taking the same without reward, and shall within eight days be filed in the office of the town clerk, which shall be deemed an acceptance of the office; and a neglect or omission to take and file such oath, or a neglect to execute and file, within the time required by law, any official bond or undertaking, shall be deemed a refusal to serve, and the office may be filled as in case of vacancy. § 55. Refusal to serve as overseer of highways or pound-master .—If any person chosen or appointed to the office of overseer of highways or pound-master shall refuse to serve, he shall forfeit to the town the sum of ten dollars. § 56. Town officers to administer* oaths .—Any town officer may administer any necessary oath in any matter or proceeding lawfully before him, or to any paper to be filed with him as such officer. § 63. Undertaking of commissioner of highways. _Every commissioner of highways shall, within ten days after notice of his election or appointment, execute an undertaking with two or more sureties, to be approved by the supervisor of his town, to the effect that he will faith¬ fully discharge his duties as such commissioner, and within ten days after the expiration of his term of office, pay over to his successor all moneys remaining in his hands as such commissioner, and render to such successor a true account of all moneys received and paid out by him as such commissioner, which undertaking shall be delivered to the supervisor, and filed by him in the office of the town clerk within ten days thereafter. 14 210 The Highway Law of New York. Resignation of town officers. § 64. Resignation of town officers .—Any three jus¬ tices of the peace of a town may, for sufficient cause shown to them accept the resignation of any town officer of their town; and whenever they shall accept any such resigna¬ tion, they shall forthwith give notice thereof to the town clerk of the town. § 65. Filling of vacancies .—When a vacancy shall occur or exist in any town office, the town board or a majority of them may, by an instrument under their hands and seals, appoint a suitable person to fill the vacancy, and the person appointed, except justices of the peace, shall hold the office until the next biennial town meeting. . . . The board making the appointment shall cause the same to be forthwith filed in the office of the town clerk, who shall forthwith give notice to the person appoined. § 66. Form of undertaking, and liability thereon . —Every undertaking of a town officer, as provided by this chapter or otherwise, must be executed by such officer and his sureties and acknowledged or proven and certi¬ fied in like manner as deeds to be recorded, and the ap¬ proval indorsed thereon. The parties executing such undertaking shall be jointly and severally liable, regard¬ less of its form in that respect, for the damages to any person or party by reason of a breach of its terms. § SO. General duties of supervisor .—The supervisor of each town shall: 1. Eeceive and pay over all moneys raised therein for defraying town charges, except those raised for the sup¬ port of highways and bridges, and of the poor. The Highway Law of New York. 211 Fires in woods. § 82. Fires in woods *—Whenever the woods in any town shall be on fire, it shall be the duty of the justices of the peace, the supervisor and commissioners of highways of such town, and of each of them, to order such and so many of the inhabitants of such town liable to work on the highways, and residing in the vicinity of the fire, as they shall severally deem necessary, to repair to the place where such fire shall prevail, and there to asisst in extin¬ guishing the same, or in stopping its progress. § 84. Delivery of books and papers by outgoing officer to successor .—Whenever the term of office of any supervisor, town clerk, commissioner of highways or over¬ seer of the poor shall expire, or when either of such officers shall resign, and another person shall be elected or ap¬ pointed to the office, the succeeding officer shall, immedi¬ ately after he shall have entered on the duties of his office, demand of his predecessor all the records, books and papers under his control belonging to such office. Every person so going out of office, whenever so required, shall deliver upon oath to his successor all the records, books and papers in his possession or under his control belonging to the office held by him, which oath may be administered by the officer to whom such delivery shall be made, and shall, at the same time pay over to his successor the moneys belonging to the town remaining in his hands. If any such officers shall have died, the successors or successor of such officer shall make such demand of the executors or administrators of such deceased officer, and such execu¬ tors or administrators shall deliver, upon the like oath, all records, books and papers in their possession, or under their control, belonging to the office held by their testator or intestate. If any person so going out of office, or his executors or administrators, shall refuse or neglect, when lawfully required, to deliver such records, books or papers, 212 The Highway Law of New Yokk. Meeting of town board for receiving accounts. he shall forfeit to the town, for every such refusal or neglect, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars; and officers entitled to demand such records, books and papers may compel the delivery thereof in the manner prescribed by law. § 161. Meeting of town board for receiving ac¬ counts of town officers .—At the meeting of the town board held on the Tuesday preceding the biennial town meeting and on the corresponding date in each alternate year, or on the third Tuesday of December in each year, all town officers who receive or disburse any moneys of the town, shall account with the board for all such moneys received and disbursed by them by virtue of their office, but no member of the board shall sit as a member of the board when any account in which he is interested is being audited by the board. The board shall make a statement of such accounts, and append thereto a certifi¬ cate, signed by at least a majority of them, showing the state of the accounts of each officer at the date of the cer¬ tificate, which statement and certificate shall be filed with the town clerk of the town, and be open to public inspec- tion during the office hours of such town clerk. Amended by L. 1897, ch. 481, and by L. 1898. ch. 363. § 171. Town fire companies .—The town board of any town may appoint in writing, any number of inhabitants of their town, which they may deem necessary, to be a fire company for the extinguishment of fires in their town; but no such company, as herein provided, shall be formed in any incorporated city or village. Each fire company, thus formed, shall choose a captain and clerk thereof, and may establish such by-laws and regulations as may be necessary to enforce the performance, by such firemen, of their duty, and may impose such penalties, not exceeding five dollars for each offense, as may be necessary for that The Highway Law of New York. 213 Town fire companies. purpose. Such penalties may be collected by and in the name of the captains, in any court having cognizance thereof, and, when collected, shall be expended by the companies for the repair and preservation of their engines and apparatus. All vacancies which may, at any time, happen in such companies by death, resignation or otherwise, shall, from time to time, be filled by the town board. The electors of any highway district, in which any town fire company shall have their headquarters, at a special meeting lawfully called by the town clerk, who is hereby authorized to call such special meeting may vote, by ballot, a sum of money, not exceeding four thousand dollars, for the purchase of a fire engine and apparatus, and for the purchase or lease of suitable buildings and grounds for keeping and storing such fire engine and apparatus and other property of said highway district. And whenever said electors shall so vote said money for the purchase of a fire engine and apparatus and for the purchase or lease of suitable buildings and grounds for keeping and storing such fire engine and apparatus and other property of said highway district, the commissioners of highways may, with the written consent and approval of the town board, contract for and purchase for such dis¬ trict a good and sufficient fire engine and apparatus, and may contract for and purchase or lease for such district, suitable buildings and grounds for keeping and storing such fire engine and apparatus, and other property of said district, at a price not to exceed the sum so voted, which engine and apparatus and buildings and grounds shall be the property of said highway district, but may be used and cared for by such fire company. The purchase-price of said fire engine and apparatus and buildings and grounds shall be assessed and levied upon the property of said dis¬ trict and collected in the same manner as other town charges are assessed, levied and collected, except that the 214 The Highway Law of New York. Compensation of town officers. amount thereof shall be put in a separate column upon the tax-roll, and the board of supervisors of the county shall cause the sum, as certified by the town board, to be levied upon the taxable property of such highway district. Amended by L. 1891, ch. 254, and by L. 1894, ch. 201. § 178. Compensation of town officers .—Town officers shall be entitled to compensation at the following rates for each day actually and necessarily devoted by them to the service of the town in the duties of their repective offices, when no fee is allowed by law for the service, as follows: 1. The supervisor, except when attending the board of supervisors, town clerks, assessors, commissioners of highways, justices of the peace and overseers of the poor, each, two dollars per day. 2. If a different rate is not otherwise established as herein provided, each inspector of election, ballot clerk and poll clerk is entitled to two dollars per day; but the board of supervisors may establish in their county a higher rate, not exceeding six dollars per day. Amended by L. 1897, ch. 252. § 180, sub. S. 8. Every sum allowed by the highway commissioners of a town in which the highways are worked and repaired by the money system of taxation in abatement of highway taxes for the maintenance of watering troughs [is a charge upon the town.—E d.] Added by L. 1897, ch. 227. § 184. Whenever a towu meeting shall vote a special appropriation of money in the sum of five hundred dollars or more, or an appropriation for highway purposes or for the support of the poor during the current year, to be levied upon the taxable property of the town, the town The Highway Law of New York. 215 Kings county. board shall have power to borrow the sum so appropriated upon the faith and credit of the town, and to issue there¬ for a certificate or certificates of .indebtedness, bearing interest and payable at such date or dates as may be fixed by said board, and the proceeds of such loan shall be placed to the credit of the public officers charged by law with the expenditure of said moneys. A statement of the amount maturing on such certificate of indebtedness shall be certified by the town board at its second meeting and delivered to the supervisor of the town, to be by him pre¬ sented to the board of supervisors of his county at its annual meeting, and the said board of supervisors shall cause the amount specified in such certified statement to be levied and raised upon the taxable property of the town in the same manner as they are directed to levy and raise other town charges. Added by L. 1897, ch. 84. The following sections are applicable only to Kings county: § 220. Town officers .—The town officers of each town in counties containing six hundred thousand or more in¬ habitants, as determined by the last preceding federal or state enumeration of the inhabitants taken prior to any election of town officers, shall be . one or three commissioners of highways, Amended by L. 1893, ch. 61, and by L. 1893, ch. 387. § 221. Election of officers.—The said town officers shall be elected by ballot by the electors of each town at the annual town meeting held next preceding the "general election at which they would have been elected under the present existing laws, . . . Amended by L. 1893, ch. 387. 216 The Highway Law of New York. Term of office. § 222. Term of office ,—The supervisor shall hold office for the term of two years; the town clerk, assessors, commissioners of highways, commissioners of excise and town auditors, each for the term of three years; When three or more incumbents are required for any one of said offices, the term of which is three or more years, one candidate shall be elected for the regular or full term in each year. Amended by L. 1893, cli. 387. § 225. j Fall terms and vacancies ,—When more than one justice of the peace, assessor, commissioner of excise, commissioner of highways, town auditor or constable are to be chosen in any of said towns, each elector shall desig¬ nate upon his ballot the person intended for the full term and for a vacancy, and if there are two or more vacancies they shall be designated as the longer and the shorter, or the longer, shorter and shortest vacancy, as the case may be, and each person having the greatest number of votes with reference to each designation shall be deemed duly elected for the term or vacancy designated. Amended by L. 1893, cli. 387. § 228. Fiscal year; meeting of town boards ,—The fiscal year in such towns shall begin on the first day of January and terminate on the thirty-first day of December. The board of town auditors shall meet annually for the purpose of auditing the accounts of town officers at the office of the town clerk on the thirtieth day of December, at two o’clock in the afternoon, except when the same shall occur on Sunday, in which case such meeting shall be held on the twenty-ninth; and all town officers or boards of town officers who receive or disburse any moneys The Highway Law of New York. 217 Resignations. belonging to the town shall account for the same, under oath, to said board, annually, at such meeting. Amended by L. 1893, ch. 387. § 232. Resignations .—The supervisor and justices of the peace of each town or a majority of them may accept the resignation of any town officer, and make appointments to fill vacancies that may be occasioned tliereb} 7 , or by death, removal from town, refusal to serve, failure to qualify or otherwise, and shall file the certificates thereof in the office of the town clerk. Amended by L. 1893, ch. 387. § 233. Vacancies .—The persons who may be appointed to fill vacancies in town offices shall serve until the second day following the next annual town meeting, or until their successors shall be duly elected and qualified; Persons who may be elected to fill vacancies in town offices shall serve during the remainder of the unexpired term. Added by^L. 1893, ch. 387. § 234. Official oath and undertaking .—Each of said town officers, except justices of the peace and inspectors of election, shall, before the commencement of the term for which they were elected or appointed, or if appointed to fill vacancies, within ten days after their appointment, severally take the constitutional oath of office, and file the same in the office of the town clerk, and also, within the same time, file therein the undertakings, if any, which are required to be given by them for the faithful discharge of their duties. . . . If . . . such officers shall fail, neglect, refuse or omit to comply with the provisions of this section, a vacancy shall thereupon be created, which shall be filled by appointment in the manner prescribed by this article; . Added by L. 1893, ch. 387. 218 The Highway Law of New York. Village Law. VILLAGE LAW. § 226. Water pipes in highways outside of village. —The board of water commissioners of a village may cause water pipes to be laid, relaid or repaired under any public highway in a county in which any part of such village is situated, or in any adjoining county, for the purpose of introducing water into and through the village; and shall cause the surface of such highway to be restored to its usual condition. ARTICLE V. Streets, Sidewalks and Public Grounds. Section 140. Definitions. 141. Separate highway district. 142. Care of bridges. 143. When village may construct or repair bridges. 144. Dedication of streets. 145. Petition for street improvement. 146. Notice of meeting of board to consider petition. 147. Meeting and determination of board. 148. Effect of determination. 149. Application for commissioners ; notice of application 150. Appointment of commissioners. 151. Notice of meeting of commissioners. 152. Meeting and award of commissioners. 153. Appeal from award of commissioners. 154. Return by clerk. 155. Hearing of the appeal. 156. Compensation of commissioners. 157. Costs on appeal. The Highway Law of New York. 219 Streets, sidewalks and public grounds. Section 158. Payment for property acquired for street improvements. 159. Changing grade of street or bridge. 160. Streets on boundary lines. 161. Crosswalks and sidewalks. 162. Credit for flagging sidewalks. 163. Snow and ice on sidewalks. 164. Cleaning streets. 165. Sprinkling streets. 166. Pavements. 167. Trimming trees. 168. Local assessments under this article, 169. Acquisition of lands for parks and squares. Section 140. Definitions •—The term “street” as used in this chapter also includes a highway, road, 'avenue, lane or alley which the public have the right to use; and the term “pavement” includes a macadam, telford, asphalt, brick or other similarly improved roadbed, and is only applied to the portion of the street between the sidewalks or established curb lines. § 141. Separate highivay district ,—The streets and public grounds of a village, except as provided in the next section, are under the exclusive control and supervi¬ sion of the board of trustees. The board of trustees may expend a portion of the street fund upon outside highways connecting with the village streets. § 142. Care of bridges ,—If at the time this chapter takes effect, the board of trustees of a village has the supervision and control of a bridge therein, it shall con¬ tinue to exercise such control under this chapter. In any other case, every public bridge within a village, shall be under the control of the commissioners of highways of the town in which the bridge is wholly or partly situated, or 220 The Highway Law of New York. Dedication of streets. such other officer as may be designated by special law, and the expense of constructing and repairing such bridge and the approaches thereto is a town charge, unless the village assumes the whole or part of such expense. § 143. When village may construct or repair bridges .—A village may assume the control, care and maintenance of a bridge or bridges wholly within its boundaries, upon the adoption of a proposition therefor, at a village election; or a proposition may be adopted authorizing the board of trustees to enter into an agree¬ ment with the commissioners of highways of a town, in which any part of such village is situated, to construct or repair a bridge in any part of the village included in such town, at the joint expense of the village and town, which agreement shall fix the portion to be paid by each. § 144. j Dedication of streets .—An owner of land in a village who has laid out a street thereon may dedicate such street, or any part thereof, or an easement therein, to the village for a public street, or an owner may dedicate for such purpose land not laid out as a street. Upon an offer in writing by the owner to make such a dedication, the board of trustees shall meet to consider the matter; and it may, by resolution, determine to accept a dedication of the whole or any part of the land described in such offer, or of the whole or any part of such street, to be described in such resolution. Upon the adoption of such a resolution the owner may execute and deliver to the village clerk a proper conveyance of the land to be dedi¬ cated. The board of trustees may, by resolution, accept the conveyance, and a certified copy of such resolution, together with the conveyance, shall thereupon be recorded in the office of the county clerk. Upon the acceptance of The Highway Law of New York. 221 Petition for street improvement. the conveyance the land described therein shall become and be a public street of the village. No street less than two rods in width shall be accepted by dedication. All offers of dedication must be entered at length in the min¬ utes of the board of trustees. § 145. Petition for street improvement, —Five resi¬ dent freeholders may present to the board of trustees a petition for laying out, altering, widening, narrowing or discontinuing a street in the village . The petition must be addressed to the board of trustees, and must contain a statement of the following facts: 1. The names and residences of the petitioners. 2. If the petition be for the laying out of a street, the general course thereof, and a description of the land to be taken. 3. If the petition be for the alteration of a street, its name, the proposed alteration, and a description of the land, if any, to be taken. 4. If the petition be for the widening of a street, its name and a description of the land to be taken. 5. If the petition be for the narrowing of a street, its name, its proposed width after such alteration, and the manner in which such narrowing is to be effected. 6. If the petition be for the discontinuance of a street, its name and the part proposed to be discontinued. 7. If the petition be for the laying out, alteration or widening of a street, the names and residences of the owners of all land to be taken. 8. If the petition be for the narrowing or discontinuance of a street, the names and residences of the owners of adjoining lands effected. § 146. Notice of meeting of board to consider pe¬ tition, —Upon the presentation of the petition the board 222 The Highway Law of New York. Notice of meeting of board. shall immediately give notice that it will meet at a speci¬ fied time and place, not less than ten nor more than twenty days from the date of such notice, to consider the petition. The notice must state the general object of the petition, and if it be for the laying out of a street, a general descrip¬ tion of its proposed course, and in any other case, the name of the street proposed to be changed or discontinued. The notice must be served upon the following persons, unless such service be waived by them in writing: 1. If the petition be for the laying out of a street, upon each owner of land to be'taken. 2. If the petition be for the alteration or widening of a street, upon each owner of land, if any, to be taken, and upon each owner of land adjoining the part of the street affected. 3. If the petition be for the narrowing of a street, upon each owner of land adjoining the part of the street affected. 4. If the petition be for the discontinuance of a street, upon each owner of land adjoining the part of the street- proposed to be discontinued, and also upon the owner of land otherwise affected by the proposed discontinuance. If a person other than the owner is in possession of such land, notice must also be served upon him. Such notice shall also be published in each newspaper in the village, and posted in five conspicuous places therein. The notice must be served, posted and published at least ten davs before the hearing. § 147. Meeting and determination of hoard .— The board shall meet at the time and place specified in the notice to consider the petition and also any objections thereto. A person affected by the proposed improvement, and upon whom notice has not been served, may appear upon the hearing. A voluntary general appearance of The Highway Law of New York. 223 Application for commissioners. such a person is equivalent to personal service of the notice upon him. The board may adjourn the hearing and must determine the matter within twenty days from the date fixed for such hearing. If the board determine to grant the petition an order must be entered in its minutes con¬ taining a description of the land, if any, to be taken. § 148. Effect of determination .—The determination by the board has the following effect: 1. If the petition for the laying out, alteration or widening of a street be granted, the board of trustees may acquire the land for such improvement by purchase or by proceedings under this article. But no street shall be laid out through a building or any fixtures or erections for the purposes of trade or manufacture, or any yard or enclosure necessary to be used for the enjoyment thereof, without the consent of the owner, except upon the order of a jus¬ tice of the supreme court residing in the judicial district in which the village or a part thereof is situated, to be granted upon an application by the board of trustees on a notice to the owner of not Jess than ten days. 2. If the petition for the narrowing of a street be granted, the board shall enter upon its records a descrip¬ tion of the street after such narrowing, and the portion of the former street not included in such description is abandoned. 3. If the petition, or the discontinuance of a street be granted, such street or the part thereof so discontinued is abandoned. § 149. Application for commissioners; notice of application, —If a petition for the laying out, alteration or widening of a street be granted, and the board cannot aai . ee with an owner upon the purchase price of land a 224 The Highway Law of New York. Meeting and award of commissioners. necessary to be acquired, an application may be made by the board to the county court of the county in which such land is situated, for the appointment of three commissioners to determine the compensation to be made to such owner. At least ten days before the making of such application a notice specifying the time and place thereof must be served upon such owner. § 150. Appointment of commissioners. —Upon such application the county court must appoint as such com¬ missioners three resident disinterested freeholders of the county in which such land is situated, not residents of the village nor nominated by a person interested in the pro¬ ceeding. In case of a vacanc}? another commissioner may be appointed in like manner. The order of appointment must contain the name of each person whose compensa¬ tion is to be determined by the commissioners. § 151. Notice of meeting of commissioners .—The commissioners shall file with the village clerk the consti¬ tutional oath of office. They shall appoint a time and place for a hearing and serve a notice thereof upon the board of trustees and upon each person named in the order. Such notice must be served at least ten days before the hearing, which must be held within twenty days after their appointment. § 152. fleeting and award of commissioners, —The commissioners shall meet at the time and place appointed and may adjourn from time to time. They shall person¬ ally examine the land, compensation for which is to be determined by them, and may take testimony in relation thereto. They shall keep minutes of their proceedings and reduce to writing all evidence taken by them. They shall The Highway Law of New Yoek. 225 Appeal from award of commissioners. award to each owner of land named in the order the com¬ pensation to which he maybe entitled after making allow¬ ance for any benefit he may derive from the improvement. After the appointment of the commissioners and before any evidence is taken on the hearing, the board may make an agreement w T ith an owner named in the order for the compensation to be made to him. If such an agreement be made, notice thereof must be served upon the commis¬ sioners, and thereupon the proceeding as to such owner is discontinued. The award shall be signed by a majority of the commissioners, and, together with the minutes of their proceedings, the evidence taken by them, and any notice of agreement served upon them, shall be filed in the office of the village clerk. § 153. Appeal from award of commissioners .—The board of trustees, or an owner to whom an award has been made by the commissioners, may, within twenty days after the filing of the award, appeal therefrom to the county court by which the commissioners were appointed. Such appeal shall be taken by a notice of appeal to be served as follows: 1. If the appeal be taken by the board of trustees, notice thereof must be filed by the village clerk in his office, and addressed to and served upon each owner to whose award objection is made by the board. 2. If the appeal be taken by an owner, the notice of appeal must be addressed to the board of trustees and served upon the village clerk. The notice must in either case briefly state the grounds upon which the appeal is taken. § 154. Betnrn by clerk .—Within ten days after such appeal the village clerk shall transmit to the county judge 15 226 The Highway Law of New York. Hearing of the appeal. the petition filed with the board for the laying out, altera¬ tion or widening of the proposed street, all papers asd evidence in the proceeding subsequently filed in his office, and a certified copy of each resolution of the board of trustees relating to the improvement. § 155. Hearing of the appeal .