TD 743 . A5 Copy 1 3 * ,r\ *r w AMERICAN SEWAGE DISPOSAL COMPANY OP BOSTON 1 i - INDEX. =■ Acton.39 Advantage of a Sewer .28 Andover.16, 30, 31, 35, 36 Bacteria.23 Barrhead.21 Bean, Henry .31 Berlin .28 Board of Health.16,17 Boston.29, 37, 38 Bradford .39 Brentwood.12, 13, 21, 31 Brockton .17,24,30 Building Sewers..,,.......5 Cameron.24 Care of Filter Beds.35 Central Park.29 Champaign.21 Character of Sewage.24 Chemical Precipitation. 33 Chicago . 21 Cloaca. 28 Commercial Advantage. 30 Construction of Sewers.. . . 7 Consultation ..- 4° Contractor. 5 Cos.t of Disposal Works. 6 Cost of Sewers.6 Crimp, W. S. .1.3D 39 Danvers.35 Darfield.21 Darwin .24 Design of Sewers . — 7 Dibden .. 24 Disposal Works..8, 9, 10 Dukal . 24 Duty of Colleges. 39 Ealing . ..3°> 39 East Orange. 3° Effectiveness of Filters.36 England.28 Exeter, Eng.21, 24 Exeter, N. H.10 Framingham .3°. 34 Frankland. 24 Gardner .3°. 34 Glover, A. ..16, 24 Great Britain.28 Hoffmann.3 1 Hydraulic Press.3 2 Importance of Disposal. 28 Inst, of Civil Engineers .23 Jones, Col.......3 1 Judicial Decisions.32 Koch.24 Dawes .. Lawrence .24, 27, 33-36 Life of Filter Beds. 3 6 London .30 Location of Disposal Works.29 Lowell.27 Macaire .. j.31 Magnitude of Disposal.21 Manurial Value of Sewage.. 31 Marcet.31 Marion .21 Marlborough .... .30, 34 Massachusetts.30 Mechi. 31 Mediterranean .28 Merrimack River...27 Mississippi.27 Model Disposal Works. • 9 Monroe. .31 Moses . 19 Natick.30 Neglect of Disposal.14,26 Newark.30 Noyes .. 22 Pasteur.24 Paris.28 Pemigewasset. 27 Pension .32 Preece, Sir Wm. Henry.23 Press.... 39 Profile House ..27 Purification of Water..20 Rapid Filtration . 37-39 Record Plans . 5 Rockingham County ... 31 Rome.28 Royalty.,.40 Sanitary Institute.23 Sedimentation.35 Scott, Moncrieff. 24 Septic Tank.21 Small Disposal Works.24 Smith, John E.31 Story of Patents.17 Sub-Surface Disposal.29, 35 Talbot, Arthur N.21 Thudichum . 31 Tiber.28 Topography. 5 University of Illinois.21 Urbana.21 Validity of Patents.16 Value of Sewage. 31 Verona. 21 Voelcker.31 Washington.28 Warrenton.24 Way . 21 Westborough .34 Winnepesaukee.27 Witt . 31 Worcester.30 Worn-out Farms. 32 i i 1 American Sewage Disposal Company OF BOSTON. 89 State Street, - - Boston, Mass. 60 Broadway, - - - New York. Main Office: BOSTON, MASS., U. S. A. ORGANIZED FOR DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCT¬ ING SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL WORKS. . . . Directors . . . JOHN N. McCLINTOCK, A. M. C. E., President and Manager. J. LESTER McLEAN, Banker and Broker, Treasurer. JOSEPH P. O’CONNELL, Merchant and Contractor. COL. A. M. BENSON, Lumber Merchant. COL. FRANCIS S.' HESSELTINE, Counsellor-at-Law. JOHN TILTON McCLINTOCK, Architect. GEORGE E. NEWHALL, Leather Merchant. ... IN CONSULTATION . . . Leading Financiers, Lawyers, Health Authorities, and Civil Engineers. >v 74668 Copyright, AMERICAN SEWAGE DISPOSAL CO., BOSTON, 1899. Or \°iod SEWER BUILDING AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SEWER BUILDING. It is possible to build sewers in any place where hunkSii habitation is feasible, and to so care for the sewage that it will not be offensive in any sense. To properly plan a system of sewers and sewage disposal works for a locality, it is of the utmost importance that a topographical map of the section to be drained be first prepared, giving the grade of the streets, depth of the cellars, and the general conformation of the territory. It is generally possible to carry the sewage by gravitation to some point where it can be treated more or less elaborately, according to the degree of purification demanded, and other conditions. If gravity can be depended upon to care for the effluent, or purified water from tanks or filter beds, the problem of sewage disposal is greatly simpli¬ fied. 2. The second step necessary after a topographical survey is the general design of a system of sewers, and of sewage disposal works. Here is where a village, town or city require the services of an expert and experienced civil engineer, one who has made himself familiar not only with the successful achievements of other engineers in the past, but is posted as to the mistakes and failures made in all parts of the world. 3. The scheme having been devised and approved by the proper authorities, plans for building and record should be made. 4. A contracting party should be obtained, and proper supervision furnished. If a city, or town would undertake to do its own work, experienced surveyors and foremen for brick¬ work and stonework, manholes, catch-basins, pipe-laying and blasting should be provided, and the line and grade adhered to faithfully. 5 COST OF SEWERS. In considering the construction of a sewer system, a rough estimate of the probable cost is generally sought. The preliminary topographical plan will cost from 50 cents to $3.00 per acre of territory to be drained, according to the characteristics of the surface, whether flat or diversified, thinly or thickly settled. A well considered design may cost from 2 to 10 cents per inhabitant, according to the size of the place; making plans for building and record will cost from $20.00 to $40.00 per mile of sewer pipe. A twelve-inch pipe with proper inlets can be laid eight feet below the surface for $ 1.00 per foot. If ledge is en¬ countered the cost is increased. Eedge work will cost from $2.00 to $5.00 per cubic yard, according to the hardness of the stone and depth below the surface. Manholes and catch- basins averaging 150 feet apart will cost about $35.00 or $40.00 each. The separate system for sewage and surface water is usually recommended, with proper appliances for flushing, to save cost of work. Disposal works will cost approximately from $1.00 to $2.00 per inhabitant. Plans for the same may be furnished at 5 % of their cost. Chemical precipitation will cost per year 20 cents per inhabitant. The cost of the trunk sewers of a system, of course, will depend upon their size. A completed sewer system in running order will cost from $2.00 to $4-00 per running foot or from $10,000 to $20,000 per mile, for a place of considerable size. Small systems will cost less. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston will furnish plans, estimates and supervision for 10% of cost of construction, or it will build the sewers and disposal works, or either, at cost and accept 10% additional for plans, super¬ vision and profits. 6 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston offer their services to properly equip any community with sewers and disposal works. They will furnish expert surveyors for making preliminary plans, expert civil engineers for designing sewer systems and sewage disposal works, ex¬ perienced and skilful sewer constructors, pipe-layers, stone- men, masons, engineers, inspectors, foremen and workmen. There are many small towns without an engineer experienced in sewer construction and sewage disposal works. This com¬ pany is prepared to undertake the work of designing and build¬ ing for such towns. They will take the contract, or let it to lowest bidder, and supervise construction. They will make an equitable arrangement with any community desiring their services. The business which the company seeks is not only the planning and construction of sewers and disposal works, but the continued operation and maintenance of the same under contract and under bond, so that skilled labor and responsible workmen will attend to keeping up the efficiency of the sys¬ tem, more especially of the disposal works. Skill, experience, and judgment are demanded for the proper construction of sewers, manholes, catch-basins, flush¬ ing tanks, and disposal works. A system however perfect may be ruined or impaired in its operation by the lack of engineering skill, experience in sewer construction, and common sense in building it. For instance, a sewer laid without regard to a grade line, following the irregularities of the surface, forming depressions and elevations, laid without close-fitting and cemented joints,with¬ out manholes or ventilation, built by unskilled labor, inspected by idiots, supervised by ignorance and stupidity, clothed with brief authority, to save fees for legitimate professional services, is bound to come to grief. 7 SEWAGE DISPOSAL WORKS. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston have come into possession of valuable patent rights covering sewage disposal by septic tanks and single and double intermittent filtration, with necessary ventilation ; and they are prepared not only to construct sewers, but also disposal works to entirely or partially remove the impurities from the sewage. Their system prevents the pollution of harbor, river, lake, or sea-shore, and covers broad irrigation, intermittent filtration, chemical precipitation, and the recovery of the manurial value of the sewage. They are prepared to undertake the disposal of sewage for New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, New Orleans, or of any smaller city or town or institution in this country or abroad. They enter the field to construct and own sewage works for a fixed sum paid per month, or per year, by the municipality, under bonds to produce a certain degree of purification, under an agreement by which the municipality may take possession of the plant for a sum agreed upon, or on equitable valuation. They propose to utilize the wasted wealth and manurial values of the sewage, to dispose of it as an article of commerce, or to use it for their own benefit in restoring the worn-out soil of the hillside farm, or the pine barren. They are prepared to obtain ten tons of fodder from an acre which now will not support a sheep. As a matter of sentiment they propose to restore the river and brook from an open sewer to its pristine purity, and to make the lakes and ponds no longer cesspools, but a delight and a joy, from which the sewer sucker disappears and in which the trout and salmon will thrive. They can save to the United States government the an¬ nual expenditure of many million dollars for dredging har¬ bors : and render sweet and free from pollution such resorts as Crescent and Nantasket beaches, Coney Island and Tong Branch. 8 MODEL DISPOSAL WORKS. The disposal works designed under the patents belonging to the Company consist of two, three, or more settling tanks, roofed over and ventilated; so arranged that the sewage may be received in any one tank and flow through any one or all of the others, or be diverted from anyone or more of the tanks, while said tank or tanks may be drawn off and cleansed at the will of the operator; built of such size that they will hold the sewage to be disposed of from one to twenty-four hours ; and provided, where sedimentation is insufficient, with appliances for injecting lime, alum, sulphate of iron or other ingredients, to produce chemical precipitation. The effluent from the settling tanks, from which has been removed by sedimentation or precipitation, much of the suspended and dissolved organic and mineral matter, is received alternately in one of two or more tanks, more or less filled with sub¬ stances, like sand, loam, gravel, broken stone, dirt, ashes, cinders, bark, coke, coal, charcoal, burnt clay, chips, hay, straw, or any other material obtainable and available, which serves to arrest the impurities of the sewage in its passage through the tanks, and partially filtrates the sewage. The effluent from the first filter bed or tank is received in one or more collecting tanks, where it is allowed to accumulate until it reaches a certain level, when it is discharged automatically and intermittently by one or more siphons, or otherwise, upon more or less extended filter beds exposed to the atmosphere or covered by a roof, stone or brick arches, tiles or inverted wooden troughs, covered by loam, sand, earth, gravel, concrete, or other available material ; said filter beds composed of from one to five feet in depth of filtering material like or unlike the substance used in the first filter; and provided with a series of underdrains which permit the collection and carrying off of the filtered effluent to some point where it will not 9 10 SEWAGE DISPOSAL "WORKS DESIGNED FOR EXETER obstruct tbe working of the filter bed. When one of the first tanks is to be drawn off and sludge removed, it is disconnected with the flow of sewage, and its contents is allowed to settle or precipitate for a proper period, after which the tank is discharged by drawing from the surface and diverting the flow upon a sludge filter bed, which permits a passage through it of the partially clarified surface effluent, but holds the sludge, ninety per cent, of which is moisture, and permits it gradually to become separated, the water from the solid substances. For the care of extensive works mechanical appliances like sludge presses or rotary dryers may be used. The sludge may be cared for upon the premises or diverted elsewhere by pumping, gravity, carting, or other means of transportation. The settling tanks, first filter, discharging tank and sludge filter, may be under the same roof or other covering, or any one or all may be exposed to the air as the locality demands. The proper ventilation of the covered tanks and filter beds is provided for by a natural or forced draft. The outside filter if covered by tiles, arches, or troughs, may also be ventilated. As the Bell Telephone patents cover the conveying of sound by electricity, both of common knowledge, so the patents controlled by the American Sewage Disposal Com¬ pany cover the treatment of sewage in a covered tank, and filter, both ventilated, and by filtration outside. The first patent under which the company operates was issued in 1882, and covers the septic tank disposal system. The patent of chief service to the company was issued in 1895, and covers the septic tank in connection with inside and outside filtration. A model illustrating the practical work¬ ing of the system under the patents was constructed for the authorities of Rockingham County, N. H., and has been in operation several years. An account and illustration of it was published in the Engineering Record in 1896. 11 12 THK BRENTWOOD, N. H. SEWAGE DISPOSAL WORKS. THE BRENTWOOD SEWAGE DISPOSAL WORKS. The Sewage Disposal Works in Brentwood, N. H., con¬ structed in the Fall of 1895, under the patents owned by the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston, is in success¬ ful operation. Some changes, found necessary after con¬ struction in its operation, having been effected, it is a model. The sewage of a large county establishment, before the plant was erected, was discharged into a small brook, and at times was equal to the volume of water of the brook before it received the sewage. The current of the brook was sluggish and meandered down the valley, across the highway, not “a thing of beauty,” but an open sewer, and an offence and a source of danger for a long distance. Two directors of the American Sewage Disposal Com¬ pany of Boston recently visited and inspected the works. The Superintendent of the establishment, Mr. - Bean, accompanied them and stated that the septic tank had been in continuous operation for six weeks without any attention whatever. In the building there was a perceptible odor from the sludge filter, but over the septic tanks and the enclosed filter beds there was nothing offensive. The septic tank was doing its work, chemically, bacteriologically, and efficiently. It was purifying the sewage. The animal life was disposing of the organic impurities. The septic tank cultivates this animal life artificially. Countless millions of organisms are aggregated, battling, struggling, devouring, doing the brief duty assigned to them by the laws of nature, converting the organic impurities into harmless elements. The surface of the collected sewage in the tanks, protected only by the walls and roof of the building, was covered with a scum of fer¬ mentation, or bacteria, which seemed to absorb into itself the gases and effluvia given out under other conditions. The effluent from the septic tank was received on four 13 carefully prepared coke filters, alternately. Here another law of nature, known in its application as intermittent down¬ ward filtration, provides for the oxydization and destruction of those very organisms so useful and important in the oper¬ ation of the tanks. The effluent, as received on the surface, has lost almost entirely its character as sewage. It is slightly discolored, but not offensive. Underdrains collect the almost absolutely pure water filtered through the coke, and discharge it from the build¬ ing. The Superintendent stated that frequently people would smell, taste, and drink the water at this stage. From this point onward it has lost all perceptible appearance and character of sewage. The little brook which it joins runs merrily on, uncontaminated, to all intents and purposes. For absolute security the effluent, probably as pure as the water of the Merrimac river above Tawrence, is, like that water, subjected to filtration on carefully prepared out-of-door filters, the construction of which has only recently been undertaken, under the advice of the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston. The Superintendent states that the sewer sludge is com¬ posted with loam or ashes, and has more manurial value than the same bulk from the barns and stables. He has a large farm under his care, and has experimented with the sludge for several years. The Brentwood plant illustrates the value of the patents owned by the Company. It was the first plant constructed, and in a certain sense was an experiment. There is a vast field for study and investigation in its operation and main¬ tenance. The farmer, the chemist, the bacteriologist, the physician, the civil engineer, the university, the state, are deeply interested, for it has solved one of the most perplexing problems ever given to man,—the purification of sewage without giving offence, and the disposal of the sludge to the best advantage. 