—The appeal may be brought on by either party by a notice of not less than teu nor more than twenty days. If the appeal is by the board of trustees, it brings up for review all proceedings by or before the commissioners, and the award made by them. If the appeal is by an owner, it brings up for review all proceedings relating to the proposed improvement. If the appeal is by the board of trustees, and two or more owners are made respondents, the county court may affirm or reverse the award of the commissioners as to the whole or any number of such owners, and if the appeal is by an owner, the county court may affirm or reverse the award. If the award be reversed, the order of reversal must state the reasons therefor,* and if upon grounds relating to the amount of the award, or for errors in the proceedings by the commissioners, it must direct a rehearing before the same or other commissioners. If it appears from the order of the county court that the award is reversed solely upon grounds relating to the amount of compensation, or for errors in the proceedings by the commissioners, no further appeal shall be allowed. The order of the county court upon such appeal, together with the papers transmitted by the village clerk, must be filed by the county judge in the office of such clerk. The order must also be entered in the office of the county clerk. § 156. Compensation of commissioners .—Each com¬ missioner is enittled to five dollars for each day actually The Highway Law of New York. 227 Costs on appeal. and necessarily spent in such proceeding, together with his necessary traveling and incidental expenses. Such compensation and expenses are a charge against the village. | 157. Costs on appeal .—Costs on appeal may be allowed as follows: 1. If on appeal by the board of trustees the award of the commissioners be affirmed, the county court may allow to the respondent costs of such appeal, against the village, not exceeding twenty-five dollars. 2. If on such an appeal the award be reversed on the ground that as to a specified owner it is excessive, the court may fix the amount of costs, not exceeding fifty dol¬ lars, to be stated in the order, to be paid by the village to such owner, if upon a rehearing the amount awarded to him is not more favorable to the village by the amount of such costs than the first award. 3. If on appeal by an owner the award be affirmed, costs not exceeding twenty-five dollars may be awarded against him, to be recovered by the village. 4. If on such an appeal the' award be reversed, the county court may allow to the owner a sum not exceeding twenty-five dollars for the costs of appeal, which shall be a charge against the village. § 158. Payment for property acquired for street improvement .—Upon the making of an agreement for compensation to an owner under this article, or upon the final order or award fixing the amount of such compensa¬ tion in proceedings therefor, the board shall immediately pay such amounts and the costs, if any, allowed in such proceedings, if it has funds available for that purpose; if not, money may be borrowed and certificates of indebted¬ ness bearing interest issued therefor, or like certificates 228 The Highway Law of New York. Changing grade of street or bridge. may be issued for such amounts, and payable, in either case, not more than one year from the date thereof; and the amount of such certificates shall be included in the next annual tax levy. § 159. Changing grade of street or bridge .—If a village has exclusive control and jurisdiction of a street or bridge therein, it may change the grade thereof. If such change of grade shall injuriously affect any building or land adjacent thereto, or the use thereof, the change of grade to the extent of the damage resulting therefrom, shall be .deemed the taking of such adjacent property for a pub¬ lic use. A person claiming damages from such change of grade must present to the board of trustees a verified claim therefor, within sixty days after such change of grade is affected. The board may agree with such owner upon the amount of damages to be allowed to him. If no agreement be made, within thirty days after the presenta¬ tion of the claim, the person presenting it may apply to the supreme court for the appointment of three commis¬ sioners to determine the compensation to which he is entitled. Notice of the application must be served upon the board of trustees at least ten days before the hearing thereof. All proceedings subsequent to the appointment of the commissioners shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of the condemnation law, so far as applicable, except that the commissioners in fixing their award may make an allowance for benefits derived by the claimant from such improvement. The amount agreed upon for such damages or the award therefor, together with the costs, if any, allowed to the claimant, shall be a charge against such village. The board may borrow money for the payment thereof, or issue certificates of indebtedness therefor, in the same manner as in case of damages for laying out a street. The Highway Law of New York. 229 Streets on boundary lines. § 160. Streets on boundary lines .—Whenever a street is on a line between two villages, or between a village and a city or town, the highway or street commissioners of such adjoining municipalities shall, on or before the first day of May in each year, meet at a time and place to be determined by them, and divide such street. The officers present at such meeting shall allot a part of the street to each municipality in such manner that the labor and expense of keeping such street in repair may be equal as nearly as practicable. The officers making such division shall, within ten days thereafter, file in the office of the clerk of each municipality a certificate showing the part of such street allotted to each. § 161. Crosswalks and sidewalks .—The board of trustees may construct and repair crosswalks upon the streets within the village. It may also construct and repair sidewalks upon such a street wholly at the expense of the village, or of the owners or occupants of the adjoining land, or partly at the expense of each. Upon the adop¬ tion of a proposition therefor in a village of the third or fourth class, all sidewalks shall thereafter be constructed and repaired wholly at the expense of the village. If a sidewalk is so required to be constructed or repaired wholly at the expense of the owners or occupants of the adjoining lands, a notice specifying the place and manner, and the time, not less than ten days, in case of a new walk, or not less than twenty-four hours in case of repairs, within which the sidewalk is required to be constructed or re¬ paired, shall be served upon such owners or occupants. If an owner or occupant shall not construct or repair the sidewalk as required by the notice, the board of trustees may cause the same to be so constructed or repaired, and assess the expense thereof upon the adjoining laud. If a sidewalk is to be constructed or repaired at the 230 The Highway Law of Hew York. Credit for flagging sidewalk. joint expense of the village and the owner or occupant, the board of trustees may cause the same to be constructed or repaired, and assess upon the adjoining land the proportion of the expense chargeable against the same; or it may direct the owner or occupant to contribute labor or-materials therefor. If the lands of a turnpike company are used as a street in a village and the company collect tolls on its roads, then the expense of constructing or repairing a sidewalk in so much of the street as is owned or controlled by the turnpike company, shall be chargeable against and assessed on the turnpike company, and the owners of the adjoining land shall not be chargeable therewith. Amended by L. 1899 , ch. 326, taking effect April 17, 1899. § 162. Credit for flagging sidewalk .—Whenever the owner or occupant of lands adjoining a street shall, with the consent of the board of trustees, construct a sidewalk of stone, cement, brick or other similar material along the line of such land, of the width of four feet or more, and of the value of at least four dollars per lineal rod, the board of trustees shall credit such owner or occupant on account of his assessment for street taxes in such village, three-fourths of the actual and necessary expense of con¬ structing such sidewalk; or, instead of such credit, may pay to such owner or occupant from the street fund of the current year, one-half of the cost of such sidewalk. If credit is allowed, such owner or occupant shall be exempt from taxation on account of streets in such village until the amount of the exemption equals the credit so allowed. § 163. Snoiv and ice on sidewalks .—The board of trustees may require the owners or occupants of land fronting on sidewalks to keep them clear of snow and ice, and upon default, may cause such sidewalks to be cleaned, and assess the expense thereof upon such adjoining land, or may cause the sidewalks on any street or portion thereof to be kept clear of snow and ice, and assess the expense upon the adjoining land. § 164. Cleaning streets •— The board of trustees may require the owners of land fronting upon the streets to keep the portion of the street between the land and the The Highway Law of New York. 231 Sprinkling streets. center of the street cleaned of rubbish or other accumula¬ tions thereon, injurious to the use or appearance thereof, and to cause all grass and weeds growing therein to be cut and removed once in each month from May to October, inclusive. If the owner of such adjoining land shall fail to comply with such requirement the board of trustees may cause such work to be done, and assess the expense thereof upon such adjoining land. § 165. Sprinkling streets .—The board of trustees may cause a street or a part thereof to be sprinkled, and may assess the expense thereof, in whole or in part, upon the owners or occupants of the adjoining land. § 166. Pavements ,—The board of trustees may cause a street in the village to be paved, wholly at the expense of the village, or of the owners of the adjoining land, or partly at the expense of each; but such street shall not be paved wholly at the expense of the owners of the adjoining land unless a petition be presented to the board of trustees signed by the owners of at least two-thirds of the frontage on the street, or portion thereof, proposed to be paved, and a hearing given thereon to all persons interested, on a notice of at least ten days. If a pavement is so required to be constructed or repaired wholly at the expense of the owners of the adjoining lands, a notice specifying the place and manner, and the time, not less than thirty days, within which the pavement is required to be constructed or repaired, shall be served upon the owners. If an owner shall not construct or repair the pavement as required by the notice, the board of trustees may cause the same to be so constructed or repaired, and assess the expense thereof upon the adjoining land. If a pavement is to be con¬ structed or repaired at the joint expense of the village and the owner of the adjoining land, the board of trustees may cause the same to be constructed or repaired, and assess 232 The Highway Law of New York. Trimming trees. upon the adjoining land the proportion of the expense chargeable against the same; or it may direct the owner to contribute labor or materials therefor. The total amount expended for street paving in any fiscal year from the moneys raised during such year for street purposes, otherwise than in pursuance of a village election, shall not be more than one-half thereof. No land owner shall be required to pave or bear the expense of paving any portion of the street not in front of such land, nor beyond the cen¬ tre of the street. All pavements laid by the owners of adjoining land shall be laid under the supervision and in accordance with the directions of the board of trustees. The expense of constructing a pavement or any part thereof maybe raised in an entire amount or in similar amounts from time to time as the board of trustees may determine. If any portion of such expense is to be borne by the village, bonds or certificates of indebtedness may be issued. If such expense or any part thereof is to be assessed upon adjoining land, the board may apportion it upon the lands and assess the same as a whole or by in¬ stallments. Notice of an assessment based upon such apportionment shall be given to the land owners, who may pay the amounts assessed within ten days after such notice. At the expiration of that time bonds or certifi¬ cates of indebtedness may be issued for the aggregate amount of such assessment then remaining unpaid. Taxes for the amount of such bonds or certificates issued on account of default in the payment of the amount appor¬ tioned upon adjoining land, shall be levied and collected in the manner prescribed by this chapter in case of unpaid assessments for the construction of sewers. Amended by L. 1898, ch. 365. § 167. Trimming trees.—The board of trustees may require the owners of land to trim the trees in front The Highway Law of New York. 233 Local assessments under this article. thereof, and upon default, may cause such trees to be trimmed, and assess the expense thereof upon the adjoin¬ ing land. § 168. Local assessments under this article .— Whenever expenditures are made by the board of trustees for constructing or repairing sidewalks or pavements, trimming trees, sprinkling streets or keeping the side¬ walks or streets cleared of weeds, ice, snow or other accu¬ mulations thereon, which under this article are assessable upon the land affected or improved thereby, the board shall serve a notice of at least ten days upon the owner or occu¬ pant of such property, stating that such expenditure has been made, its purpose and amount, and that at a speci¬ fied time and place it will meet to make an assessment of the expenditure upon such land. The board shall meet at the time and place specified. It shall hear and deter¬ mine all objections that may be made to such assessment, including the amount thereof, and shall assess upon the land the amount which it may deem just and reasonable, not exceeding, in case of default, the amount stated in the notice. If the amount so assessed be not paid within twenty days after such assessment, an action to recover the amount may be maintained by the village against the owner or occupant liable therefor, or a special warrant may be issued by the board of trustees for the collection of such assessment, or the amount thereof may be included in the next annual tax levy. § 169. Acquisition of lands for parks and squares . _The board of trustees may, on behalf of the village, ac¬ cept by grant or devise a gift of land for a public park or square within the village, or wholly within one mile of the boundaries thereof, or may submit to a village election 234 The Highway Law of New York. Acquisition of lands for parks and squares. a proposition to purchase land so located for such purpose at an expense, specified in the proposition, not exceeding one per centum of the value of the taxable property of the village, as appears by the last preceding assessment roll. Upon the acquisition of land for the purposes of this sec¬ tion, either by gift or purchase, the board may establish and maintain a public park or square thereon. The Highway Law of New York. 235 Transportation corporations law. TRANSPORTATION CORPORA¬ TIONS LAW § 33. Crossings ,—Wherever any tramway, constructed by any such corporation, shall cross a railroad, highway, turnpike, plank-road or canal, such tramway shall be so constructed as not to interfere with the free use of such railroad, highway, turnpike, plank-road or canal for the purposes for which they were intended. § 43. Railroad, turnpike, plank-road and high¬ way crossings ,— Whenever any line of pipe of any such corporation shall necessarily cross any railroad, highway, turnpike or plank-road, such line of pipe shall be made to cross under such railroad, highway, turnpike or plank-road and with the least injury thereto practicable, and unless the right to cross the same shall be acquired by agree¬ ment, compensation shall be ascertained and made to the owners thereof, or to the public in case of highways, in the manner prescribed in the condemnation law, but no ex¬ clusive title or use shall be so acquired as against any rail¬ road, turnpike or plank-road corporation, nor as against the rights of the people of this state in any public high¬ way, but the rights acquired shall be a common use of the lands in such manner as to be of the least practical injury to such railroad, turnpike or plank-road, consistent with the use thereof by such pipe-line corporation, nor shall any such corporation take or use any lands, fixtures or erections of any railroad corporation, or have the right to acquire by condemnation the title or use, or right to run along or upon the lands of any such corporation, except for the purpose of directly crossing the same when necessary. 236 The Highway Law of New York. Consent of local authorities. g 45. Consent of local authorities .—No pipe line shall be constructed across, along or upon any public highway without the consent of the commissioners of high¬ ways of the town in which such highway is located, upon such terms as may be agreed upon with such commis¬ sioners. If such consent or the consent of the commis¬ sioners or municipal authorities required by the preceding section cannot be obtained, application may be made to the general term of the supreme court of the department in which such highway or bridge is situated for an order per¬ mitting the corporation to construct its line across, along or upon such highway, or across or upon such bridge. The application shall be by duly verified petition and notice which shall be served upon the commissioners of highways of the town in which the highway is situated, or the municipal authorities of the village or city where such bridge is located, according to the practice or order of the court, or an order to show cause, and the court upon the hearing of the application may grant an order per¬ mitting the line to be so constructed in such manner and upon suoh terms as it may direct. The Highway Law of New York. 237 Turnpike, plank-road and bridge corporations. * ARTICLE IX. Turnpike, Plank-Road and Bridge Corporations. Section 120. Incorporation. 121. Restriction upon location of road. 122. Agreement for use of highway. 123. Application to board of supervisors. 124. Commissioners to lay out road. 125. Possession of and title to real estate. 126. Use of turnpike road by plank road. 127. Width and construction of road. 128. Construction of bridges ; obstruction of rafts prohibited, 129. Certificate of completion of road or bridge. 130. Gates, rates of toll; and exemption. 131. Toll gatherers. 132. Penalty for running a gate. 133. Location of gates and change thereof. 134. Inspectors, their powers and duties. 135. Change of route, extensions and branches. 136. Milestones, guide-posts and hoist-gates. 137. Location of office of corporation. 138. Consolidation of corporations, sale of franchise, 139. Surrender of road. 140. Taxation and exemption. 141. Hauling logs and timber. 142. Encroachment of fences. 143. Penalty for fast driving over bridges. 144. Acts of directors prohibited. 145. Actions for penalties. 146. Proof of incorporation. 147. When stockholders, to be directors. 148. Dissolution of corporation, road to be a highways 149. Town must pay for lands not originally a highway. 150. High way labor upon line of plank-road or turnpike. 151. Extensionof corporate existence. 238 The Highway La^w of New York. Incorporation. Section 120. Incorporation .—Five or more persons may become a corporation for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and owning a turnpike, plank-road or a bridge, or causeway across any stream or channel of water, or adjoining bay, swamp, marsh, or water to form in con¬ nection with such bridge or causeway a continuous road¬ way across the same, by signing, acknowledging and filing a certificate containing the name of the corporation, its duration, not exceeding fifty years, the amount and num¬ ber of shares of its capital stock, the number of its direc¬ tors, and their names and post-office address for the first year, the termini of the proposed road, its length, and each town, city or village into or through which it is to pass, or of a bridge, the location and plan thereof, and the post-office address of each subscriber, and the number of shares of stock which he agrees to take, the aggregate of which subscriptions shall not be less than five hundred dollars for every mile of road, or if a bridge corporation not less than one-fourth of the amount of the capital st )ck, and five per cent of which must be actually paid in cash. There shall be indorsed on and annexed to the certificate and made a part thereof the affidavit of at least three of the directors named therein, that the required amount of capital stock has been subscribed and the prescribed per¬ centage paid in cash. § 121. Restrictions upon location of road .—No such road shall be laid out through any orchard of the growth of four years or more to the injury or destruction of fruit trees, or through any garden cultivated for four years or more before the laying out of the road, or through any dwelling-house or building connected therewith, or any yards or inclosures necessary for its use or enjoyment without the consent of the owner thereof, nor shall any such corporation bridge any stream in any manner that The Highway Law of New York. 239 Agreement for use of highways. will prevent or endanger the passage of any raft of twenty- five feet in width, or where the same is navigable by vessels or steamboats. § 122. Agreement for use of highways .—The super¬ visor and commissioner of higways, or a majority if there be more than one of any town, may agree in writing with any such corporation for the use of any part of a public highway therein required for the construction of any such road, and the compensation to be paid by the corporation for taking and using such highway for such purpose on first obtaining consent of at least two-thirds of all the owners of land bounded on or along such highway, which agreement shall be filed and recorded in the town clerk’s office of the town. If such agreement cannot be made the corporation may acquire the right to take such highway for such purpose by condemation. The compensation therefor shall be paid to the commissioners of highways, to be expended by them in improving the highways of the town. § 123. Application to board of supervisors .—If the lands necessary for the construction of the road or bridge of any such corporation in any county have not been procured by gift or purchase, and the right to take and use any part of any highway therein required by such corporation shall not have been pro¬ cured by agreement with the supervisor and commis¬ sioners of highways of the town in which such highway is situated, the corporation may make application to the board of supervisors of each county in which such bridge or road, or any part thereof, is to be located, for authority to build, lay out and construct the same, and take the necessary real estate for such purpose. Notice of the application shall be published in at least one public news- 240 The Highway Law of New Yoke. Commissioners to lay out road. paper in each county for six successive weeks, specify¬ ing the time and place where it will be made, the location, length and breadth of any such bridge, and the length and route of any such proposed road, its character, and each town, city and village in or through which it is to be constructed. The application may be made at any annual or special meeting of the board, and if the corporation desires a special meeting therefor any three members of the board may fix a time when the same shall be held, and notice thereof shall be served upon each of the other supervisors by delivering the same to him personally or leaving it at his place of resi¬ dence at least twenty days before the minutes,* and the expenses of the special meeting and of notifying the mem¬ bers of the board thereof shall be paid by the corporation. All persons interested therein or owning real estate in any of the towns through which it is proposed to construct the road may appear and be heard upon the hearing of the application. The board may take testimony in respect thereto, or authorize it to be taken by a committee of the board and may adjourn the hearing from time to time. After hearing the application the board may, by an order entered in its meetings,* authorize the corporation to con¬ tract such bridge or road and to take the real estate neces¬ sary for that purpose, and a copy of the order certified by the clerk of the board shall be recorded by the corporation in the office of the clerk of the county in which such bridge or road or any part thereof is to be located before any act shall be done under it. See County Law, § 62, Appendix. § 124. Commissioners to lay out road .—If the appli¬ cation for the construction of any such road is granted, * So in the original The Highway Law of New York. 241 Possession of and title to real estate. the board shall appoint three disinterested persons, not owners of real estate in any town, through which the road is to be constructed or in any adjoining town, commissioners to lay out the road. They shall take the constitutional oath of office, and without unnecessary delay lay out the route of such road in such manner as in their opinion will best promote the public interests; they shall hear all per¬ sons interested who shall apply to be heard and may take testimony in relation thereto, and shall cause an accurate survey and description of the road and the necessary build¬ ings and gates, signed and acknowledged by them to be recorded in the clerk’s office of the county. If the road is situated in more than one county, such survey and description shall be separate as to that portion in each county and filed in the office of the clerk of the county in* which it relates. The corporation shall pay each commis¬ sioner three dollars for every day spent by him in the per¬ formance of his duties and his necessary expenses. § 125. Possession of and title to real estate .—The route so laid out and surveyed by the commissioners shall be the route of the road, and the corporation may enter upon, take and hold for the purposes of its incorporation, the lands described in such survey as necessary for the construction of its road, and requisite buildings and gates. If for any cause the owner of any of such lands shall be incapable of selling the same or his name or residence can not, with reasonable diligence be ascertained 01 the cor¬ poration is unable to agree with the owner for the purchase thereof it may acquire title thereto by condemnation. § 126. Use of turnpike road by plank-road.—No plank-road shall be made on the roadway of any turnpike * So in the original. 16 242 The Highway Law of New York. Use of turnpike road by plank-road. corporation without its consent, except for the purpose of crossing the same. Any plank-road corporation may con¬ tract with any connecting turnpike corporation for the purchase of its roadway or a part thereof, or of its stock, on such terms as may be mutually agreed upon, and such stock, if purchased, shall be held by the plank-road cor¬ poration for the benefit of its stockholders in proportion to the amount of stock held by each, and a transfer of stock in the plank-road corporation shall carry with it its pro¬ portional amount of the turnpike stock, and entitle the holder thereof to his share of the dividends derived there¬ from. After the purchase of the whole of the stock of any such turnpike corporation by such plank-road corporation the directors of the plank-road corporation shall be the directors of the turnpike corporation, and shall manage its affairs and render an account of the same annually to the stockholders of the plank-road corporation. If the plank- road corporation is dissolved, its stockholders at the time of dissolution shall be the stockholders of the turnpike cor¬ poration in proportion to the amount of stock held by each, and the stock of the turnpike corporation shall thereafter be deemed to be divided into shares equal in number to the shares of stock of the late plank-road corporation, and scrip therefor shall be issued accordingly to each of the last stockholders of the plank-road corporation, and the officers of the turnpike corporation shall be the same in number as provided for in its charter or certificate of incorporation, and shall be chosen by such former stock, holders of the plank-road corporation or their assigns. A corporation owning a turnpike road on or adjoining which a plank-road shall have been constructed may abandon that portion of its road on or adjoining the route of which a plank-road is actually constructed and used. The Highway Law of Hew Yoek. 243 Width and construction of road. § 127. Width and construction of road .—Every such plank-road shall be so constructed as to make, secure and maintain a smooth and permanent road, the track of which shall be made of timber, plank or other hard material forming a hard and even surface, and every such turnpike road shall be bedded with stone, gravel or such other material as may be found on the line thereof, and faced with broken stone or gravel, forming a hard and even surface with good and sufficient ditches on each side wherever practicable, and all such roads shall be laid out at least four rods wide and the arch or bed at least eighteen feet wide, and shall be so constructed as to permit carri¬ ages and other vehicles conveniently to pass each other, and to pass on and off such road where intersected with other roads. Any corporation which shall have once laid its road with plank may relay the same, or any part thereof, with broken stone, gravel, shells or other hard materials, forming a good and substantial road. Any plank-road or turnpike corporation may lay iron rails on its road suitable for the use of wagons and vehicles drawn by horses or animals over its road, but no other motive power shall be used thereon. § 128. Construction of bridges; obstruction of rafts prohibited.