14 If the system will care for Brentwood, it will care for Chicago, for New Orleans, for Boston, for New York, or for any city or town in the world. The time is fast coming when it will be considered as absurd to dump sewage into the ocean, the lake, the river, or the brook, as great cargoes of grain or any food products. The Brentwood Disposal Works, if rebuilt, would receive some minor changes in construction, which would add to their efficiency, and facilitate the care of the sludge. THE VALIDITY OF THE PATENTS. The validity and originality of the patents is demon¬ strated by the adverse report made by the Massachusetts State Board of Health in October, 1895. The system was at that time unknown to the Board, familiar as they must have been with all methods of sewage disposal in use in any part of the world. The experimental station, maintained by the State for many years at Lawrence, had failed to make the im¬ portant discovery of the working of the septic tank. When this was combined with rapid inside filtration, it was such an innovation that it was condemned by them. They refused to permit it to be inaugurated at Andover, although the Sew¬ erage Committee of the town favored it, petitioned for it, and stated in their report to the town that it would effect a saving of $75,000. The State demanded the method of discharging the crude sewage upon six acres of sand exposed to the air, which doubtlessly would purify the water filtering through it, but would pollute the atmosphere. Now that the works at Andover are constructed, and the superintendent finds that the effluent from an improperly built septic tank can be cared for and properly treated on two-fifths of an acre, the State authorities have inaugurated a series of experiments in rapid filtration from this same faulty septic tank. As their 1898 report has not been issued (October, 1899), their report con¬ cerning its operation may be looked for in 1901; in the mean¬ while the septic tank is in full and successful operation in various countries of Europe and many States of the Union; and the original inventor, Mr. Amasa S. Glover, has gone to his last reward, his great discovery opposed to the last of his life. 16 Born July 25, 1817. Died July 5, 1897. . 1 STORY OF THE PATENTS. About 1880, Amasa S. Glover, of Brockton, discovered accidentally, the principle of the Septic Tank. It was disclosed to him while caring for the drainage of his own residence. Being an observing and an intelligent man, he recognized its value, and applied for and obtained a patent in 1882, covering the principle. To apply the idea to the care of the sewage of a city, he employed an able civil engineer, and submitted, in 1886, a system for the sewage disposal of Brockton, which is described on page 11, of Report of the Mas¬ sachusetts State Board of Health for 1888. “ Mr. Glover’s original scheme, as far as it relates to the purification of sewage, consists of three principal parts : “ 1. A settling-basin, which, without the aid of chemi¬ cals, is intended to separate and retain the solid portion of the sewage. “2. A wall of gravel at one end of the settling-basin through which the sewage is expected to filter. “ A series of arches of soft brick, over which the sewage is to flow, and through which it is intended to filter, then to drop through the space below, and so become aerated. From this space it is to run through drains to the stream. “ He proposes four divisions of this apparatus to allow for draining, etc. All of the apparatus is to be covered with a building having a central shaft or chimney for removing foul odors. “ Mr. Glover’s scheme was referred to our engineer, who, after careful consideration of the method, and interviews with Mr. Glover, reports as follows : “ The scheme, as proposed, is thoroughly impracticable. The settling-basins would not cause the suspended matters to settle to a great extent, and the filters would not pass a sufficient volume at first, and would soon become clogged.” 7 “ Mr. Glover also presented an alternative scheme of a settling-basin and a sub-surface disposal on land.” In the light of modern research this report recalls the story of Galilei, who was forced, on bended knee, to disown his great astronomical discovery, at the command of church authorities. During the years following, Mr. Glover approached the State authorities, from different directions, with the same general result. He was a persistent man, however. He knew that his scheme would work, and convinced one civil engineer after another that there was something behind it. In the summer of 1895 Mr. Glover was introduced to the present manager and engineer of the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston, whom he interested in the subject, and whom he regularly employed, for many months, to make an exhaustive study of the subject of sewage dis¬ posal, and incidentally, to become an expert in that line. By the engineer s advice, he took out the second patent covering the septic tank and rapid inside filtration, and outside filtra¬ tion, which added to the value of the system, as it made it simply perfect. Mr. Glover did not understand the chemical and bio¬ logical action in the tanks ; he knew the results because he had experimented himself; with his own eyes he had seen the working of the septic tank, and proclaimed it to the world. It became an “ Article of Faith ” with him,—a creed. He died in 1897, and in due legal form, the patents which he took out for sewage disposal eventually came into the possession of the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston. The officers of the corporation in advertising and com¬ mending this system to towns, cities, and institutions through¬ out the world, embark in the business with implicit faith born of actual and absolute knowledge obtained from a 18 working model on a scale large enough to demonstrate its feasibility under all conditions. They recognized the fact that though the underlying principles are correct, they require the services of an expert civil engineer to adapt them to the needs and demands of each community where they are adopted. The patents go back so far that they are established in right and equity, and conflict with no previous patents issued to anybody. As might be expected, patents of such vast value have been, and will continue to be, imitated. It is needless to state that the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston are acting under the best obtainable legal advice, and will maintain and defend their own rights and those of their patrons to the fullest extent. In the year 1451, B. C., Moses gave, to the people the law to govern them in sanitary affairs which is being confirmed by the latest scientific investigation. “ Thou shalt have a place also without the camp, whither thou shalt go forth abroad : “And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon : and it shall be when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee : “For the Lord thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp, to deliver thee, and to give up thine enemies before thee : therefore shall thy camp be holy : that He see no un¬ clean thing in thee, and turn away from thee.” Deuteron¬ omy xxiii, 12-14. *9 THE PURIFICATION OF DRINKING WATER. The patents of the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston, apply as well to the purification of water to be used for a city or town as to sewage disposal. There is no necessity to longer endure the scourge of typhoid fever in any community. It is an enemy to be met openly and van¬ quished. However it originates, it is propagated principally by drinking water; and when that is purified the dread fever disappears. The government of a city or town are elected to care for the well-being of the citizens. The health of a com¬ munity is of the utmost importance. Now that it is known that it is possible to prevent typhoid and similar diseases, the city fathers should be held responsible for their outbreak in any community. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston may be called upon for advice, consultation, or contracting, to render the water supply of any municipality as free from or¬ ganic impurities as if distilled or drawn from an artesian well. Settling tanks and rapid filtration would purify the water from any lake, river, or stream, more especially if it was slowly filtered afterwards intermittently through a good filtering material like coke, charcoal or sand. It is not safe to depend upon straining water through gravel only; for medical and health authorities recognize the fact that the germs so fatal to man can and do pass for a long distance by devious underground channels. It is asserted on high au¬ thority that many germs will not be destroyed even when subjected to temperature below the freezing point. It is feasible to attend to the purification of water where gravity affords a water supply. Where it is necessary to use a pumping station, an additional hoist of from three to five feet will be all required for the operation of our system. 20 SEPTIC TANK. The septic tank sewage disposal system is accepted in England, where by law a certain degree of purification is de¬ manded, as correct and efficient. An inspector of the Eocal Government Board recently said : “My Board does not refuse to sanction loans on these (septic tanks) systems. It is chary of sanctioning loans for any system which may be regarded as of an experimental character ; but after full and careful consideration with respect to this particular system before us, it has made up its mind to sanction loans for such schemes.” The works referred to, at Darfield, filter the effluent from the septic tanks at the rate of 425 gallons per square yard, or 2,000,000 gallons per acre. The works at Barrhead, Scot., filter the effluent from septic tanks at the rate of 960,000 gallons per acre. Septic tanks are in successful operation at Exeter, Eng. Besides the pioneer plant in the United States at Brentwood, N. H., erected in 1895, septic tanks have been successfully operated at Marion, la.; at Verona, N. J. ; at Urbana; on a small scale at Chicago ; and at Champaign, Ill. The last was planned by Prof. Arthur N. Talbot, of the University of Illinois, who reports: “From the results of these analyses it appears from 80 to 90 per cent, of the total organic matter, as represented by the albuminoid ammonia, by the oxygen consumed, and by the total organic nitrogen, is taken out. A still larger percentage of the organic matter in suspension is taken out. It may be said that these results are better than the results ordinarily obtained by the chemical precipitation process, and nearly as good as the winter results of some of the intermittent downward filtration processes. •“The effluent during the time this study has been made, has been fairly clear, free from odor, and unobjectionable, a water chemically better than that of some of the shallow wells in this city. 21 “ The effluent may be discharged into a small stream without objectionable results. In a trip east, a number of years ago, Mr. Noyes, who was city engineer of Newton, and later the metropolitan en¬ gineer of Boston, told me of a cesspool he had constructed for a public school building on this principle, which had worked successfully.” These tanks were at first built “with¬ out any idea of bacterial purification of the sewage in the tank.” “ They were used to exclude the sludge.” “But it was soon found that another action w T as going on.” Prof. Talbot makes but one error. It is in this state¬ ment: “This system may be used without infringing on any patents.” An examination of the records of the Patent office at Washington will show the error. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston is very desirous of establishing at least one experimental station under skilled supervision in every State of the Union, where investigations may be conducted exhaustively in this great field. “ Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone ? “ Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent ? “And whosoever shall give to drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, he shall have his reward.” If a stranger tarries in a city and asks for a cup of cold water, and the rulers give unto him water to drink which is polluted and conceals disease and death, they dis¬ regard the sacred laws of hospitality, bring sorrow to some distant home, and bow down the old and young with grief. Will they be rewarded? 22 BACTERIA. Sir William Henry Preece, president Institute of Civil Engineers, in his address before the Sanitary Institute of Great Britain, at its Southampton meeting, in August, 1899, said : “ The new biological treatment is a return to nature. ‘Nature never yet betrayed the heart that loved her.’ That wonderful micro-organism that has eluded man’s observation for all these millions of years, is divided into two classes, bacteria, which work with oxygen, and those which do not. The sewage first reaches the settling tanks, where the inor¬ ganic matter, such as sand and grit, is deposited. The albuminous and organic matters and urea, which are found in all sewage, are there transformed by bacteria into forms of ammonia. The decomposition of animal and vegetable mat¬ ter, which is invariably due to the action of these bacteria, is thus utilized to liquefy organic solids, and in this way to simplify their removal. Other bacteria, gradually, in special filters, transform the ammonia, by the aid of oxygen and other elements present, into nitrates. The process of filtering is intermittent, for air is essential to maintain the supply of oxygen to the nitrifying bacteria; but an air blast, in some cases, is used to maintain a continuous action. The nitrify¬ ing effect is enhanced if the air be warmed to about ioo° F. The filters must have porosity and resistance to flow to re¬ tard the passage of the sewage through them, for time is essential for the bacteria to grow and to act. In sandy ground nature does this, but on clay formation, coke-breeze, and even coal, is found to be very effective. In this way bac¬ teria first liquefy the solid matters in the sewage, and then nitrify them, simultaneously purifying and enriching the effluent, and preventing the formation of that wasteful pro¬ duct, sludge. Bacteria thus fulfils the highest function of the engineer, and nature asserts her power in fulfilling the 23 clearly-defined will of the Great Creator. The biological system has clearly come to stay. It is, however, still in the experimental stage. No great town has committed itself to its general use. “Darwin was perhaps one of the first to point out how the lower animal life assisted nature by absorbing, as food, the decay of vegetation, digesting it and execrating it in the form of mold and loam. His observations on the growth and functions of worms is not the least philosophical and sci¬ entific portion of his great labors. He probably attributed to worms much that is done by bacteria. Pasteur, the father of the germ theory, taught us how bacteria acted as nature’s chemist. Koch, in Germany, has been a worthy disciple of Pasteur. The intermittent benefit of filtration was discovered in the laboratory by Frankland in 1870. Warrington found in 1882 that sterilizing by boiling and antiseptic treatment stopped all nitrification. Aerating filters and the true action of bacteria were developed at Lawrence, in Massachusetts, from 1889 to 1893 ; Scott Moncrieff introduced his group of trickling cultivation beds in 1891; Dibdin commenced his experiments with filter beds shortly after ; Cameron intro¬ duced his septic tank in Exeter in 1895 1 Ducal his continuous filtration process in 1897 : and now, step by step, in Germany, France and England, we have reached a point where we can fairly say that sewage can be effectively treated with safety, simplicity and economy, by natural means.” History founded on the official records will give Glover the credit for discovering the septic tank, for his patent was taken out in 1882, and also for the added treatment of filtra¬ tion, for he recommended it for Brockton in 1886. His patent for double filtration was taken out in 1895. 24 SMALL DISPOSAL WORKS. The discovery that is destined to become of such impor¬ tance and value to cities and towns, is equally applicable to detached institutions, State prisons, hospitals, asy¬ lums, jails, poor-houses, hotels on the mountains, in the valleys, by the seaside ; colleges and seminaries, mansions, villas, and single farmhouses. The plant can be so con¬ structed that it works automatically beneath the velvety sod, continuously, efficiently, and economically. It is the one indispensable thing that must be considered and planned for by the architect in all detached structures erected in the future, designed for human habitation, when comfort, health, and any degree of luxury is expected. It is second in im¬ portance only to a pure water supply. Its site should be chosen with as much care as that of the structure it is to benefit. The expense of this necessary work may be pro¬ portional to the cost of the structure it serves, to its per¬ manency, or to economy in maintainance. Two per cent, of the cost of separate buildings ought generally to provide disposal works for them of the best character. The ex¬ penditure would be diminished for temporary disposal works; and increased for those working automatically, and re¬ quiring attention only at very long intervals. They may be disguised or absolutely concealed. They should be provided, if only to care for the drain from the kitchen sink ; certainly, to care for the laundry and bathroom. They would be the foes of flies and mosquitoes ; and banish and keep away from the lonely farmhouse many of those fearful scourges so fatal to old and young, so frequently devastating a school district and a neighborhood, and so erroneously ascribed to an all-wise Providence rather than to human carelessness, negligence, or ignorance. 25 NEGLECT OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL. There is one school district in New England, wherein a century ago there were three hundred inhabitants, scat¬ tered over fertile farms, self-sustaining and prosperous, where the people were not only fed, but clothed, from the fruit, vegetables, meat, grain and wool raised there. The old red school-house at the cross roads sheltered seventy or more pupils formerly, whereas to-day there is not a school-child in the district, and only a few old people remain and obtain a scanty subsistance on the worn-out farms. There are doubtless hundreds of such districts scattered throughout New England and the Eastern States. The same soil is there as of old, and it can be restored to its former fertility by judicious treatment. If what is taken from the soil is replaced, in whatever form, its fertility is main¬ tained indefinitely. There are farms in Italy and Syria which have been cropped for over two thousand years, which re¬ tain their fertility year after year, producing wonderful crops. The food of a town or city is furnished by the country farming districts near or far, and the waste of the town or city should be restored to the land. It must be done in the line of true political economy. Our territory is capable of sustaining countless millions with proper care; as it is now we are becoming crowded. The effect on land of sewer sludge, the solid matter in the sewage, has been demonstrated. In about eighteen months it disintegrates and becomes the most fertile loam, retaining its richness for many years, or until successive crops again exhaust the soil. The famous Profile House in the White Mountains would be deserted if it made a cesspool of Echo Take. The Pemige- wasset River starts from its source pure and uncontaminated, and for a long distance in its course it is protected from filth by interested parties, but it is a very convenient drain, and is soon polluted ruthlessly, needlessly, criminally. It is a most 26 beautiful and romantic stream, famed in prose and poetry, and should be restored and protected by stringent laws. It would not cost much to purify it before it joins the Winnepe- saukee and forms the Merrimack. Thence to the ocean the river is in a bad condition. Lowell does not improve it as it flows by, although it is the very foundation of the prosperity of the city. Lawrence recognizes the native value of the water of the river by removing the organic impurities and traces of sewage by filtration, and demonstrates the possi¬ bility of rendering pure water from sewage. The dead body of a human being would not be allowed to drift down a river; the proper authorities would pay for its recovery and for its disposal : so the law should provide for removing all causes of offence from the river, not only the bodies of animals, but sewage and pollution of every kind, and permit only surface drainage. The great Mississippi Valley, from the head waters of every stream draining it, should be exempt from the pollution by sewage or mill refuse of any of its water courses. For several hundred miles from its mouth the great river spurns all pollution. It literally rolls onward toward the Gulf, aerating and oxydizing its vast volume, receiving no tributaries, but tapped in many places for irrigation ; for its surface, held by levees, is higher than the bordering country. It gives, but does not take. To let loose the plague or cholera germ in it, might lead to scenes of untold horror. 27 THE MAGNITUDE AND IMPORTANCE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL. This country seems just awakening to the importance of this subject. The great cities of Paris and Berlin have solved the problem of sewage disposal. The “tight little island” of England forbids the pollution of rivers and harbors; and a royal commission enforces the law. Only one state in the Union, Washington, has followed the example of England. The magnitude of the problem elsewhere may be known from the fact that more money has been expended in sewage dis¬ posal works in Great Britain within a quarter of a century than the national debt of the United States incurred in sup¬ pressing the Rebellion. The opinion has been expressed by some writer of note that the fall of Rome and the decay of the Roman Empire was due not to the inroads of barbarians, but to the Cloaca or ancient great sewer of Rome, which poured into the Tiber and into the sea and lost the manurial value from a million farms, made a desert of most of the Mediterranean Coast, filled up the Roman harbor, and degenerated the Latin race. An English writer of repute, a physician and a scientist, considers sewage disposal by water carriage, while a great convenience, almost a curse to modern civilization ; for as sewers are commonly built, they lead to a serious drain on a community, the inception of new diseases, and the spread of contagion. On the other hand he advocates the scattering of the people from the cities to the country. With proper sewage disposal the sewers become a bless¬ ing to any community. a8 LOCATION OF DISPOSAL WORKS. It is possible to treat sewage in a thickly settled section, without creating a nuisance. As a matter of cost as well as sentiment it is usually advisable to carry it as far as possible from any human habitation. It is much better to treat it on the main business street of a town or city than to pollute the water front or the source of water supply of the community it¬ self, or of a neighboring municipality. It is not only foolish but criminal to endanger the lives or health of human beings: even the cattle, the sheep, or the hog, must be protected from contamination, while milk or meat is an article of food. Every community should, if possible, treat and purify its sewage within its own territory, so as not only to have ab¬ solute authority on the premises, but be spared the humili¬ ation of having its dirty but necessary work thrust upon its neighbors. If no land is available within its boundaries it should be bought, annexed, or made. Disposal works can be so designed, constructed, and operated, that the land devoted to the purpose may be the most beautiful and attractive section of the town or city in which they are located. It may be made to equal a section of Central Park, Boston Common or Public Garden, Mount Auburn, or Forest Hills Cemetery. The necessary structures may be disguised as Assyrian, Egyptian, Grecian, or Roman edifices, or represent the castellated medieval Gothic fortress. The architect could readily design an appropriate exterior. The experiments at Eawrence demonstrate that sub¬ surface filtration works are feasible. The ground above, if not converted into a park or play-ground, could be devoted to municipal purposes, such as the storage of water-and sewer- pipe, paving blocks, edge stones, machinery, carts, or lumber. The sludge could be forced through pipe lines to any locality. 