— Every bridge constructed by any such cor¬ poration shall be built with a good and substantial railing or * sliding at least four and one-half feet high, and over any stream navigable by rafts the corporation shall keep the channel of the stream above and below the bridge free and clear from all deposits, formed or occasioned by the erection of the bridge, which shall in any wise obstruct the navigation thereof, and shall be liable to all persons unreasonably or unnecessarily delayed or hindered in passing the same for all damages sustained thereby. * So in the original. 244 The Highway Law of New York. Certificate of completion of road or bridge. Nothing in this act shall be construed to authorize the bridging of any river or water-course where the tide ebbs and flows, or any waters over which the federal authorities have any control, unless the consent of such federal au¬ thorities be first obtained; nor the construction of any bridge within the limits prescribed by any existing law for the erection or maintenance of any other bridge. Amended by L. 1892, ch. 6S6, by L. 1895, ch. 722, and by L. 1896, ch. 778. § 129. Certificate of completion of road or bridge . —When any such corporation ;shall .have completed its bridge or road or any five consecutive miles thereof, it may apply to the commissioners of highways of each town in which the completed road or bridge is situated to inspect the same, and if a majority of the commissioners are sat¬ isfied that the road or bridge is made and completed as required by law and in a manner safe and convenient for the public use, they shall make a certificate to that effect, which shall be filed in the office of the county clerk. Each commissioner shall be paid by the corporation two dollars per day for his services and necessary expenses. § 130. Gates, rates of toll; and exemption .—Upon filing such certificate such corporation may erect a toll- gate at such bridge or one or more toll-gates upon the road so inspected, and may demand and receive the following rates of toll, a printed list of which shall be conspicuously posted at or over each gate: If a bridge corporation, such sum as shall be from time to time prescribed by the board of supervisors of the county or counties in which the bridge is located. If a turnpike or plank-road, for every vehicle drawn by one animal, one cent per mile, and one cent per mile for each additional animal; for every vehicle used The Highway Law of New York. 245 Gates; rates of toll; and exemption. chiefly for carrying passengers, three cents per mile, and one cent per mile for each additional animal; for every horse rode, led or driven, three-quarters of a cent per mile; for every score of sheep or swine, one and one-half cents per mile, and for every score of neat cattle, two cents per mile. When diverging roads strike any plank-road or turn* pike at or near any toll-gate, the board of supervisors of the county may direct that the toll charge shall commence from the point of such divergence, and only for the dis¬ tance traveled on such turnpike or plank-road, but fractions of cents may be made units of cents in favor of the plank- road or turnpike corporation. The corporation may from time to time commute, but not for a longer period than one year at any one time, with any person whose place of abode shall adjoin or be near to the road for the toll pay¬ able at the nearest gate on each side thereof, and the com¬ mutation may be renewed from year to year. No tolls shall be charged or collected at any gate, from any person going to or from public worship, a funeral, school, town meeting or election at which he is a voter to cast his vote, a military parade which he is required by law to attend, any court which he shall be required to attend as a juror or witness, nor when going to or from his required work upon any public highway, nor when transporting troops in the actual service of the United States; and no toll from persons living within one-half mile of the gate by the most usual traveled road when not engaged in the trans¬ portation of other persons or property except that persons living within one mile of the gate, by the most usually traveled road, in an incorporated village of over six thous¬ and inhabitants, when not engaged in the transporation of the persons or property shall be exempt from the pay¬ ment of toll. Amended by L. 1893, ch. 538. See County Law, §§ 62, 73, Appendix. 246 The Highway Law of New York. Toll gatherers. § 131. Toll gatherers. —Every such corporation may appoint toll gatherers to collect toll at each gate, who may detain and prevent from passing through the gate, any person riding, leading or driving animals or vehicles, sub¬ ject to the payment of toll, until the toll is paid, but if he shall unreasonably hinder or delay any traveler or pas¬ senger liable to the payment of toll, or shall demand or receive from any person more toll than he is authorized by law to collect, be shall forfeit to such person the sum of five dollars for every offense, and the corporation employ¬ ing him shall be liable for the payment thereof, and for any damages sustained by any person for acts done or omitted to be done by him in his capacity of toll gatherer, if, on recovery of judgment against the toll gatherer there¬ for, execution thereon shall be returned nulla bona. § 132. JPenalty for running a gate. — Any person who, with intent to avoid the payment of toll, shall pass any gate, without paying the toll required by law, or shall, with his team, carriage or horse, turn out of a turnpike or plank-road and pass any gate thereon on ground adjacent thereto, shall forfeit for each offense the sum of ten dollars to the corporation injured. § 133. Location of gates and change thereof. —No such corporation shall erect any toll-gate, house, or other building within ten rods of the front of any dwelling house, barn or other out house, without the written consent of the owner, and the county judge of the county in which the same is located shall, on application, order any build¬ ing so erected to be removed, and if a majority of the com¬ missioners of highways of any town, in which a toll- gate shall be located, or in an adjoining town, shall deem the location of any gate unjust to the public interests by The Highway Law of New York. 247 Location of gates and change thereof. reason of the proximity of diverging roads or otherwise, they may, on fifteen days’ written notice to the president or secretary of the corporation, apply to the county court of the county in which the gate is located, for an order to alter or change its location. On hearing such application, and viewing the premises, if deemed necessary, the court may make such order in the matter as may be just and proper. Either party may, within fifteen days thereafter, appeal to the general term of the supreme court from such order, on giving such security as the county judge, mak¬ ing the order, may prescribe. Upon such appeal the su¬ preme court, on motion of either party and on due notice, shall appoint three disinterested persons who are not resi¬ dents of any town through or into which such road shall run, or to or from which it is the principal thoroughfare, or any adjoining town, as referees to hear, try and deter¬ mine the appeal. Such referees shall view the premises and the location of the gate, and hear the parties in the same manner as on the trial of an issue of fact by a referee in a civil action in the supreme court, and report their decison thereon and the reasons therefor, and the evidence taken thereon to the supreme court, and such court shall review the report and render judgment thereon as justice and equity shall require, which shall be final and conclusive. The referees shall be entitled to the same fees as referees in civil actions in the supreme court, to be paid in the first instance by the party in whose favor their report or decision shall be, and the supreme court shall award judgment therefor, with such costs and ex¬ penses as it may deem reasonable, to the successful party on the appeal, which judgment shall be entered with the order affirming or reversing the order appealed from, and may be enforced by execution as a judgment of a court of record. If the order of the county court is not appealed from, it may be enforced, as the court may direct, and 248 The Highway Law of New York. Inspectors; their powers and duties. the court may allow such costs as maybe deemed just and equitable. § 134. Inspectors; their powers and duties .—The commissioners of highways of the several towns and the trustees or other officers in the incorporated cities and vil¬ lages of the state, who perform the duties of commission¬ ers of highways in such cities and villages, shall be inspectors of plank-roads and turnpikes, in their respec¬ tive towns, cities and villages. They shall inspect or cause to be inspected by one or more of them the whole of such turnpike or plank-roads as lies in their respective towns, villages or cities, at least once in each month, and when¬ ever written complaint shall be made to any inspector, that any part of such road lying in the town, city or vil¬ lage of such inspector is out of repair he shall, without delay, view and examine the part complained of. If such turnpike or plank-road shall be found to be out of repair or in condition not to be conveniently used by the public, such inspectors or either of them, or the one to whom such complaint shall have been made, shall give written notice to the toll-gatherer, or person attending the gate nearest the place out of repair or in bad condition to cause the same to be put in good condition before a time therein designated not less than forty-eight hours after the service of such notice, or to appear before the county court of the county in which that part of the road is situated, at a time in said notice designated, and show cause why such turnpike or plank-road should not be repaired or put in good condition as in said notice directed. If such road shall not have been theretofore repaired or put in good condition as in said notice directed then the county court shall, upon the return of such notice hear the allegations and proofs of the parties, and it shall always be open for that purpose; and if the court shall find such road to be The Highway Law of New York. 249 Inspectors ; their powers and duties. out of repair or in bad condition it may give additional time for the repair thereof, or it may order the gate near¬ est the place out of repair or in bad condition to be imme¬ diately upon the service of the order, or at a time therein specified, thrown open and to remain open until the road shall be fully repaired at the place directed to be repaired as aforesaid. Such order shall be served in the manner therein specified upon the keeper of the gate so ordered to be thrown open. Any inspector within the town, city or village where such road has been repaired pursuant to notice or order as aforesaid, may certify that such road has been duly repaired. The fees of the inspector for the services above mentioned shall be two dollars for each day actually employed, together with necessary witnesses fees, to be paid by the corporation or person whose road is so inspected, if the gates are ordered to be thrown open, but otherwise to be charged, audited and paid in the same manner as other fees of commissioners of highways. Any inspector w r ho neglects to perform his duties shall forfeit to the party aggrieved the sum of twenty-five dollars for each offense. Every keeper of a gate ordered to be thrown open, not immediately obeying such order or not keeping such gate open until such road shall be fully repaired or until a certificate that such road has been duly repaired is granted, or hindering or delaying any person in pass¬ ing, or taking any tolls from any person passing such gate during the time it ought to be open, shall forfeit to the party aggrieved the sum of ten dollars for each offense, and the corporation or person owning the road, who shall refuse or neglect to obey the requirements of any such order shall forfeit to the people of the state the sum of two hundred dollars for each offense. Amended by L. 1896, ch. 343. 250 The Highway Law of New York. Change of route ; extension and branches. § 135. Change of route; extension and branches. —Any such corporation may, with the written consent of the owners of two-thirds of its capital stock and of a ma¬ jority of the commissioners of highways of the town or towns, in which any change or extension is proposed to be made, construct branches to its main line or extend the same, or change the route of its road or any part thereof, and acquire the right of way for the same in the same manner as for the original or main line, and may, by any of its officers, agents or servants, enter upon lands for the purpose of making any examination, survey or map, doing no necessary damage; but before entering upon, taking or using such lands,the corporation shall make a survey and map thereof, designating thereon the lands of each owner or occupant intended to be taken or used, which shall be signed and acknowledged by the engineer making the same and the president of the corporation and filed in the office of the clerk of the county in which the land is situated. § 136. Milestones, guide-posts and hoist-gates .—A mile-stone or post shall be erected and maintained by every such corporation on each mile of its road, on which shall be fairly and legibly marked or inscribed the distance of such stone or post from the place of commencement of the road, and when the road shall commence at the end of any other road having mile-stones or posts on which the distance from any city or town is marked, a continua¬ tion of that distance shall in like manner be inscribed. A guide-post shall also be erected at the intersection of every public road leading into or from every turnpike or plank-road, on which shall be inscribed the name of the place to which such intersecting road leads in the direc¬ tion to which the name on the guide-post shall point. No plank-road or turnpike corporation shall erect or put The Highway Law of New York. 251 Location of office of corporation. up any hoist-gate on its road. Any person who shall wilfully break, cut down, deface or injure any mile-stone, post or gate on such road, or dig up, or injure any part of the road, or anything belonging thereto, shall forfeit to the corporation twenty-five dollars for every offense, in addition to the damages resulting from the act. § 137. Location of office of corporation .—Within two weeks after the formation of any such corporation its directors shall designate some place within a county in which its road or bridge, or some part thereof shall be contructed as its office, and shall give public notice thereof by publishing the same once in each week for three suc¬ cessive weeks in a public newspaper in the county, and shall file a copy of the notice in the office of the county clerk of every county in which any part of the road or bridge is, or is to be contructed, and if the location of such office shall be changed, like notice of the change shall be published and filed, in which shall be specified the time of making the change, before it shall take effect. Every notice, summons or other paper required by law to be served on the corporation may be served by leaving the same at such office with any person having charge thereof, at any time between nine o’clock in the forenoon, and five o’clock in the afternoon of any day except Sunday or a legal holiday. § 138. Consolidation of corporations and sale of franchise .—Any two or more of such corporations may consolidate into one corporation on such terms as the per¬ sons owning two-thirds of the stock of each corporation may agree upon, and may change the name of the road on filing in the office where the original certificates of incorporation were filed, a certificate containing the names 252 The Highway Law of New York. Surrender of road. of the roads so consolidated, and the name by which such road shall thereafter be known. Any plank-road or turn¬ pike corporation may, with the consent of the owners of sixty per cent, of its stock, sell, and convey the whole or any part of its rights, property and franchises to any other domestic plank-road or turnpike corporation, and such sale and conveyance shall vest the rights, property and franchises thereby transferred in the corporation to which they are conveyed for the term of its corporate existence. § 139. Surrender of road .— The directors of any plank-road or turnpike corporation *way abandon the whole or any part of its road at either or both ends thereof, upon obtaining the written consent of the stockholders* owning two-thirds of the stock of the corporation, which surrender shall be by a declaration in writing to that effect, attested by the seal of the corporation and acknowl¬ edged by the president and secretary. Such declaration and consent shall be filed and recorded in the clerk's office of the county in which any part of the road abandoned shall be situated, and the road so abandoned shall cease to be the road or the property of the corporation, and shall revert and belong to the several towns, cities and villages through which it was constructed, and the corporation shall no longer be liable to maintain it or to be assessed thereon, or permitted to collect tolls for traveling over the same, but without impairing its right to take toll on the remaining part of its road at the rate prescribed by law. And whenever any turnpike or plank-road company, now existing or hereafter created, shall abandon all or any part of its road within this state, in the manner above pro¬ vided, or whenever its charter or franchise of such com¬ pany shall be annulled or revoked, the road of such turn- * So in the original. The Highway Law of New York. 253 Taxation and exemption. pike or plank-road company shall revert to and belong to the several towns, cities and villages through which such road shall pass. And it shall be the duty of the several towns, cities and villages acquiring any road under this act to immediately lay out and declare the same a free public highway. And it shall be the duty of the several towns, cities and villages, to maintain and work every road acquired under the provisions of this act in the same man¬ ner as the other roads of such towns, cities and villages are maintained and worked. And any town, city or village may borrow money in the manner provided by law for the purpose of improving or repairing the same. Amended by L. 1896, ch. 964. § 140. Taxation and exemption .—So much of any bridge or toll-house of any bridge corporation as may be within any town, city or village, shall be liable to tax¬ ation therein as real estate. Toll-houses and other fix¬ tures and all property belonging to any plank-road or turnpike corporation shall be exempt from assessment and taxation for any purpose until the surplus annual receipts of tolls on its road over necessay repairs and a suitable reserve fund for repairs or relaying of plank, shall exceed seven per cent per annum on the first cost of the road. If the assessors of any town, village or city and the cor¬ poration disagree concerning any exemption claim, the corporation may appeal to the county judge of the county in which such assessment is proposed to be made, who shall, after due notice to both parties, examine the books and vouchers of the corporation, and take such further proof as he shall deem proper, and decide whether such corporation is liable to taxation under this section, and his decision shall be final. 254 The Highway Law of New York. Hauling logs and timber. § 141. Hauling logs and timber .—Any person who shall draw or haul or cause to be drawn or hauled, any logs, timber or other material upon the bed of any plank or turnpike road, unless the same shall be entirely elevated above the surface of the road on wheels or runners, and the road-bed shall be injured thereby, or who shall do or cause to be done an act by which the road-bed, or any ditch, sluice, culvert or drain appertaining to any turn¬ pike or plank-road shall be injured or obstructed, or shall divert or cause to be diverted, any stream of water so as to injure or endanger any part of such road, shall forfeit to the corporation the sum of five dollars for every offense in addition to the damages resulting from the wrongful act. § 142. Encroachment of fences . — Whenever the president or secretary of any turnpike or plank-road cor¬ poration shall notify any inspector of such roads in the county where situated that any person is erecting or has erected any fence or other structure upon any part of the premises lawfully set apart for any such turnpike or plank- road, the inspector shall examine into the facts and order the fence or other structure to be removed if it shall appear to be upon any part of any such road, and any person neglecting or refusing to remove the same within twenty •/ days or such further time not exceeding three months, as may be fixed by the inspector, shall forfeit to the corpora¬ tion the sum of five dollars for every day, during which the fence or other structure shall remain upon such road, but no such order shall require the removal of any fence, previously erected, between the first day of December and the first day of April. § 143. Penalty for fast driving over bridges. —Any plank-road, turnpike or bridge corporation may put up and The Highway Law of New York. 255 Acts of directors prohibited. maintain at conspicuous places at each end of any bridge, owned or maintained by it, the length of whose span is not less than twenty-five feet, a notice with the following words in large characters: “One dollar fine for riding or driving over this bridge faster than a walk.” Whoever shall ride or drive faster than a walk, over any bridge, upon which such notice shall have been placed, and shall then be, shall forfeit to the corporation the sum of one dollar for everv such offense. § 144. Acts of directors prohibited .—No director of any such corporation shall be concerned, directly or indi¬ rectly, in any contract for making or working ’any road belonging to it during the tim3 he shall be a director. No contractor for the making of such road, or any part thereof, shall make a new contract for the performance of his work, or any part of it, other than by hiring hands, teams, car¬ riages or utensils to be superintended and paid by himself, unless such new contract and its terms be laid before the board of directors and be approved by them. § 145. Actions for penalties .—No action to recover any penalty against any turnpike or plank-road corpora¬ tion, shall be commenced or maintained against it, or any of its officers or agents, unless commenced within thirty days after the penalty was incurred. § 146. JProof of incorporation . — In any action brought by or against any domestic turnpike or plank- road corporation, which shall have been in actual opera¬ tion, and in possession of a road upon which it has taken toll for five consecutive years, next preceding the com¬ mencement of the action, parol proof of such corporate existence and use shall be sufficient to establish the incor- 256 The Highway Law of New York. When stockholders to be directors. poration of the corporation, for all the puposes of the action, unless the opposing party shall set up a claim in his complaint or answer duly verified of title in himself to the road, or some part thereof stating the nature of his title and right to the immediate possession and use thereof. § 147. When stockholders to be directors .—When the whole number of stockholders in any turnpike or plank- road corporation shall not exceed the number of directors specified in the certificate of incorporation, each stock¬ holder shall be a director of such corporation, and the stockholders shall constitute the board of directors, what¬ ever may be their number, and a majority thereof shall be a quorum for the transaction of business. § 148. j Dissolution of corporation .—Every turnpike, plank-road or bridge corporation may be dissolved by the legislature when, by the income arising from tolls, it shall have been compensated for all moneys expended in pur¬ chasing, making, repairing and taking care of its road, and have received in addition thereto an average annual interest at the rate of ten per cent., and on such dissolu¬ tion all the rights and property of the corporation shall vest in the people of the state. Any such corporation, which shall not within two years from the filing of its cer¬ tificate of incorporation, have commenced the construction of its road or bridge and actually expended thereon ten per cent of its capital, or which shall not within five years from such filing have completed its road or bridge, or, in case such bridge is destroyed, shall not rebuild the same within five years, or which, for a period of five con¬ secutive years shall have neglected or omitted to exercise its corporate functions shall be deemed dissolved. Where the corporation has neglected or omitted for five years to The Highway Law of New York. 257 Towns must pay for lands not originally a highway. exercise its corporate functions, and its road-bed or right of way shall have been used as a public highway for that period, or where any such corporation shall have become dissolved, or where the road or any part of it of a turn¬ pike or plank-road corporation, or the bridge of any bridge corporation, shall have been discontinued, such road-bed or right of way, and such discontinued road or bridge, and the road or bridge of any such dissolved corporation, shall thereafter be a public highway, with the same effect as if laid out by the commissioners of highways of the town, and be subject to the laws relating to highways and the erection, repairing and preservation of bridges thereon. See County Law, § 80, Appendix. § 149. Towns must pay for lands not originally a highway .—When the corporate existence of any plank- road or turnpike corporation shall have ceased by limita¬ tion of time, or where any judgment of ouster or dissolu¬ tion, or restraining the exercise of its franchise has been rendered in any action against it, such portion of the line of its road as was built over lands which were originally purchased by it and not previously a public highway shall not be used as a public highway, nor be taken possession or control of by the town in which the same may be, or by any of the authorities thereof or be claimed or worked or used as a public highway until the town shall pay over to the treasurer, receiver or other legal representatives of the corporation, or its assigns, the principal sum of the amounts paid by it for such lands, as shown by the deeds of conveyance thereof to it, and every such judgment shall provide accordingly. Such payments shall be made within three months after the expiration of the corporate exis¬ tence of the corporation, or if any such judgment has been or shall be rendered within three months after service of 17 258 The Highway Law of New York. Highway labor upon line of plank-road or turnpike. written notice of the entry thereof on the supervisor of the town, and the person receiving such payment shall exe¬ cute a proper discharge therefor and a conveyance to the town of all the title and interest which the corporation had in such lands at the expiration of its corporate existence. § 150. Highway labor upon line of planlz-road or turnpike* —Every person liable for highway labor living or owning property on the line of any plank-road or turn¬ pike may, on written application to the commissioners of highways of the town, on any day previous to making out the highway warrant by the commissioners, be assessed for the highway labor upon his property upon the line of such road, in the discretion of the commissioners to be worked out upon the line of such road as a separate road district, and the commissioners shall make a separate list of the persons and property so assessed, as for a separate road district, and deliver the same to one of the directors of the corporation owning such road, who shall cause such highway labor to be worked out on such road in the same manner that oversees* of highways are required to do, and such directors shall possess the powers and have the authority to compel the performance of such highway labor for the payment of the tax therefor as such over¬ sees * now have bylaw, and shall make like returns to the commissioners of highways, and any person so assessed may commute for the highway labor assessed upon him or his property by paying the sum now fixed by law as the commutation for such highway labor. § 151. Extension of corporate existence .