29 COMMERCIAL ADVANTAGE OF DISPOSAL WORKS. There is nothing that can be done by the citizens of a town or city which advertises it more as a desirable place for business or residence, than scientifically constructed sewage disposal works. Good schools, good roads, good water, good railroad facilities, good hotels, good government, and good people are expected in every American city and in most American towns. Sewers soon become a necessity to every large aggregation of population. But sewage disposal works appeal to the imagination. They advertise a city as one in the van of progress. Haling, a suburb of kondon, took a leap into popularity and prominence as soon as the sewage disposal plant was established there. It became instantly the most thriving suburb of that metropolis. Hast Orange, N. J., became the most popular suburb of New York when the sew¬ age disposal works were constructed in the town ; and the village quickly doubled, trebled, and quadrupled in popu¬ lation and wealth, attracting the choicest kind of people. The town got such a start that eventually it outgrew its dis¬ posal works, and found it more economical to enter the New¬ ark sewers than to enlarge the plant, land had become so valuable. Worcester, Mass., is famous for the enterprise of its citizens, the character of its manufactures, and the magnitude of its disposal system. Gardner, Brockton, Andover, Marlboro, Framingham, and Natick, Mass., have sewage disposal systems: and the State of Massachusetts has taken the most advanced ground of any Commonwealth in the world in investigating and experimenting officially with sewage and sewage dis¬ posal; bacteria and chemical action; filtration and ozydization; in examination and purification of water ; and in publishing their work in full in exhaustive reports, eagerly sought for by scientific men throughout the world. 3 ° MANURIAL VALUE OF SEWAGE. The manurial value of sewer sludge per individual per annum is variously estimated by different authorities from $1.62 to $5.00. Eawes and Way value it at J2.11 Voelcker values it at 2.25 Hofmann and Witt value it at 2.94 Thudichum values it at 5.00 Macaire, Marcet, Mechi, and Voelcker analyze it and find it equal to, or to exceed in value, stable manure. W. Santo Crimp an English authority writes : “ There can be no question that sludge does possess some manurial value, and the experiments by Dr. Munro, by Colonel Jones, and by the author, show that it is of about the same value as farm-yard manure, weight for weight. Indeed Dr. Munro is inclined to think that when properly dried and pulverized, a manure may be produced from sewage sludge worth con¬ siderably more per ton than farm-yard manure.” Sludge, if buried a few inches under a covering of loam, ashes, sand or earth, in northern sections of the United States, being subjected to the rigors of one winter, will be thor¬ oughly disintegrated, and become a very valuable fertilizer. It is best to treat it on a sandy or gravelly soil, where the moisture is more readily absorbed in the soil beneath. Mr. John E- Smith, Superintendent of the Board of Public Works of Andover, Mass., has experimented with sewer sludge, and finds it produces wonderful fertility. Mr. Henry Bean, Superintendent of the Rockingham County establishment at Brentwood, N. H., finds it of more value on the farm than stable manure. 31 Whether the manurial value in the sewage is recovered and applied to the soil, or buried, or burned, or wasted, depends upon the judgment of each community. There is a value of about $2.50 per inhabitant per year, according to investi¬ gating German scientists, which can be advantageously applied to the land. It is possible that under unfavorable circumstances it costs more to recover it than it is worth as an article of commerce. But no community can afford to waste it. To illustrate : our pension roll is heavy, but the money is returned to the community, and there is no loss, simply a redistribution of the cash. If, however, we had to pay a tribute to a foreign country of only $100,000,000 per year, it is only a question of a few years when the country would be ruined and money would disappear. The waste of values in sewage is a drain on any community, like a tribute to a foreign power. It is not only a waste to neglect the sewage, but a cause of pollution to the air or to the water. If prop¬ erly applied it is a source of wealth, two blades of grass replacing one; or else it ruins a brook, a river or a lake, covers with sewer fungus the water-worn ledges and rocks along the shore, or fills up a harbor and desecrates a sea front. Whenever it is a matter of judicial decision, the pollution of a stream by sewage is prohibited. Sewer sludge can be variously treated and disposed of. Hydraulic presses might remove the moisture. Cars might carry it to any part of New England. Thousands of worn-out farms could profit by it, and be restored to fertility .—Boston Herald, 32 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION. Chemical precipitation of the suspended organic im¬ purities in the sewage is in operation on a large scale in the city of Worcester, Massachusetts, the abiding place of ioo,- ooo inhabitants. The small river which receives the effluent from the disposal works is as free from contamination below the inlet as it is above. The sludge is exposed on beds to drain and evaporate, and is drawn away when nearly free from moisture by farmers within a radius of twelve miles. The experiments at Lawrence demonstrate that the area required after precipitation, for purification by intermittent filtration, is reduced to one twentieth of what would be re¬ quired without precipitation. The fallacy that running water purifies itself, a mistake that has led to the death of countless millions of the human race, is founded on the apparent fact that contaminated water soon clarifies itself by sedimentation. The germs so fatal to man are invisible to the naked eye, and give no evidence to any sense of their existence. They may exist in the cool sparkling water from the deepest well, or in the clear spring, the broadest river, or the great lake; only inter¬ mittent filtration or distillation will destroy the life of all germs. Chemical precipitation removes about 50% of the sus¬ pended and dissolved organic impurities of the sewage, and adds to the amount of sludge to be cared for. There is reason to believe that the bacteria in the rapid filters of the system advocated by the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston, will still further remove the impurities; while the outside filtration, through properly prepared filter beds, will render the effluent absolutely pure. This system will be found of service where land is costly and where a large quantity of sewage is to be treated. 33 THE CHARACTER OF AMERICAN SEWAGE. The following article from the Boston Herald may be read with profit: The experiments at Lawrence have demonstrated that ordinary sewage from American cities contains 998 parts of pure water, one part of mineral matter, and one part of animal and vegetable matter, or organic matter. Sewage would become entirely purified if we could take out the two parts of mineral and organic matter and leave the 998 parts of pure water, but as the mineral matter is not generally objectionable, we are satisfied to call it purified if we succeed in taking out the one part of organic matter. If to the surface of a body of open sand an inch of sew¬ age is applied, it is found one day later that the bottom particles go down about nine inches, the top particles remaining just below the surface. In this nine inches about two-thirds of the space is occupied by sand, one- ninth of the space is water, and about one-quarter is air. The sewage is suspended here in extremely thin layers, covering the particles of sand and stretching between some of the nearest particles, and intimately mingled with more than twice its volume of air. Upon covering the sur¬ face with sewage today, the sewage of yesterday and more of the air which is associated with it are pushed down, with more or less mixture, by the incoming sewage to the nine inches next below. Sewage will average in 100,000 parts, of free ammonia, 2.68 parts; of albuminoid ammonia, .63 parts; of chlorine, 8.57 parts; of bacteria 923,000 per cubic centimeter. After settling four hours in the tank it loses 18.2 per cent, of albuminoid ammonia, and 12 per cent, of bacteria, by sedimentation. The amount of sludge in sewage varies, but unless care is taken any sewage will in time clog any ordinary filter. The sewage applied to the experimental filters at Lawrence contains more sludge than the sewage of other places, and consequently the experimental filters require more attention to prevent clogging than do the several large filters in actual service at Framingham, Marlboro, Gardner and Westboro, which receive more dilute sewage. 34 CARE OF FILTER BEDS. There are four methods of treating the sewage to prevent or relieve the clogging of the filter beds by the removal of sludge before the sewage is carried to the filter beds. 1. By rapid filtration through coarse gravel, with the aid of air drawn through the gravel. 2. By chemical precipitation. 3. By sedimentation. 4. By mechanical devices, such as fine screens or wire cloth. Tank No. 1 at Lawrence contains coarse mortar sand, 46 per cent, from .02 to .04 of an inch in diameter. A sample of open sand like this, having a depth of 5% feet, allowed water to pass through it at the rate of 300,000,000 gallons per acre per day, when covered to the depth of six inches, or at the rate of 60,000 gallons per square yard per day. The quantity of water remaining in this sand, when drained so that no more will readily run from it, is probably a little greater near the bottom than in the upper layers, but the sand is so open that, when so drained, air can pass quite freely up through a depth of five feet of it; and when the surface is covered with water, air within the sand will be forced down and out through the underdrains. It is well known that with filters of suitable material sewage may be purified at the rate of more than 100,000 gallons per acre daily with the removal of over 90 per cent, of the organic matter .—Boston Herald . The experiment at Lawrence most nearly in line with the system proposed for Andover and Danvers by Civil Engineer John N. McClin- tock, was with a filter bed containing 60 inches in depth of sand. It received the supernatant liquid from sewage which had been allowed to settle four hours. It was constructed in September. The surface was scraped on an average once in six days, and the average depth removed was .37 inch. In December the sand was spaded over to a depth of 6 inches, three times, to remove sub-surface clogging. The average rate of filtration was 416,300 gallons per acre per day, removing 89.4 per cent, of albuminoid ammonia, and 98.6 per cent, of bacteria. By passing the sewage through two filters, without sedimentation, 320,000 gallons per day per acre was purified by the removal of 96.7 per cent, of albuminoid ammonia and 99.9 per cent, of bacteria. From a chemical and biological point of view, no marked difficulties attend the purification of sewage applied beneath the surface. As much of the sludge as possible should be removed from the original sewage by screens and sedimentation before applying it to the sub surface .—Boston Herald . 35 LIFE, OR CONTINUED EFFECTIVENESS OF FILTER BEDS. The average results from all the filters at Lawrence, some of which have been in operation regularly for six years, indicate that with the main body of the sand remaining the same, sewage filters may continue to purify sewage for an indefinite time, provided they receive proper treatment to insure sufficient ventilation for the oxydation and nitrifica¬ tion of the applied sewage. The interruption of the ventilation of the filter, owing to clogging by the stored organic matter of the sludge at the surface, is prevented to a great extent by a systematic weekly raking to the depth of about one inch. Eventually the storage of sludge in the material disturbed by the weekly raking is so great that ventilation is no longer afforded by this means. It is then necessary, in order to insure the continued efficiency of the filter, to present cleaner material at the surface, and one of the ways by which this may be accomplished is by removing the clogged material by scraping and replacing it with fresh material. There was removed from the surface of experimental filter No. i five inches of clogged material. This was four years and five months after the filter was first put in operation. The total depth removed in five years and four months was nine inches, or 7.9 cubic yards per million gallons of sewage filtered. The sand in place in the filter at Andover costs 35 cents a cubic yard. Allowing 200,000 gallons of sewage per day for Andover at pres¬ ent, the cost of renewing the filter would average 55 cents per day, or .#201.84 a year. The enclosed filter beds in the system recommended for Andover provide 1% square yards of filtering surface for 1000 gallons of sewage daily. The experiments at Lawrence do not cover this condition, but disposal works in England in successful operation for many years show what this rapid filtration will do .—Boston Herald. 36 RAPID FILTRATION. The following interview in 1895 is from the columns of the Boston Herald , a paper which always expresses a deep and intelligent interest in this subject : Mr. John N. McClintock said yesterday to a Herald man : “The system provides tanks for sedimentation, which may be used at any time for chemical precipitation, with provision for drawing off the clear water collected in the tanks upon a small filter bed, followed by the sludge, which, after drainage, can be composted with ashes, loam or sand, and removed. It provides a filter bed, through which the sewage, deprived of much of its sludge, is allowed to pass at the rate of 1000 gal¬ lons per square yard per day by intermittent filtration. It provides for the working of this system throughout the year by covering the filter beds with a roof, and the ventilation of the sewage by a forced draught. “The filter beds being protected by a building, can be cared for and renewed at all seasons, and will not become a nuisance in any neighborhood. “The partially purified and wholly clarified effluent from the covered filter beds is carried to an out-of-doors filter, where it is distributed by a se-ries of overdrains, thoroughly ventilated, under a cover of loam. These out-of-door filter beds are thoroughly underdrained, and provide for the further purification of the sewage, allowing an acre for the purification of a 100,000 gallons of sewage daily. “After the sewage has been clarified by sedimentation in the tanks, and -purified by rapid, intermittent filtration through the first filter beds, so much of the impurities will be found to have been removed that an acre will probably purify from 300,000 to 500,000 gallons daily. “What sewage passes through a five-foot filter bed will not clog the overdrains. If it should clog the overdrains in the course of years, new overdrains could be laid at a trifling expense. If it was found that over¬ drains made of inverted troughs of hemlock boards lasted many years, the cost would be a mere trifle. “If this system applies to the sewage disposal of a farm-house, a vil¬ lage, or a small town, it applies to a city of the size of New Orleans, Bos¬ ton, Chicago or New York. 37 “Boston is now pumping the foul stuff, and pouring it out in front of her front door at the mouth of the harbor, or at Moon island, making of the harbor a collecting tank. Some of the sludge is collected and dumped some miles from the shore. The fertilizing value of this sewage, which is being lost, is over $3,000,000 a year. It is injuring the harbor, by fill¬ ing it up with the most noxious of materials. In the course of the coming years, what is now a beautiful expanse of water will be a vast marsh, if the present system is maintained, with a narrow channel scoured through it by the Neponset, the Charles and the Mystic rivers. The amount of sludge deposited in the harbor yearly at present is from 29,200 cubic yards, the lowest estimate, to 136,875 cubic yards, enough to raise the grade three feet, of from six to thirty acres. A float placed in the water at the mouth of the harbor at the beginning of the flood tide will come toward the city with the incoming tide; it will remain station¬ ary a short time at high water; it will retrace its course with the ebb tide. Unless it is lodged on the shore, its voyage will be up and down the harbor, day after day, year after year, until the small volume of fresh water received by the harbor crowds it out into the ocean. So it is with the sewage that does not lodge on the shore or settle to the bottom. “The experiments of the State Board of Health, wisely conducted for many years at Lawrence, have demonstrated that this sewage can be purified by intermittent filtration at the rate of one acre of land for from 400 to 4000 inhabitants. It would require from 100 to 1000 acres to pro¬ vide for the sewage of the metropolitan district around Boston. “There are thousands of acres of marsh and flats around the city that can be used,—at the mouth of the Neponset, in South Boston, on the Charles, up the Mystic, in Medford, Malden, Everett, Chelsea, Revere, Winthrop, Milton and Quincy. Provincetown could furnish millions of yards of the finest filtering material. “The marsh can be reclaimed for 10 cents a foot, raised three to five feet with sand, overdrained and underdrained, streets laid out, covering the mains of the overdrains. The grade of the Back Bay Fens might be raised, and sub-surface irrigation used, to their increased beauty and fer¬ tility. What garden spots those marshes would make, like those around Paris and Berlin! What a magnificent system of parks, breathing spots for the numberless millions who will inhabit Boston in the centuries to come ! “Sewage can be so treated that it becomes as pure as spring water, and the air we breathe will come to us uncontaminated by the outfall at Deer island or Moon island, and Boston harbor be as free from impurities as when first visited by the Puritans.” 