—No turn¬ pike, plank-road or bridge corporation shall extend its corporate existence, pursuant to the provisions of the * So in the original. The Highway Law of New York. 259 Extension of corporate existence. general corporation law, without the written consent of the persons owning at least two-thirds of its capital stock, nor without the consent of the board of supervisors of each county in which any part of its road or bridge is situated, which consent shall be given by a resolution of the board adopted at any regular or special meeting, and a copy of such resolution, certified by the clerk of the board, or verified by the affidavit of some member thereof, together with such consent of the stockholders, and a statement verified by the affidavit of the president and treasurer of the corporation, showing the actual capital expended upon the construction of the road, exclusive of repairs, the name of each town or ward through or into which the road passes, and, if any part of the road shall have been aban¬ doned, the actual cost of the remaining part, exclusive of repairs, shall be filed with the certificate of the contin¬ uance of the corporate existence. No further abandon¬ ment of any road belonging to a corporation whose cor¬ porate existence has been so extended shall be made, except with the consent of a majority of the board of supervisors of the county in which the abandoned portion of the road may lie, which consent shall be filqd in the office of the clerk of the county. 260 The Highway Law of New York. Navigation law. NAVIGATION LAW. ARTICLE V. Rivers and Streams as Public Highways. Section 70. Dams and bridges. 71. Booms, etc., to be opened on notice, penalty for failure. 72. Shutes and aprons in connection with dams, etc., damages to be paid. 73. Marks on logs and timber to be recorded. 74. Persons prohibited from landing logs, etc. 75. Undertakings of persons floating lumber and logs. 76. Application of article. Section 70. Dams and bridges .—No dam shall be erected oil any river or stream in this state, recognized by law or use as a public highway for the purpose of floating and running lumber, logs or other timber, over or upon the same, unless there be built in such dam an apron, at least fifteen feet in width, in the middle of the current of such river or stream, of a proper slope for the safe pass¬ age of lumber, logs and other timber. No bridge shall be built over any such river or stream in such a manner as to obstruct or prevent the free and uninterrupted passage of lumber, logs and other timber down and along such river or stream. § 71. Booms, etc., to be opened on notice; penalty for failure .—Every person who shall build any boom or other obstruction in the waters of any river or stream, for The Highway Law of New York. 261 Shutes and aprons in connection with dams, &c., damages to be paid. the purpose of stopping or securing lumber, logs or other timber, shall within ten days after the receipt of a written notice from any person who shall have lumber, logs or other timber to transport on such river or stream, open such boom or remove such obstruction or part thereof so as to permit the assorting and passage of such lumber, logs and other timber through and down such river or stream. Every person who wilfully obstructs, by booms or otherwise, the channel of any river or stream so as to hinder or delay the free passage of lumber, logs or timber over or through the same, shall be liable to a penalty of fifty dollars for each day of the continuance of such ob¬ struction, to be recovered by the person aggrieved thereby, and in addition to such penalty, shall be liable for all damages caused by such obstruction. § 72. Shiites and aprons in connection with dams, etc., damages to be paid .—Any person desiring to float or run lumber, logs or timber down a river or stream, recognized by law or use as a public highway, may con¬ struct a shute or apron in connection with any dam across such river or stream, and may reconstruct any booms or other works already constructed in, over or across such river or stream, in such manner as to allow lumber, logs or other timber to pass the same, and may remove obstruc¬ tions in such river or stream and construct such other piers, booms or other works as may be necessary for the passage of lumber, logs or other timber over and through the channels of such river or stream. In such construc¬ tions no injury or damage shall be done to the owner or occupant of any such booms, dams or other works, or to the owner or occupant of any land on which such piers, booms or other works are constructed, or lands flooded thereby. Every such person shall pay to the owner or occupant of such lands all damages he may sustain by The Highway Law of New York. 262 Marks on logs and timber to be recorded. reason of the construction of such piers, booms, or other works, or the flooding of lands thereby. In case the amount of such damages can not be agreed upon by the parties interested, the same shall be appraised by three commissioners to be appointed by the county judge of the county in which the owner or occupant claiming damages shall reside, on the application of any person interested in the appraisal of such damages, on three days’ notice in writing to the opposite parties of the time and place of making such application. Any person making claim for damages under this article, shall apply within one year after the occurrence of the same, or be debarred from re¬ covering the same. This article shall apply to all booms or other works heretofore or hereafter constructed, but shall not be constructed so as to impair or abridge any private or individual rights, except so far as may be nec¬ essary for the improvement of rivers and streams, for floating or running lumber, logs or other timber down the same. § 73. Marks on logs and timber to be recorded .— Every person who shall run any logs or timber down any river or stream recognized by law or use as a public high¬ way, shall select some mark different from any mark previously recorded, and shall put the same on each log or stick of timber in some conspicuous place, and shall cause such mark to be recorded in the county clerk’s office of each county in or through which such river or stream runs. The county clerk shall be entitled to the sum of fifty cents for recording such mark, to be paid by the per¬ son having the same recorded, and a copy of said entry, certified by the clerk, shall be presumptive evidence that the logs or timber so marked are the property of the per¬ son by whom such mark was selected and recorded. The Highway Law of New York. 263 Persons prohibited from landing logs, etc. § 74. Persons prohibited f rom landing logs, etc .— No person shall stop, take up or draw to, or lodge on the shore of any river or stream used for floating logs, timber or lumber, or on any island therein, any lumber, logs, timber, boards or planks floating in such river or stream, without the consent of the owner thereof. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall for each vio¬ lation forfeit to the person aggrieved thereby the sum of ten dollars, and in addition thereto shall be liable to the owner of such logs, timber or lumber for all damages sus¬ tained thereby. § 75. Undertakings of persons floating lumber and logs .—Every person intending to float or run lumber, logs or other timber upon any river or stream recognized by law or use as a public highway, shall execute a bond to the people of the state with sufficient sureties in the sum of five thousand dollars as an indemnity against all loss and damage that may be caused to any property, by reason of the use of such river or stream as provided in this article, and such bond may be sued upon by any person suffering such loss or damage. Such bond shall be approved by the county judges of the counties through which such river or stream flows and shall be filed in one of the offices of the clerks of such counties, and certified copies thereof in the other of such offices. No person shall float or run any lumber, logs or timber upon such streams until such bond shall have been executed, approved and filed. § 76. Application of article .—This article shall not apply to the Hudson river, the Alleghany river and its tributaries; nor the Delaware river and its tributaries, nor the waters located in Franklin county, nor the Beaver 264 The Highway Law of New York. Application of article. river and its tributaries, nor the Oswegatchie and its trib¬ utaries, nor the Grass river and its tributaries, nor the Raequette river and its tributaries, nor the West Canada creek and its tributaries, nor the Black river and its tribu¬ taries above its junction with the Moose river, nor the waters located in Lewis county used for floating or driving logs or lumber; nor be construed to repeal any existing law now applicable to any creek or river in this state. The Highway Law of New York. 265 Canal law. CANAL LAW. § 110. Alteration of roads ,—If the superintendent of public works, or assistant superintendent having charge of the work, deems it necessary to discontinue or alter any part of a public road, because of its interference with the proper location or construction of any work on the canals, either of construction, repairs or improvement, he shall direct such discontinuance or alteration to be made, and file an accurate description of the part of such road so dis¬ continued and laid out anew in the office of the town clerk of the town in which the same is situated; and from the time of filing such description, such road shall be so altered. The passage of the part of such road so discontinued or altered shall not be obstructed until such superintendent or his assistant opens and works the part of such road so laid out anew, as to render the same passable. The written certificate of a justice of the peace of the county in which such road is situated that the part so laid out anew has been so opened and worked, shall be sufficient evidence thereof. Every alteration made by any engineer on any public road upon either of the canals before the first day of January, 1828, shall be deemed valid in law from the time of such alteration. § 111. Farm 6 Laws 1898, chapter 115. maps, plans and specifications, and of his certificate of the approval of the highway or section thereof so designated as aforesaid. § 6. After the receipt thereof upon a majority vote of such board of supervisors, it may adopt a resolution that such highway or section thereof so approved shall be con¬ structed under the provisions of this act, or of any existing act, and thereupon shall transmit a certified copy of such resolution to such state engineer. § 7. In case the boundaries of such proposed highway shall deviate from the existing highway, the board of supervisors must make provision for securing the requisite right of way prior to the actual commencement of the work of improvement. § 8. Upon receipt of the certified copy of the resolution provided in section six, such state engineer shall advertise for bids for two successive weeks in a newspaper published at the county seat of such county, and in such other news¬ paper as shall be deemed of advantage for the construction of such highway or section thereof, according to such plans and specifications, and award such contract to the lowest responsible bidder, except that he may in his discretion award the contract to the board of supervisors of the county or the town board or boards of the town or towns in which such highway lies, and except that no contract shall be awarded at a greater sura than the estimate provided in section five. But if no bid otherwise acceptable be made within such estimate, such state engineer may amend his estimate, certify the same to the board of supervisors, and upon the adoption by it of a resolution as provided in section six based on such amended estimate, proceed anew to obtain The Highway Law’ of New York. 357 Laws 1898, chapter 115. bids and award the contract as herein provided. Such engineer may reject any or all bids, and before entering into any contract for such construction, he shall require a bond with sufficient sureties, conditioned that if the pro¬ posal shall be accepted the party thereto will perform the work upon the terms proposed and within the time pre¬ scribed and in accordance with the plans and specifica¬ tions; and as a bond of indemnity against any direct or indirect damages that shall be suffered or claimed during the construction of such road and until the same is accepted. The people of the state of New York shall in no case be liable for any damages suffered. Partial pay¬ ments may be provided for in the contracts and paid in the manner herein provided when certified to by such state engineer to an amount not to exceed seventy-five per cen¬ tum of the value of the work done; twenty-five per cen¬ tum of the contract price shall be retained until the entire work has been accepted. Whenever a county engineer has been appointed in the county in which such highway or section thereof is to be constructed, he shall have gen¬ eral charge and supervision of the work under the direc¬ tion of such state engineer and shall report to him from time to time the progress of the work and such facts in relation thereto as may be required. If there is no county engineer, such state engineer shall have some competent person to superintend and have engineering supervision of the work. § 9. One-half of the expense of the construction thereof shall be paid by the state treasurer upon "the warrant of the comptroller, issued upon the requisition of such engineer, out of any specific appropriations made to carry out the provisions of this act. And one-half of the expense thereof shall be a county charge in the first instanoe, and the same shall be paid by the county treasurer of the 358 The Highway Law of New York. Laws 1898, chapter 115. county in which such highway or section thereof is, upon the requisition of such engineer, but the amount so paid shall be apportioned by the board of supervisors, so that if the same has been built upon a resolution of said board without petition, thirty-five per centum of the cost of con¬ struction shall be a general county charge; and fifteen per centum shall be a charge upon the town in which the improved highway or section thereof is located, and if the same has been built upon a resolution of said board after petition as provided in section two, thirty-five per centum shall be a general county charge and fifteen per centum shall be assessed upon and paid by the owners of the lands benefited in the proportion of the benefits accruing to said owners as determined by the town assessors in the next section hereof. § 10. The town assessors of any town in which any high¬ way or section thereof has been improved or constructed pursuant to petition as provided in section two of this act, shall have power and it shall be their duty upon receiving notice from the board of supervisors of the county in which said town is located, of the cost of construction or improve¬ ment of such highway or section thereof in such town, to assess an amount equal to fifteen per centum of said total cost upon the lands fronting or abutting on such highway or section thereof. Such assessment shall be apportioned according to the benefits accruing to the owners of the lands so located, according to the best judgment of said assessors, upon at least ten days’ notice of the time and place of such apportionment to the persons affected thereby, and after such persons have had an opportunity to be heard; and the assessments so made when duly attested by the oaths of such assessors shall be collected in the same manner as the general taxes of such town are collected. Amended by L. 1899, ch. 92, taking effect March 16, 1899. § 11. The construction and improvement of highways and sections thereof, under the provisions of this act, shall be taken up and carried forward in the order in which The Highway Law of Hew York. 359 Laws 1898, chapter 115. they are finally designated, as determined by the date of the receipt in each case of the certified copy of the resolution pro¬ vided in section six by such engineer as hereinbefore provided. Sec. 12. Upon the completion of such highways or sections thereof, so constructed by such engineer, and his acceptance of the same, and after payment has been made, as herein provided, such engineer shall inform the board of supervisors of such county that the highways or sections thereof designated have been constructed as herein provided, and he may serve notice on said board to accept such highway thus constructed, which notice shall be filed in the office of the clerk of said county; and twenty days after the service and filing of said notice, such highway or section thereof shall be deemed accepted by said board of super¬ visors of such county; and thereafter they shall maintain the same as a county road, and apportion the expense as they may be empowered by law, and the commissioners of highways of the town or towns respectively wherein such improved highways lie shall care for and keep the same in repair, under the direction and supervision of the state engineer and surveyor and such rules and regulations as he may prescribe. Amended by L. 1900, ch. 293, taking effect April 6, 1900. Sec. 13. All persons owning property abutting on such road so improved, or residing thereon, shall thereaftei pay all high way taxes assessed against them in money, in the manner now provided by law. Sec. 14. Whenever any county has had aid in building any such highway, and it seems advantageous to such state engineer that a section or sections of highway, not exceed¬ ing one mile in length, should be constructed under this act to connect these roads together, and would be of great public utility and general convenience, he may serve notice on the board of supervisors of such county, and shall file one in the county clerk’s office, designating the highways already constructed and the existing terminal, and the 360 The Highway Law op New York. Laws 1898, chapter 115. section or sections, in his opinion, necessary to be con¬ structed and his reasons therefor. And it shall be the duty of the board of supervisors to provide for the con¬ struction of such connecting highway or section thereof, within one year after the service and filing of such notice under this act. § 15. In addition to his other powers and duties, the state engineer and surveyor shall compile statistics relative to the public highways throughout the state, and shall collect all information in regard thereto deemed exped¬ ient. He shall investigate and determine upon various methods of road construction adapted to different sections of the state, and as to the best methods of construction and maintenance of roads and bridges, and such other information relating thereto as he shall deem appropriate. He may be consulted at all reasonable times by county, city, town or village officers having care and authority over highways and bridges, and shall advise such officers relative to the conduction, repair, alteration, or mainten¬ ance of the same; and shall furnish such other informa¬ tion and advice as may be requested by persons interested in the construction and maintenance of public highways, and shall, at all times, lend his aid in promoting highway improvement throughout the state. He shall hold in each year at least one public meeting in each county, and shall cause due notice of such meeting to be given. He shall co-operate with all highway officers and shall assist county and town authorities, and when requested by them, fur¬ nish them with plans and directions for the improvement of the public highways and bridges. § 16. He shall report annually to the legislature con¬ cerning all the work performed by him, together with such recommendations upon the subject of highway con- The Highway Law of New Yobk. 61 Laws 1898, chapter 133. struction and maintenance as to him shall seem appro¬ priate. § 17. The commissioners of highways and town board of any town, and the board of supervisors of any county, and all other officers who now have or may hereafter have by law the care and supervision of the public highways and bridges shall, from time to time, upon his written request furnish him with all available information in con¬ nection with the building and maintenance of the public highways and bridges in their respective localities. § 18. The operation of this act shall not be affected by any special act, but the highways may be improved under this act or such special act wherever the same may now exist. § 19. This act shall take effect immediately. LAWS 1898, CHAPTER 133. AN ACT to 'provide for the employment of convicts on the highways in Clinton county. Section 1. The superintendent of state prisons is hereby authorized to employ not to exceed two hundred convicts confined in Clinton prison in the improvement of the highways between said Clinton prison and the village of Saranac, in the town of Saranac, in the county of Clinton. The sum of five thousand dollars, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated out iof any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated for team hire, officers’ salaries, tools, equipment and 382 The Highway Law of New York. Laws 1898, chapter 224. other incidental expenses necessarily required to carry out the provisions of this act. The sum hereby appropriated shall be payable by the treasurer, upon the warrant of the comptroller, to be expended under the direction of the superintendent of state prisons. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately. LAWS 1898, CHAPTER 224. AN ACT to authorize the supervisors of Albany county to appoint sidepath commissioners with power to regulate the use of bicycles within such county , to license the use of the same, and to expend the funds raised thereby in the construction and maintenance of sidepaths for bicycles . Whole act amended by L. 1899, ch. 428, talcing effect April 25, 1899. § 1. The members of the board of sidepath commis¬ sioners of the county of Albany [are continued in office, until the expiration of their terms respectively. Such board shall hereafter consist of seven resident citizens of such county, each of whom shall be a cyclist, four of whom shall be residents of the city of Albany, one a resident of the city of Cohoes, one a resident of the city of Watervliet, and one a resident of one of the towns of such county. Such commissioners shall serve without compen¬ sation, but shall be allowed their actual and necessary dis¬ bursements in the performance of their duties, bills for which shall be paid out of the sidepath fund. Such a commisssioner hereafter appointed for a full term shall hold office for three years, from and including the first day of January of the year in which he is appointed. A commissioner hereafter appointed to fill a vacancy, occur¬ ring otherwise than by expiration of term, shall be appointed for the unexpired term of his predecesor in office. Whenever a vacancy shall occur in the office oi The Highway Law of New York. 363 Laws 1898, chapter 224. such commissioner by expiration of term or otherwise, the chairman and secretary of the board shall file a notice with the county judge, specifying the name of such com¬ missioner, the city or town in which he resides, and the term for which his successor should be appointed. Upon the receipt of such notice, the county judge shall appoint a person to fill such vacancy and file such appointment in the office of the county clerk. The county clerk shall forthwith notify such person of his appointment, and he shall take office immediately upon filing his written accept¬ ance thereof with the county clerk. If any person so appointed fails to file such acceptance within ten days after receiving notice thereof, or if any member of the board shall fail to attend three consecutive regular meet¬ ings without r being excused by a vote of the board, the board of sidepath commsisioners may declare the place vacant by a majority vote of the board. The board of sidepath commissioners shall have power to temporarily fill any vacancy on the board, and the person so chosen shall hold office until the county judge shall select a per¬ son to fill such vacancy, and until the person so selected shall have filed his acceptance of the office, as provided by this section. § 2. Such board of sidepath commissioners is hereby authorized and empowered to construct and maintain sidepaths along any public road or sections thereof, of said county outside the limits of incorporated cities and villages, excepting that no sidepath shall be constructed along any road which is not more than two rods wide, without the approval of the commissioner of highways or other officer performing similar duties, or the approval of the supervisor, of each town in which said sidepath shall be built. No sidepath shall be constructed upon or along any regularly constructed sidewalk or between such side¬ walk and the highway except by and with the consent of the owners of the lands abutting on such sidewalk. Such paths shall not be less than three feet nor more than six feet wide, without the consent of the abutting owners, and shall be constructed within the outside lines and along and upon either side of such public roads as the board of sidepath commissioners shall determine. The board of sidepath commissioners is also authorized and empowered 364 The Highway Law of New York. Laws 1898, chapter 224. to lay out, construct and repair sidepaths along the public streets of such county, by and with the consent of the officers having jurisdiction over the same. No member or any number of members of such sidepath commission shall begin or in any way authorize the construction of a sidepath, to be built from the sidepath fund, till the record of the proceedings of the board shows that it has voted to construct such path. § 3. Such board of sidepath commissioners shall, upon entering upon its duties, and in each calendar year there¬ after, determine upon a form of license to consist of a suitable inscription or device to be affixed or attached to a bicycle, and shall upon payment of a fee, to be deter¬ mined by such commissioners, of not less than fifty cents nor more than one dollar, cause the same to be affixed or attached in some prominent place upon the left-hand side of the front fork, or upon the lower tube of the frame, within six inches from the head, in such manner that the license device will show on the left side of the lower tube, of each bicycle presented for such purpose. Such license shall be plainly numbered and shall not be valid unless attached to a bicycle in the places aforesaid. Each such license shall be good during the calendar year in which it is so attached or affixed to a bicycle and no longer. The sidepaths now and which may be hereafter constructed in said county are hereby placed under the control and direc¬ tion of the board of sidepath commissioners; but the owners of lands abutting on a sidepath shall not be pro¬ hibited from constructing, improving and maintaining a sidewalk upon or along a sidepath on which their lands abut; provided that the riding of any bicycle upon any sidewalk which shall have been, or at any time hereafter shall be constructed at the expense of wheelmen or cyclists, shall not be prohibited, unless the road or a portion thereof, in front of such sidewalk shall be maintained in a suitable condition for the use of bicycles. Said sidepaths are hereby declared to be for the exclusive use of bicycle riders and pedestrians; but bicycle riders shall have the right of way on the beaten track worn by bicycles on such paths. No person shall ride a bicycle on such sidepaths unless there shall appear upon such bicycle a valid license, issued and attached as above provided, excepting that The Highway Law of Kew York. 865 Laws 1898, chapter 224. non-residents of the county of Albany may purchase a license badge from 'any county sidepath commission* which has been lawfully appointed by a board of super¬ visors or a county judge, and which is constructing or maintaining sidepatlis for the use of cyclists in any other county in this state, and extends like privileges to non¬ resident cyclists; and such license shall be valid in the county of Albany only for the use of such non-residents, and when attached to a bicycle in the places before men¬ tioned in this section. § 4. The license fees collected by the said board of side- path commissioners shall be deposited on or before the first day of each month with the county treasurer, by whom they shall be credited to a special fund, to be called “the sidepath fund" upon which the board of sidepath com¬ missioners is authorized to draw warrants, signed by a majority of such board; but no warrant shall be so drawn in excess of the amout actually on deposit, nor shall any contract or purchase be made exceeding the amount of such fund at the time of making such contract or purchase. All warrants or orders so issued against such fund shall be accompanied by vouchers for the work performed or purchases made, duly audited by a majority of said board of sidepath commissioners, and such warrant or order with the vouchers thereto attached, shall be sufficient warrant to the said county treasurer to pay the same. § 5. The said board of sidepath commissioners shall devote the moneys so collected to the repairing of existing sidepaths in the county of Albany, to the construction of new sidepaths; to the planting of shade trees along such paths after the consent of the owners of abutting lands to the planting of said trees has been obtained; to the main¬ taining of order upon the same, and the enforcement of such necessary rules for the use thereof as may be, from time to time, adopted by the said board of sidepath com¬ missioners. § 6. Any person riding a bicycle upon any sidepath now existing or hereafter constructed in the county of Albany in violation of section three, shall be guilty of a mis¬ demeanor, and shall upon conviction be punishable by a fine of not less than five dollars or more than twenty-five dollars. 