38 RAPID FILTRATION IN ENGLAND. At Ealing, a suburb of London, with a population in 1870 of 7500, there was treated 400,000 gallons of sewage ‘daily by filtering it through a superficial area of 1870 square feet, seven feet four inches in thickness, through which the sewage passed in 10 minutes, removing 32 per cent, of total suspended and dissolved solid matters, 78 per cent, of organic carbon 4 per cent, of organic nitrogen and 39 per cent, of ammonia. At Bradford the sewage is filtered at the rate of 900 gallons per square yard per day after precipitation with lime and settling 30 to 40 minutes. The residue is colorless and without odor, save the smell of lime. Acton, a village of 7000 inhabitants, filters its sewage at the rate of 1000 gallons per square yard daily. Information about Ealing, Bradford and Acton has been obtained from “Sewage Disposal Works,” written by W. Santo Crimp, an English civil engineer .—Boston Herald. THE DUTY OF COLLEGES. The time has come when West Point, Annapolis, Har¬ vard, Yale, Dartmouth, Bowdoin, and all the great universi¬ ties and colleges should follow the example of Columbia and Cornell, and establish departments devoted to sanitary engin¬ eering. The health and physical welfare of coming genera¬ tions are vastly more important to humanity than Greek roots or any dead-and-gone abstraction. It is a matter of national importance, demonstrated by the general lack of knowledge on the subject, shown during the last War. An experimental station might well be estab¬ lished in every state where bacteriology and chemistry pertain¬ ing to the subject could be considered. The press is free to use any of the ideas or paragraphs contained in this pamphlet, but is requested to give due credit to the American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston. 39 CONSULTATION AND ROYALTY. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston does not seek to do all the business in the world or even in the United States in the line of sewer building or in the con¬ struction of sewage disposal works. It is aware that its patents dating back many years cover the most valuable, most reasonable, and most effective sewage disposal system ever devised by the ingenuity of man. It is no trust, trying to suppress competition ; but enters legitimately the engineer¬ ing and contracting field, welcoming intelligent and honest rivalry. It seeks the co-operation of engineers and con¬ tractors, and is willing for a reasonable royalty to share with any individual, firm, or municipality in any locality, the benefits of its system. It is open to any negotiation looking towards the formation of a subordinate company having ex¬ clusive territory in some particular state of the Union, or some foreign country. To organize such a company it is necessary for at least one civil engineer of good standing, and one reliable con¬ tractor to unite their interests. The rights and interests of the parent company are so vitally involved with the success of a branch company that some care will be exercised in forming such companies. The American Sewage Disposal Company of Boston, through its engineer, architect, counsellor, contractor, banker and broker, offers its services actively or in consultation, not only to municipalities, but to engineers and contractors on all matters pertaining to sewer designing ; to sewer construction ; to disposal works designed to partly purify and clarify sew¬ age for admission into salt water, or to wholly purify sewage before it enters a source of water supply ; to raising money for sewer construction ; to apportioning the expense of con¬ struction ; and to the many questions constantly arising in regard to sewers and sewage disposal systems. 40 SPECIAL. This pamphlet not being designed for general distribution, but rather for the use of individuals or municipalities with whom business relations are desired, the following may be considered confidential and only presented where the letters could properly be submitted. The company, in extending its business and soliciting opportunities for legitimate enterprise, calls attention to the character and professional reputation of the President and manager of the company, John N. McCi• Sewer Commissioners. John E. Smith, ) Andover, Mass., Oct. 5, 1899. Mr. John N. McCeintock, C. E- Dear Sir :— The action of the State Board of Health rendered it im¬ possible for Andover to construct the disposal system designed by you. Our disposal works, as constructed under the advice, and with the consent of the State Board, consist of a filtration and of four acres made up of twenty beds, each containing about one-fifth of an acre. In the operation of these beds we find it possible to filter the whole of the present flow of sewage of the town, about 60,000 gals, per day, by alternating two of these beds. In regard to using crude sewage, concentrated, I have made but one trial; it burned the growing crop. A second crop grown in the same ground, after plowing in, shows wonderful fertility of the ground. Yours truly, John E- Smith, Superintendent Board of Public Works. October 19, 1893, he was elected a member of the Boston Society of Civil Engineers, and the following year a member, and later a director, of the Harvard Improvement Association. In 1896 he was secretary of the American Whist Club of 49 Boston, which includes in its membership many of the leaders in the literary, social and financial circles of Boston. The members of the club, the officers of the Harvard Improve¬ ment Association, and many other Boston gentlemen, petitioned for his appointment as Assistant Superintendent U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, with the rank of colonel, to serve either with the army or with the navy, when, upon the breaking out of the war with Spain, he offered his services to the government in any capacity in which his experience would be of value. He assured the Secretary of War that he could guard the health of a regiment, brigade, army corps, or camps of mobi¬ lization, as a city engineer protects a city. He did his whole duty in trying to avert the mortality in the camps. Mr. McClintock studied the effect of sewage on Boston harbor with Assistant Henry Mitchell of the Coast Survey; and was before the court in 1877 as an expert witness on the effect of sewage on Portland harbor in a legal battle between Gen. Charles P. Mattocks and Speaker Thomas B. Reed. He has been frequently called as an expert witness on civil engineering subjects before State and United States Courts since 1872. Brockton, Oct. 21, 1899. Mr. J. N. McCrintock, Dear Sir :— Your letter was received this morning. It is with great pleasure we send to you the picture of our dear father by this mail. How pleased he would be to know it, for he tried so hard and suffered so much to put the system before the world ! Please credit us all with any amount of gratitude for giv¬ ing to father the credit of the invention. We hope that you will feel that we thoroughly appreciate the interest and labor you have had to bring value to the patents, that have been seemingly dead to the world. Yours gratefully, For Estate of A. S. Glover. S. B. Farrrr. 50 THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. Mr. Joseph P. O’Connell, one of the directors of the American Sewage Disposal Company, conducts an extensive business, furnishing masons’ supplies, brick, lime, cement and pipe, besides being a contractor, entrusted with some of the most important sewer work for Boston and neighboring cities let out in recent years. He has built many miles of sewers under the most difficult conditions. He is highly respected by the city officials with whom he has had business relations, and is specially skilled in sewer construction. The other officers of the Company are men of sound judgment in finances, whose co-operation will be of weight and value when important contracts are made. They embark in this business not only from motives of self-interest, but from patriotic and public-spirited sentiments, planning not only to benefit certain localities, but the community at large, the nation, and the world for the present and for the future. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 0 027 327 919 2