366 The Highway Law of New York. Laws 1898, chapter 224. § 7. Any person who shall wilfully drive, lead, stand or hitch any horse, cattle, sheep, swine or other animals upon any sidepath now constructed or hereafter to be con¬ structed in the county of Albany, except for the purposes of access to, and egress from, lands abutting on the high¬ way, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. § 8 The location of the sidepaths heretofore constructed in the county of Albany is hereby ratified and confirmed, and any person willfully obstructing, injuring or destoy- ing any portion thereof, or any portion of a sidepath here¬ after constructed, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. § 9. Said board of sidepath commissioners shall be authorized to adopt rules covering the speed, use of lamps and signals by cyclists using the paths in said county. Violation of rules so adopted shall constitue a mis¬ demeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not exceed¬ ing five dollars. § 10. The said board of sidepath commissioners shall have the power to appoint one or more persons in each city, village and town, to be known as sidepath police, who shall serve without compensation except for their actual disbursements, such bills to be audited and paid as provided in section four of this act, and who sh all have power to make arrests for the violations of this act, and also for the violations of sections six hundred and fify-two (relative to sidepaths) and six hundred and fifty-four-a (relative to deposits of certain substances on the public road) of the penal code. § 11. Courts of special sessions having jurisdiction to try misdemeanors, as provided by section fifty-six of the code of criminal procedure, shall have exclusive jurisdic¬ tion to try offenders in all cases occurring under this act, in the same manner as in other cases, where they now have jurisdiction and to render and enforce judgment to the extent herein provided. § 12. The said board of sidepath commissioners shall keep a book or books of record, containing the names and addresses of all persons to whom licenses shall be issued under the provisions of this act, and records of all pro¬ ceedings of said board. Said books shall be open to public inspection during customary business hours. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately. The Highway Law of New York. 367 Laws 1898, chapter 277. LAWS 1898, CHAPTER 277. AN ACT to authorize the construction and maintenance of bicycle paths or wheelways within the limits of the highways in Columbia county. Section 1. Any individual or individuals, corporation, association or bicycle club, residing or having an office in Columbia county, is hereby authorized and empowered, with the consent of any one of the commissioners of high¬ ways of the town, to construct bicycle paths or wheelways, not over eight feet in width, within the limits of any or all the highways, outside of the main traveled portion thereon, in any or all of the towns of Columbia county, and there¬ after to use and maintain the same. § 2. All bridges, sluiceways, culverts, trestles, crossings and the path or wheelway itself shall be so constructed as to not interfere with that portion of the highway in use by teams and vehicles, except by the consent of the commis¬ sioner of highways of the respective towns in which the said path or wheelway is being constructed. § 3. Any and all crossings of the highway shall be con¬ structed at grade therewith, and at all places where ingress and egress is had, to and from, the adjacent property, suitable crossings shall be constructed and maintained. The said paths or wheelways shall be constructed as nearly on a grade with the highways as the grade and conditions of the lands on the sides thereof will permit, without making unnecessary cuts and fills. § 4. All portions of any said paths or wheelways which have already been constructed or which may hereafter be constructed, may be used for bicycle and tricycle riding and by pedestrians, and shall not be used for any other 368 The Highway Law of New York. Laws 1898, chapter 277. purpose or purposes. And all portions of any said paths or wheelways which have already been constructed by or for the use of bicyclists, and which are now used as bicycle paths, or wheelways, are hereby legalized, ratified and confirmed, and shall have the same standing in law as paths hereafter constructed under the provisions of this act. § 5. The placing or causing to be placed on any part of said paths or wheelways, of any iron, glass, earthenware or any other substance injurious to bicycle tires or liable to be injurious thereto, and the injuring or obstructing of any of the said paths or wheelways in any manner, and the leading, riding, or driving of any horse or horses or any other animal or animals on any of the said paths or wheelways and the drawing or placing of any wagon, buggy, cart, sleigh, cutter or any other conveyance on any portion of any of the said paths or wheelways, and the willful leading, driving or allowing of any animal to walk or run upon any of the said paths or wheelways, is hereby prohibited. § 6. Nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit the lawful crossing of the said paths or wheelways with any animal or animals or with any conveyance or convey¬ ances. § 7. Any person who shall (willfully and maliciously) do or commit any of the acts hereinbefore prohibited, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. § 8. This act shall take effect immediately. The Highway Law of Hew Yoek. 368a Laws 1899, chapter 152. LAWS 1899, CHAPTER 152. An ACT in relation to the use of bicycles on sidepaths , for licensing bicycles , for the appointment of sidepath commissioners and to provide for the construction, maintenance, regulation , preservation and shading of sidepaths. (Became a law March 27, 1899.) Whole act amended by L. 1900, eh. 640, taking effect April 24, 1900. Sec. 1. The county judge of any county except Albany, may, upon the petition of fifty resident wheelmen of such county, appoint from the resi¬ dent citizens thereof, five or seven persons, the number to be determined by such judge, giving to each city and to one or more towns in such county, a representation on the board as near as possible in proportion to the probable number of cyclists residing in such localities, each of whom shall be a cyclist, who shall constitute a board of sidepath commissioners for such county. The terms of such commissioners if the number be five, shall be one, two, three, four and five years respectively, and if the number appointed be seven, the terms of such commissioners shall be, two to serve one year, two to serve two years, and one each to serve three, four and five years, from and including the first day of January of the year in which the appointment is made, to be determined by such commissioners by lot, within one month after their appointment. A commissioner thereafter appointed for a full term, shall hold office for five years from and including the first day of January of the year in which the appointment is made. A commissioner appointed to fill a vacancy occurring otherwise than by expiration of term, shall be appointed for the unexpired term of his predecessor in office. Whenever a vacancy shall occur in the office of such a commissioner, by expiration of term or other¬ wise, the chairman or secretary of the board shall immediately file a notice with the county judge, specifying the name of such commissioner, the city or town in which he resided, and the term for which his successor shall be appointed. Upon the receipt of such notice the county judge shall thereupon appoint a person to fill such vacancy and file such appointment in the office of the county clerk. The county clerk shall forthwith notify such person of his appointment, and he shall take office immediately upon filing his written acceptance thereof with the county clerk, and taking the constitutional oath of office. If any person so appointed fails to file such acceptance with the county clerk or to take the constitutional oath of office within ten days after receiving notice of his appointment, or if any member of the board fails to attend three consecutive regular meetings without being excused by a vote of the board, the board of sidepath commis¬ sioners may declare the place vacant by a majority vote of the board. In case charges against any such commissioner are made in writing and filed with the county judge, said county judge may notify such commissioner to :368b The Highway Law of Hew Yoke. Laws 1899, chapter 152. appear and make answer to such charges, and may remove such commis¬ sioner from office if sufficient cause be shown. Such commissioners shall serve without compensation, but shall be repaid their actual and neces¬ sary disbursements out of the sidepath fund. The present boards of side- path commissioners appointed pursuant to chapter 152 of the laws of eighteen hundred and ninety-nine and chapter one hundred and ninety-four of the laws of eighteen hundred and ninety-nine are hereby continued to the end of the terms of the respective members thereof. Sec. 2. Such board of sidepath commissioners is hereby authorized and empowered to construct and maintain sidepaths along any public road, or street, or section thereof of the county, provided the said board of sidepath commissioners shall be required to obtain the written approval of the com¬ missioner of highways, or other officer performing similar duties, or the written approval of the supervisor of each town in which said sidepath shall be built, and file the same in the town clerk’s office, before construct¬ ing paths along any road outside the limits of incorporated cities or villages; and provided, that they shall be required to secure the approval of the trustees of an incorporated village by a resolution at a meeting thereof, before constructing paths along any street of such village; and provided, that they shall be required to secure the approval of the com¬ mon council of a city by resolution at a meeting thereof, before construct¬ ing paths along any street, or section thereof, in such city. No sidepath shall be constructed upon or along any regularly constructed or main¬ tained sidewalk, except with the consent of the persons owning the abut¬ ting lands. Such paths shall not be less than three or more than six feet wide, without the consent of the owners of abutting lands, and shall be constructed within the outside lines and along and upon either side of such public roads or streets. The term “sidewalk” as used in this act, means any sidewalk constructed or maintained as such by the public authorities or the owner of the abutting lands, which is reserved by custom for the use of pedestrians; but not including foot paths or portions of the public road which are worn only by travel. The term “sidepath” shall be construed to include any path built or acquired by a sidepath commission. No member or any number of members of a sidepath commission shall begin or in any way authorize the construction of a sidepath, to be built from the sidepath fund, until the record of the proceedings of the board shows that it has voted to construct such path. Boards of sidepath commis¬ sioners are authorized upon unanimous vote of the board, to acquire, by gift, purchase or lease, any lands outside of the regular highways neces¬ sary for the purpose of building sidepaths, and to expend any of the funds in their possession for this purpose. Sec. 3. Such board of sidepath commissioners shall at their first meeting, or within a reasonable time thereafter, and in each succeeding calendar The Highway Law of Hew Yoee. 368c Laws 1899, chapter 152. year, adopt a form of license, badge, emblem or device suitable to be affixed to a bicycle and to be known as a bicycle sidepath license. Any person upon the payment of a fee, to be determined by such commissioners, of not less than fifty cents nor more than one dollar, except in the county of Monroe, where the fee shall continue to be twenty-five cents, shall be entitled to receive such license, which shall be good during the calendar year for which it is issued, and no longer. Every such license to be valid must be issued by the commissioners of the county wherein the bicyclist resides, except that any bicyclist who resides in another state or in some county of this state where there is no sidepath commission, may secure a license in any county where a sidepath commission has been lawfully appointed and such license shall be valid for the use of the person so purchasing till a sidepath commission is organized in the county where such person resides, or for the calendar year for which it is issued and no longer. No person shall ride a bicycle on any sidepatn in any county of this state where a sidepath commission has been, or at any time here¬ after may be appointed, unless a valid bicycle license is attached or affixed to the left side of the front fork thereof so that the license shall show on the left side of such bicycle. No person shall counterfeit any such license or make, sell, give away or have on his or her bicycle, a license purport¬ ing to be issued by any county in this state, unless regularly issued by the respective boards of sidepath commissioners appointed pursuant to law. No license shall be valid unless attached to a bicycle as aforesaid. Such license shall be plainly numbered and shall not be valid if the number has been mutilated or changed, so as to deceive or be calculated to deceive. No person shall have a license issued for a prior year or anything in the similitude of such a license attached to his or her bicycle in the place aforesaid except a valid license for the calendar year in which it is so used. Sec. 4. The license fees collected by the said boards of sidepath com¬ missioners shall be deposited on or before the first day of each month with the county treasurer of their respective counties, by whom they shall be credited to a special fund, to be called “the sidepath fund,” upon which the boards of sidepath commissioners are authorized to draw warrants signed by a majority of the board, but no warrants shall be so drawn in excess of the amount actually on deposit; nor shall any contract or purchase be made exceeding the amount of such funds at the time of making such contract or purchase. All bills shall be sworn to. Each board of side- path commissioners shall report annually to the county judge of their res¬ pective counties, giving a detailed financial statement and filing with said report the vouchers of each expenditure, which report and vouchers shall be deposited in the county clerk’s office. Sec. 5. The said boards of sidepath commissioners shall devote the moneys so collected to the repairing of existing paths in their respective counties; 368 d The Highway Law of Hew Yoek. Laws 1899, chapter 152. to the construction of new paths; to the planting of shade trees along such paths, where the consent of the owners of abutting lands to the planting of said trees has been obtained; to the maintaining of order on the paths; and the necessary and authorized expenses incurred in enforcing this act. Sec. 6. No person shall wilfully lead, stand, hitch, ride or drive any horse, cattle, sheep, swine or other animals upon any sidepath now con¬ structed or hereafter to be constructed in this state, except for the pur¬ poses of access to, and egress from, lands abutting on the highway. Sec. 7. No person shall wilfully obstruct, injure or destroy any sidepath or any portion thereof, now constructed or hereafter to be constructed in this state. Sec. 8. No person shall ride a bicycle at a greater rate of speed than ten miles an hour when passing another cyclist or a pedestrian on any sidepath in this state. Sec. 9. The sidepaths heretofore constructed and hereafter to be con¬ structed in this state are hereby placed under the control and direction of the boards of sidepath commissioners of the various counties in which they are located. Sec. 10. Any board of sidepath commissioners, with the consent of the commissioner of highways or other officer performing similar duties, hav¬ ing jurisdiction thereof, may remove limbs of trees overhanging any side- path in the county wherein said board has jurisdiction, when in the judg¬ ment of said board, the same shall interfere with the free passage of bicycles along said paths. Sec. 11. Any person who rides a bicycle on any sidepath in this state in violation of any of the sections of this act, or does any of the acts by the provisions of this law forbidden, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punishable by a fine of not less than five nor more than twenty-five dollars, and in case of failure to pay any fine that may be imposed, such person may be committed to jail not exceeding one day for each dollar of such fine. Sec. 12. Courts of special sessions having jurisdiction to try misde¬ meanors as provided by section fifty-six of the code of criminal procedure, shall have exclusive jurisdiction to try offenders in all cases occurring under this act, in the same manner as in other cases where they now have jurisdiction, and subject to the same power of removal and to render and enforce judgment to the extent herein provided. Sec. 2. Chapter seventy-one of the law's of eighteen hundred and ninety- eight, and chapter one hundred and ninety-four of the laws of eighteen hundred and ninety-nine are hereby repealed. Sec. 3. This act shall take effect July first, nineteen hundred. The Highway Law of New York. 368e Laws 1899, chapter 594. LAWS 1899, CHAPTER 594. AN ACT authorizing boards of supervisors to acquire the rights, franchises and property of individuals and corporations exacting toll for the use of turnpikes, plank roads and bridges . (Became a law May 16, 1899.) Section 1. The board of supervisors of any county, except a county wholly within the city of New York, and except the counties of Onondaga, Erie and Essex, may by a vote of a majority of the members thereof, by resolution, determine to acquire the rights and franchises of any individual or corporation, lawfully entitled to exact a toll or charge for walking, riding or driving over any plank- road or turnpike, or a bridge within such county, erected over an unnavigable stream. Upon the adoption of such resolution, the board of supervisors shall acquire such rights, franchises and property by purchase, if able to acrree with the owners thereof and “otherwise by condem- nation in the name of the county. Any turnpike, plank- road or bridge corporation may by the affirmative vote of stockholders owning a majority of the stock thereof, expressed in writing or at a special meeting of the stock¬ holders of such corporation held upon written notice of at least ten days to all the stockholders thereof, authorize its board of directors or trustees to dispose of the rights, franchises and property of such corporation [within a county, pursuant to this act for a specified sum, and thereupon the board of directors or trustees of such cor¬ poration may convey and sell such rights, franchises and property to the county accordingly. § 2 The board of supervisors of such county may borrow money for the acquisition of such rights, fran¬ chises and property, and may issue the bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the county therefor, but such 368f The Highway Law oe New Yobk. Laws 1899, chapter 594. bonds or other evidences of indebtedness shall not bear a rate of interest exceeding five per centum per annum and shall not run tor a longer period than twenty years and shall not be sold for less than par. § 3, The amount of such bonds together with the interest thereon shall be apportioned by the board of supervisors upon the towns, cities and villages constituting separate highway districts, in which such plankroad, turnpike or bridge is located in such proportions as [the board may deem just; and the amount so apportioned to each municipality for the payment of the principal and interest of such bonds shall be annually levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner as money for other county charges. § 4. A plankroad, turnpike or bridge acquired pursuant to this act shall become part of the highway system of such county, and of the towns, cities and villages in which the same is located, and shall thereafter be repaired and maintained in the same manner as the other high¬ ways and bridges therein. § 5. When a plankroad, turnpike, tollroad or bridge is partly in one county and partly in another, the board of supervisors of the said counties shall act together, in the manner prescribed above, and determine the amount to be paid to said plankroad, turnpike, tollroad or bridge company, by each county, and such amount against each county, after such determination, shall be paid by each county. § 6. This act shall take effect immediately. The Highway Law of New York. 368g Laws 1899, chapter 634. LAWS 1899, CHAPTER 634. AN ACT to regulate the use of bicycles , tricycles and similar vehicles , and to require uniformity of ordinances affecting the same (Became a law May 23, 1899.) Section 1. Tbe municipal officers and boards in the several cities, towns, and tillages of this state now hav¬ ing the authority to enact such ordinances, may pass oidinances regulating the use of bicycles, tricycles and similar vehicles on the public highways, streets, avenues, walks, paiks and public places within their limits in accordance with the following provisions, and not other¬ wise. 1. To requrie all bicycles, tricycles and similar vehicles when ridden on such public highways, streets, avenues, walks or public place, to have attached thereto or carried therewith a lignt of such illuminatting power as to be plainly seen two hundred feet ahead, and kept lighted between one hour after sunset and one hour before sun¬ rise; but this section shall not apply to any rider whose light has become extinguished or who is necessarily absent from his or her home without a light, when going at a pace not exceeding six miles an hour, when an audible signal is given a" provided in subdivision two of this section as often as thirty feet are passed over. 2. To require riders of all such bicycles, tricycles or similar vehicles to give an alarm by bell, whistle or other¬ wise, which may be heard one hundred feet distant, when about to meet or pass pedestrians and when about to meet or pass other vehicles. 3 To regulate the rate of speed at which it may be law¬ ful to ride such bicycles, tricycles or similar vehicles; pro¬ vided however, that cyclists shall not be restricted to a 368h The Highway Law of New York. Laws 1899, chapter 634. rate of speed slower than is allowed any other kind or class of vehicle. 4. To regulate or prohibit coasting or proceeding by inertia or momentum wLk the feet off the pedals; the carrying of children under five years of age upon bicycles; the observance by cyclists of such rules of the road as are established by the highway law; to permit the authorities of such municipality having charge of the public higways, streets, squares or parks, in their dis¬ cretion, upon any special occasion, to grant permits to any person or persons to ride such machines during a specified time, upon specified portions of the public streets or highways of such city, town or village, at any rate of speed, and annex such other reasonable conditions to such permits as they shall deem proper; and the said authori¬ ties of such municipality may also, under such conditions as they may deem proper, permit the use of velocipedes and other similar machines by children on any sidewalk in any public way, square, or park in such municipality. 5. To regulate or prohibit the riding of any bicycles, tricycles or similar vehicles upon the sidewalks within the limits of any city, town or village; except that no city, town or village shall have any power to prohibit the riding of any bicycles upon any sidewalk within the limits of such city, town or village when said sidewalk shall have been or shall be hereafter constructed solely at the expense of wheelmen or cyclists, by and with the consent of the officers having jurisdiction therein, unless the road or street in front of said sidewalk is paved with some smooth and permanent pavement like asphalt or brick, and maintained in a condition suitable for the use of cycles. The term 4 ‘sidewalk” as used in this act, means any sidewalk laid out as such by any city, town or village, or by the owners of the abutting lands which is reserved. The Highway Law of New York. 368i Laws 1899, chapter 6S4. by custom for the use of pedestrians, and which has been especially prepared for their use, but not including foot¬ paths or portions of public roads lying outside of the thickly settled parts of cities and towns, which are worn only by travel, and are not improved by the public authori¬ ties, or by the abutting owners. 6. To provide that every person violating any such ordinances shall be punished by a fine not exceeding the sum of five dollars for each offense, and in case of the non-payment of such fine, by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one day for each dollar of such fine, in the discretion of the court or magistrate. § 2. No city, town or village, shall have any power to make any ordinance, by-law or regulation respecting the use of bicycles or tricycles except as provided in this act; and except as provded in this act, no ordinance, by-law or regulation heretofore or hereafter made by a city, town or village, in respect to bicycles or tricycles, shall have any force or effect. Nothing in this act shall affect the juris¬ diction of sidepath commissioners nor the use of sidepaths. § 3. Any person arrested for the violation of any of the provisions of this act, or of any ordinance or by-law adopted as provided in this act, may tender at the time of his or her arrest, or at any time before the hearing thereon either five dollars in current money, or his or her bicycle or similar vehicle, as security for his or her appearance in court to make answer to the charge of violating the provi¬ sions of this act or any ordinance or by-law adopted as provided in this act; and the officer making the arrest, shall accept the security, which the rider may offer, as aforesaid, for his appearance, before the most convenient court or magistrate, to be specified by said officer at a time to be fixed by him not less than one da} 7 , in said city, village or town having jurisdiction of the offense, and such 368j The Highway Law of New Yoke. Laws 1899. chapter 634. security shall be forthwith delivered, by such officer, to such court or [magistrate. In case the person arrested shall fail to appear and answer to such charge at the time so specified or at such other time to which the matter shall have been adjourned, such security shall be forfeited, and if money, shall be disposed of in the same manner as other fines are disposed of by such court or magistrate, and, if a bicycle or similar vehicle, it may be sold under the direction of such court or magistrate at public sale, a notice of which sale shall be posted in three public places in such city, town or village, and a copy thereof served personally or by mail upon the person who tendered the same at least six days before such sale, and five dollars of the money received upon such sale shall be disposed of in the same manner as other fines collected by such court or magistrate, and the remainder of the money received upon such sale shall be paid to the owner of such bicycle or other similar vehicle on demand. § 4. This act shall take effect immediately. FORMS. The Highway Law of New York. 371 Forms. FORMS. No. 1. Resignation of Highway Commissioners. To the Town Clerk (Justices of the Peace) of the Town of . in the County of. . N. Y.: I hereby tender my resignation of the office of commissioner of high¬ ways of said town, for the following reasons : . Dated this... .day of.. 18... Notice of Acceptance of Resignation. COUNTY OF.) >ss.: Town of. ) To the Town Clerk of the Town of . You are hereby notified, pursuant to section 64 of the town law, that we, the undersigned, justices of the peace of said town, have, for good cause shown, accepted the resignation of... .as commissioner of highways of said town. Dated this_day of.. 18.... Justices of the Peace. JSTo. 2. Appointment of Highway Commissioner to Fill Vacancy. COUNTY OF. • • • ) V ss.: Town of. ) Whereas, a vacancy has occurred in the office of commissioner of high¬ ways of said town by the resignation (or otherwise) of....; now therefore 372 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. we, the undersigned, town board of said town, do hereby, pursuant to section 65 of the town law, appoint_to fill the vacancy in said office. Witness our hands and seals this.day of., 18_ Town Board. Notice to Person Appointed. COUNTY OF Town of... To _ Esq. : You are hereby notified, pursuant to section 65 of the town law, that you have been appointed commissioner of highways of said town of ., to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation (or otherwise) of .and you are required to take the oath of office, and file your under¬ taking within ten days after receiving this notice, as directed by section 51 of the town law. Dated this.day of., 18_ Town Clerk. No . 3. Undertaking of Highway Commissioner. Whereas, .of the town of., in the county of., was on the.day of.. 18 .., duly elected commissioner of highways ; now, therefore, we, the said.principal and.and. of the town of.. his sureties, do hereby, pursuant to section 63 of the town law, jointly and severally undertake that the said_will faith¬ fully discharge his duties as such commissioner, and that he will within ten days after the expiration of his term of office, pay over to his successor all moneys remaining in his hands as such commissioner, and render to The Highway Law of New York. 373 Forms. such successor a true account of all moneys received and paid out by him as such commissioner. Dated this-day of.... 18.. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) County of. >ss. : Town of. ) On this.day of., 18_, before me, the subscriber, per¬ sonally appeared.and.to me personally known to be the same persons mentioned in, and who executed the foregoing undertaking, and severally acknowledged that they executed the same. Notary Public. Justification of Sureties. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) >- ss. : County of. ) _and__ the sureties mentioned in the foregoing undertaking, being severally duly sworn, each for himself says, that he is a resident and free¬ holder (or householder) within this State, and is worth.dollars over and above all debts and liabilities which he owes or has incurred, and exclusive of property exempt by law from levy and sale on execution. Subscribed and sworn to before me ,) this_day of. ,18... ) Notary Public. Approval by Supervisor. I hereby approve of the foregoing undertaking, and of the sufficiency of the sureties therein named. Supervisor of the Town of 374 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 4. Undertaking of Treasurer of Highway Commissioners. (Highway Law, § 2.) Whereas, the commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of., have designated ., one of their number, to be treasurer, pursuant to section 2 of the highway law; now, therefore, we, the said., and., as his surety (or sureties), do hereby jointly and severally undertake to and with the said town that the said.will faithfully account and pay over to any officer or person, entitled thereto, any money that may come into his hands as such treasurer. Dated this.day of., 18_ STATE OF NEW YORK, ) > ss.: County of. ) On this.day of., 18-, before me personally appeared the above-named.and., to me personally known to be the same person described in and who executed the foregoing undertaking, and they severally acknowledged that they executed the same. Notary Public. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) V ss.: County of. ) .and., above named, being duly and severally sworn, each for himself says that he is a resident of and a householder, or freeholder, within the state, and is worth.dollars over and above all debts and liabilities which he owes or has incurred, and exclusive of property exempt by law from levy and sale under execution. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this.day of. ,18_ Notary Public. The Highway Law of New York. 87.5 Forms. Approval by Supervisor. I approve of the foregoing undertaking, and of the sufficiency of the sureties therein named. Dated this.day of., 18_ Supervisor of the Town of. No. 5. Division of Town into Highway Districts. {Highway Law , § 4.) The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of. in the county of.hereby divide the highways of said town into districts as follows: District No. 1 shall comprise (here insert the description thereof, and in like manner of all the other districts). And we hereby assign to each of said districts the inhabitants and cor¬ porations, respectively, residing or located or assessed for highway labor therein and liable to work on highways. Dated this.day of.,18- Commissioners of Highways. No. 6. Appointment of Overseers. {Highway Laic , § 4.) The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of. ? in the county of.,do hereby appoint overseers of the highways of said town for the ensuing year, as follows: District No. 1.—. District No. 2.—. District No. 3.—. Dated this_day of.. 18... Commissioners of Highways. 376 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 7. Notice to Overseers of Appointment. {Highway Law, § 4.) COUNTY OF ss.: Town of. ) To . Please take notice that you have been appointed by the commissioner of highways, overseer in highway district No... in the town of.. county of., N. Y., for the ensuing year; and you are hereby required to report to the town clerk within sixteen days after receiving this notice, the names of all the taxable inhabitants and corporations in your highway district liable to be assessed for highway labor therein. Dated this_day of.. 18- Town Clerk. No. 8. Consent of Town Board. {Highway Laic, § 10.) * COUNTY OF.) [• ss.: Town of.) At a special meeting of the town board of said town, called by the supervisor (or town clerk) thereof, held on this-day of., 18.., the following preamble and resolution was adopted : Whereas, The highway (or bridge), known as.. was destroyed by.. on., 18. .,(or has become dam¬ aged), and there not being sufficient moneys in the hands of the commis¬ sioners of highways to rebuild (or repair) the same; therefore, be it Resolved, That we do hereby consent that the commissioners of highways of the town of.cause said highway (or bridge) to be imme¬ diately rebuilt (or repaired) according to law. Town Board. The Highway Law of New York. 377 Forms. Town Clerk’s Certificate to Transcript. COUNTY OF >• ss.: Town of. ) I do hereby certify that I have compared the above transcript of the proceedings of the town board of said town, at a special meeting held on the_day of.18.., with the original record thereof in my office, and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole of such original. Dated this.... day of.. 18.. Town Clerk. No. 9. Request to Convene Town Board. (Highway Law, §11.) To the Supervisor {or Town Clerk) of the Town of . . in the County of .•' The undersigned commissioners of highways of said town, do hereby request that the town board be convened in special session, for the pur¬ pose of auditing the bills and expenses incurred in the erection (or repair) of the highway (or bridge) under the consent given by said board on the _day of.. 18.. Dated this_day of.. 18.. Commissioners of Highways. Certificate of Supervisor and Town Clerk. COUNTY. ) > ss.: Town of. ; The undersigned, supervisor and town clerk of said town, do hereby certify that at a special session of the town board this day held, for the pur¬ pose of auditing and allowing the bills and expenses incurred by the com¬ missioners of highways of said town, under the consent given by said 378 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. town board, on the-day., 18...the following bills and accounts were audited and allowed, with interest: Date. In whose favor. Nature of work done and material furnished. Amount allowed. Dated this... .day of 18.... Supervisor. Town Clerk. No. 10. . Accounts for Services and Materials. {Highway Laid, § 12.) The Town of., to., Dr. January, 18.., to.(days’ labor on). January, 18.., to.(feet of plank) . Total.. $ $ COUNTY OF >• ss.: Town of. ) .,being duly sworn, says he is the claimant in the above account, and that the items of said account are correct, and that the disbursements and services charged therein have been in fact made or rendered, and goods supplied, and that no part of the same has been satisfied. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this.day of., 18.. Notary Public. The Highway Law of New Yoke. 379 Forms. COUNTY OF. ) - ss.: Town of. ) The undersigned, commissioners of highways of said town, do hereby certify that in the foregoing account of., the services mentioned were actually performed, and the material mentioned was actually fur¬ nished, and the same was so performed and furnished at our request. Dated this.day of.,18- Commissioners of Highways. No. 11. Complaint about Unsafe Toll-bridge. (Highway Law, § 13.) COUNTY OF. ) >■ ss.: Town of. ; .. being duly sworn, says that he believes the toll-bridge belong¬ ing to.situated on the.at. has become and is unsafe for public use and travel; and that the reasons for his belief are founded on the following facts:. Subscribed and sworn to before me, ) this.day of. ,18.. ) Notary Public Jo. 12. Notice to Owners of Unsafe Toll-bridge. (Highway Law , § 13.) To . You are hereby notified that the commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of. have, on complaint 380 The Highway Law of New York. Forms made, carefully and thoroughly examined the toll-bridge situated on the .at.and found it to be unsafe for public use and travel in the following particulars: .•. Dated this.day of.18- Commissioners of Highways. No. 13. Application to Lay Water-pipes in Highway. {Highway Law , § 14.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Toivn of . County of . The undersigned, an inhabitant of the said town of. does hereby make application to you for permission to lay and maintain water-pipes and hydrants under ground, within the highways of said town, pursuant to section 14 of the highway law, as follows:. Dated this.day of.. 18- No. 14. Permission to Lay Water-pipes in Highway. {Highway Law , § 14.) The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of.. on the written application of., do hereby grant permission to the said.to lay and maintain water-pipes and hydrants under ground within the highways of said town, as follows: . But such pipes are not to be laid under the traveled portion of the highway, except to cross the same for the purpose of supplying premises with water; and this permission is upon condition that such pipes shall be so laid as not to interrupt or The Highway Law of New York. 381 Forms. interfere with public travel upon the highway, and thatTthe applicant shall replace all earth removed, and leave the highway in all respects’in as good condition as before the laying of such pipes. Dated this .... day of.. 18- Commissioners of Highways. JVo. 15 . Claim for Damages Against Town. {Highway Law , § 16.) To ., Supervisor of the Town of .. in the County of .: I claim a cause of action against the said town of.. by reason of defects in the highway (or bridge) in said town, and the following is a statement of such cause of action: ...* Dated this-day of.18.. . STATE OF NEW YORK ,) [• ss.: County of. ) being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the above named claimant; that he has read the foregoing statement and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters he believes it to be true. Sworn to before me, this.... ) day of.. 189., ) Notary Public. 382 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. JS r o. 16. Report of Highway Commissioners. (Highway Law , § 19.) At First Meeting of Town Board. The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of.. in the county of.. hereby render to the town board of said town, the following report: 1. The highway labor assessed in said town for the year ending on.. 18..., was_days; and the highway labor performed in said town during the said year was.... days, as appears by the accounts rendered us by the several overseers of the highways in said town. 2. The said commissioners have received during the said year the fol¬ lowing sums of money for fines and commutations, and from other sources: Date. | from whom received. | On what account. | Amount. 3. They have paid out during the said year, for which they have receipts in full, the following sums: Date. TO whom paid. | On what account. Amount. 4. The improvements which have been made on the highways and bridges in said town during said year are as follows: . And the highways and bridges in said town are as to condition as follows: Dated this ... day of February, 18... Commissioners of highways. At Second Meeting of Town Board. The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of.. hereby render to the town board of said town the following report: The Highway Law of New York. 383 Forms. 1. The following improvements are necessary to be made on the high¬ ways and bridges in said town during the next fiscal year, viz.: . 2. The probable expense of making such improvements beyond what the labor to be assessed will accomplish, is by us estimated at $. Dated this ... day of November, 18.... Commissioners of Highways. No. 17. Notice to Remove Obstructions. (Highway Laic, § 21.) To... , Overseer of Highway District No -, of the Toicn of . in the County of .: We, the undersigned inhabitants of said town, liable to payment of highway tax, hereby give notice that the highway in said district is obstructed by.at.and request that you forthwith proceed to remove said obstruction. Dated this... .day of.18 ... No. 18. Lists of Inhabitants. (Highicay Law, § 31.) I } . . overseer of highway district No-- of the town of.. .do hereby certify that the following is a true and correct list of all the inhabitants and corporations who are liable to work on the high¬ ways in said district. NAMES. | _ NAMES. _ Dated this... .day of ,, 18.... Overseer of Highway District No.... 384 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 10. List of Non-Resident Lands. (Highway Law, § 32.) The following is a list and statement of the contents of all lots, pieces or parcels of land within the town of., in the county of. ., owned by non-residents therein, made by the undersigned, com¬ missioners of highways of said town : NAME OF TRACT Number lot. Part. Number section. Township. Number range Number acres. Valua¬ tion. Dated this_day of., 18.... Commissioners of Highways. No. 20. Road Warrant. (.Highway Law, § 33.) To ., Overseer of Highways in District No ., of the Town of ., hounded as follows . You will cause the several persons and corporations whose names are hereunto annexed, to labor on the highways in your district the number of days set opposite their names, or commute therefor at the rate of one dollar for each day ; two-thirds to be performed by the first day of .next, and the residue by the first day of. .next. You are also required to cause all noxious weeds on the highways in your district to be cut down between the fifteenth day of June and first day of July, and again between the fifteenth day of August and first day of September ; and also to cause the loose stones The Highway Law of New York. 385 Forms. lying on the beaten track of the road to be removed at least once in each month from the first day of April to the first day of December. Should any name in your district be omitted, or new inhabitants move in, you are to annex their names, and to assess them in proportion to their real and personal estate. And whenever the labor in your ward or district has been worked out, commuted for, or returned to the supervisor, and the highways are obstructed by snow, or otherwise, and written notice has been given to you by any two or more inhabitants of the town liable to the payment of highway tax, requesting the removal of such obstruction, you are required to immediately call upon all persons liable to highway tax in your district to assist in removing such obstructions, and such labor, so called for by you, shall be assessed upon those liable to perform the same, in proportion to their original assessments. Also, to deliver to the supervisor of said town, on or before the first day of October next, a list of all resident landholders residing in your dis¬ trict, who have not worked out their highway assessment or commuted for the same, and a list of all the lands of non-residents, and of persons unknown, which are taxed on your list, on which the labor assessed by the commissioners or added by you, according to law, has not been per¬ formed or commuted for, and the number of days unpaid for by each, charging for the same at the rate of one dollar and fifty cents per day, which list shall be accompanied by your affidavit, duly certified, that you have given the notice required by sections 60 and 61 of the highway law, and that the labor for which such residents and such land is returned has not been performed or commuted. You are to make return to one of the commissioners of highways on the second Tuesday next preceding the annual town meeting in your town, unthin the year for which you are appointed, verified by your oath containing: First. The names of all per¬ sons assessed to work on the highways in the district of which you are overseer. Second. The names of all those who have actually worked on the highways with the number of days they have so worked. Third. The names of all those who have been fined, and the sums in which they have been fined. Fourth. The names of all those who have commuted, and the manner in which the moneyes arising from fines and commuta¬ tions have been expended by you. Fifth. A list of all persons whose names you have returned to the supervisor as having neglected or refused to work out their highway assessments, with the number of days and 25 386 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. amount of tax so returned for each person, and a list of all lands which you have returned to the supervisor for non-payment of taxes, and the amount of tax on each tract of land so returned — according to the stat¬ ute in such case made and provided. And you are to pay over to said commissioners according to law, all moneys payed to you for commuta tion by all moneyed or stock corporations hereby assessed upon it or them for highway labor, and all moneys remaining in your hands, arising from fiees and commutations. The law imposes a penalty of ten dollars on the overseers for neglect or refusal to make such return, or to pay over said moneys, which fine the commissioners are bound to enforce in every case of default. Dated this .. .day of.,18 Commissioners of Highways. NAMES. Da5 r s Days Days Amount assessed. worked. commuted. of fines. JTo. 21. Appealjby Non-resident. (Highway Law , § 36.) COUNTY OF. ) > ss.: Town of.. ) ., a non-resident owner of lands in said town, considering (or. agent of.. a non-resident owner of lands in said town, who considers) himself aggrieved in the assessment for highway labor by the commis¬ sioners of highways of said town, upon the following described lands, to . does hereby appeal from the assessment of said commisssoners to the county judge of said county. Dated this.day of., 18... 5 The Highway Law of New York. 387 Forms. Notice to Commissioners. To... ...» .,., commissioners of highways of the town of ., You are hereby notified, that considering myself aggrieved by your assessment for highway labor on the land owned by me in said town, I have this day appealed to the county judge of the county of .. who will on the.day of.. at-o’clock, in the.noon at.. in the village of.hear and decide on said appeal. Dated this.day of.. 18- No. 22. New Assessment by Overseers. (Highway Law , § 42.) The amount of labor assessed on the inhabitants of highway district No. . . town of.. being deemed by me, the undersigned over¬ seer of highways in said district, insufficient to keep the highways therein in repair, I do therefore, pursuant to section 42 of the highway law, make a further assessment as follows: Names. | Days. _| Names. | Days. _ Dated this.day of.. 18- Overseer of Highways, District No.... No. 23. Order Authorizing Planting of Shade Trees, or Construction of Sidewalks. (.Highway Law, § 43.) COUNTY OF.) - ss.: Town of. ; We, the undersigned commissioners of highways of said town, do hereby authorize., at his own expense, to locate and plant trees and locate 388 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. and construct sidewalks along gthe highway adjoining his premises, in highway district No.in said town, according to a map or diagram hereto attached and made a part of this order. Dated this.day of.. 18_ Commissioners of Highways. No. 24. / Application to Anticipate Sidewalk Tax. (Highivay Law , § 45.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of . . in the County of .; We, the undersigned, a majority of the inhabitants of highway district No-in said town of., subject to assessment for highway labor therein, hereby make application to you for authority to anticipate and expend.of the highway labor or commutation money of said district in the construction, improvement and repair of the sidewalks in said district for the term of.years, pur¬ suant to section 45 of the highway law. Dated this-day of., 18_ Order of Commissioners. COUNTY OF Town of. \ SS " We, the undersigned commissioners of highways of said town, hereby authorize the overseer of highway district No_, in said town, to antici¬ pate and expend.of the highway labor or commutation money received therefor, in said district, for the term of .years, in the construction, improvement and repair The Highway Law of New York. 389 Forms. of the sidewalk within the limits of said district, pursuant to sections 45 and 46 of the highway law. Dated this_day of.. 18- Commissioners of Highways. No. *>K Certificate of Anticipation. (Highway Law t § 46.) COUNTY OF ss.: Town of. ) I, the undersigned, overseer of highway district No.,in the said town of.. hereby certify that_has anticipated and worked (or commuted for).days, constructing, improving and repairing the sidewalk within the limits of said district, pursuant to section 45 of the highway law. Dated this_day of. 18... Overseer of Highways, District No.... No. 26. Transfer of Certificate. (Highway Law , § 47.) For value received, I hereby assign and transfer all my right and inter¬ est in and to the within certificate of anticipation to...., grantee of the real property upon which such highway labor is assessable. Dated this_day of.18- • • 390 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 27. Request to Change System. (Highway Law, § 51.) To ., Town Clerk of the Town of .. in the County of . We, the undersigned, taxpayers of said town of.. hereby request that a vote by ballot be taken at the next annual town meeting in said town by the electors thereof entitled to vote thereon, on the question of changing the system of taxation for working the high¬ ways in said town, pursuant to sections 50, 51, 52 and 53 of the highway law. L Dated this.day of. 18.... No. 28. Notice to Corporation. (Highway Late, § 60.) To .. a Corporation (or . Agent of .): Take notice that you (or .) are assessed.day’s'labor in high¬ way district No.in the town of.. county of., and that said labor is required to be performed on the highway at .in said district on the-day of. next, and the days following, and you are required to furnish.and to perform.day’s labor in a day, and will be allowed one day for every eight hours of work on said highway between 7 o'clock in the A. M. and 6 o’clock in the p. m. Dated this-day of.,18_ Overseer of Highway District No.... The Highway Law of New York. 391 F orms. 29. Notice to Non-Residents. (.Highway Law, $ 61.) . Agent of ., a Non-resident Owner of Lands in the Town °f ., in the County of . Take notice that., a non-resident of the said town, is assessed. days labor in highway district No., in said town, and that said labor is required to be performed on the highway at.in said district on the.... day of.next, and the days following. Dated this ... day of., 18_ Overseer of Highway District No.... Notice for Filing. Notice is hereby given that the highway labor assessed on the following described parcels of land in the town of., county of., owned by non-residents, is required to be performed from the_day of .to the... .day of.next, in highway district No_, m said town, on the highway at. owners’ names. | Description of lands. | Daj r s assessed. Dated this_day of., 18- Overseer of Highway District No.... JVo. SO. List of Unperformed Labor. (.Highway Law , § 66.) To the Supervisor of the Town of . in the County of .: The following is a list of all the resident landholders residing in highway district No_, in the said town of.. who have not worked out their highway assessments, or commuted for the same, with the number of days not worked or commuted for by each, at one dollar and fifty cents per day; and also a list of all the lands of non-residents and of persons 392 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. unknown, which are assessed on my warrant by the commissioners of highways, or added by me according to law, on which the labor assessed has not been performed or commuted for, and the number of day’s labor unpaid by each, charging for each at the rate of one dollar and fifty cents per day: Owners’ Name. Description of land. Assessed value. Number of days Amount. Owners’ Name. List of Non-resii Description of land. >ent Land Assessed value. s. Number of days Amount. Overseer of Highway District No.... COUNTY OF > ss.: Town of. ) ., being duly sworn, says he is the overseer of highway district No ., in the town of.. in the county of., and that he has given the notices to appear and work, required by sections 60 and 61 of the highway law, and that the labor for which such residents and such land is returned, has not been performed or commuted for. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this_day of_ 18.. I \ Overseer of Highway District No.... Notary Public. No. 31. Return of Overseer, {Highway Law, § 69.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of ., in the County of .; The undersigned, overseer of highway district No., in said town, The Highway Law of New York. 393 Forms. hereby renders the following account pursuant to section 69 of the high, way law: 1. The names of all persons assessed to work on the highways in said district are as follows: \ Names. I Days assessed. 2. The names of all persons who have actually worked on the highways, with the number of days they have -worked, are as follows: Names. 1 Days worked. 3. The names of all those who have been they have been fined, are as follows: Names. fined, and the sums in which Amount. 4. The names of those who have commuted, and the amount of the commutation, are as follows: Names. | Amount. 5. The moneys arising from penalties and commutations have been expended as follows:. 6. Names returned to the supervisor of persons who have neglected or refused to work out their highway assessments, with the number of days and amount of tax so returned, are as follows: Names. | Days assessed. | Amount of tax. 7. The following is a list of lands returned to the supervisor for non¬ payment of taxes: Names of owners Description. Assessed value. Number days. Amount. • Overseers of Highway District No.... 394 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. ss.; COUNTY OF. Town of. ., being duly sworn, says he is overseer of highway district No. .. in the town of.. and that the foregoing account sub¬ scribed by him, is true to the best of his knowledge and belief. Overseer of Highway District No.... Subscribed and sworn to before me, | this_day of.. 18_ ) Notary Public. No. 32. Notice to Remove Weeds. (Highway Law , § 71.) To .. Occupant of . Abutting on the Higlucay in Highway District No ...., in the Town of .. County of ., N. Y.: The undersigned, overseer of highways of said district, hereby notifies and requires you to cut all weeds, briers and brush growing upon the above described lands within the bounds of said highway within ten days after the receipt of this notice; and if you fail to do so, I shall cause the same to be cut and make a report thereof pursuant to section 71 of the highway law. Dated this.day of.,18_ Overseer of Highway District No.... No. 33. Report of Overseers as to Weeds. (Highway Law , § 71.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of . County of .: The undersigned, overseer of highway district No.... , in said town, The Highway Law of New York. 395 Forms. in accordance with section 71 of the highway law, hereby renders the fol¬ lowing report: The amount of money expended by me for cutting weeds, briers and brush within the bounds of the highway in said district, and the names of the owners and occupants of the several pieces or parcels of land against which said labor was performed, with a brief description of the same, are as follows: NAME OF OWNER. Name of occupant. Description of premises. Amount expended. And in each case default was made by the occupant, after due notice had been given. Dated this.day of.. 18- Overseer of Highway District No.... COUNTY OF ss.: Town of. ) .. being duly sworn, says the foregoing report subscribed by him is true. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this.day of., 18.. Notary Public. No. 34. Certificate of Commissioners. (Highway Law, § 71.) To ., Supervisors of the Town of . , in the County’of . : The undersigned, commissioners of highways of said town, hereby certify that the annexed reports have been made by the overseers of highways whose names are thereto subscribed, pursuant to section 71 o f 896 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. the highway law; and that the several amounts therein expended were paid as follows: . Dated this...... day of.. 18.... Commissioners of Highways. Yo. 35 . Laying Out Highway upon Dedication. (Highway Law , § 80.) Application. To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of . , County of .: The undersigned, liable to be assessed for highway labor in the town of ., hereby applies to you to lay out a highway in said town, commencing.which proposed highway will pass through the lands of., and., who consent to the laying out of such highway. Dated this.day of., 18.... Dedication. I,., of the town of.. county of., N. Y., for value received, hereby dedicate to the town of., aforesaid, a strip of land across my premises in said town, for the purpose of a high¬ way, described as follows:. And I also hereby release said town from all damages by reason of the laying out and opening of said highway. In witness whereof , I have hereunto set my hand and seal, this. day of., 18_ STATE OF NEW YORK, ) V ss.: County of. ) On this.day of., 18-, before me, the subscriber, The Highway Law of New York. 397 Forms. personally appeared.. to me known to be the person described in, and who executed the foregoing agreement, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same. Notary Public. Order. At a meeting of the commissioners of highways of the town of. in the county of., on the.day.. 18...., for the purpose of deliberating on the propriety of laying out a highway in said town, hereinafter described, and on the application of., a person liable to be assessed for highway labor in said town, and a release from the owners of the land through which the highway is proposed to be opened, having been given, it is ordered and determined that a highway shall be, and the same is hereby laid out in said town as follows: Begin- ing. Dated this.day of.. 18.... Commissioners of Highways. Wo. 36. Laying Out Highway upon Release of Damages. (Highway Law , § 80.) Application. To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of .. County of . The undersigned, liable to be assessed for highway labor in the town of . . hereby applies to you to lay out (or alter) a highway in said town, commencing.which proposed highway will pass through the lands of.and.. who consent to, the laying out (or altering) of such highway. Dated this.day of.,18- 398 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. Consent of Town Board. The undersigned, the town board of the town of.. in the county of., hereby consent that the commissioners of high¬ ways of said town make an order laying out (or altering) the proposed highway described in the application of.. pursuant to section 80 of the highway law. Dated this.day of., 18_ Supervisor. Town Clerk. Justices of the Peace. Release of Damages. I,.. of the town of., county of., N. Y., for and in consideration of the sum of. , hereby con¬ sent that a highway be laid out and opened (or altered) across my premises in the town of., county of., N. Y., pursuant to the application of., dated the.day of.,18_, and release said town from all damages by reason of laying out and opening (or alter¬ ing) such highway through my premises. Dated this.day of., 18... Order. At a meeting of the commissioners of highways of the town of. in the county of.on the.day of., 18..., for the purpose of deliberating on the propriety of laying out (or altering) a highway in said town hereinafter described, on the written application of .. a person liable to be assessed for highway labor in said town and the written consent of the town board of said town, and a release from the owners of the land through which the proposed highway is to be opened, the consideration of any one claimant not exceeding $100, and to all the claimants not exceeding $500, it is ordered and determined that a The Highway Law of New York. 399 Forms. highway shall be, and the same is hereby laid out in said town as follows : . And the line of survey shall be the centre of the highway, which shall be.rods in width. Dated this.day of.. 18.... Commissioners of Highways. No. 37. Application to Lay Out Highway. [Highway Law , § 82.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of . County of .: The undersigned, liable to be assessed for highway labor in your town, hereby applies to you to lay out a highway in said town, as follows: .which proposed highway will pass through the lands of.and.(who consent to the laying out of the high¬ way, or as the case may be). Dated this.day of.. 18- JVo. 38. Application to Alter Highway, (.Highway Law , § 82.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of .. County of ..* The undersigned, liable to be assessed for highway labor in your town, hereby applies to you to alter the highway leading from.to .. in said town as follows:. The proposed alteration passes through the lands of. and .( w ho consent to the proposed alteration, or as the case may be). Dated this .. .day of.>18- 400 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 39. Application to Discontinue Highway. {Highway Law , $ 82.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of . County of . The undersigned, liable to be assessed for highway labor in your town hereby applies to you to discontinue the old highway beginning ^.on the ground that said highway has been abandoned. Dated this_day of.. 18- No. 40. Application for Commissioners. (. Highway Law , § 83.) COUNTY COURT.—.County. In the Matter of the Application of.to Lay Out (Alter or Dis¬ continue) a Highway in the Town of.and the Assess¬ ment of Damages Therefor. To the County Court of. . County: The petition of., of the town of.. county of.. respectfully shows that your petitioner is a person liable to be assessed for highway labor in the town of., county of.; that on the-day of., 18.he presented the following application in writing to the commissioners of highways of said town. That said application was in good faith made; that the commissioners of highways have not laid out (altered or discontinued) said highway pur¬ suant to section 80 of the highway law. Wherefore, your petitioner prays that three commissioners be appointed pursuant to section 84 of the highway law, to determine upon the necessity of the proposed highway (or altering or discontinuing the said highway), and to assess the damages by reason of laying out and opening (or altering or discontinuing) such highway. Dated this... .day of , 18 ... The Highway Law of New Yoke. 401 Forms., STATE OF NEW YORK, ) [■ ss.: County of. ) ., being duly sworn, says he has read the foregoing petition by him subscribed, and that the same is true to the knowledge of deponent, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters he believes it to be true. Subscribed and sworn to before me, ^ this-day of. 18.. i Notary Public. Xo. 41. Appointment of Commissioners. (. Highway Lciiv, § 84.) At a.term of the County Court of the county of. held at.in the.in and for said county. Present, Hon.. county judge. In the Matter of the Application of., to Lay Out (Alter or Discontinue) a Highway in the Town of.and the As¬ sessment of Damages Therefor. On reading and filing the petition of., of the town of., in said county, dated the .... day of .,18.., praying for the appointment of three commissioners, pursuant to section 84 of the high¬ way law, to certify as to the necessity of laying out and opening (altering or discontinuing) a highway as follows: .and to assess the damages by reason of laying out (altering or discontinuing) such highway, it is hereby ordered that ..., .... and.of the town of sa id county, be, and they are hereby appointed such commis¬ sioners. 26 County Judge. 402 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 42. Subpoena and Oath. ( Highway Law, § 84.) Subpoena. The People of the State of New York to _ and _: You and each of you are hereby commanded to be and appear before us, commissioners appointed by the county court of.county, at the ., in the town of.on the ... .day of.. 18__ at -o’clock in the.noon, to testify and give evidence in the matte 1 ' of laying out (altering or discontinuing) a highway and assessing the damages therefor, in the town of., then and there to be heard and determined. Dated this.day of., 18_ Commissioners. Oath. You do solemnly swear that the evidence you shall give touching the necessity of laying out (altering or discontinuing) the highway in question, and assessing the damages therefor (or as the case may be), shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God. No. 43. Notice of Meeting. {Highway Law , § 85.) Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has made application to the commissioners of highways of the town of ,., in the county of .* for the laying out (altering or discontinuing) of a highway in said town, as follows: .which proposed highway (or alteration) will pass through the lands of. and by an order of the county court dated the_day of.18.., . and .were appointed commissioners to certify as to the necessity of said proposed highway (alteration or discontinuance), and to The Highway Law of New York. 403 Forms. assess the damages by reason of the laying out and opening (alteration or discontinuance) of such highway ; and that said commissioners will all meet at.in said town, on the... .day of., 18...., at ....o’clock in the.noon, to examine the proposed highway (or the highway) and hear the commissioners of highways and all others inter¬ ested therein, and to assess the damages if such highway be determined to be necessary (or is altered or discontinued). Dated this_day of.. 18- Affidavit of Service. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) V ss.: County of. ) ...., being duly sworn, says that he caused notices in writing, of which the within is a copy, to be posted up at.. at..and- .. three public places in the town of.. said county, on the.... day of.. 18_, and that he served a like notice on .on the.day of 18__ by.and that said notices were posted at the respective places, and served on the respective persons herein named, at least eight days before the time specified therein for the meeting of said commissioners. Subscribed and sworn to before me, ) this_day of. ,18.. ) Notary Public. JS r o. 44 . Decision Favoring Application. (.Highway Laic, % 86.) The undersigned, by an order of the county court of.county, dated the.day of., 18...., on the application of., having been appointed commissioners to certify as to the necessity of lay¬ ing out and opening (altering or discontinuing) a highway in the town of The Highway Law of New Yoke. 40-i Forms. ., in said county, begining... which proposed highway (or highway) crosses the lands of. .and to assess the damages to be caused thereby; now, there¬ fore, we, the said commissioners, having given due notice of the time and place at which w T e would meet, and all having met at.. .in said town on the.day of., 18...., pursuant to such notice, and having taken the constitutional oath of office, and on proof of the service and posting of the notices by the applicant, pursuant to section 85 of the highway law, having viewed the proposed highway (or alteration or high¬ way proposed to be discontinued) and the lands through which it is proposed to be laid out and opened (altered or discontinued) and having heard all the allegations of the commissioners of highways and the parties interested therein, and the evidence of all the witnesses produced, do thereupon certify, that in our opinion it is necessary and proper that th e highway be laid out and opened (altered or discontinued) pursuant to the said application of., dated the.day of. ,18_; and w T e have assessed the damages required to be asseseed by reason of laying out and opening (altering or discontinuing) such highway as follows: The damages of.at $.; the damages of.at $. Dated this.day of., 18.... Commissioners. JS T o. 45. Decision Denying Application. {Highway Law , § 88.) The undersigned, by an order of the county court of.county dated the....day of. ,18...., on the application of., having been appointed commissioners to certify as to the necessity of laying out and opening (altering or discontinuing) a highway in the town of.in said county, as follows:. which proposed highway (or highway) crosses the lands of. and to assess the damages to be caused thereby; now, therefore, we, the said commissioners, having given due notice of the time and place The Highway Law of New York. 405 Forms. at which we would meet, and all having met at. in said town, on the... .day of.18.., pursuant to such notice, and having taken the constitutional oath of office, and on proof of the service and posting of the notices by the applicant, pursuant to section 85 of the highway law, having viewed the proposed highway (or alteration or highway proposed to be discontinued) and the lands through which it is proposed to be laid out and opened (altered or discontinued) and having heard all the allega¬ tions of the commissioners of highways and the parties interested therein, and the evidence of all the witnesses produced, do thereupon certify, that in our opinion such highway, or alteration or discontinuance, is unneces¬ sary and improper and should not be laid out (or should not be made, or such highway should not be discontinued). Dated this... .day of. 18.... Commissioners. No 46. Notice of Motion to Confirm. (.Highway Law, § 89.) COUNTY COURT.— .County. In the Matter of the Application of.to Lay Out (Alter or Dis¬ continue) a Highway in the Town of., and the Assessment of Damages therefor. To . and .: Take notice that an application will be made to this court at a. term thereof, to be held at the.in the.of. , on the.day of.. 18_, for an order confirming the decision of the commissioners in the above entitled matter, which decision is dated the.day of.. 18__ and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem proper; that said application will be made upon said decision and upon the affidavits and papers, with copies of which you are herewith served. Dated this.day of.. 18- 406 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 47. Order of Confirmation. (Highway Law , l 89.) At a term of the.County Court, held at the.in the .of., on the.day of.. 18_ Present—Hon.. county judge. COUNTY COURT—. County. In the Matter of the Application of.to Lay Out (Alter or Dis¬ continue) a Highway in the Town of., and the Assess¬ ment of Damages therefor. On reading and filing the decision of the commissioners,...and -, in the above entitled matter, dated the_day of., 18_, by which it appears.with proof of due service upon.and.of notice of this application and. and on motion of., counsel for., after hearing., counsel for.and., opposed, and on reading.it is here¬ by ordered that the said decision be and the same is hereby confirmed. County Judge. No. 48. Order Laying Out after Confirmation. (Ilighivay Law, % 89.) Whereas, ....did present to us as commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of.. a written application dated the... .day of., 18.to lay out a highway in said town ; and, whereas, commissioners were appointed by the county court of said county, pursuant to section 84 of the highway law, and after having duly met, certified that such proposed highway was necessary and proper and should be laid out and opened, and assessed the damages therefor ; and the said court having confirmed the decision of said commissioners (or no motion having been made to the county court to confirm, vacate or modify such decision) which said application, orders and certificate (or other The Highway Law of Hew Yoke. 407 Forms. papers) were duly filed in the office of the town clerk of said town, to which reference is here made. Now, therefore, we, the undersigned commissioners of highways of said town, pursuant to section 89 of the highway law, do hereby lay out such highway as so applied for and ordered, whereof a survey has been made as follows : .and the line of such survey shall be the center of the highway, which is to be.rods in width. Dated this_day of.18- Commissioners of Highways. No. 40. Notice of Motion to Vacate or Modify. {Highway Laic, § 89.) County Court.—.County. In the Matter of the Application of-to Lay Out (Alter or Discon¬ tinue) a Highway in the Town of.. and the Assessement of Damages therefor. To ... .and -: Take notice that an application will be made to this court at a. term thereof to be held at the.in the.of.’ on the.day of.. 18 ..., for an order vacating (modifying or correcting), in the following particulars.the decision of the commissioners in the above entitled matter, which decision is dated the... .day of., 18...., with costs on this motion, and such further relief as the court may deem proper. That such application will be made upon said decision and the affidavits and papers, with copies of which you are herewith served. Dated this-day of.. 18- 408 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 50. Order Vacating or Modifying, (Highivvy Law , § 89.) At a term of the.County Court, held at the.in the .of.. on the.day of.. 18- Present—Hon., county judge. In the Matter of the Application of., to Lay Out (Alter or Dis¬ continue) a Highway in the Town of.., and the Assess¬ ment of Damages therefor. On reading and filing the decision of the commissioners.,.and ., in the above entitled matter, dated the.day of., 18.., by which it appears.with proof of due service upon., and.of notice of this application and. and on motion of., counsel for., after hearing., counsel for. and.opposed, and on reading., it is hereby ordered that the said decision be and the same is hereby vacated (or modified or corrected as follows):.(or that a new hearing be had before the same or other commissioners to be named herein), with $.costs of this motion to.against. County Judge. No. 51. Consent of Owner. (Highway Law, § 90.) Whereas .has made application in writing to the commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of., dated the.day of., 18...., to lay out a highway in said town beginning at (insert description), and which said highway will pass through my orchard, Now, therefore, I do hereby consent that such highway be so laid out, opened, worked and used through my said orchard; but this consent shall not be construed as a waiver or release of my claim for damages, by reason thereof. Dated the day of , 18 .... The Highway Law of New York. 409 Forms. Yo. 52. Order Laying Out, after Consent. (. Highway Law , § 90.) Whereas, .did, on the... .daj 7- of., 18 ...., present to us as commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of .a written application to lay out a highway in said town, pass¬ ing through an orchard of...., of the growth of four years or more, and the said... .having consented that such highway be so laid out, Now, therefore, we, the undersigned commissioners of higliwaj^s, pursu¬ ant to section 90 of the highway law, do hereby lay out said highway, as so applied for, whereof a survey has been made as follows : . and the line of survey is to be the center of the highway which is to be .rods in width. Dated this... .day of., 18- Commissioners of Highways. No. 53. Certificate of Commissioners to County Court, {Highway Law, § 90.) COUNTY COURT— .County. In the Matter of the Application of .. to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of.. and the Assessment of Damages therefor. To the County Court of . County : The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of.. in said county, hereby certify that on the... .day of.. 18...., __ who is liable to be assessed for highway labor in said town, made a -written application to us as such commissioners to lay out a highway in said town, passing through an orchard of...of the growth of four years or more, pursuant to section 90 of the highway law, as follows. . And that the said.does not consent thereto; 410 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. that the following proceedings were had upon such application: . ... We further certify that the public interest will be greatly promoted by the laying out and opening of such highway through said orchard; and commissioners appointed by this court have certified that such highway is necessary and proper, and have assessed the damages of.by reason thereof, at $.* Dated this.day of.. 18- Commissioners of Highways. 3 o. 51. Order of County Court. (Highway Laiv, § 90.) At a term of the.county court, held at., in the .of., on the.day of., 18_ Present—Hon., county judge. In the Matter of the Application of., to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of., and the Assessment of Damages therefor. Upon reading and filing the certificate of.,.and. , com¬ missioners of highways of the town of., in the county of .. dated the.day of.,18_, stating. .with proof of due service of notice of this motion, and upon reading the .and after hearing., of counsel for the applicant, and_, of counsel for__ opposed, it is hereby ordered that said highway be laid out and opened pursuant to section 90 of the highway law-, with ten dollars costs of this motion. County Judge. The Highway Law of New York. 411 Forms. No. 55. Order of Appellate Division. (.Highway Law , § 90.) In the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, for the.. .depart¬ ment, held at the court-house in the city of.on the. day of., 18_ Present—Hon.,.,.. Justices of the Supreme Court. In the Matter of the Application of.. to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of., and the Assessment of Damages therefor. .,., and., as commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of., having presented to us the order of the county court of.county, dated the.day of -•a** .. 18_, that a highway be laid out in said town, passing through the orchard of., of the growth of four years or more, pur¬ suant to section 90 of the highway law, the said.not consenting thereto, with the certificate and proofs upon which the said order was granted, duly certified by such court, with proof of due service of notice of this motion, on the said._ , and after hearing., of counsel for the applicant, on the motion, and., of counsel for., opposed, it hereby ordered that the said order of such county court be, and the same is hereby confirmed, with $.costs of this motion. No. 50. Order laying Out after Confirmation by Appellate Division. (Highway Laic, § 90.) Whereas, _did, on the-day of.. 18-, present to us as commissioners of highways of the town of.. in the county of.. a written application to lay out a highway in said town, passing through an orchard of...., of the growth of four years or more, and such proceedings having been had thereon, pursuant to section 90 of the highway law, that the county court of said county has ordered said highway to be laid out and opened, which said order has been duly con¬ firmed by a general term of the Supreme Court in the.department, 412 The Highway Law of New York. Forms which said application, certificates and orders and other papers in said proceedings are duly filed in the office of the town clerk of said town, t° which reference is here made. Now, therefore, we, the undersigned commissioners of highways, pur¬ suant to section 90 of the highway law, do hereby lay out said highway as so applied for and ordered, whereof a survey has been made as follows: Beginning.and the line of survey is to be the center of the highway, which is to be_rods in width. Dated this_day of.. 18_ Commissioners of Highways. No. 57. Notice of Meeting. (Highway Laic, § 94.) To _ and. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, who are commissioners of highways for the town of.,will meet at.in said town, on the....day of., 18. at... .o’olock in the.noon, for the purpose of determining upon the necessity of and arriving at a common understanding in relation to the laying out of a new highway (or the altering of a highway) extending from the town (or city or village) of.to the town (or city or village) of., and described as follows :. Dated this_day of., 18.... No. 58. Certificate of Disagreement. (.Highway Law, § 94.) COUNTY COURT—.County. In the Matter of the Application of. .. .to Lay Out (or Alter) a Highway Extending from the Town (or City or Village) of .to the Town (or City or Village) of. To the County Court of . County: The undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of. 413 The Highway Law of Hew York. Forms. in the county of., hereby certify that on the .. .day of. ., 18.----, who is liable to be assessed for highway labor in the town of., made a written application to us as such commis¬ sioners to lay out (or alter) a highway extending from the town (or village) of., in the county of., to the town (or city or village) of. in the county of. That the highway commissioners of the said towns (or the said town and the city or village authorities of the said city or village) cannot agree as to the necessity of such highway or the terms upon which the same shall be laid out. Commissioners. No. 59. Order Appointing Commissioners. (.Highway Law, § 94.) At a.term of the county court of the county of., held at.in the.in and for said county. Present—Hon-, county judge. In the Matter of the Application of-to Lay Out (or Alter) a Highway Extending from the Town (or City or Village) of .., to the Town (or City or Village) of. On reading and filing the certificate of.. and-, highway com¬ missioners of the town of., and. and...., of the city or village of., in the county of., dated the-day of . . 18_, stating and upon reading the.and after hearing...., of counsel for the applicant, and.. of counsel foi., opposed, it is hereby ordered that....,-, and...., of the town of. county of., be, and they are hereby appointed commis¬ sioners to determine upon the necessity of laying out (or altering) such highway (or adjust the terms upon which such highway shall'be laid out (or altered). County Judge. 414 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. GO. Decision of Commissioners. (Highway Law , § 94.) The undersigned, by an order of the county court of.county, dated the.day of.. 18_, having been appointed com¬ missioners to certify as to the necessity of laying out (or altering) a high¬ way extending between the town (city or village) of.and the town (city or village) of., in the county of.and described as follows.; now, therefore, we, the said commis¬ sioners, having given due notice of the time and place at which we would meet, and all having met at., in the town of.. on the.day of.18-- pursuant to such notice, and having taken the constitutional oath of office, and on proof of the service of the notice on the highway commissioners of the town of.. (or of the town of.and city or village of.) and having viewed the proposed highway (or proposed alteration of a highway) and the lands through which it is proposed to be laid out (or altered), and having heard all the allegations of the commissioners of highways and the parties interested therein, and the evidence of all the witnesses pro¬ duced, do thereupon certify that in our opinion it is necessary and proper that the highway be laid out (or altered) and we have assessed the damages required to be assessed by reason of laying out (or altering) such highway as follows: The damages of.at $., etc. Dated this.day of., 18_ Commissioners. No. 61 . Applicaton'to Lay Out'Highway on Town Line. (Highway Law , § 97.) To the Commissioners of each of the Towns of . and . in the County of .: We, the undersigned,., an inhabitant of the town of_ .in The Highway Law of New York. 415 Forms. said county, liable to be assessed for highway labor therein, and., an inhabitant of the town of., said county, and liable to be assessed for highway labor therein, hereby apply to you to lay out a high¬ way on the line between said towns as follows., and which said highway will pass through the lands of.and. Dated this.day of.,18- Division into Districts. It is hereby ordered that the said highway be divided into (two) districts as follows: That the part thereof from.to.shall be one of said highway districts, and shall be allotted to the town of. , and the residue of said highway shall be the other of said highway districts, and shall be allotted to the town of. Dated this.day of.. 18- Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Commissioners of Highways of the Town of JSTo. 62. Description of Abandoned Highway. {Highway Law, § 99.) We, the undersigned, commissioners of highways of the town of .. in the county of.. hereby certify that the fol¬ lowing highway., has been abandoned by the public, and is no longer used as a public highway; and pursuant to section 99 of the highway law, the same is discontinued. Dated this... .day of.. 18.... Commissioners of Highways 416 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. No. 63. Notice of Fallen Tree. (.Highway Laic, § 103.) To . Please take notice that a tree has fallen from your inclosed land into the highway at., and you are hereby required to remove the same within two days after the service of this notice. Dated this_day of., 18.... No. 64. Notice of Encroachment. {Highway Laic, § 105.) To . You are hereby notified by the undersigned commissioners of highways of the town of.. in the county of., that the high¬ way in district No.. in said town adjoining the premises owned (or occu¬ pied by you at.have been encroached upon (or obstructed) to the extent of.by.and you are hereby directed to remove the same within sixty days after the service of this notice. Dated this... .day of., 18.... Commissioners of Highways. No. 6o. Application for Private Road. (.Highway Law, § 106.) To the Commissioners of Highways of the Town of . County of . The undersigned, who is liable to be assessed for highway labor in your town, hereby makes application to you to lay out a private road for his The Highway Law of New York. 417 Forms. use and benefit as follows:. and said proposed road will run through the land of., occupied by. Dated this_day of., 18_ JSTo. 66. Notice to Applicant. {Highway Law, § 108.) To . Owner, and . Occupant: ., of the town of., in the county of. having made written application to us, the undersigned, as commissioners of highways of said town, to lay out a private road for his use and benefit in said town, a copy of which is hereto attached, you are hereby notified that a jury will be selected at.. in said town, on the_day of., 18_, at_o’clock in the.noon, for the purpose of determining upon the necessity of such road, and assessing the damages therefor. Dated this_day of.. 18_ Commissioners of Highways. No. 67. Affidavit of Service. {Highway Law, § 109.) COUNTY OF. ) >• ss.: Town of. ) .. being duly sworn, says that he served the application and notice hereto attached on.and.. on the.day of., 18.... by delivering to and leaving with each of them true copies of the same. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this.day of.,18- i 27 Notary Public. 418 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. JSTo. 68. Venire. (Highway Law , § 112.) COUNTY OF Town of... ss.: To .: You are hereby summoned and required to appear at the., in said town of., on the.day of.. 18...at . o’clock in the.noon, to form a jury of freeholders to determine as to the necessity of laying out a private road through the lands of. on the application of.. and to assess the amount of damages sustained by reason of such opening, if it is determined to open the same. Dated this.day of., 18... Commissioners of Highways. JSTo. 69. Verdict of Jury. (Highway Law , § 114.) COUNTY OF. ) >■ ss.: Town of. ) We, the undersigned, being six disinterested freeholders of the said town of.having met on the.day of.,18_, at the house of., in the said town, and having been duly sworn well and truly to determine as to the necessity of the private road described in the application of.,a copy of which is hereto attached, and having viewed the premises through which it is proposed to be laid out, and having heard the parties and evidence produced, do hereby certify that in our opinion it is necessary and proper to lay out a The Highway Law of Hew York. 419 Forms. private road for the use and benefit of., pursuant to his said application, and we assess the damages of.at $. Dated this.day of., 18_ Yo. 70. Certificate of Commissioners. (Highway Law , § 116.) Whereas, .. . .did present to us as commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of., a written application to lay out a private road in said town for his use and benefit, hereinafter described ; and six disinterested freeholders having convened, after due notice to the owners and occupants of the lands through which said road is proposed to be laid, and after viewing said lands and hearing the parties and witnesses produced, certified that said road is necessary and proper* and assessed the damages to be caused thereby, which certificate was dated the_day of.. 18-, and duly filed with said applica¬ tion, in the office of the town clerk of said town ; and no motion has been made to the county court to confirm, vacate or modify (or as the case may be). Now, therefore, we, the undersigned, commissioners of highways of said town, pursuant to section 116 of the highway law, do hereby lay out said private road as so applied for and certified to, whereof a survey has been made as follows :.and the line of survey is to be the center of the road, which is to be... .rods in width. Dated this ...day of .,18- Commissioners of Highways. 420 The Highway Law of New York. Forms. JSTo. 71. Notice by Highway Commissioners to those of Another Town. (.Highway Law , § 135.) To the commissioners of highways of the town of., in the county of., take notice that in pursuance of the proceedings of the board of supervisors of the county of., as follows :., you are required to join with the commissioners of highways of the town of.. in constructing (or repairing) such bridge, at the joint expense of said towns, and to serve upon us your written consent thereto, within twenty days after service of this notice upon j r ou, and that in case of your failure so to do the undersigned commissioners of highways of the town of., will proceed to construct (or repair) such bridge pursuant to law. Dated this-day of., 18_ Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Jo. 72. Laying Out County Highways. (County Law , $ 61.) Application. To the Board of Supervisors of the County of .. We, the undersigned, being twenty-five resident taxpayers of the county of.. hereby make application, in pursuance of section 61 of the county law, for the laying out of a county highway of the width of .. described as follows:. Dated this-day of., 18_ Notice. To the Highway Commissioners of the Several Towns in the County of Notice is hereby given that on the... .day of , 18... .the fore- The Highway Law of New York. 421 Forms. going application will be presented to the board of supervisors of the county of. Dated this_day of.. 18_ STATE OF NEW YORK fcs.: County of. ) ., being duly sworn, says that he is a resident of.. N.Y. ? and that he served copies of the petition and notice annexed hereto, per¬ sonally, on each of the following commissioners of highways at the times and places opposite their names, respectively: .at., N. Y., .. at_o’clock in the.noon. .at. , N. Y., . , at_o'clock in the.noon. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this_day of.. 18- Notary Public. Resolution by Supervisors. At a meeting of the board of supervisors of the county of.. held at.on the -day of .. 18.... Whereas, application has been made for the laying out (altering or dis¬ continuing) of a highway in said county, and whereas satisfactory proof has been made to us of the service of a copy of such application, together with a notice of intention to make the same, upon a commissioner of highways of each town in said county. Resolved , That a highway of the width of .be laid out in accord¬ ance with such application, as follows: . .. Chairman. .. Cleric. Adopted. Ayes.... Noes.... The Highway Law of New York. 423 Index. INDEX. A. ABANDONMENT: of highway, what constitutes. 09. ABATEMENT: see, Tax. ACCOUNTS; how made out, 16. ACTION: against overseer to collect pen alt v, 32. by town against commissioners, 26. for injuries to highway, 19. ADJOURNMENT: of proceedings to lay out highway, 131. ALBANY COUNTY: bicycle paths in, 362. APPEALS : by owner of non-resident lands from assessment, 41. by towns jointly liable to build bridge, i43. from decisions laying out, &c., highway, 83. APPENDIX : General Laws, 171. Miscellaneous Laws, 278, ASSESSMENT see. Labor on Highways, Tax. BENEFITS: assessment of, 81. B. 424 The Highway Law of Hew Yoek. Index. BICYCLE: as a carriage, 153. entitled to free use of highway, 154. injuries to bicycle paths, 154, 155. paths in Albany county, 362. in Cattaraugus county, 349. in Columbia county, 367. in Monroe county, 351. Side path commissioner, 368a. ordinances regulating use of, 363g. BONDS : issue of, by county, 52. proceeds of county bonds, 53. BRIDGE: < d itional tax for, 13, 206. between cities and towns, 326. breaking of, when town not liable for, 147. care of, generally, 3. corporations, 238. construction of bridges by, 238, 243. certificate of completion of bridge, 244. erection of gates by, 244. rates of toll by, 244. toll gathers, 246. penalty for running gate, 246. location and change of gates, 246. office of corporation, 251. consol dation of colorations, 251, bridge liable to taxation, 253. penalty for fast driving over, 255. acts of directors prohibited, 255. actions for penalties, 255. proof of incorporation, 255. when stockholders to be directors, 256. dissolution of corporation, 256. extension of corporate existence, 258. county aid in construction of, 132, 135. supervisors to levy tax, 136. expense of budding or repairing, 132. The Highway Law of New Yoke. 420 Index. BRIDGE : statement of, 136. extraordinary repairs of, 14. auditing expense of, 15. iron bridge, erection of, 143. joint liabilities of towns as to, 136. refusal to repair. 138, 142. proceedings in court, 139. commissioners to institute proceedings, 140. dutv of commissioners, 140. report of commissioners, 141. appeals from decision of court, 141. power of court on appeal, 141. penalty for fast driving on, 143, 255. notice of, 143, 255. repair of, generally, 4. toll-bridge, when unsafe, 17. see, Canal, River, Village. CANAL: C. as highway, 103. bridges built by municipal corporations, 269. lift-bridge, &c., built by city, 270. commutation for bridges, 266. farm and road bridges over, 265. restriction upon construction of, 268. iron bridges, 267. models and location of bridges, 268. penalty for fast driving over bridge, 270. private road in lieu of bridge, 267. CARRIAGE : definition of term, 153. free use of highway by, 154. owners of, liable for acts of drivers, 153. see, Law of the Road., CATTARAUGUS COUNTY: bicycle paths in, 349. 426 The Highway Law of New York. Index. CERTIORARI: to review assessment in laying out road, 85-87. COLUMBIA COUNTY : bicycle paths in, 367. COMMISSIONERS OF HIGHWAYS: actions against, by town, 26, actions by, for injuries to highway, 18. additional tax, how raised by, 13. altering highway, 64-131. as fence viewers, 3, 206. as inspectors of turnpikes, 248. assessment for unperformed labor, 59. assessment of highway labor by, 37. assignments to highway districts by, 6. as water commissioners, 4. bridges, duty as to, 182-143. care of sewers, drains and culverts by, 4. certificate to accounts, 16. collection of penalties against overseer by, 32, 59. compensation of, 214. consent of, to pipes in highway. 18. consent of, to railroad crossing highway. 279. contracts of, to be filed, 321. describing and recording highways by, 4. discontinuing highway. 64-131. division of town into highway districts by, 4. duties of in commissioner districts, 34. election of, 3, 205, 342. expenditure of moneys by, 7. extraordinary repairs by, 14. expense thereof, 15. fences removed by, 113. fires in woods, duties as to, 211. general powers of, 3. guide-boards erected by, 9. holding over, 3. in Kings county, 215. The Highway Law of New York. 427 Index. COMMISSIONERS OF HIGHWAYS : laying out highway, 64-131. lists of inhabitants delivered to, 36. meetings of, for assessment, 36. mile-stones erected by, 9. non-resident lands, to make list of, 36. oath of office of, 3. overseers to be appointed by, 6 .} powers as to state roads, 278. powers of one commissioner, 3. private roads, duties as to, 124-131. protection of highways against streams, 8. removal from office, 3. repair of highways and bridges by, 4. reports of, 28. resignation of, 3, 210. road machines and implements purchased by, 10. sidewalks, may authorize laying of, 44. stone crushers purchased by, 12. custody of, 13. term of office of, 3, 205. to deliver books to successor, 211. to render account to town board, 212. to require overseers to give warning, 7. treasurer of, 2. undertaking of, 2. trees, may authorize planting of, 44. undertaking of, 3, 209, 210. unsafe toll-bridge, duties as to, 17. vacancy in office of, 3, 210. COMMUTATION: money to be collected by overseers, 29, 55. rate of, 55. CONSTITUTION: / provision as to highways, 171. 428 The Highway Law of New York. Index. CORPORATION: assessment of, for highway labor, 37, 38. assignment of, to highway district, 6. commutation by, 38, 55. day’s labor by, what it consists of, 57. may furnish substitute, 57. notice to work to be given to, 54. penalty for neglect to work or commute, 57 . see. Bridge, Turnpike. COSTS: of assessment of damages on laying out road, 92. auditing of, 92. of motions, in proceedings under Highway Law, 145 COUNTY: aid in construction and repair of bridges, 132, 135. supervisors to levy tax, 136. county road system, adoption of, 50. expenses of how paid, 51. issue of bonds, 52. jurisdiction of roads, in whom, 52. proceeds of bonds, 53. engineer, 51. to have charge of county roads, 52. general duties as to roads and bridges, 193-204. supervisors to collect arrearages of labor, &c., 59. to have charge of county roads, 52. COUNTY ROAD: see, County. CROSSINGS: see, Highway, Law of the Road, Railroad. CUL DE SAC : as highway, 102. The Highway Law of Hew York. 429 Index. D. DAMAGES: audit of, without action, 27. for laying out highway, 68, 78, 81. auditing of, 92. review of, 85. for laying out private road, 128. DEDICATION: and acceptance, 66. of highways, 65. of streets in villages, 220. DEFINITION: of highway, 101. DISTRICT: see, Labor on Highway, Town. DRIFTWAY: as highway, 102. E. ELECTION: of highway commissioners, 3. ELECTRIC LIGHT: right of line in highway, 111. ELEVATED RAILROAD: see, Railroad. ENCROACHMENT: see, Highway. ENGINEER: county engineer, 51. to have charge of county roads, 52. EXTRA VIAM: right to pass over lands adjacent to highway, 112. F. FEE: see, Highway. 430 The Highway Law of New York. Index. FENCE: abatement of tax for removal of, 62. removal of by commissioners, 113 wire fences may be erected by town, 289. FENCE VIEWERS: highway commissioners as, 3, 206. FERRY: appendages for rope ferries, 160. as highway, 102. leasing right of passage, 160. licenses for running, 157. undertaking on application for, 160. schedule of rates to be posted, 161. penalty for failure to post, 161. use of highway by ferry corporation, 111. FINES: to be collected by overseers, 29. FORMS: abandoned highway, description of, 415. accounts for services and materials, 378. altering, discontinuing, laying out highway: laying out on dedication, 396. laying out on release of damages, 397 application to lay out, 399. application to alter, 399. application to discontinue, 400. application for commissioners, 400. appointment of commissioners, 401. subpoena and oath, 402. notice of meeting of commissioners, 402. decision favoring application, 403. decision denying application, 403. notice of motion to confirm, 405. order of confirmation, 406. order laying out after confirmation, 406. notice of motion to vacate or modify, 407. order vacating or modifying, 408. The Highway Law of New York. 431 Index. FORMS : appeal by non-resident, 386. application to lay water-pipes in highway, 380. appointment of commissioner to fill vacancy, 371. appointment of overseers, 375. claim for damages against town, 381. complaint about unsafe toll-bridge, 379. consent of town board to repair of highway, &c., 376. county highway, laying out, 420. disagreement of officers of different towns: notice of meeting, 412. certificate of disagreement, 412. order appointing commissioners, 413. decision of commissioners, 414. division of town into highway districts, 375. highway on town line, application to lay out, 414 laying out of highway through improved lands: consent of owner, 408. order laying out, after consent, 409. certificate of commissioners to county court, 409. order of county court, 410. order of appellate division, 411. order laying out after confirmation by appellate division, 411. list of inhabitants, 383. list of non-resident lands, 384. list of unperformed labor, 391. new assessment by overseers, 387. notice by commissioners to those of another town, 420. notice of encroachment, 416. notice of fallen tree, 416. notice to corporation of assessment, 390. notice to non-residents of assessment, 391. notice to overseers of appointment, 376. notice to owners of unsafe toll-bridge, 379. notice to remove obstructions, 383. order authorizing planting of shade trees, 387. permission to lay water-pipes in highway, 380. private road: 432 The Highway Law of New York. Index. FORMS: application for, 416. notice to applicant, 417. affidavit of service of notice, 417. venire, 418. verdict of jury, 418. certificate of commissioners, 419. report of highway commissioners, 382. request by commissioners to convene town board, 377. resignation of highway commissioner, 371. return of overseer, 392. road warrant, 384. sidewalks, order authorizing construction of, 387. application to anticipate tax for, 388 certificate of anticipation, 389. system of taxation, request to change, 390. undertaking of highway commissioner, 372. of treasurer, 374. weeds, notice to remove, 394. report of overseer as to, 394. certificate of commissioners, 395. GOOD ROADS: an act providing for, 3.54. GUIDE-BOARDS: erection of, by highway commissioners, 9. by turnpike corporations, 250. H. HIGHWAYS : abandonment of, 99. additional tax for improvement of, 13, 206. altering, laying out, discontinuing, 64-131. application for, 73. application for commissioners, 73. appointment of commissioners, 75. duties of commissioners, 75. notice of meeting of commissioners, 77. The Highway Law of New York. 433 Index. HIGHWAYS: decision of commissioners, 78, 83. assessment of damages, 78, 81. ; assessment of benefits, 81. motion to confirm, &c., decision, 83. certiorari to review assessment, 85-87. limitations upon laying out, 87. laying out through improved grounds, 87 laying out through burying grounds, 91. costs of assessment, 92. damages assessed and collected, 93. auditing of damages and costs, 92. disagreement of officers of different towns, 94, 95. highway in two or more towns, 97. highway upon town line, 97. final determination, how carried out, 99. alteration for canal purposes, 265. animals straying on, proceedings, 174. appropriation of money for, by special town meeting, 208. by use, 101, 104. care of, generally, 3, 29. certain license moneys to be devoted to, 291. compensation for laying out, &c., 68. crossed by pipe line, 235. crossed by railroad, 271. crossing railroad, 91, 279. damages for discontinuing, 325. dedication of, 65. definition of, 101. canal as, 103. cul de sac as, 102. driftway as, 102. ferry as, 102. particular cases, 104. pier as, 102. railroad as 103. river as, 103. 28 434 The Highway Law of New York. Index. HIGHWAYS : shore as, 102. street as, .102. turnpike as, 103. way by necessity, 104. description of, 4. districts, 5. drainage, sewer and water pipes in. 13. encroachment on, penalty for, 114. exemption of national guard from toll, 113, 245. extraordinary repairs of, 14. expense thereof, 15. free use of by all vehicles, 154. guide-boards erected on, 9. injuries to, action for, 19. damages for, 145. penalties for, 146, 147. laid out along division lines, 131. leaving horses without being tied, 152. liability of towns for defects in, 20. macadamizing, 317, 320. machines and implements for work on, 10. mile-stones erected on, 9. monuments to be erected as boundaries, 29. noxious weeds to be cut down, 29. obstructed, to be opened by overseers, 30. obstructing, penalty for, 114. overseers, duties of in relation to, 29. recording of, 5. removal of obstructions and encroachments, 118. repairing road on line between city and town, 283. repair of, generally, 4, 29. steam engines passing on, 147. stone and rubbish not to be dumped on, 156. stone-crushers and materials for, 12. expense of, 317. stone in, to be removed, 29. survey of, 71. The Highway Law of New York. 435 Index. HIGHWAYS: uses of, 105. by electric light company, 111 by elevated railroads, 109. by ferry corporation, 111. by national guard, 113. by steam railroads, 108. by street railroads, 110. by telegraph line, 110. by telephone line, 110. by turnpike corporations, 111. extra viam, 112. for floating logs and timber, 260. laying of pipes, 111. miscellaneous rights and uses, 112. ownership of the fee, 105-108. penal code provisions as to, 112. widening of, 311, 328. see, Good Roads, Indians, Labor on Highways, Law of the Road, Railroad, State Roads, Village. HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER: see, Commissioner of Highways. HIGHWAY LAW: construction of, 164. laws repealed by, 163, 165. publication of, 314. saving clause, 163. title, short, of act, 2. when to take effect, 164. ' 1 L IMPLEMENTS : purchase of, for work on highways, 10. to be furnished by those assessed for highway febor, 55. INDIANS: highways on tribal lands, 275j highway labor by, 276. Tiie Highway Law of New York. 436 Index. INJURY: action for injury to highway, ID. to highway, damages for, 145. penalties for, 146, 147. INTEMPERATE DRIVERS : not to be engaged, 151. when to be discharged, 152. K. KINGS COUNTY : commissioners of highways in, 215-217. improvement of highways in, 305. L. LABOR ON HIGHWAYS : abatement of tax for shade trees, 45. for watering trough, 47. for removal of fence, 62. for street lamps, 62. for using wide wagon tires, 63. amount of assessment, 37. anticipation of tax for sidewalks, 46. certificate of, 46. transfer of certificate, 47. appeals by non-residents, 41. assessment for unperformed labor, 58. list of unperformed labor, 58. collection of arrearages by supervisors, 59. assessment list delivered to overseers, 40. names omitted therefrom, 41. assessment of, how made, 37. assessment when village within town, 284. assignment to highway districts, 6. by Indians, 276. commutation of, 55. credit on private roads, 42. day’s labor, what it consists of, 51 division of town into districts, 5. The Highway Law of New York. 437 Index. LABOR ON HIGHWAYS: exemption from, 37. officers of State Assylum for Idiots, 281. may be applied to a certain highway, 38. meetings of commissioners for assessment, 36 new assessments by overseers, 43. notice to work, 54. to non-residents, 55. occupant assessed instead of owner, 42. omissions of assessors corrected, 43. ©mission to work, may be excused by overseer, 58. overseers to give warning, 7. penalties for neglect to work or commute, 57. performance of, 54. reassessment in case of neglect, 43. state prison convicts, employment of, 315, 361. substitutes for, 57. - teams and implements for, 56. tenant to deduct assessment, 42 upon line of turnpike, 258. see, Tax. LABOR SYSTEM: see, System of Taxation. LAMPS: abatement of tax for, 62. lamp districts in town, 322. LAW OF THE ROAD: carriages to turn to the right, 149, 151. coossing of highway, 149-151, 271. right of way, 149, 151. L75D: in overseer’s return, 60. of inhabitants liable to labor, 36. of unperformed labor, 58. 438 The Highway Law of New York. Index. M. MACHINES: purchase of, for roads, 10. MILE-STONES: erection of, by highway commissioners, 9. by turnpike corporations, 250. MILITIA: see, National Guard. MONEY SYSTEM: see, System of Taxation. MONROE COUNTY: bicycle paths in, 351. MONUMENTS: erection of, as highway boundaries, 29. NT. NATIONAL GUARD: exemption of, from toll, 113. NEWBURGH AND COCHETON ROAD* may be surrendered, 353. NON-RESIDENT LANDS: appeal from assessment by owner of, 41, list of, made by commissioners, 36. notice to work to owners of, 55, O, OATH: of highway commmissioner, 3. of overseer of highway, 30. of office generally, 172, 208. town officer may administer, 209. OBSTRUCTION: see, Highway. OCCUPANT: see. Labor on Highways. The Highway Law of New York. 489 Index. OFFICER: failure of, to act, 145. oath of, 172, 208. ORDINANCES: regulating use of bicycles, 368g„ OVERSEERS OF HIGHWAYS : abatement of tax to be allowed by, 45, 47, 62. 63. anticipation of sidewalk tax, certificate of by, 46. appointment of, 6. assessment list delivered to, 40. collection of fines by, 29, 55. of commutation money by, 29, 55. compensation of, 33, duties of, generally, 29, 54. may acquire gravel for highways, 301. may excuse omission to perform labor, 54. monuments to be erected by, 29. new awaeaisiaents by, 43. notice to non-residents, 55. notice to work given by, 54. noxious weeds to be cut by, 29. oath of, 30. opening of obstructed highways by, 30. penalties against, 81. collection of, 83. refusal to serve as, 7, 209. required to warn those liable to work, 7, 29. resignation of, 210. return of, 60. stones to be removed by, 39. to add names omitted from assessment list, 41* to deliver lists of inhabitants, 36. to give notice to remove weeds, 61. to make list of unperformed labor, 59. penalty for failure to make list, 59. to make requisition for teams and implements,' 56. to recover penalty for neglect to work, 62. underbaking of, 30, 210. vacancy m office of, T # 210. 440 The Highway Law of Hew York. Index. P. PAPERS : where to be filed, 144. PENALTY : against overseer, 31, 59. collection of, 32, 59. for failiing to post ferry schedule, 161. for falling trees, 114. for fast driving on bridge, 143, 255, 270. for neglect to work or commute, 57. recovery of, 57. for obstructing or encroaching on highway, 112, 114. for running horses on highway, 113. for running toll-gate, 246. for unlawfully exacting toll, 113. recovery of, generally, 155. PIER: as highway, 102. PIPES: crossing highway, 235. drainage, sewer and water, in highway, 18. for heating purposes, 285. in highway outside of village, 218. the right to lay, 111. PLANK-ROAD : see, Turnpike. PRIVATE ROADS : credit on assessment for working, 42. for what purpose to be used, 130. proceedings to lay out, 124-131. R. RAILROAD : as highway, 103. corporation may lay tracks on highway, 272. duties of, on highway, 147. flagmen at crossing, 273. The Highway Law of New York. 441 Index. RAILROAD: highway crossing railroad, 91, 279. intersection of highways by, 271. consent of commissioners to, 279. rights of, in highway, 108, 109, 110. sign boards at crossing, 273. street railroad crossing steam railroad, 303. REAL PROPERTY : how assessed, for highway labor, 37, 39 REPORT: of highway commissioners, 28. of overseers, 60. RICHMOND COUNTY: improvement of roads in, 293. RIGHT OF WAY: see, Law of the Road. RIVERS: application of Navigation Law to which, 283. as public highway, 103, 260. booms to be opened on notice, 260. penalty for failure, 261. dams and bridges on, how built, 260. marks on logs to be recorded, 262. passage of logs regulated, 344. persons prohibited from landing logs, 263. shutes and aprons for dams, 261. undertaking of person floating logs, 263. ROAD MACHINES: purchase of, 10. a SHADE TREES; see, Treeauj' jSHtlitfe us wa 7 , 103. SIDE-PATHS: commissioners to construct, 368a. 442 The Highway Law of New York. Index. SIDEWALKS: anticipation of labor tax on, 46. certificate of, 46. transfer of certificate, 47. commissioners may authorize laying of, 44- driving vehicles on. 154. in villages, 229, 230. obstruction of, 117. STATE ROADS: attention of, 278. New York and Albany post road, 324. STEAM ENGINES: passage of, over highways, 147. STONE: to be removed by overseers, 29. not to be dumped on highway, 156. STONE CRUSHERS: custody of, 13. expense of, 317. materials for, 13. purchase of, 12. STRAYS: upon highways, provisions as to, 174, STREET: as highway, 102. STREET LAMPS: see, Lamps. STREET RAILROAD: see, Railroad. SUPERVISORS: see, County. SURVEY: when highway laid oat, 71. The Highway Law of New York. 443 Index. SYSTEM OF TAXATION : labor system, defined, 48. money system, defined, 48. town may change system, 48. vote thereon, 48. when change to take effect, 48. annual tax under money system, 49. villages exempt therefrom, 49. county road system, adoption of, 50. expenses of, how paid, 51. issue of bonds, 52. jurisdiction of county roads, in whom, 52. proceeds of county bonds, 53. abatement of, for shade trees, 45. for removal of fence, 62. tar street lamps, 62. for watering trough, 47. sum allowed a town charge, 214. j additional, for highway improvement, 13, 206, 289. annual, under money system, 49. villages exempt therefrom, 49. anticipation of, for sidewalks, 46. certificate of, 46. transfer of certificate, 47. for street purposes in villages, 233. rebate of, on account of wagon tires, 63. see, Labor on Highways, System of Taxation. TEAMS: furnished by those liable to highway labor, 56, TELEGRAPH: „ •v right of line in highway, 110. TELEPHONE : right of line in highway, 110. 444 The Highway Law of Hew York. Index. TENANT: see, Labor in Highway. TIRES: see, Wagon. TITLE : short, of this act, 2. TOLL: abatement of, for watering trough, 281. exemption of National Guard from, 113, 245. gatherers, 48. penalty for ruiming toll-gate, 246. rates of, for turnpikes and bridges, 245. TOLL-BRIDGE: see, Bridges. TOWN: action by, against commissioners. 28. division of, into highway districts, 5. into commissioner districts, 33. fire companies in, 212. lamp districts in, 322. liability of, for defects in highway, 20. may borrow money for highway purposes, 214. officers in Kings county, 215. supervisor not to receive highway moneys, 210. w r ho to vote at town meetings, 207. wire fences may be erected by, 280. see, Bridges, System of Taxation. TOWN BOARD : audit of damages without action, 27. audit of expenses for laying out highway, 03. consent to extraordinary repairs, 14. auditing expense of, 15. dividing town into commissioner districts. 33L Tiie Highway Law of New York. 445 Index. TREASURER: of highway commissioners, 2. undertaking of, 2. TREES: abatement of tax for planting, 45. commissioners may authorize planting, 44. penalty for falling, 114. prevention of mutilation of, 286. removal of fallen, 114. to whom they belong, 148. trimming of, in villages, 232. TURNPIKE (or Plank-road): as highway, 103. the use of highways for, 111. acquisition of, by county, 346. corporations, 238. use of highway by, 238-243. certificate of completion of road by, 244. erection of toll-gates by, 244. rates of toll, 245. toll gatherers, 246. penalty for running gate, 246. location and change of gates, 246. commissioners of highways as inspectors, 248. change of route by, 250. mile-stones to be erected by, 250. guide-posts to be erected by, 250. hoist-gate not to be erected by, 250. office of corporation, 251. consolidation of corporations, 251. surrender of road, 252, 257. exemption of road from taxation, 253. haruling logs over road, 254. encroachment of fences, 254. acts of directors prohibited, 255. actions for penalties, 2-15. proof of incorporation, 255. 446 The Highway Law of New York. Index. TURNPIKE (or Plankroad): when stockholders to be directors, 256. dissolution of corporation, 256. highway labor upon line of turnpike, 258. extension of corporate existence, 258. abatement of toll for watering trough, 281. board of supervisors many acquire, 368e. UNDERTAKING: of treasurer of highway commissioners, 2. of highway commissioners, 3. of ferry corporation or owner, 160, USE: highway by, 101, 104. USES OF HIGHWAY: see, Highway. VEHICLES : to turn to the right, 147. see, Law of the Road. VILLAGE : exempt from tax under money system, 49. water pipes in highway outside of, 218. as separate highway district, 219. care of bridges by, 219, 220. dedication of slreets, 220. street improvement in, 221-227. 287. changing grade of street or bridge, 228, 283. streets on boundary lines, 2^9. crosswalks in, 229. sidewalks in, 229, 230. cleaning streets in, 231. sprinkling streets in, 231. pavements in, how laid, 231. trimming trees in, 232. local assessments for streets, &c., 233. acquisition of land by, for parks, &c., 233. pipes in, for heating purposes, 285 The Highway Law of New York. 44 ? Index. W WAGON: rebate of tax for using wide tires, 63. WATER COMMISSIONERS: highway commissioners as, 4. WATERING TROUGH : abatement of tax for, 47. sum allowed a charge upon town, 214*. abatement of toll for, on turnpike, 281. WAY: by necessity, 104. WEEDS: cutting of, by overseers, 29. destruction oi, by owner or occupant, 61. notice to renew, 01. town meefings-to make, provisions as to, 206. ' r tv r- , ^ > - H Z 7 i 0^4 (P